2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
git-read-tree(1)
|
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
|
|
----
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
git-read-tree - Reads tree information into the index
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
--------
|
2011-07-02 04:38:26 +02:00
|
|
|
[verse]
|
2009-06-26 07:14:10 +02:00
|
|
|
'git read-tree' [[-m [--trivial] [--aggressive] | --reset | --prefix=<prefix>]
|
read-tree, merge-recursive: overwrite ignored files by default
This fixes a long-standing patchwork of ignored files handling in
read-tree and merge-recursive, called out and suggested by Junio long
ago. Quoting from commit dcf0c16ef1 ("core.excludesfile clean-up"
2007-11-16):
git-read-tree takes --exclude-per-directory=<gitignore>,
not because the flexibility was needed. Again, this was
because the option predates the standardization of the ignore
files.
...
On the other hand, I think it makes perfect sense to fix
git-read-tree, git-merge-recursive and git-clean to follow the
same rule as other commands. I do not think of a valid use case
to give an exclude-per-directory that is nonstandard to
read-tree command, outside a "negative" test in the t1004 test
script.
This patch is the first step to untangle this mess.
The next step would be to teach read-tree, merge-recursive and
clean (in C) to use setup_standard_excludes().
History shows each of these were partially or fully fixed:
* clean was taught the new trick in 1617adc7a0 ("Teach git clean to
use setup_standard_excludes()", 2007-11-14).
* read-tree was primarily used by checkout & merge scripts. checkout
and merge later became builtins and were both fixed to use the new
setup_standard_excludes() handling in fc001b526c ("checkout,merge:
loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude",
2011-11-27). So the primary users were fixed, though read-tree
itself was not.
* merge-recursive has now been replaced as the default merge backend
by merge-ort. merge-ort fixed this by using
setup_standard_excludes() starting early in its implementation; see
commit 6681ce5cf6 ("merge-ort: add implementation of checkout()",
2020-12-13), largely due to its design depending on checkout() and
thus being influenced by the checkout code. However,
merge-recursive itself was not fixed here, in part because its
design meant it had difficulty differentiating between untracked
files, ignored files, leftover tracked files that haven't been
removed yet due to order of processing files, and files written by
itself due to collisions).
Make the conversion more complete by now handling read-tree and
handling at least the unpack_trees() portion of merge-recursive. While
merge-recursive is on its way out, fixing the unpack_trees() portion is
easy and facilitates some of the later changes in this series. Note
that fixing read-tree makes the --exclude-per-directory option to
read-tree useless, so we remove it from the documentation (though we
continue to accept it if passed).
The read-tree changes happen to fix a bug in t1013.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-27 18:33:40 +02:00
|
|
|
[-u | -i]] [--index-output=<file>] [--no-sparse-checkout]
|
2010-09-10 15:28:59 +02:00
|
|
|
(--empty | <tree-ish1> [<tree-ish2> [<tree-ish3>]])
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
Reads the tree information given by <tree-ish> into the index,
|
2005-05-10 23:32:38 +02:00
|
|
|
but does not actually *update* any of the files it "caches". (see:
|
2007-12-29 07:20:38 +01:00
|
|
|
linkgit:git-checkout-index[1])
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
Optionally, it can merge a tree into the index, perform a
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
fast-forward (i.e. 2-way) merge, or a 3-way merge, with the `-m`
|
|
|
|
flag. When used with `-m`, the `-u` flag causes it to also update
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
the files in the work tree with the result of the merge.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
Trivial merges are done by 'git read-tree' itself. Only conflicting paths
|
|
|
|
will be in unmerged state when 'git read-tree' returns.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
-m::
|
2005-12-02 12:37:13 +01:00
|
|
|
Perform a merge, not just a read. The command will
|
|
|
|
refuse to run if your index file has unmerged entries,
|
|
|
|
indicating that you have not finished previous merge you
|
|
|
|
started.
