git-commit-vandalism/Documentation/git-fast-export.txt

285 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

git-fast-export(1)
==================
NAME
----
git-fast-export - Git data exporter
SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
'git fast-export' [<options>] | 'git fast-import'
DESCRIPTION
-----------
This program dumps the given revisions in a form suitable to be piped
into 'git fast-import'.
You can use it as a human-readable bundle replacement (see
Recommend git-filter-repo instead of git-filter-branch filter-branch suffers from a deluge of disguised dangers that disfigure history rewrites (i.e. deviate from the deliberate changes). Many of these problems are unobtrusive and can easily go undiscovered until the new repository is in use. This can result in problems ranging from an even messier history than what led folks to filter-branch in the first place, to data loss or corruption. These issues cannot be backward compatibly fixed, so add a warning to both filter-branch and its manpage recommending that another tool (such as filter-repo) be used instead. Also, update other manpages that referenced filter-branch. Several of these needed updates even if we could continue recommending filter-branch, either due to implying that something was unique to filter-branch when it applied more generally to all history rewriting tools (e.g. BFG, reposurgeon, fast-import, filter-repo), or because something about filter-branch was used as an example despite other more commonly known examples now existing. Reword these sections to fix these issues and to avoid recommending filter-branch. Finally, remove the section explaining BFG Repo Cleaner as an alternative to filter-branch. I feel somewhat bad about this, especially since I feel like I learned so much from BFG that I put to good use in filter-repo (which is much more than I can say for filter-branch), but keeping that section presented a few problems: * In order to recommend that people quit using filter-branch, we need to provide them a recomendation for something else to use that can handle all the same types of rewrites. To my knowledge, filter-repo is the only such tool. So it needs to be mentioned. * I don't want to give conflicting recommendations to users * If we recommend two tools, we shouldn't expect users to learn both and pick which one to use; we should explain which problems one can solve that the other can't or when one is much faster than the other. * BFG and filter-repo have similar performance * All filtering types that BFG can do, filter-repo can also do. In fact, filter-repo comes with a reimplementation of BFG named bfg-ish which provides the same user-interface as BFG but with several bugfixes and new features that are hard to implement in BFG due to its technical underpinnings. While I could still mention both tools, it seems like I would need to provide some kind of comparison and I would ultimately just say that filter-repo can do everything BFG can, so ultimately it seems that it is just better to remove that section altogether. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-05 00:32:38 +02:00
linkgit:git-bundle[1]), or as a format that can be edited before being
fed to 'git fast-import' in order to do history rewrites (an ability
relied on by tools like 'git filter-repo').
OPTIONS
-------
--progress=<n>::
Insert 'progress' statements every <n> objects, to be shown by
'git fast-import' during import.
--signed-tags=(verbatim|warn|warn-strip|strip|abort)::
Specify how to handle signed tags. Since any transformation
after the export can change the tag names (which can also happen
when excluding revisions) the signatures will not match.
+
When asking to 'abort' (which is the default), this program will die
when encountering a signed tag. With 'strip', the tags will silently
be made unsigned, with 'warn-strip' they will be made unsigned but a
warning will be displayed, with 'verbatim', they will be silently
exported and with 'warn', they will be exported, but you will see a
warning.
--tag-of-filtered-object=(abort|drop|rewrite)::
Specify how to handle tags whose tagged object is filtered out.
Since revisions and files to export can be limited by path,
tagged objects may be filtered completely.
+
When asking to 'abort' (which is the default), this program will die
when encountering such a tag. With 'drop' it will omit such tags from
the output. With 'rewrite', if the tagged object is a commit, it will
rewrite the tag to tag an ancestor commit (via parent rewriting; see
linkgit:git-rev-list[1])
-M::
-C::
Perform move and/or copy detection, as described in the
linkgit:git-diff[1] manual page, and use it to generate
rename and copy commands in the output dump.
+
Note that earlier versions of this command did not complain and
produced incorrect results if you gave these options.
--export-marks=<file>::
Dumps the internal marks table to <file> when complete.
