git-commit-vandalism/t/lib-diff-data.sh

23 lines
776 B
Bash
Raw Normal View History

"lib-diff" tests: make "README" and "COPYING" test data smaller Follow-up the change in 459b8d22e54 (tests: do not borrow from COPYING and README from the real source, 2015-02-15) by not shipping a full copy of older versions of the top-level "COPYING" and "README" files. The tests that use them just need the small blurb at the top of "COPYING" as test data, or mock data that's dissimilar. Let's provide that with a "COPYING_test_data" function instead. We're not replacing this with some other generic test data (e.g. "lorum ipsum") because these tests require test file header to be the old "COPYING" file. See e.g. "t4003-diff-rename-1.sh" which changes the file, and then does full "test_cmp" comparisons on the resulting "git diff" output. This change only changes tests that used the "lib-diff.sh" library, but splits up what they need into a new "lib-diff-data.sh". A subsequent commit will change related tests that were missed in 459b8d22e54. For the test in "t4008-diff-break-rewrite.sh" the "README" file can go away in favor of echoing the line "some dissimilar content" to a file in the one test that needed it. The point of that test is to start with files "A" and "B", and then have A be more similar to the state of "B" than to its old version (by copying over the content from the "COPYING" file). Just comparing the pre-image of "some dissimilar content" and later a munged version of the "COPYING" output serves that purpose. While we're at it get rid of a stray "echo $tree" debugging line added in 15d061b435a ([PATCH] Fix the way diffcore-rename records unremoved source., 2005-05-27), and stop calling "hash-object" to get the hash of an object we've just added to the index. We can instead extract that information from the index itself with "rev-parse". Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-10-15 11:30:16 +02:00
COPYING_test_data () {
cat <<\EOF
Note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as this project
is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
HOWEVER, in order to allow a migration to GPLv3 if that seems like
a good idea, I also ask that people involved with the project make
their preferences known. In particular, if you trust me to make that
decision, you might note so in your copyright message, ie something
like
This file is licensed under the GPL v2, or a later version
at the discretion of Linus.
might avoid issues. But we can also just decide to synchronize and
contact all copyright holders on record if/when the occasion arises.
Linus Torvalds
EOF
}