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-15 00:20:01 +01:00
|
|
|
--reset::
|
read-tree.txt: clarify --reset and worktree changes
The description of --reset stays true to the first implementation in
438195cced (git-read-tree: add "--reset" flag, 2005-06-09). That is,
--reset discards unmerged entries. Or at least true to the commit
message because I can't be sure about read-tree's behavior regarding
local changes.
But in fcc387db9b (read-tree -m -u: do not overwrite or remove untracked
working tree files., 2006-05-17), it is clear that "-m -u" tries to keep
local changes, while --reset is singled out and will keep overwriting
worktree files. It's not stated in the commit message, but it's obvious
from the patch.
I went this far back not because I had a lot of free time, but because I
did not trust my reading of unpack-trees.c code. So far I think the
related changes in history agree with my understanding of the current
code, that "--reset" loses local changes.
This behavior is not mentioned in git-read-tree.txt, even though
old-timers probably can just guess it based on the "reset" name. Update
git-read-tree.txt about this.
Side note. There's another change regarding --reset that is not
obviously about local changes, b018ff6085 (unpack-trees: fix "read-tree
-u --reset A B" with conflicted index, 2012-12-29). But I'm pretty sure
this is about the first function of --reset, to discard unmerged entries
correctly.
PS. The patch changes one more line than necessary because the first
line uses spaces instead of tab.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01 14:05:05 +02:00
|
|
|
Same as -m, except that unmerged entries are discarded instead
|
2021-09-27 18:33:48 +02:00
|
|
|
of failing. When used with `-u`, updates leading to loss of
|
|
|
|
working tree changes or untracked files or directories will not
|
|
|
|
abort the operation.
|
2005-11-15 00:20:01 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
-u::
|
|
|
|
After a successful merge, update the files in the work
|
|
|
|
tree with the result of the merge.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-19 20:33:14 +02:00
|
|
|
-i::
|
|
|
|
Usually a merge requires the index file as well as the
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
files in the working tree to be up to date with the
|
2005-09-19 20:33:14 +02:00
|
|
|
current head commit, in order not to lose local
|
|
|
|
changes. This flag disables the check with the working
|
|
|
|
tree and is meant to be used when creating a merge of
|
|
|
|
trees that are not directly related to the current
|
|
|
|
working tree status into a temporary index file.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
|
|
|
-n::
|
|
|
|
--dry-run::
|
|
|
|
Check if the command would error out, without updating the index
|
2014-04-01 00:11:44 +02:00
|
|
|
or the files in the working tree for real.
|
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-09 22:25:15 +02:00
|
|
|
-v::
|
|
|
|
Show the progress of checking files out.
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-16 21:03:45 +02:00
|
|
|
--trivial::
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
Restrict three-way merge by 'git read-tree' to happen
|
2007-06-16 21:03:45 +02:00
|
|
|
only if there is no file-level merging required, instead
|
|
|
|
of resolving merge for trivial cases and leaving
|
|
|
|
conflicting files unresolved in the index.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-02 10:11:05 +01:00
|
|
|
--aggressive::
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
Usually a three-way merge by 'git read-tree' resolves
|
2006-03-02 10:11:05 +01:00
|
|
|
the merge for really trivial cases and leaves other
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
cases unresolved in the index, so that porcelains can
|
2006-03-02 10:11:05 +01:00
|
|
|
implement different merge policies. This flag makes the
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
command resolve a few more cases internally:
|
2006-03-02 10:11:05 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
* when one side removes a path and the other side leaves the path
|
|
|
|
unmodified. The resolution is to remove that path.
|
|
|
|
* when both sides remove a path. The resolution is to remove that path.
