git-commit-vandalism/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh

170 lines
4.5 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
test_description='miscellaneous rev-list tests'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
echo content1 >wanted_file &&
echo content2 >unwanted_file &&
git add wanted_file unwanted_file &&
2020-07-07 23:41:51 +02:00
test_tick &&
git commit -m one
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects heeds pathspecs' '
git rev-list --objects HEAD -- wanted_file >output &&
grep wanted_file output &&
! grep unwanted_file output
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects with pathspecs and deeper paths' '
mkdir foo &&
>foo/file &&
git add foo/file &&
2020-07-07 23:41:51 +02:00
test_tick &&
git commit -m two &&
git rev-list --objects HEAD -- foo >output &&
grep foo/file output &&
git rev-list --objects HEAD -- foo/file >output &&
grep foo/file output &&
! grep unwanted_file output
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects with pathspecs and copied files' '
git checkout --orphan junio-testcase &&
git rm -rf . &&
mkdir two &&
echo frotz >one &&
cp one two/three &&
git add one two/three &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m that &&
ONE=$(git rev-parse HEAD:one) &&
git rev-list --objects HEAD two >output &&
grep "$ONE two/three" output &&
! grep one output
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects --no-object-names has no space/names' '
git rev-list --objects --no-object-names HEAD >output &&
! grep wanted_file output &&
! grep unwanted_file output &&
! grep " " output
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects --no-object-names works with cat-file' '
git rev-list --objects --no-object-names --all >list-output &&
git cat-file --batch-check <list-output >cat-output &&
! grep missing cat-output
'
test_expect_success '--no-object-names and --object-names are last-one-wins' '
git rev-list --objects --no-object-names --object-names --all >output &&
grep wanted_file output &&
git rev-list --objects --object-names --no-object-names --all >output &&
! grep wanted_file output
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list A..B and rev-list ^A B are the same' '
2020-07-07 23:41:51 +02:00
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty -m another &&
git tag -a -m "annotated" v1.0 &&
git rev-list --objects ^v1.0^ v1.0 >expect &&
git rev-list --objects v1.0^..v1.0 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
revision: mark contents of an uninteresting tree uninteresting "git rev-list --objects ^A^{tree} B^{tree}" ought to mean "I want a list of objects inside B's tree, but please exclude the objects that appear inside A's tree". we see the top-level tree marked as uninteresting (i.e. ^A^{tree} in the above example) and call mark_tree_uninteresting() on it; this unfortunately prevents us from recursing into the tree and marking the objects in the tree as uninteresting. The reason why "git log ^A A" yields an empty set of commits, i.e. we do not have a similar issue for commits, is because we call mark_parents_uninteresting() after seeing an uninteresting commit. The uninteresting-ness of the commit itself does not prevent its parents from being marked as uninteresting. Introduce mark_tree_contents_uninteresting() and structure the code in handle_commit() in such a way that it makes it the responsibility of the callchain leading to this function to mark commits, trees and blobs as uninteresting, and also make it the responsibility of the helpers called from this function to mark objects that are reachable from them. Note that this is a very old bug that probably dates back to the day when "rev-list --objects" was introduced. The line to clear tree->object.parsed at the end of mark_tree_contents_uninteresting() can be removed when this fix is merged to the codebase after 6e454b9a (clear parsed flag when we free tree buffers, 2013-06-05). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-16 00:38:01 +01:00
test_expect_success 'propagate uninteresting flag down correctly' '
git rev-list --objects ^HEAD^{tree} HEAD^{tree} >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual
revision: mark contents of an uninteresting tree uninteresting "git rev-list --objects ^A^{tree} B^{tree}" ought to mean "I want a list of objects inside B's tree, but please exclude the objects that appear inside A's tree". we see the top-level tree marked as uninteresting (i.e. ^A^{tree} in the above example) and call mark_tree_uninteresting() on it; this unfortunately prevents us from recursing into the tree and marking the objects in the tree as uninteresting. The reason why "git log ^A A" yields an empty set of commits, i.e. we do not have a similar issue for commits, is because we call mark_parents_uninteresting() after seeing an uninteresting commit. The uninteresting-ness of the commit itself does not prevent its parents from being marked as uninteresting. Introduce mark_tree_contents_uninteresting() and structure the code in handle_commit() in such a way that it makes it the responsibility of the callchain leading to this function to mark commits, trees and blobs as uninteresting, and also make it the responsibility of the helpers called from this function to mark objects that are reachable from them. Note that this is a very old bug that probably dates back to the day when "rev-list --objects" was introduced. The line to clear tree->object.parsed at the end of mark_tree_contents_uninteresting() can be removed when this fix is merged to the codebase after 6e454b9a (clear parsed flag when we free tree buffers, 2013-06-05). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-16 00:38:01 +01:00
'
test_expect_success 'symleft flag bit is propagated down from tag' '
git log --format="%m %s" --left-right v1.0...master >actual &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
< another
< that
2020-07-07 23:41:51 +02:00
> two
> one
EOF
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list can show index objects' '
# Of the blobs and trees in the index, note:
#
# - we do not show two/three, because it is the
# same blob as "one", and we show objects only once
#
# - we do show the tree "two", because it has a valid cache tree
# from the last commit
#
# - we do not show the root tree; since we updated the index, it
# does not have a valid cache tree
#
echo only-in-index >only-in-index &&
test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
rev1=$(git rev-parse HEAD:one) &&
rev2=$(git rev-parse HEAD:two) &&
revi=$(git hash-object only-in-index) &&
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
$rev1 one
$revi only-in-index
$rev2 two
EOF
git add only-in-index &&
git rev-list --objects --indexed-objects >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list can negate index objects' '
git rev-parse HEAD >expect &&
git rev-list -1 --objects HEAD --not --indexed-objects >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--bisect and --first-parent can be combined' '
git rev-list --bisect --first-parent HEAD
'
test_expect_success '--header shows a NUL after each commit' '
# We know that there is no Q in the true payload; names and
# addresses of the authors and the committers do not have
# any, and object names or header names do not, either.
git rev-list --header --max-count=2 HEAD |
nul_to_q |
grep "^Q" >actual &&
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
Q$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)
Q
EOF
test_cmp expect actual
'
revision: allow --end-of-options to end option parsing There's currently no robust way to tell Git that a particular option is meant to be a revision, and not an option. So if you have a branch "refs/heads/--foo", you cannot just say: git rev-list --foo You can say: git rev-list refs/heads/--foo But that breaks down if you don't know the refname, and in particular if you're a script passing along a value from elsewhere. In most programs, you can use "--" to end option parsing, like this: some-prog -- "$revision" But that doesn't work for the revision parser, because "--" is already meaningful there: it separates revisions from pathspecs. So we need some other marker to separate options from revisions. This patch introduces "--end-of-options", which serves that purpose: git rev-list --oneline --end-of-options "$revision" will work regardless of what's in "$revision" (well, if you say "--" it may fail, but it won't do something dangerous, like triggering an unexpected option). The name is verbose, but that's probably a good thing; this is meant to be used for scripted invocations where readability is more important than terseness. One alternative would be to introduce an explicit option to mark a revision, like: git rev-list --oneline --revision="$revision" That's slightly _more_ informative than this commit (because it makes even something silly like "--" unambiguous). But the pattern of using a separator like "--" is well established in git and in other commands, and it makes some scripting tasks simpler like: git rev-list --end-of-options "$@" There's no documentation in this patch, because it will make sense to describe the feature once it is available everywhere (and support will be added in further patches). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-06 16:39:58 +02:00
test_expect_success 'rev-list --end-of-options' '
git update-ref refs/heads/--output=yikes HEAD &&
git rev-list --end-of-options --output=yikes >actual &&
test_path_is_missing yikes &&
git rev-list HEAD >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --count' '
count=$(git rev-list --count HEAD) &&
git rev-list HEAD >actual &&
test_line_count = $count actual
'
test_expect_success 'rev-list --count --objects' '
count=$(git rev-list --count --objects HEAD) &&
git rev-list --objects HEAD >actual &&
test_line_count = $count actual
'
test_done