Marks are written one per line as `:markid SHA-1`. Only marks
for revisions are dumped; marks for blobs are ignored.
Backends can use this file to validate imports after they
have been completed, or to save the marks table across
incremental runs. As <file> is only opened and truncated
at completion, the same path can also be safely given to
--import-marks.
The file will not be written if no new object has been
marked/exported.
--import-marks=<file>::
Before processing any input, load the marks specified in
<file>. The input file must exist, must be readable, and
must use the same format as produced by --export-marks.
--mark-tags::
In addition to labelling blobs and commits with mark ids, also
label tags. This is useful in conjunction with
`--export-marks` and `--import-marks`, and is also useful (and
necessary) for exporting of nested tags. It does not hurt
other cases and would be the default, but many fast-import
frontends are not prepared to accept tags with mark
identifiers.
+
Any commits (or tags) that have already been marked will not be
exported again. If the backend uses a similar --import-marks file,
this allows for incremental bidirectional exporting of the repository
by keeping the marks the same across runs.
--fake-missing-tagger::
Some old repositories have tags without a tagger. The
fast-import protocol was pretty strict about that, and did not
allow that. So fake a tagger to be able to fast-import the
output.
--use-done-feature::
Start the stream with a 'feature done' stanza, and terminate
it with a 'done' command.
--no-data::
Skip output of blob objects and instead refer to blobs via
their original SHA-1 hash. This is useful when rewriting the
directory structure or history of a repository without
touching the contents of individual files. Note that the
resulting stream can only be used by a repository which
already contains the necessary objects.
--full-tree::
This option will cause fast-export to issue a "deleteall"
directive for each commit followed by a full list of all files
in the commit (as opposed to just listing the files which are
different from the commit's first parent).
teach fast-export an --anonymize option Sometimes users want to report a bug they experience on their repository, but they are not at liberty to share the contents of the repository. It would be useful if they could produce a repository that has a similar shape to its history and tree, but without leaking any information. This "anonymized" repository could then be shared with developers (assuming it still replicates the original problem). This patch implements an "--anonymize" option to fast-export, which generates a stream that can recreate such a repository. Producing a single stream makes it easy for the caller to verify that they are not leaking any useful information. You can get an overview of what will be shared by running a command like: git fast-export --anonymize --all | perl -pe 's/\d+/X/g' | sort -u | less which will show every unique line we generate, modulo any numbers (each anonymized token is assigned a number, like "User 0", and we replace it consistently in the output). In addition to anonymizing, this produces test cases that are relatively small (compared to the original repository) and fast to generate (compared to using filter-branch, or modifying the output of fast-export yourself). Here are numbers for git.git: $ time git fast-export --anonymize --all \ --tag-of-filtered-object=drop >output real 0m2.883s user 0m2.828s sys 0m0.052s $ gzip output $ ls -lh output.gz | awk '{print $5}' 2.9M Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-27 19:01:28 +02:00
--anonymize::
Anonymize the contents of the repository while still retaining
the shape of the history and stored tree. See the section on
`ANONYMIZING` below.