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
* when both sides add a path identically. The resolution
|
2006-03-02 10:11:05 +01:00
|
|
|
is to add that path.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-09 16:30:34 +01:00
|
|
|
--prefix=<prefix>::
|
2006-01-15 06:46:58 +01:00
|
|
|
Keep the current index contents, and read the contents
|
2011-12-31 12:50:56 +01:00
|
|
|
of the named tree-ish under the directory at `<prefix>`.
|
|
|
|
The command will refuse to overwrite entries that already
|
2018-01-09 16:30:34 +01:00
|
|
|
existed in the original index file.
|
2006-01-15 06:46:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-01 08:27:41 +02:00
|
|
|
--index-output=<file>::
|
|
|
|
Instead of writing the results out to `$GIT_INDEX_FILE`,
|
|
|
|
write the resulting index in the named file. While the
|
|
|
|
command is operating, the original index file is locked
|
|
|
|
with the same mechanism as usual. The file must allow
|
|
|
|
to be rename(2)ed into from a temporary file that is
|
|
|
|
created next to the usual index file; typically this
|
|
|
|
means it needs to be on the same filesystem as the index
|
|
|
|
file itself, and you need write permission to the
|
|
|
|
directories the index file and index output file are
|
|
|
|
located in.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-14 22:46:42 +01:00
|
|
|
--[no-]recurse-submodules::
|
doc: --recurse-submodules mostly applies to active submodules
The documentation refers to "initialized" or "populated" submodules,
to explain which submodules are affected by '--recurse-submodules', but
the real terminology here is 'active' submodules. Update the
documentation accordingly.
Some terminology:
- Active is defined in gitsubmodules(7), it only involves the
configuration variables 'submodule.active', 'submodule.<name>.active'
and 'submodule.<name>.url'. The function
submodule.c::is_submodule_active checks that a submodule is active.
- Populated means that the submodule's working tree is present (and the
gitfile correctly points to the submodule repository), i.e. either the
superproject was cloned with ` --recurse-submodules`, or the user ran
`git submodule update --init`, or `git submodule init [<path>]` and
`git submodule update [<path>]` separately which populated the
submodule working tree. This does not involve the 3 configuration
variables above.
- Initialized (at least in the context of the man pages involved in this
patch) means both "populated" and "active" as defined above, i.e. what
`git submodule update --init` does.
The --recurse-submodules option mostly affects active submodules. An
exception is `git fetch` where the option affects populated submodules.
As a consequence, in `git pull --recurse-submodules` the fetch affects
populated submodules, but the resulting working tree update only affects
active submodules.
In the documentation of `git-pull`, let's distinguish between the
fetching part which affects populated submodules, and the updating of
worktrees, which only affects active submodules.
Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-06 15:57:09 +02:00
|
|
|
Using --recurse-submodules will update the content of all active
|
2017-03-14 22:46:42 +01:00
|
|
|
submodules according to the commit recorded in the superproject by
|
2020-04-06 15:57:06 +02:00
|
|
|
calling read-tree recursively, also setting the submodules' HEAD to be
|
2017-03-14 22:46:42 +01:00
|
|
|
detached at that commit.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:47:11 +02:00
|
|
|
--no-sparse-checkout::
|
|
|
|
Disable sparse checkout support even if `core.sparseCheckout`
|
|
|
|
is true.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-10 15:28:59 +02:00
|
|
|
--empty::
|
|
|
|
Instead of reading tree object(s) into the index, just empty
|
|
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-22 10:31:37 +01:00
|
|
|
-q::
|
|
|
|
--quiet::
|
|
|
|
Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
<tree-ish#>::
|
|
|
|
The id of the tree object(s) to be read/merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-30 17:35:33 +02:00
|
|
|
MERGING
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
-------
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
If `-m` is specified, 'git read-tree' can perform 3 kinds of
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
merge, a single tree merge if only 1 tree is given, a
|
2017-05-11 14:06:33 +02:00
|
|
|
fast-forward merge with 2 trees, or a 3-way merge if 3 or more trees are
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
provided.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
Single Tree Merge
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
If only 1 tree is specified, 'git read-tree' operates as if the user did not
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
specify `-m`, except that if the original index has an entry for a
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
given pathname, and the contents of the path match with the tree
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
being read, the stat info from the index is used. (In other words, the
|
|
|
|
index's stat()s take precedence over the merged tree's).
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
That means that if you do a `git read-tree -m <newtree>` followed by a
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
`git checkout-index -f -u -a`, the 'git checkout-index' only checks out
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
the stuff that really changed.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
This is used to avoid unnecessary false hits when 'git diff-files' is
|
|
|
|
run after 'git read-tree'.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Tree Merge
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
Typically, this is invoked as `git read-tree -m $H $M`, where $H
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
is the head commit of the current repository, and $M is the head
|
|
|
|
of a foreign tree, which is simply ahead of $H (i.e. we are in a
|
2009-10-24 10:31:32 +02:00
|
|
|
fast-forward situation).
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
When two trees are specified, the user is telling 'git read-tree'
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-03 19:16:30 +02:00
|
|
|
1. The current index and work tree is derived from $H, but
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
the user may have local changes in them since $H.
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-03 19:16:30 +02:00
|
|
|
2. The user wants to fast-forward to $M.
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
In this case, the `git read-tree -m $H $M` command makes sure
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
that no local change is lost as the result of this "merge".
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
Here are the "carry forward" rules, where "I" denotes the index,
|
|
|
|
"clean" means that index and work tree coincide, and "exists"/"nothing"
|
|
|
|
refer to the presence of a path in the specified commit:
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-23 07:55:26 +02:00
|
|
|
....
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
I H M Result
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
2010-03-15 11:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
0 nothing nothing nothing (does not happen)
|
|
|
|
1 nothing nothing exists use M
|
|
|
|
2 nothing exists nothing remove path from index
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
3 nothing exists exists, use M if "initial checkout",
|
checkout: do not lose staged removal
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-08 04:49:25 +02:00
|
|
|
H == M keep index otherwise
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
exists, fail
|
checkout: do not lose staged removal
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-08 04:49:25 +02:00
|
|
|
H != M
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean I==H I==M
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
2010-03-15 11:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
4 yes N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index
|
|
|
|
5 no N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-15 11:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
6 yes N/A yes nothing exists keep index
|
|
|
|
7 no N/A yes nothing exists keep index
|
|
|
|
8 yes N/A no nothing exists fail
|
|
|
|
9 no N/A no nothing exists fail
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
10 yes yes N/A exists nothing remove path from index
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
11 no yes N/A exists nothing fail
|
|
|
|
12 yes no N/A exists nothing fail
|
|
|
|
13 no no N/A exists nothing fail
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
clean (H==M)
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
14 yes exists exists keep index
|
|
|
|
15 no exists exists keep index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean I==H I==M (H!=M)
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
16 yes no no exists exists fail
|
|
|
|
17 no no no exists exists fail
|
|
|
|
18 yes no yes exists exists keep index
|
|
|
|
19 no no yes exists exists keep index
|
|
|
|
20 yes yes no exists exists use M
|
|
|
|
21 no yes no exists exists fail
|
2017-09-23 07:55:26 +02:00
|
|
|
....
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
In all "keep index" cases, the index entry stays as in the
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
original index file. If the entry is not up to date,
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
'git read-tree' keeps the copy in the work tree intact when
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
operating under the -u flag.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
When this form of 'git read-tree' returns successfully, you can
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
see which of the "local changes" that you made were carried forward by running
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
`git diff-index --cached $M`. Note that this does not
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
necessarily match what `git diff-index --cached $H` would have
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
produced before such a two tree merge. This is because of cases
|
|
|
|
18 and 19 --- if you already had the changes in $M (e.g. maybe
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
you picked it up via e-mail in a patch form), `git diff-index
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
--cached $H` would have told you about the change before this
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
merge, but it would not show in `git diff-index --cached $M`
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
output after the two-tree merge.
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
Case 3 is slightly tricky and needs explanation. The result from this
|
checkout: do not lose staged removal
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-08 04:49:25 +02:00
|
|
|
rule logically should be to remove the path if the user staged the removal
|
2008-09-29 22:30:00 +02:00
|
|
|
of the path and then switching to a new branch. That however will prevent
|
checkout: do not lose staged removal
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-08 04:49:25 +02:00
|
|
|
the initial checkout from happening, so the rule is modified to use M (new
|
2010-03-15 11:54:46 +01:00
|
|
|
tree) only when the content of the index is empty. Otherwise the removal
|
checkout: do not lose staged removal
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-08 04:49:25 +02:00
|
|
|
of the path is kept as long as $H and $M are the same.
|
2005-06-07 20:36:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
3-Way Merge
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Each "index" entry has two bits worth of "stage" state. stage 0 is the
|
|
|
|
normal one, and is the only one you'd see in any kind of normal use.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
However, when you do 'git read-tree' with three trees, the "stage"
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
starts out at 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that you can do
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
$ git read-tree -m <tree1> <tree2> <tree3>
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and you will end up with an index with all of the <tree1> entries in
|
|
|
|
"stage1", all of the <tree2> entries in "stage2" and all of the
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
<tree3> entries in "stage3". When performing a merge of another
|
|
|
|
branch into the current branch, we use the common ancestor tree
|
|
|
|
as <tree1>, the current branch head as <tree2>, and the other
|
|
|
|
branch head as <tree3>.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
Furthermore, 'git read-tree' has special-case logic that says: if you see
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
a file that matches in all respects in the following states, it
|
|
|
|
"collapses" back to "stage0":
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- stage 2 and 3 are the same; take one or the other (it makes no
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
difference - the same work has been done on our branch in
|
|
|
|
stage 2 and their branch in stage 3)
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- stage 1 and stage 2 are the same and stage 3 is different; take
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
stage 3 (our branch in stage 2 did not do anything since the
|
|
|
|
ancestor in stage 1 while their branch in stage 3 worked on
|
|
|
|
it)
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- stage 1 and stage 3 are the same and stage 2 is different take
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
stage 2 (we did something while they did nothing)
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
The 'git write-tree' command refuses to write a nonsensical tree, and it
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
will complain about unmerged entries if it sees a single entry that is not
|
|
|
|
stage 0.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-03 22:27:26 +02:00
|
|
|
OK, this all sounds like a collection of totally nonsensical rules,
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
but it's actually exactly what you want in order to do a fast
|
|
|
|
merge. The different stages represent the "result tree" (stage 0, aka
|
|
|
|
"merged"), the original tree (stage 1, aka "orig"), and the two trees
|
|
|
|
you are trying to merge (stage 2 and 3 respectively).
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
The order of stages 1, 2 and 3 (hence the order of three
|
2014-05-21 20:52:26 +02:00
|
|
|
<tree-ish> command-line arguments) are significant when you
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
|
|
|
|
populated. Here is an outline of how the algorithm works:
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if a file exists in identical format in all three trees, it will
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
automatically collapse to "merged" state by 'git read-tree'.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- a file that has _any_ difference what-so-ever in the three trees
|
2005-08-05 17:05:02 +02:00
|
|
|
will stay as separate entries in the index. It's up to "porcelain
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
policy" to determine how to remove the non-0 stages, and insert a
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
merged version.
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- the index file saves and restores with all this information, so you
|
|
|
|
can merge things incrementally, but as long as it has entries in
|
2006-06-03 22:27:26 +02:00
|
|
|
stages 1/2/3 (i.e., "unmerged entries") you can't write the result. So
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
now the merge algorithm ends up being really simple:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* you walk the index in order, and ignore all entries of stage 0,
|
|
|
|
since they've already been done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* if you find a "stage1", but no matching "stage2" or "stage3", you
|
|
|
|
know it's been removed from both trees (it only existed in the
|
|
|
|
original tree), and you remove that entry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* if you find a matching "stage2" and "stage3" tree, you remove one
|
|
|
|
of them, and turn the other into a "stage0" entry. Remove any
|
|
|
|
matching "stage1" entry if it exists too. .. all the normal
|
|
|
|
trivial rules ..
|
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
You would normally use 'git merge-index' with supplied
|
|
|
|
'git merge-one-file' to do this last step. The script updates
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
the files in the working tree as it merges each path and at the
|
|
|
|
end of a successful merge.
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
|
|
|
|
populated, it is assumed that it represents the state of the
|
|
|
|
files in your work tree, and you can even have files with
|
|
|
|
changes unrecorded in the index file. It is further assumed
|
|
|
|
that this state is "derived" from the stage 2 tree. The 3-way
|
|
|
|
merge refuses to run if it finds an entry in the original index
|
|
|
|
file that does not match stage 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is done to prevent you from losing your work-in-progress
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
changes, and mixing your random changes in an unrelated merge
|
|
|
|
commit. To illustrate, suppose you start from what has been
|
2006-06-07 14:56:45 +02:00
|
|
|
committed last to your repository:
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
$ JC=`git rev-parse --verify "HEAD^0"`
|
|
|
|
$ git checkout-index -f -u -a $JC
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
You do random edits, without running 'git update-index'. And then
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
you notice that the tip of your "upstream" tree has advanced
|
|
|
|
since you pulled from him:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
$ git fetch git://.... linus
|
2011-12-26 17:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
$ LT=`git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD`
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your work tree is still based on your HEAD ($JC), but you have
|
|
|
|
some edits since. Three-way merge makes sure that you have not
|
2005-11-11 02:12:27 +01:00
|
|
|
added or modified index entries since $JC, and if you haven't,
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
then does the right thing. So with the following sequence:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
$ git read-tree -m -u `git merge-base $JC $LT` $JC $LT
|
|
|
|
$ git merge-index git-merge-one-file -a
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
$ echo "Merge with Linus" | \
|
2008-06-30 08:09:04 +02:00
|
|
|
git commit-tree `git write-tree` -p $JC -p $LT
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 06:13:03 +01:00
|
|
|
what you would commit is a pure merge between $JC and $LT without
|
2005-06-07 23:35:43 +02:00
|
|
|
your work-in-progress changes, and your work tree would be
|
|
|
|
updated to the result of the merge.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
However, if you have local changes in the working tree that
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
would be overwritten by this merge, 'git read-tree' will refuse
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
to run to prevent your changes from being lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, there is no need to worry about what exists only
|
|
|
|
in the working tree. When you have local changes in a part of
|
|
|
|
the project that is not involved in the merge, your changes do
|
|
|
|
not interfere with the merge, and are kept intact. When they
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
*do* interfere, the merge does not even start ('git read-tree'
|
2005-12-06 08:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
complains loudly and fails without modifying anything). In such
|
|
|
|
a case, you can simply continue doing what you were in the
|
|
|
|
middle of doing, and when your working tree is ready (i.e. you
|
|
|
|
have finished your work-in-progress), attempt the merge again.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-30 17:35:33 +02:00
|
|
|
SPARSE CHECKOUT
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit
Make several small updates, to address a few documentation issues
I spotted:
* sparse-checkout focused on "patterns" even though the inputs (and
outputs in the case of `list`) are directories in cone-mode
* The description section of the sparse-checkout documentation
was a bit sparse (no pun intended), and focused more on internal
mechanics rather than end user usage. This made sense in the
early days when the command was even more experimental, but let's
adjust a bit to try to make it more approachable to end users who
may want to consider using it. Keep the scary backward
compatibility warning, though; we're still hard at work trying to
fix up commands to behave reasonably in sparse checkouts.
* both read-tree and update-index tried to describe how to use the
skip-worktree bit, but both predated the sparse-checkout command.
The sparse-checkout command is a far easier mechanism to use and
for users trying to reduce the size of their working tree, we
should recommend users to look at it instead.
* The update-index documentation pointed out that assume-unchanged
and skip-worktree sounded similar but had different purposes.
However, it made no attempt to explain the differences, only to
point out that they were different. Explain the differences.
* The update-index documentation focused much more on (internal?)
implementation details than on end-user usage. Try to explain
its purpose better for users of update-index, rather than
fellow developers trying to work with the SKIP_WORKTREE bit.
* Clarify that when core.sparseCheckout=true, we treat a file's
presence in the working tree as being an override to the
SKIP_WORKTREE bit (i.e. in sparse checkouts when the file is
present we ignore the SKIP_WORKTREE bit).