teach fast-export an --anonymize option Sometimes users want to report a bug they experience on their repository, but they are not at liberty to share the contents of the repository. It would be useful if they could produce a repository that has a similar shape to its history and tree, but without leaking any information. This "anonymized" repository could then be shared with developers (assuming it still replicates the original problem). This patch implements an "--anonymize" option to fast-export, which generates a stream that can recreate such a repository. Producing a single stream makes it easy for the caller to verify that they are not leaking any useful information. You can get an overview of what will be shared by running a command like: git fast-export --anonymize --all | perl -pe 's/\d+/X/g' | sort -u | less which will show every unique line we generate, modulo any numbers (each anonymized token is assigned a number, like "User 0", and we replace it consistently in the output). In addition to anonymizing, this produces test cases that are relatively small (compared to the original repository) and fast to generate (compared to using filter-branch, or modifying the output of fast-export yourself). Here are numbers for git.git: $ time git fast-export --anonymize --all \ --tag-of-filtered-object=drop >output real 0m2.883s user 0m2.828s sys 0m0.052s $ gzip output $ ls -lh output.gz | awk '{print $5}' 2.9M Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-27 19:01:28 +02:00
fast-export: allow seeding the anonymized mapping After you anonymize a repository, it can be hard to find which commits correspond between the original and the result, and thus hard to reproduce commands that triggered bugs in the original. Let's make it possible to seed the anonymization map. This lets users either: - mark names to be retained as-is, if they don't consider them secret (in which case their original commands would just work) - map names to new values, which lets them adapt the reproduction recipe to the new names without revealing the originals The implementation is fairly straight-forward. We already store each anonymized token in a hashmap (so that the same token appearing twice is converted to the same result). We can just introduce a new "seed" hashmap which is consulted first. This does make a few more promises to the user about how we'll anonymize things (e.g., token-splitting pathnames). But it's unlikely that we'd want to change those rules, even if the actual anonymization of a single token changes. And it makes things much easier for the user, who can unblind only a directory name without having to specify each path within it. One alternative to this approach would be to anonymize as we see fit, and then dump the whole refname and pathname mappings to a file. This does work, but it's a bit awkward to use (you have to manually dig the items you care about out of the mapping). Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-25 21:48:32 +02:00
--anonymize-map=<from>[:<to>]::
Convert token `<from>` to `<to>` in the anonymized output. If
`<to>` is omitted, map `<from>` to itself (i.e., do not
anonymize it). See the section on `ANONYMIZING` below.
fast-export: add --reference-excluded-parents option git filter-branch has a nifty feature allowing you to rewrite, e.g. just the last 8 commits of a linear history git filter-branch $OPTIONS HEAD~8..HEAD If you try the same with git fast-export, you instead get a history of only 8 commits, with HEAD~7 being rewritten into a root commit. There are two alternatives: 1) Don't use the negative revision specification, and when you're filtering the output to make modifications to the last 8 commits, just be careful to not modify any earlier commits somehow. 2) First run 'git fast-export --export-marks=somefile HEAD~8', then run 'git fast-export --import-marks=somefile HEAD~8..HEAD'. Both are more error prone than I'd like (the first for obvious reasons; with the second option I have sometimes accidentally included too many revisions in the first command and then found that the corresponding extra revisions were not exported by the second command and thus were not modified as I expected). Also, both are poor from a performance perspective. Add a new --reference-excluded-parents option which will cause fast-export to refer to commits outside the specified rev-list-args range by their sha1sum. Such a stream will only be useful in a repository which already contains the necessary commits (much like the restriction imposed when using --no-data). Note from Peff: I think we might be able to do a little more optimization here. If we're exporting HEAD^..HEAD and there's an object in HEAD^ which is unchanged in HEAD, I think we'd still print it (because it would not be marked SHOWN), but we could omit it (by walking the tree of the boundary commits and marking them shown). I don't think it's a blocker for what you're doing here, but just a possible future optimization. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-16 08:59:54 +01:00
--reference-excluded-parents::
By default, running a command such as `git fast-export
master~5..master` will not include the commit master{tilde}5
and will make master{tilde}4 no longer have master{tilde}5 as
a parent (though both the old master{tilde}4 and new
master{tilde}4 will have all the same files). Use
--reference-excluded-parents to instead have the stream
fast-export: add --reference-excluded-parents option git filter-branch has a nifty feature allowing you to rewrite, e.g. just the last 8 commits of a linear history git filter-branch $OPTIONS HEAD~8..HEAD If you try the same with git fast-export, you instead get a history of only 8 commits, with HEAD~7 being rewritten into a root commit. There are two alternatives: 1) Don't use the negative revision specification, and when you're filtering the output to make modifications to the last 8 commits, just be careful to not modify any earlier commits somehow. 2) First run 'git fast-export --export-marks=somefile HEAD~8', then run 'git fast-export --import-marks=somefile HEAD~8..HEAD'. Both are more error prone than I'd like (the first for obvious reasons; with the second option I have sometimes accidentally included too many revisions in the first command and then found that the corresponding extra revisions were not exported by the second command and thus were not modified as I expected). Also, both are poor from a performance perspective. Add a new --reference-excluded-parents option which will cause fast-export to refer to commits outside the specified rev-list-args range by their sha1sum. Such a stream will only be useful in a repository which already contains the necessary commits (much like the restriction imposed when using --no-data). Note from Peff: I think we might be able to do a little more optimization here. If we're exporting HEAD^..HEAD and there's an object in HEAD^ which is unchanged in HEAD, I think we'd still print it (because it would not be marked SHOWN), but we could omit it (by walking the tree of the boundary commits and marking them shown). I don't think it's a blocker for what you're doing here, but just a possible future optimization. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-16 08:59:54 +01:00
refer to commits in the excluded range of history by their
sha1sum. Note that the resulting stream can only be used by a
repository which already contains the necessary parent
commits.
--show-original-ids::
Add an extra directive to the output for commits and blobs,
`original-oid <SHA1SUM>`. While such directives will likely be
ignored by importers such as git-fast-import, it may be useful
for intermediary filters (e.g. for rewriting commit messages
which refer to older commits, or for stripping blobs by id).
--reencode=(yes|no|abort)::
Specify how to handle `encoding` header in commit objects. When
asking to 'abort' (which is the default), this program will die
when encountering such a commit object. With 'yes', the commit
message will be re-encoded into UTF-8. With 'no', the original
encoding will be preserved.
--refspec::
Apply the specified refspec to each ref exported. Multiple of them can
be specified.
[<git-rev-list-args>...]::
A list of arguments, acceptable to 'git rev-parse' and
'git rev-list', that specifies the specific objects and references
to export. For example, `master~10..master` causes the
current master reference to be exported along with all objects
fast-export: add --reference-excluded-parents option git filter-branch has a nifty feature allowing you to rewrite, e.g. just the last 8 commits of a linear history git filter-branch $OPTIONS HEAD~8..HEAD If you try the same with git fast-export, you instead get a history of only 8 commits, with HEAD~7 being rewritten into a root commit. There are two alternatives: 1) Don't use the negative revision specification, and when you're filtering the output to make modifications to the last 8 commits, just be careful to not modify any earlier commits somehow. 2) First run 'git fast-export --export-marks=somefile HEAD~8', then run 'git fast-export --import-marks=somefile HEAD~8..HEAD'. Both are more error prone than I'd like (the first for obvious reasons; with the second option I have sometimes accidentally included too many revisions in the first command and then found that the corresponding extra revisions were not exported by the second command and thus were not modified as I expected). Also, both are poor from a performance perspective. Add a new --reference-excluded-parents option which will cause fast-export to refer to commits outside the specified rev-list-args range by their sha1sum. Such a stream will only be useful in a repository which already contains the necessary commits (much like the restriction imposed when using --no-data). Note from Peff: I think we might be able to do a little more optimization here. If we're exporting HEAD^..HEAD and there's an object in HEAD^ which is unchanged in HEAD, I think we'd still print it (because it would not be marked SHOWN), but we could omit it (by walking the tree of the boundary commits and marking them shown). I don't think it's a blocker for what you're doing here, but just a possible future optimization. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-16 08:59:54 +01:00
added since its 10th ancestor commit and (unless the
--reference-excluded-parents option is specified) all files
common to master{tilde}9 and master{tilde}10.
EXAMPLES
--------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
$ git fast-export --all | (cd /empty/repository && git fast-import)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This will export the whole repository and import it into the existing
empty repository. Except for reencoding commits that are not in
UTF-8, it would be a one-to-one mirror.
-----------------------------------------------------
$ git fast-export master~5..master |
sed "s|refs/heads/master|refs/heads/other|" |
git fast-import
-----------------------------------------------------
This makes a new branch called 'other' from 'master~5..master'
(i.e. if 'master' has linear history, it will take the last 5 commits).
Note that this assumes that none of the blobs and commit messages
referenced by that revision range contains the string
'refs/heads/master'.
ANONYMIZING
-----------
If the `--anonymize` option is given, git will attempt to remove all
identifying information from the repository while still retaining enough
of the original tree and history patterns to reproduce some bugs. The
goal is that a git bug which is found on a private repository will
persist in the anonymized repository, and the latter can be shared with
git developers to help solve the bug.