Note that this commit, like many touching documentation, is best viewed
with the `--color-words` option to diff/log.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-14 16:59:42 +01:00
|
|
|
Note: The `update-index` and `read-tree` primitives for supporting the
|
|
|
|
skip-worktree bit predated the introduction of
|
|
|
|
linkgit:git-sparse-checkout[1]. Users are encouraged to use
|
|
|
|
`sparse-checkout` in preference to these low-level primitives.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
"Sparse checkout" allows populating the working directory sparsely.
|
Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit
Make several small updates, to address a few documentation issues
I spotted:
* sparse-checkout focused on "patterns" even though the inputs (and
outputs in the case of `list`) are directories in cone-mode
* The description section of the sparse-checkout documentation
was a bit sparse (no pun intended), and focused more on internal
mechanics rather than end user usage. This made sense in the
early days when the command was even more experimental, but let's
adjust a bit to try to make it more approachable to end users who
may want to consider using it. Keep the scary backward
compatibility warning, though; we're still hard at work trying to
fix up commands to behave reasonably in sparse checkouts.
* both read-tree and update-index tried to describe how to use the
skip-worktree bit, but both predated the sparse-checkout command.
The sparse-checkout command is a far easier mechanism to use and
for users trying to reduce the size of their working tree, we
should recommend users to look at it instead.
* The update-index documentation pointed out that assume-unchanged
and skip-worktree sounded similar but had different purposes.
However, it made no attempt to explain the differences, only to
point out that they were different. Explain the differences.
* The update-index documentation focused much more on (internal?)
implementation details than on end-user usage. Try to explain
its purpose better for users of update-index, rather than
fellow developers trying to work with the SKIP_WORKTREE bit.
* Clarify that when core.sparseCheckout=true, we treat a file's
presence in the working tree as being an override to the
SKIP_WORKTREE bit (i.e. in sparse checkouts when the file is
present we ignore the SKIP_WORKTREE bit).
Note that this commit, like many touching documentation, is best viewed
with the `--color-words` option to diff/log.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-14 16:59:42 +01:00
|
|
|
It uses the skip-worktree bit (see linkgit:git-update-index[1]) to
|
|
|
|
tell Git whether a file in the working directory is worth looking at.
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
'git read-tree' and other merge-based commands ('git merge', 'git
|
|
|
|
checkout'...) can help maintaining the skip-worktree bitmap and working
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
directory update. `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` is used to
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
define the skip-worktree reference bitmap. When 'git read-tree' needs
|
|
|
|
to update the working directory, it resets the skip-worktree bit in the index
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
based on this file, which uses the same syntax as .gitignore files.
|
Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit
Make several small updates, to address a few documentation issues
I spotted:
* sparse-checkout focused on "patterns" even though the inputs (and
outputs in the case of `list`) are directories in cone-mode
* The description section of the sparse-checkout documentation
was a bit sparse (no pun intended), and focused more on internal
mechanics rather than end user usage. This made sense in the
early days when the command was even more experimental, but let's
adjust a bit to try to make it more approachable to end users who
may want to consider using it. Keep the scary backward
compatibility warning, though; we're still hard at work trying to
fix up commands to behave reasonably in sparse checkouts.
* both read-tree and update-index tried to describe how to use the
skip-worktree bit, but both predated the sparse-checkout command.
The sparse-checkout command is a far easier mechanism to use and
for users trying to reduce the size of their working tree, we
should recommend users to look at it instead.
* The update-index documentation pointed out that assume-unchanged
and skip-worktree sounded similar but had different purposes.
However, it made no attempt to explain the differences, only to
point out that they were different. Explain the differences.
* The update-index documentation focused much more on (internal?)
implementation details than on end-user usage. Try to explain
its purpose better for users of update-index, rather than
fellow developers trying to work with the SKIP_WORKTREE bit.
* Clarify that when core.sparseCheckout=true, we treat a file's
presence in the working tree as being an override to the
SKIP_WORKTREE bit (i.e. in sparse checkouts when the file is
present we ignore the SKIP_WORKTREE bit).
Note that this commit, like many touching documentation, is best viewed
with the `--color-words` option to diff/log.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-14 16:59:42 +01:00
|
|
|
If an entry matches a pattern in this file, or the entry corresponds to
|
|
|
|
a file present in the working tree, then skip-worktree will not be
|
2011-09-21 09:48:38 +02:00
|
|
|
set on that entry. Otherwise, skip-worktree will be set.
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then it compares the new skip-worktree value with the previous one. If
|
2011-09-21 09:48:38 +02:00
|
|
|
skip-worktree turns from set to unset, it will add the corresponding
|
|
|
|
file back. If it turns from unset to set, that file will be removed.
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` is usually used to specify what
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
files are in, you can also specify what files are _not_ in, using
|
|
|
|
negate patterns. For example, to remove the file `unwanted`:
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
git-read-tree.txt: update sparse checkout examples
The negation example uses '*' to match everything. This used to work
before 9037026 (unpack-trees: fix sparse checkout's "unable to match
directories") because back then, the list of paths is used to match
sparse patterns, so with the patterns
*
!subdir/
subdir/ always matches any path that start with subdir/ and "*" has no
chance to get tested. The result is subdir is excluded.
After the said commit, a tree structure is dynamically created and
sparse pattern matching now follows closely how read_directory()
applies .gitignore. This solves one problem, but reveals another one.
With this new strategy, "!subdir/" rule will be only tested once when
"subdir" directory is examined. Entries inside subdir, when examined,
will match "*" and are (correctly) re-added again because any rules
without a slash will match at every directory level. In the end, "*"
can revert every negation rules.
In order to correctly exclude subdir, we must use
/*
!subdir
to limit "match all" rule at top level only.
"*" rule has no actual use in sparse checkout and can be confusing to
users. While we can automatically turn "*" to "/*", this violates
.gitignore definition. Instead, discourage "*" in favor of "/*" (in
the second example).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-26 01:09:15 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
!unwanted
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
Another tricky thing is fully repopulating the working directory when you
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
no longer want sparse checkout. You cannot just disable "sparse
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
checkout" because skip-worktree bits are still in the index and your working
|
|
|
|
directory is still sparsely populated. You should re-populate the working
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
directory with the `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` file content as
|
|
|
|
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
git-read-tree.txt: update sparse checkout examples
The negation example uses '*' to match everything. This used to work
before 9037026 (unpack-trees: fix sparse checkout's "unable to match
directories") because back then, the list of paths is used to match
sparse patterns, so with the patterns
*
!subdir/
subdir/ always matches any path that start with subdir/ and "*" has no
chance to get tested. The result is subdir is excluded.
After the said commit, a tree structure is dynamically created and
sparse pattern matching now follows closely how read_directory()
applies .gitignore. This solves one problem, but reveals another one.
With this new strategy, "!subdir/" rule will be only tested once when
"subdir" directory is examined. Entries inside subdir, when examined,
will match "*" and are (correctly) re-added again because any rules
without a slash will match at every directory level. In the end, "*"
can revert every negation rules.
In order to correctly exclude subdir, we must use
/*
!subdir
to limit "match all" rule at top level only.
"*" rule has no actual use in sparse checkout and can be confusing to
users. While we can automatically turn "*" to "/*", this violates
.gitignore definition. Instead, discourage "*" in favor of "/*" (in
the second example).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-26 01:09:15 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 09:48:37 +02:00
|
|
|
Then you can disable sparse checkout. Sparse checkout support in 'git
|
|
|
|
read-tree' and similar commands is disabled by default. You need to
|
2009-08-20 15:47:08 +02:00
|
|
|
turn `core.sparseCheckout` on in order to have sparse checkout
|
|
|
|
support.
|
2009-08-20 15:47:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-29 01:55:27 +02:00
|
|
|
SEE ALSO
|
2005-05-10 23:32:38 +02:00
|
|
|
--------
|
2022-03-03 17:15:43 +01:00
|
|
|
linkgit:git-write-tree[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
|
|
|
|
linkgit:gitignore[5], linkgit:git-sparse-checkout[1]
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIT
|
|
|
|
---
|
2008-06-06 09:07:32 +02:00
|
|
|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
|