With this option, git will replace all refnames, paths, blob contents,
commit and tag messages, names, and email addresses in the output with
anonymized data. Two instances of the same string will be replaced
equivalently (e.g., two commits with the same author will have the same
anonymized author in the output, but bear no resemblance to the original
author string). The relationship between commits, branches, and tags is
retained, as well as the commit timestamps (but the commit messages and
refnames bear no resemblance to the originals). The relative makeup of
the tree is retained (e.g., if you have a root tree with 10 files and 3
trees, so will the output), but their names and the contents of the
files will be replaced.
If you think you have found a git bug, you can start by exporting an
anonymized stream of the whole repository:
---------------------------------------------------
$ git fast-export --anonymize --all >anon-stream
---------------------------------------------------
Then confirm that the bug persists in a repository created from that
stream (many bugs will not, as they really do depend on the exact
repository contents):
---------------------------------------------------
$ git init anon-repo
$ cd anon-repo
$ git fast-import <../anon-stream
$ ... test your bug ...
---------------------------------------------------
If the anonymized repository shows the bug, it may be worth sharing
`anon-stream` along with a regular bug report. Note that the anonymized
stream compresses very well, so gzipping it is encouraged. If you want
to examine the stream to see that it does not contain any private data,
you can peruse it directly before sending. You may also want to try:
---------------------------------------------------
$ perl -pe 's/\d+/X/g' <anon-stream | sort -u | less
---------------------------------------------------
which shows all of the unique lines (with numbers converted to "X", to
collapse "User 0", "User 1", etc into "User X"). This produces a much
smaller output, and it is usually easy to quickly confirm that there is
no private data in the stream.
fast-export: allow seeding the anonymized mapping After you anonymize a repository, it can be hard to find which commits correspond between the original and the result, and thus hard to reproduce commands that triggered bugs in the original. Let's make it possible to seed the anonymization map. This lets users either: - mark names to be retained as-is, if they don't consider them secret (in which case their original commands would just work) - map names to new values, which lets them adapt the reproduction recipe to the new names without revealing the originals The implementation is fairly straight-forward. We already store each anonymized token in a hashmap (so that the same token appearing twice is converted to the same result). We can just introduce a new "seed" hashmap which is consulted first. This does make a few more promises to the user about how we'll anonymize things (e.g., token-splitting pathnames). But it's unlikely that we'd want to change those rules, even if the actual anonymization of a single token changes. And it makes things much easier for the user, who can unblind only a directory name without having to specify each path within it. One alternative to this approach would be to anonymize as we see fit, and then dump the whole refname and pathname mappings to a file. This does work, but it's a bit awkward to use (you have to manually dig the items you care about out of the mapping). Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-25 21:48:32 +02:00
Reproducing some bugs may require referencing particular commits or
paths, which becomes challenging after refnames and paths have been
anonymized. You can ask for a particular token to be left as-is or
mapped to a new value. For example, if you have a bug which reproduces
with `git rev-list sensitive -- secret.c`, you can run:
---------------------------------------------------
$ git fast-export --anonymize --all \
--anonymize-map=sensitive:foo \
--anonymize-map=secret.c:bar.c \
>stream
---------------------------------------------------
After importing the stream, you can then run `git rev-list foo -- bar.c`
in the anonymized repository.
Note that paths and refnames are split into tokens at slash boundaries.
The command above would anonymize `subdir/secret.c` as something like
`path123/bar.c`; you could then search for `bar.c` in the anonymized
repository to determine the final pathname.
To make referencing the final pathname simpler, you can map each path
component; so if you also anonymize `subdir` to `publicdir`, then the
final pathname would be `publicdir/bar.c`.
LIMITATIONS
-----------
Since 'git fast-import' cannot tag trees, you will not be
able to export the linux.git repository completely, as it contains
a tag referencing a tree instead of a commit.
SEE ALSO
--------
linkgit:git-fast-import[1]
GIT
---
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite