git-commit-vandalism/builtin/apply.c

4130 lines
104 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* apply.c
*
* Copyright (C) Linus Torvalds, 2005
*
* This applies patches on top of some (arbitrary) version of the SCM.
*
*/
#include "cache.h"
#include "cache-tree.h"
#include "quote.h"
#include "blob.h"
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
#include "delta.h"
#include "builtin.h"
#include "string-list.h"
#include "dir.h"
#include "diff.h"
#include "parse-options.h"
/*
* --check turns on checking that the working tree matches the
* files that are being modified, but doesn't apply the patch
* --stat does just a diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
* --numstat does numeric diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
* --index-info shows the old and new index info for paths if available.
* --index updates the cache as well.
* --cached updates only the cache without ever touching the working tree.
*/
static const char *prefix;
static int prefix_length = -1;
static int newfd = -1;
static int unidiff_zero;
static int p_value = 1;
static int p_value_known;
static int check_index;
static int update_index;
static int cached;
static int diffstat;
static int numstat;
static int summary;
static int check;
static int apply = 1;
static int apply_in_reverse;
static int apply_with_reject;
static int apply_verbosely;
static int allow_overlap;
static int no_add;
static const char *fake_ancestor;
static int line_termination = '\n';
static unsigned int p_context = UINT_MAX;
static const char * const apply_usage[] = {
N_("git apply [options] [<patch>...]"),
NULL
};
static enum ws_error_action {
nowarn_ws_error,
warn_on_ws_error,
die_on_ws_error,
correct_ws_error
} ws_error_action = warn_on_ws_error;
static int whitespace_error;
static int squelch_whitespace_errors = 5;
static int applied_after_fixing_ws;
static enum ws_ignore {
ignore_ws_none,
ignore_ws_change
} ws_ignore_action = ignore_ws_none;
static const char *patch_input_file;
static const char *root;
static int root_len;
static int read_stdin = 1;
static int options;
static void parse_whitespace_option(const char *option)
{
if (!option) {
ws_error_action = warn_on_ws_error;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "warn")) {
ws_error_action = warn_on_ws_error;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "nowarn")) {
ws_error_action = nowarn_ws_error;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "error")) {
ws_error_action = die_on_ws_error;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "error-all")) {
ws_error_action = die_on_ws_error;
squelch_whitespace_errors = 0;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "strip") || !strcmp(option, "fix")) {
ws_error_action = correct_ws_error;
return;
}
die(_("unrecognized whitespace option '%s'"), option);
}
static void parse_ignorewhitespace_option(const char *option)
{
if (!option || !strcmp(option, "no") ||
!strcmp(option, "false") || !strcmp(option, "never") ||
!strcmp(option, "none")) {
ws_ignore_action = ignore_ws_none;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(option, "change")) {
ws_ignore_action = ignore_ws_change;
return;
}
die(_("unrecognized whitespace ignore option '%s'"), option);
}
static void set_default_whitespace_mode(const char *whitespace_option)
{
if (!whitespace_option && !apply_default_whitespace)
ws_error_action = (apply ? warn_on_ws_error : nowarn_ws_error);
}
/*
* For "diff-stat" like behaviour, we keep track of the biggest change
* we've seen, and the longest filename. That allows us to do simple
* scaling.
*/
static int max_change, max_len;
/*
* Various "current state", notably line numbers and what
* file (and how) we're patching right now.. The "is_xxxx"
* things are flags, where -1 means "don't know yet".
*/
static int linenr = 1;
/*
* This represents one "hunk" from a patch, starting with
* "@@ -oldpos,oldlines +newpos,newlines @@" marker. The
* patch text is pointed at by patch, and its byte length
* is stored in size. leading and trailing are the number
* of context lines.
*/
struct fragment {
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
unsigned long leading, trailing;
unsigned long oldpos, oldlines;
unsigned long newpos, newlines;
/*
* 'patch' is usually borrowed from buf in apply_patch(),
* but some codepaths store an allocated buffer.
*/
const char *patch;
unsigned free_patch:1,
rejected:1;
int size;
int linenr;
struct fragment *next;
};
/*
* When dealing with a binary patch, we reuse "leading" field
* to store the type of the binary hunk, either deflated "delta"
* or deflated "literal".
*/
#define binary_patch_method leading
#define BINARY_DELTA_DEFLATED 1
#define BINARY_LITERAL_DEFLATED 2
/*
* This represents a "patch" to a file, both metainfo changes
* such as creation/deletion, filemode and content changes represented
* as a series of fragments.
*/
struct patch {
char *new_name, *old_name, *def_name;
unsigned int old_mode, new_mode;
int is_new, is_delete; /* -1 = unknown, 0 = false, 1 = true */
int rejected;
unsigned ws_rule;
int lines_added, lines_deleted;
int score;
unsigned int is_toplevel_relative:1;
unsigned int inaccurate_eof:1;
unsigned int is_binary:1;
unsigned int is_copy:1;
unsigned int is_rename:1;
unsigned int recount:1;
struct fragment *fragments;
char *result;
size_t resultsize;
char old_sha1_prefix[41];
char new_sha1_prefix[41];
struct patch *next;
};
static void free_fragment_list(struct fragment *list)
{
while (list) {
struct fragment *next = list->next;
if (list->free_patch)
free((char *)list->patch);
free(list);
list = next;
}
}
static void free_patch(struct patch *patch)
{
free_fragment_list(patch->fragments);
free(patch->def_name);
free(patch->old_name);
free(patch->new_name);
free(patch->result);
free(patch);
}
static void free_patch_list(struct patch *list)
{
while (list) {
struct patch *next = list->next;
free_patch(list);
list = next;
}
}
/*
* A line in a file, len-bytes long (includes the terminating LF,
* except for an incomplete line at the end if the file ends with
* one), and its contents hashes to 'hash'.
*/
struct line {
size_t len;
unsigned hash : 24;
unsigned flag : 8;
#define LINE_COMMON 1
apply: do not patch lines that were already patched When looking for a place to apply a hunk, we used to check lines that match the preimage of it, starting from the line that the patch wants to apply the hunk at, looking forward and backward with increasing offsets until we find a match. Colin Guthrie found an interesting case where this misapplied a patch that wanted to touch a preimage that consists of } } return 0; } which is a rather unfortunately common pattern. The target version of the file originally had only one such location, but the hunk immediately before that created another instance of such block of lines, and find_pos() happily reported that the preimage of the hunk matched what it wanted to modify. Oops. By marking the lines application of earlier hunks touched and preventing match_fragment() from considering them as a match with preimage of other hunks, we can reduce such an accident. I also considered to teach apply_one_fragment() to take the offset we have found while applying the previous hunk into account when looking for a match with find_pos(), but dismissed that approach, because it would sometimes work better but sometimes worse, depending on the difference between the version the patch was created against and the version the patch is being applied. This does _not_ prevent misapplication of patches to a file that has many similar looking blocks of lines and a preimage cannot identify which one of them should be applied. For that, we would need to scan beyond the first match in find_pos(), and issue a warning (or error out). That will be a separate topic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-04 21:25:34 +01:00
#define LINE_PATCHED 2
};
/*
* This represents a "file", which is an array of "lines".
*/
struct image {
char *buf;
size_t len;
size_t nr;
size_t alloc;
struct line *line_allocated;
struct line *line;
};
/*
* Records filenames that have been touched, in order to handle
* the case where more than one patches touch the same file.
*/
static struct string_list fn_table;
static uint32_t hash_line(const char *cp, size_t len)
{
size_t i;
uint32_t h;
for (i = 0, h = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (!isspace(cp[i])) {
h = h * 3 + (cp[i] & 0xff);
}
}
return h;
}
/*
* Compare lines s1 of length n1 and s2 of length n2, ignoring
* whitespace difference. Returns 1 if they match, 0 otherwise
*/
static int fuzzy_matchlines(const char *s1, size_t n1,
const char *s2, size_t n2)
{
const char *last1 = s1 + n1 - 1;
const char *last2 = s2 + n2 - 1;
int result = 0;
/* ignore line endings */
while ((*last1 == '\r') || (*last1 == '\n'))
last1--;
while ((*last2 == '\r') || (*last2 == '\n'))
last2--;
/* skip leading whitespace */
while (isspace(*s1) && (s1 <= last1))
s1++;
while (isspace(*s2) && (s2 <= last2))
s2++;
/* early return if both lines are empty */
if ((s1 > last1) && (s2 > last2))
return 1;
while (!result) {
result = *s1++ - *s2++;
/*
* Skip whitespace inside. We check for whitespace on
* both buffers because we don't want "a b" to match
* "ab"
*/
if (isspace(*s1) && isspace(*s2)) {
while (isspace(*s1) && s1 <= last1)
s1++;
while (isspace(*s2) && s2 <= last2)
s2++;
}
/*
* If we reached the end on one side only,
* lines don't match
*/
if (
((s2 > last2) && (s1 <= last1)) ||
((s1 > last1) && (s2 <= last2)))
return 0;
if ((s1 > last1) && (s2 > last2))
break;
}
return !result;
}
static void add_line_info(struct image *img, const char *bol, size_t len, unsigned flag)
{
ALLOC_GROW(img->line_allocated, img->nr + 1, img->alloc);
img->line_allocated[img->nr].len = len;
img->line_allocated[img->nr].hash = hash_line(bol, len);
img->line_allocated[img->nr].flag = flag;
img->nr++;
}
/*
* "buf" has the file contents to be patched (read from various sources).
* attach it to "image" and add line-based index to it.
* "image" now owns the "buf".
*/
static void prepare_image(struct image *image, char *buf, size_t len,
int prepare_linetable)
{
const char *cp, *ep;
memset(image, 0, sizeof(*image));
image->buf = buf;
image->len = len;
if (!prepare_linetable)
return;
ep = image->buf + image->len;
cp = image->buf;
while (cp < ep) {
const char *next;
for (next = cp; next < ep && *next != '\n'; next++)
;
if (next < ep)
next++;
add_line_info(image, cp, next - cp, 0);
cp = next;
}
image->line = image->line_allocated;
}
static void clear_image(struct image *image)
{
free(image->buf);
image->buf = NULL;
image->len = 0;
}
/* fmt must contain _one_ %s and no other substitution */
static void say_patch_name(FILE *output, const char *fmt, struct patch *patch)
{
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
if (patch->old_name && patch->new_name &&
strcmp(patch->old_name, patch->new_name)) {
quote_c_style(patch->old_name, &sb, NULL, 0);
strbuf_addstr(&sb, " => ");
quote_c_style(patch->new_name, &sb, NULL, 0);
} else {
const char *n = patch->new_name;
if (!n)
n = patch->old_name;
quote_c_style(n, &sb, NULL, 0);
}
fprintf(output, fmt, sb.buf);
fputc('\n', output);
strbuf_release(&sb);
}
#define SLOP (16)
static void read_patch_file(struct strbuf *sb, int fd)
{
if (strbuf_read(sb, fd, 0) < 0)
die_errno("git apply: failed to read");
/*
* Make sure that we have some slop in the buffer
* so that we can do speculative "memcmp" etc, and
* see to it that it is NUL-filled.
*/
strbuf_grow(sb, SLOP);
memset(sb->buf + sb->len, 0, SLOP);
}
static unsigned long linelen(const char *buffer, unsigned long size)
{
unsigned long len = 0;
while (size--) {
len++;
if (*buffer++ == '\n')
break;
}
return len;
}
static int is_dev_null(const char *str)
{
return !memcmp("/dev/null", str, 9) && isspace(str[9]);
}
#define TERM_SPACE 1
#define TERM_TAB 2
static int name_terminate(const char *name, int namelen, int c, int terminate)
{
if (c == ' ' && !(terminate & TERM_SPACE))
return 0;
if (c == '\t' && !(terminate & TERM_TAB))
return 0;
return 1;
}
/* remove double slashes to make --index work with such filenames */
static char *squash_slash(char *name)
{
int i = 0, j = 0;
if (!name)
return NULL;
while (name[i]) {
if ((name[j++] = name[i++]) == '/')
while (name[i] == '/')
i++;
}
name[j] = '\0';
return name;
}
static char *find_name_gnu(const char *line, const char *def, int p_value)
{
struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
char *cp;
/*
* Proposed "new-style" GNU patch/diff format; see
* http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112927316408690&w=2
*/
if (unquote_c_style(&name, line, NULL)) {
strbuf_release(&name);
return NULL;
}
for (cp = name.buf; p_value; p_value--) {
cp = strchr(cp, '/');
if (!cp) {
strbuf_release(&name);
return NULL;
}
cp++;
}
strbuf_remove(&name, 0, cp - name.buf);
if (root)
strbuf_insert(&name, 0, root, root_len);
return squash_slash(strbuf_detach(&name, NULL));
}
static size_t sane_tz_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *tz, *p;
if (len < strlen(" +0500") || line[len-strlen(" +0500")] != ' ')
return 0;
tz = line + len - strlen(" +0500");
if (tz[1] != '+' && tz[1] != '-')
return 0;
for (p = tz + 2; p != line + len; p++)
if (!isdigit(*p))
return 0;
return line + len - tz;
}
static size_t tz_with_colon_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *tz, *p;
if (len < strlen(" +08:00") || line[len - strlen(":00")] != ':')
return 0;
tz = line + len - strlen(" +08:00");
if (tz[0] != ' ' || (tz[1] != '+' && tz[1] != '-'))
return 0;
p = tz + 2;
if (!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++) || *p++ != ':' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++))
return 0;
return line + len - tz;
}
static size_t date_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *date, *p;
if (len < strlen("72-02-05") || line[len-strlen("-05")] != '-')
return 0;
p = date = line + len - strlen("72-02-05");
if (!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++) || *p++ != '-' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++) || *p++ != '-' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++)) /* Not a date. */
return 0;
if (date - line >= strlen("19") &&
isdigit(date[-1]) && isdigit(date[-2])) /* 4-digit year */
date -= strlen("19");
return line + len - date;
}
static size_t short_time_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *time, *p;
if (len < strlen(" 07:01:32") || line[len-strlen(":32")] != ':')
return 0;
p = time = line + len - strlen(" 07:01:32");
/* Permit 1-digit hours? */
if (*p++ != ' ' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++) || *p++ != ':' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++) || *p++ != ':' ||
!isdigit(*p++) || !isdigit(*p++)) /* Not a time. */
return 0;
return line + len - time;
}
static size_t fractional_time_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *p;
size_t n;
/* Expected format: 19:41:17.620000023 */
if (!len || !isdigit(line[len - 1]))
return 0;
p = line + len - 1;
/* Fractional seconds. */
while (p > line && isdigit(*p))
p--;
if (*p != '.')
return 0;
/* Hours, minutes, and whole seconds. */
n = short_time_len(line, p - line);
if (!n)
return 0;
return line + len - p + n;
}
static size_t trailing_spaces_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *p;
/* Expected format: ' ' x (1 or more) */
if (!len || line[len - 1] != ' ')
return 0;
p = line + len;
while (p != line) {
p--;
if (*p != ' ')
return line + len - (p + 1);
}
/* All spaces! */
return len;
}
static size_t diff_timestamp_len(const char *line, size_t len)
{
const char *end = line + len;
size_t n;
/*
* Posix: 2010-07-05 19:41:17
* GNU: 2010-07-05 19:41:17.620000023 -0500
*/
if (!isdigit(end[-1]))
return 0;
n = sane_tz_len(line, end - line);
if (!n)
n = tz_with_colon_len(line, end - line);
end -= n;
n = short_time_len(line, end - line);
if (!n)
n = fractional_time_len(line, end - line);
end -= n;
n = date_len(line, end - line);
if (!n) /* No date. Too bad. */
return 0;
end -= n;
if (end == line) /* No space before date. */
return 0;
if (end[-1] == '\t') { /* Success! */
end--;
return line + len - end;
}
if (end[-1] != ' ') /* No space before date. */
return 0;
/* Whitespace damage. */
end -= trailing_spaces_len(line, end - line);
return line + len - end;
}
static char *null_strdup(const char *s)
{
return s ? xstrdup(s) : NULL;
}
static char *find_name_common(const char *line, const char *def,
int p_value, const char *end, int terminate)
{
int len;
const char *start = NULL;
if (p_value == 0)
start = line;
while (line != end) {
char c = *line;
if (!end && isspace(c)) {
if (c == '\n')
break;
if (name_terminate(start, line-start, c, terminate))
break;
}
line++;
if (c == '/' && !--p_value)
start = line;
}
if (!start)
return squash_slash(null_strdup(def));
len = line - start;
if (!len)
return squash_slash(null_strdup(def));
/*
* Generally we prefer the shorter name, especially
* if the other one is just a variation of that with
* something else tacked on to the end (ie "file.orig"
* or "file~").
*/
if (def) {
int deflen = strlen(def);
if (deflen < len && !strncmp(start, def, deflen))
return squash_slash(xstrdup(def));
}
if (root) {
char *ret = xmalloc(root_len + len + 1);
strcpy(ret, root);
memcpy(ret + root_len, start, len);
ret[root_len + len] = '\0';
return squash_slash(ret);
}
return squash_slash(xmemdupz(start, len));
}
static char *find_name(const char *line, char *def, int p_value, int terminate)
{
if (*line == '"') {
char *name = find_name_gnu(line, def, p_value);
if (name)
return name;
}
return find_name_common(line, def, p_value, NULL, terminate);
}
static char *find_name_traditional(const char *line, char *def, int p_value)
{
size_t len = strlen(line);
size_t date_len;
if (*line == '"') {
char *name = find_name_gnu(line, def, p_value);
if (name)
return name;
}
len = strchrnul(line, '\n') - line;
date_len = diff_timestamp_len(line, len);
if (!date_len)
return find_name_common(line, def, p_value, NULL, TERM_TAB);
len -= date_len;
return find_name_common(line, def, p_value, line + len, 0);
}
static int count_slashes(const char *cp)
{
int cnt = 0;
char ch;
while ((ch = *cp++))
if (ch == '/')
cnt++;
return cnt;
}
/*
* Given the string after "--- " or "+++ ", guess the appropriate
* p_value for the given patch.
*/
static int guess_p_value(const char *nameline)
{
char *name, *cp;
int val = -1;
if (is_dev_null(nameline))
return -1;
name = find_name_traditional(nameline, NULL, 0);
if (!name)
return -1;
cp = strchr(name, '/');
if (!cp)
val = 0;
else if (prefix) {
/*
* Does it begin with "a/$our-prefix" and such? Then this is
* very likely to apply to our directory.
*/
if (!strncmp(name, prefix, prefix_length))
val = count_slashes(prefix);
else {
cp++;
if (!strncmp(cp, prefix, prefix_length))
val = count_slashes(prefix) + 1;
}
}
free(name);
return val;
}
/*
* Does the ---/+++ line has the POSIX timestamp after the last HT?
* GNU diff puts epoch there to signal a creation/deletion event. Is
* this such a timestamp?
*/
static int has_epoch_timestamp(const char *nameline)
{
/*
* We are only interested in epoch timestamp; any non-zero
* fraction cannot be one, hence "(\.0+)?" in the regexp below.
* For the same reason, the date must be either 1969-12-31 or
* 1970-01-01, and the seconds part must be "00".
*/
const char stamp_regexp[] =
"^(1969-12-31|1970-01-01)"
" "
"[0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]:00(\\.0+)?"
" "
"([-+][0-2][0-9]:?[0-5][0-9])\n";
const char *timestamp = NULL, *cp, *colon;
static regex_t *stamp;
regmatch_t m[10];
int zoneoffset;
int hourminute;
int status;
for (cp = nameline; *cp != '\n'; cp++) {
if (*cp == '\t')
timestamp = cp + 1;
}
if (!timestamp)
return 0;
if (!stamp) {
stamp = xmalloc(sizeof(*stamp));
if (regcomp(stamp, stamp_regexp, REG_EXTENDED)) {
warning(_("Cannot prepare timestamp regexp %s"),
stamp_regexp);
return 0;
}
}
status = regexec(stamp, timestamp, ARRAY_SIZE(m), m, 0);
if (status) {
if (status != REG_NOMATCH)
warning(_("regexec returned %d for input: %s"),
status, timestamp);
return 0;
}
zoneoffset = strtol(timestamp + m[3].rm_so + 1, (char **) &colon, 10);
if (*colon == ':')
zoneoffset = zoneoffset * 60 + strtol(colon + 1, NULL, 10);
else
zoneoffset = (zoneoffset / 100) * 60 + (zoneoffset % 100);
if (timestamp[m[3].rm_so] == '-')
zoneoffset = -zoneoffset;
/*
* YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss must be from either 1969-12-31
* (west of GMT) or 1970-01-01 (east of GMT)
*/
if ((zoneoffset < 0 && memcmp(timestamp, "1969-12-31", 10)) ||
(0 <= zoneoffset && memcmp(timestamp, "1970-01-01", 10)))
return 0;
hourminute = (strtol(timestamp + 11, NULL, 10) * 60 +
strtol(timestamp + 14, NULL, 10) -
zoneoffset);
return ((zoneoffset < 0 && hourminute == 1440) ||
(0 <= zoneoffset && !hourminute));
}
/*
* Get the name etc info from the ---/+++ lines of a traditional patch header
*
* FIXME! The end-of-filename heuristics are kind of screwy. For existing
* files, we can happily check the index for a match, but for creating a
* new file we should try to match whatever "patch" does. I have no idea.
*/
static void parse_traditional_patch(const char *first, const char *second, struct patch *patch)
{
char *name;
first += 4; /* skip "--- " */
second += 4; /* skip "+++ " */
if (!p_value_known) {
int p, q;
p = guess_p_value(first);
q = guess_p_value(second);
if (p < 0) p = q;
if (0 <= p && p == q) {
p_value = p;
p_value_known = 1;
}
}
if (is_dev_null(first)) {
patch->is_new = 1;
patch->is_delete = 0;
name = find_name_traditional(second, NULL, p_value);
patch->new_name = name;
} else if (is_dev_null(second)) {
patch->is_new = 0;
patch->is_delete = 1;
name = find_name_traditional(first, NULL, p_value);
patch->old_name = name;
} else {
char *first_name;
first_name = find_name_traditional(first, NULL, p_value);
name = find_name_traditional(second, first_name, p_value);
free(first_name);
if (has_epoch_timestamp(first)) {
patch->is_new = 1;
patch->is_delete = 0;
patch->new_name = name;
} else if (has_epoch_timestamp(second)) {
patch->is_new = 0;
patch->is_delete = 1;
patch->old_name = name;
} else {
patch->old_name = name;
patch->new_name = xstrdup(name);
}
}
if (!name)
die(_("unable to find filename in patch at line %d"), linenr);
}
static int gitdiff_hdrend(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
return -1;
}
/*
* We're anal about diff header consistency, to make
* sure that we don't end up having strange ambiguous
* patches floating around.
*
* As a result, gitdiff_{old|new}name() will check
* their names against any previous information, just
* to make sure..
*/
#define DIFF_OLD_NAME 0
#define DIFF_NEW_NAME 1
static char *gitdiff_verify_name(const char *line, int isnull, char *orig_name, int side)
{
if (!orig_name && !isnull)
return find_name(line, NULL, p_value, TERM_TAB);
if (orig_name) {
int len;
const char *name;
char *another;
name = orig_name;
len = strlen(name);
if (isnull)
die(_("git apply: bad git-diff - expected /dev/null, got %s on line %d"), name, linenr);
another = find_name(line, NULL, p_value, TERM_TAB);
if (!another || memcmp(another, name, len + 1))
die((side == DIFF_NEW_NAME) ?
_("git apply: bad git-diff - inconsistent new filename on line %d") :
_("git apply: bad git-diff - inconsistent old filename on line %d"), linenr);
free(another);
return orig_name;
}
else {
/* expect "/dev/null" */
if (memcmp("/dev/null", line, 9) || line[9] != '\n')
die(_("git apply: bad git-diff - expected /dev/null on line %d"), linenr);
return NULL;
}
}
static int gitdiff_oldname(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
char *orig = patch->old_name;
patch->old_name = gitdiff_verify_name(line, patch->is_new, patch->old_name,
DIFF_OLD_NAME);
if (orig != patch->old_name)
free(orig);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_newname(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
char *orig = patch->new_name;
patch->new_name = gitdiff_verify_name(line, patch->is_delete, patch->new_name,
DIFF_NEW_NAME);
if (orig != patch->new_name)
free(orig);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_oldmode(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->old_mode = strtoul(line, NULL, 8);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_newmode(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->new_mode = strtoul(line, NULL, 8);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_delete(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_delete = 1;
free(patch->old_name);
patch->old_name = null_strdup(patch->def_name);
return gitdiff_oldmode(line, patch);
}
static int gitdiff_newfile(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_new = 1;
free(patch->new_name);
patch->new_name = null_strdup(patch->def_name);
return gitdiff_newmode(line, patch);
}
static int gitdiff_copysrc(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_copy = 1;
free(patch->old_name);
patch->old_name = find_name(line, NULL, p_value ? p_value - 1 : 0, 0);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_copydst(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_copy = 1;
free(patch->new_name);
patch->new_name = find_name(line, NULL, p_value ? p_value - 1 : 0, 0);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_renamesrc(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_rename = 1;
free(patch->old_name);
patch->old_name = find_name(line, NULL, p_value ? p_value - 1 : 0, 0);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_renamedst(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
patch->is_rename = 1;
free(patch->new_name);
patch->new_name = find_name(line, NULL, p_value ? p_value - 1 : 0, 0);
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_similarity(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
if ((patch->score = strtoul(line, NULL, 10)) == ULONG_MAX)
patch->score = 0;
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_dissimilarity(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
if ((patch->score = strtoul(line, NULL, 10)) == ULONG_MAX)
patch->score = 0;
return 0;
}
static int gitdiff_index(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
/*
* index line is N hexadecimal, "..", N hexadecimal,
* and optional space with octal mode.
*/
const char *ptr, *eol;
int len;
ptr = strchr(line, '.');
if (!ptr || ptr[1] != '.' || 40 < ptr - line)
return 0;
len = ptr - line;
memcpy(patch->old_sha1_prefix, line, len);
patch->old_sha1_prefix[len] = 0;
line = ptr + 2;
ptr = strchr(line, ' ');
eol = strchr(line, '\n');
if (!ptr || eol < ptr)
ptr = eol;
len = ptr - line;
if (40 < len)
return 0;
memcpy(patch->new_sha1_prefix, line, len);
patch->new_sha1_prefix[len] = 0;
if (*ptr == ' ')
builtin-apply: prevent non-explicit permission changes A git patch that does not change the executable bit records the mode bits on its "index" line. "git apply" used to interpret this mode exactly the same way as it interprets the mode recorded on "new mode" line, as the wish by the patch submitter to set the mode to the one recorded on the line. The reason the mode does not agree between the submitter and the receiver in the first place is because there is _another_ commit that only appears on one side but not the other since their histories diverged, and that commit changes the mode. The patch has "index" line but not "new mode" line because its change is about updating the contents without affecting the mode. The application of such a patch is an explicit wish by the submitter to only cherry-pick the commit that updates the contents without cherry-picking the commit that modifies the mode. Viewed this way, the current behaviour is problematic, even though the command does warn when the mode of the path being patched does not match this mode, and a careful user could detect this inconsistencies between the patch submitter and the patch receiver. This changes the semantics of the mode recorded on the "index" line; instead of interpreting it as the submitter's wish to set the mode to the recorded value, it merely informs what the mode submitter happened to have, and the presense of the "index" line is taken as submitter's wish to keep whatever the mode is on the receiving end. This is based on the patch originally done by Alexander Potashev with a minor fix; the tests are mine. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-02 11:55:37 +01:00
patch->old_mode = strtoul(ptr+1, NULL, 8);
return 0;
}
/*
* This is normal for a diff that doesn't change anything: we'll fall through
* into the next diff. Tell the parser to break out.
*/
static int gitdiff_unrecognized(const char *line, struct patch *patch)
{
return -1;
}
/*
* Skip p_value leading components from "line"; as we do not accept
* absolute paths, return NULL in that case.
*/
static const char *skip_tree_prefix(const char *line, int llen)
{
int nslash;
int i;
if (!p_value)
return (llen && line[0] == '/') ? NULL : line;
nslash = p_value;
for (i = 0; i < llen; i++) {
int ch = line[i];
if (ch == '/' && --nslash <= 0)
return (i == 0) ? NULL : &line[i + 1];
}
return NULL;
}
/*
* This is to extract the same name that appears on "diff --git"
* line. We do not find and return anything if it is a rename
* patch, and it is OK because we will find the name elsewhere.
* We need to reliably find name only when it is mode-change only,
* creation or deletion of an empty file. In any of these cases,
* both sides are the same name under a/ and b/ respectively.
*/
static char *git_header_name(const char *line, int llen)
{
const char *name;
const char *second = NULL;
size_t len, line_len;
line += strlen("diff --git ");
llen -= strlen("diff --git ");
if (*line == '"') {
const char *cp;
struct strbuf first = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf sp = STRBUF_INIT;
if (unquote_c_style(&first, line, &second))
goto free_and_fail1;
/* strip the a/b prefix including trailing slash */
cp = skip_tree_prefix(first.buf, first.len);
if (!cp)
goto free_and_fail1;
strbuf_remove(&first, 0, cp - first.buf);
/*
* second points at one past closing dq of name.
* find the second name.
*/
while ((second < line + llen) && isspace(*second))
second++;
if (line + llen <= second)
goto free_and_fail1;
if (*second == '"') {
if (unquote_c_style(&sp, second, NULL))
goto free_and_fail1;
cp = skip_tree_prefix(sp.buf, sp.len);
if (!cp)
goto free_and_fail1;
/* They must match, otherwise ignore */
if (strcmp(cp, first.buf))
goto free_and_fail1;
strbuf_release(&sp);
return strbuf_detach(&first, NULL);
}
/* unquoted second */
cp = skip_tree_prefix(second, line + llen - second);
if (!cp)
goto free_and_fail1;
if (line + llen - cp != first.len ||
memcmp(first.buf, cp, first.len))
goto free_and_fail1;
return strbuf_detach(&first, NULL);
free_and_fail1:
strbuf_release(&first);
strbuf_release(&sp);
return NULL;
}
/* unquoted first name */
name = skip_tree_prefix(line, llen);
if (!name)
return NULL;
/*
* since the first name is unquoted, a dq if exists must be
* the beginning of the second name.
*/
for (second = name; second < line + llen; second++) {
if (*second == '"') {
struct strbuf sp = STRBUF_INIT;
const char *np;
if (unquote_c_style(&sp, second, NULL))
goto free_and_fail2;
np = skip_tree_prefix(sp.buf, sp.len);
if (!np)
goto free_and_fail2;
len = sp.buf + sp.len - np;
if (len < second - name &&
!strncmp(np, name, len) &&
isspace(name[len])) {
/* Good */
strbuf_remove(&sp, 0, np - sp.buf);
return strbuf_detach(&sp, NULL);
}
free_and_fail2:
strbuf_release(&sp);
return NULL;
}
}
/*
* Accept a name only if it shows up twice, exactly the same
* form.
*/
second = strchr(name, '\n');
if (!second)
return NULL;
line_len = second - name;
for (len = 0 ; ; len++) {
switch (name[len]) {
default:
continue;
case '\n':
return NULL;
case '\t': case ' ':
/*
* Is this the separator between the preimage
* and the postimage pathname? Again, we are
* only interested in the case where there is
* no rename, as this is only to set def_name
* and a rename patch has the names elsewhere
* in an unambiguous form.
*/
if (!name[len + 1])
return NULL; /* no postimage name */
second = skip_tree_prefix(name + len + 1,
line_len - (len + 1));
if (!second)
return NULL;
/*
* Does len bytes starting at "name" and "second"
* (that are separated by one HT or SP we just
* found) exactly match?
*/
if (second[len] == '\n' && !strncmp(name, second, len))
return xmemdupz(name, len);
}
}
}
/* Verify that we recognize the lines following a git header */
static int parse_git_header(const char *line, int len, unsigned int size, struct patch *patch)
{
unsigned long offset;
/* A git diff has explicit new/delete information, so we don't guess */
patch->is_new = 0;
patch->is_delete = 0;
/*
* Some things may not have the old name in the
* rest of the headers anywhere (pure mode changes,
* or removing or adding empty files), so we get
* the default name from the header.
*/
patch->def_name = git_header_name(line, len);
if (patch->def_name && root) {
char *s = xmalloc(root_len + strlen(patch->def_name) + 1);
strcpy(s, root);
strcpy(s + root_len, patch->def_name);
free(patch->def_name);
patch->def_name = s;
}
line += len;
size -= len;
linenr++;
for (offset = len ; size > 0 ; offset += len, size -= len, line += len, linenr++) {
static const struct opentry {
const char *str;
int (*fn)(const char *, struct patch *);
} optable[] = {
{ "@@ -", gitdiff_hdrend },
{ "--- ", gitdiff_oldname },
{ "+++ ", gitdiff_newname },
{ "old mode ", gitdiff_oldmode },
{ "new mode ", gitdiff_newmode },
{ "deleted file mode ", gitdiff_delete },
{ "new file mode ", gitdiff_newfile },
{ "copy from ", gitdiff_copysrc },
{ "copy to ", gitdiff_copydst },
{ "rename old ", gitdiff_renamesrc },
{ "rename new ", gitdiff_renamedst },
{ "rename from ", gitdiff_renamesrc },
{ "rename to ", gitdiff_renamedst },
{ "similarity index ", gitdiff_similarity },
{ "dissimilarity index ", gitdiff_dissimilarity },
{ "index ", gitdiff_index },
{ "", gitdiff_unrecognized },
};
int i;
len = linelen(line, size);
if (!len || line[len-1] != '\n')
break;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(optable); i++) {
const struct opentry *p = optable + i;
int oplen = strlen(p->str);
if (len < oplen || memcmp(p->str, line, oplen))
continue;
if (p->fn(line + oplen, patch) < 0)
return offset;
break;
}
}
return offset;
}
static int parse_num(const char *line, unsigned long *p)
{
char *ptr;
if (!isdigit(*line))
return 0;
*p = strtoul(line, &ptr, 10);
return ptr - line;
}
static int parse_range(const char *line, int len, int offset, const char *expect,
unsigned long *p1, unsigned long *p2)
{
int digits, ex;
if (offset < 0 || offset >= len)
return -1;
line += offset;
len -= offset;
digits = parse_num(line, p1);
if (!digits)
return -1;
offset += digits;
line += digits;
len -= digits;
*p2 = 1;
if (*line == ',') {
digits = parse_num(line+1, p2);
if (!digits)
return -1;
offset += digits+1;
line += digits+1;
len -= digits+1;
}
ex = strlen(expect);
if (ex > len)
return -1;
if (memcmp(line, expect, ex))
return -1;
return offset + ex;
}
static void recount_diff(const char *line, int size, struct fragment *fragment)
{
int oldlines = 0, newlines = 0, ret = 0;
if (size < 1) {
warning("recount: ignore empty hunk");
return;
}
for (;;) {
int len = linelen(line, size);
size -= len;
line += len;
if (size < 1)
break;
switch (*line) {
case ' ': case '\n':
newlines++;
/* fall through */
case '-':
oldlines++;
continue;
case '+':
newlines++;
continue;
case '\\':
continue;
case '@':
ret = size < 3 || prefixcmp(line, "@@ ");
break;
case 'd':
ret = size < 5 || prefixcmp(line, "diff ");
break;
default:
ret = -1;
break;
}
if (ret) {
warning(_("recount: unexpected line: %.*s"),
(int)linelen(line, size), line);
return;
}
break;
}
fragment->oldlines = oldlines;
fragment->newlines = newlines;
}
/*
* Parse a unified diff fragment header of the
* form "@@ -a,b +c,d @@"
*/
static int parse_fragment_header(const char *line, int len, struct fragment *fragment)
{
int offset;
if (!len || line[len-1] != '\n')
return -1;
/* Figure out the number of lines in a fragment */
offset = parse_range(line, len, 4, " +", &fragment->oldpos, &fragment->oldlines);
offset = parse_range(line, len, offset, " @@", &fragment->newpos, &fragment->newlines);
return offset;
}
static int find_header(const char *line, unsigned long size, int *hdrsize, struct patch *patch)
{
unsigned long offset, len;
patch->is_toplevel_relative = 0;
patch->is_rename = patch->is_copy = 0;
patch->is_new = patch->is_delete = -1;
patch->old_mode = patch->new_mode = 0;
patch->old_name = patch->new_name = NULL;
for (offset = 0; size > 0; offset += len, size -= len, line += len, linenr++) {
unsigned long nextlen;
len = linelen(line, size);
if (!len)
break;
/* Testing this early allows us to take a few shortcuts.. */
if (len < 6)
continue;
/*
* Make sure we don't find any unconnected patch fragments.
* That's a sign that we didn't find a header, and that a
* patch has become corrupted/broken up.
*/
if (!memcmp("@@ -", line, 4)) {
struct fragment dummy;
if (parse_fragment_header(line, len, &dummy) < 0)
continue;
die(_("patch fragment without header at line %d: %.*s"),
linenr, (int)len-1, line);
}
if (size < len + 6)
break;
/*
* Git patch? It might not have a real patch, just a rename
* or mode change, so we handle that specially
*/
if (!memcmp("diff --git ", line, 11)) {
int git_hdr_len = parse_git_header(line, len, size, patch);
if (git_hdr_len <= len)
continue;
if (!patch->old_name && !patch->new_name) {
if (!patch->def_name)
die(Q_("git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
"%d leading pathname component (line %d)",
"git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
"%d leading pathname components (line %d)",
p_value),
p_value, linenr);
patch->old_name = xstrdup(patch->def_name);
patch->new_name = xstrdup(patch->def_name);
}
if (!patch->is_delete && !patch->new_name)
die("git diff header lacks filename information "
"(line %d)", linenr);
patch->is_toplevel_relative = 1;
*hdrsize = git_hdr_len;
return offset;
}
/* --- followed by +++ ? */
if (memcmp("--- ", line, 4) || memcmp("+++ ", line + len, 4))
continue;
/*
* We only accept unified patches, so we want it to
* at least have "@@ -a,b +c,d @@\n", which is 14 chars
* minimum ("@@ -0,0 +1 @@\n" is the shortest).
*/
nextlen = linelen(line + len, size - len);
if (size < nextlen + 14 || memcmp("@@ -", line + len + nextlen, 4))
continue;
/* Ok, we'll consider it a patch */
parse_traditional_patch(line, line+len, patch);
*hdrsize = len + nextlen;
linenr += 2;
return offset;
}
return -1;
}
static void record_ws_error(unsigned result, const char *line, int len, int linenr)
{
char *err;
if (!result)
return;
whitespace_error++;
if (squelch_whitespace_errors &&
squelch_whitespace_errors < whitespace_error)
return;
err = whitespace_error_string(result);
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s.\n%.*s\n",
patch_input_file, linenr, err, len, line);
free(err);
}
static void check_whitespace(const char *line, int len, unsigned ws_rule)
{
unsigned result = ws_check(line + 1, len - 1, ws_rule);
record_ws_error(result, line + 1, len - 2, linenr);
}
/*
* Parse a unified diff. Note that this really needs to parse each
* fragment separately, since the only way to know the difference
* between a "---" that is part of a patch, and a "---" that starts
* the next patch is to look at the line counts..
*/
static int parse_fragment(const char *line, unsigned long size,
struct patch *patch, struct fragment *fragment)
{
int added, deleted;
int len = linelen(line, size), offset;
unsigned long oldlines, newlines;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
unsigned long leading, trailing;
offset = parse_fragment_header(line, len, fragment);
if (offset < 0)
return -1;
if (offset > 0 && patch->recount)
recount_diff(line + offset, size - offset, fragment);
oldlines = fragment->oldlines;
newlines = fragment->newlines;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
leading = 0;
trailing = 0;
/* Parse the thing.. */
line += len;
size -= len;
linenr++;
added = deleted = 0;
for (offset = len;
0 < size;
offset += len, size -= len, line += len, linenr++) {
if (!oldlines && !newlines)
break;
len = linelen(line, size);
if (!len || line[len-1] != '\n')
return -1;
switch (*line) {
default:
return -1;
case '\n': /* newer GNU diff, an empty context line */
case ' ':
oldlines--;
newlines--;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
if (!deleted && !added)
leading++;
trailing++;
break;
case '-':
if (apply_in_reverse &&
ws_error_action != nowarn_ws_error)
check_whitespace(line, len, patch->ws_rule);
deleted++;
oldlines--;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
trailing = 0;
break;
case '+':
if (!apply_in_reverse &&
ws_error_action != nowarn_ws_error)
check_whitespace(line, len, patch->ws_rule);
added++;
newlines--;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
trailing = 0;
break;
/*
* We allow "\ No newline at end of file". Depending
* on locale settings when the patch was produced we
* don't know what this line looks like. The only
* thing we do know is that it begins with "\ ".
* Checking for 12 is just for sanity check -- any
* l10n of "\ No newline..." is at least that long.
*/
case '\\':
if (len < 12 || memcmp(line, "\\ ", 2))
return -1;
break;
}
}
if (oldlines || newlines)
return -1;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
fragment->leading = leading;
fragment->trailing = trailing;
/*
* If a fragment ends with an incomplete line, we failed to include
* it in the above loop because we hit oldlines == newlines == 0
* before seeing it.
*/
if (12 < size && !memcmp(line, "\\ ", 2))
offset += linelen(line, size);
patch->lines_added += added;
patch->lines_deleted += deleted;
if (0 < patch->is_new && oldlines)
return error(_("new file depends on old contents"));
if (0 < patch->is_delete && newlines)
return error(_("deleted file still has contents"));
return offset;
}
/*
* We have seen "diff --git a/... b/..." header (or a traditional patch
* header). Read hunks that belong to this patch into fragments and hang
* them to the given patch structure.
*
* The (fragment->patch, fragment->size) pair points into the memory given
* by the caller, not a copy, when we return.
*/
static int parse_single_patch(const char *line, unsigned long size, struct patch *patch)
{
unsigned long offset = 0;
unsigned long oldlines = 0, newlines = 0, context = 0;
struct fragment **fragp = &patch->fragments;
while (size > 4 && !memcmp(line, "@@ -", 4)) {
struct fragment *fragment;
int len;
fragment = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*fragment));
fragment->linenr = linenr;
len = parse_fragment(line, size, patch, fragment);
if (len <= 0)
die(_("corrupt patch at line %d"), linenr);
fragment->patch = line;
fragment->size = len;
oldlines += fragment->oldlines;
newlines += fragment->newlines;
context += fragment->leading + fragment->trailing;
*fragp = fragment;
fragp = &fragment->next;
offset += len;
line += len;
size -= len;
}
/*
* If something was removed (i.e. we have old-lines) it cannot
* be creation, and if something was added it cannot be
* deletion. However, the reverse is not true; --unified=0
* patches that only add are not necessarily creation even
* though they do not have any old lines, and ones that only
* delete are not necessarily deletion.
*
* Unfortunately, a real creation/deletion patch do _not_ have
* any context line by definition, so we cannot safely tell it
* apart with --unified=0 insanity. At least if the patch has
* more than one hunk it is not creation or deletion.
*/
if (patch->is_new < 0 &&
(oldlines || (patch->fragments && patch->fragments->next)))
patch->is_new = 0;
if (patch->is_delete < 0 &&
(newlines || (patch->fragments && patch->fragments->next)))
patch->is_delete = 0;
if (0 < patch->is_new && oldlines)
die(_("new file %s depends on old contents"), patch->new_name);
if (0 < patch->is_delete && newlines)
die(_("deleted file %s still has contents"), patch->old_name);
if (!patch->is_delete && !newlines && context)
fprintf_ln(stderr,
_("** warning: "
"file %s becomes empty but is not deleted"),
patch->new_name);
return offset;
}
static inline int metadata_changes(struct patch *patch)
{
return patch->is_rename > 0 ||
patch->is_copy > 0 ||
patch->is_new > 0 ||
patch->is_delete ||
(patch->old_mode && patch->new_mode &&
patch->old_mode != patch->new_mode);
}
static char *inflate_it(const void *data, unsigned long size,
unsigned long inflated_size)
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
{
2011-06-10 20:52:15 +02:00
git_zstream stream;
void *out;
int st;
memset(&stream, 0, sizeof(stream));
stream.next_in = (unsigned char *)data;
stream.avail_in = size;
stream.next_out = out = xmalloc(inflated_size);
stream.avail_out = inflated_size;
git_inflate_init(&stream);
st = git_inflate(&stream, Z_FINISH);
git_inflate_end(&stream);
if ((st != Z_STREAM_END) || stream.total_out != inflated_size) {
free(out);
return NULL;
}
return out;
}
/*
* Read a binary hunk and return a new fragment; fragment->patch
* points at an allocated memory that the caller must free, so
* it is marked as "->free_patch = 1".
*/
static struct fragment *parse_binary_hunk(char **buf_p,
unsigned long *sz_p,
int *status_p,
int *used_p)
{
/*
* Expect a line that begins with binary patch method ("literal"
* or "delta"), followed by the length of data before deflating.
* a sequence of 'length-byte' followed by base-85 encoded data
* should follow, terminated by a newline.
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
*
* Each 5-byte sequence of base-85 encodes up to 4 bytes,
* and we would limit the patch line to 66 characters,
* so one line can fit up to 13 groups that would decode
* to 52 bytes max. The length byte 'A'-'Z' corresponds
* to 1-26 bytes, and 'a'-'z' corresponds to 27-52 bytes.
*/
int llen, used;
unsigned long size = *sz_p;
char *buffer = *buf_p;
int patch_method;
unsigned long origlen;
char *data = NULL;
int hunk_size = 0;
struct fragment *frag;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
llen = linelen(buffer, size);
used = llen;
*status_p = 0;
if (!prefixcmp(buffer, "delta ")) {
patch_method = BINARY_DELTA_DEFLATED;
origlen = strtoul(buffer + 6, NULL, 10);
}
else if (!prefixcmp(buffer, "literal ")) {
patch_method = BINARY_LITERAL_DEFLATED;
origlen = strtoul(buffer + 8, NULL, 10);
}
else
return NULL;
linenr++;
buffer += llen;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
while (1) {
int byte_length, max_byte_length, newsize;
llen = linelen(buffer, size);
used += llen;
linenr++;
if (llen == 1) {
/* consume the blank line */
buffer++;
size--;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
break;
}
/*
* Minimum line is "A00000\n" which is 7-byte long,
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
* and the line length must be multiple of 5 plus 2.
*/
if ((llen < 7) || (llen-2) % 5)
goto corrupt;
max_byte_length = (llen - 2) / 5 * 4;
byte_length = *buffer;
if ('A' <= byte_length && byte_length <= 'Z')
byte_length = byte_length - 'A' + 1;
else if ('a' <= byte_length && byte_length <= 'z')
byte_length = byte_length - 'a' + 27;
else
goto corrupt;
/* if the input length was not multiple of 4, we would
* have filler at the end but the filler should never
* exceed 3 bytes
*/
if (max_byte_length < byte_length ||
byte_length <= max_byte_length - 4)
goto corrupt;
newsize = hunk_size + byte_length;
data = xrealloc(data, newsize);
if (decode_85(data + hunk_size, buffer + 1, byte_length))
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
goto corrupt;
hunk_size = newsize;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
buffer += llen;
size -= llen;
}
frag = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*frag));
frag->patch = inflate_it(data, hunk_size, origlen);
frag->free_patch = 1;
if (!frag->patch)
goto corrupt;
free(data);
frag->size = origlen;
*buf_p = buffer;
*sz_p = size;
*used_p = used;
frag->binary_patch_method = patch_method;
return frag;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
corrupt:
free(data);
*status_p = -1;
error(_("corrupt binary patch at line %d: %.*s"),
linenr-1, llen-1, buffer);
return NULL;
}
static int parse_binary(char *buffer, unsigned long size, struct patch *patch)
{
/*
* We have read "GIT binary patch\n"; what follows is a line
* that says the patch method (currently, either "literal" or
* "delta") and the length of data before deflating; a
* sequence of 'length-byte' followed by base-85 encoded data
* follows.
*
* When a binary patch is reversible, there is another binary
* hunk in the same format, starting with patch method (either
* "literal" or "delta") with the length of data, and a sequence
* of length-byte + base-85 encoded data, terminated with another
* empty line. This data, when applied to the postimage, produces
* the preimage.
*/
struct fragment *forward;
struct fragment *reverse;
int status;
int used, used_1;
forward = parse_binary_hunk(&buffer, &size, &status, &used);
if (!forward && !status)
/* there has to be one hunk (forward hunk) */
return error(_("unrecognized binary patch at line %d"), linenr-1);
if (status)
/* otherwise we already gave an error message */
return status;
reverse = parse_binary_hunk(&buffer, &size, &status, &used_1);
if (reverse)
used += used_1;
else if (status) {
/*
* Not having reverse hunk is not an error, but having
* a corrupt reverse hunk is.
*/
free((void*) forward->patch);
free(forward);
return status;
}
forward->next = reverse;
patch->fragments = forward;
patch->is_binary = 1;
return used;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
}
/*
* Read the patch text in "buffer" taht extends for "size" bytes; stop
* reading after seeing a single patch (i.e. changes to a single file).
* Create fragments (i.e. patch hunks) and hang them to the given patch.
* Return the number of bytes consumed, so that the caller can call us
* again for the next patch.
*/
static int parse_chunk(char *buffer, unsigned long size, struct patch *patch)
{
int hdrsize, patchsize;
int offset = find_header(buffer, size, &hdrsize, patch);
if (offset < 0)
return offset;
patch->ws_rule = whitespace_rule(patch->new_name
? patch->new_name
: patch->old_name);
patchsize = parse_single_patch(buffer + offset + hdrsize,
size - offset - hdrsize, patch);
if (!patchsize) {
static const char *binhdr[] = {
"Binary files ",
"Files ",
NULL,
};
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
static const char git_binary[] = "GIT binary patch\n";
int i;
int hd = hdrsize + offset;
unsigned long llen = linelen(buffer + hd, size - hd);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (llen == sizeof(git_binary) - 1 &&
!memcmp(git_binary, buffer + hd, llen)) {
int used;
linenr++;
used = parse_binary(buffer + hd + llen,
size - hd - llen, patch);
if (used)
patchsize = used + llen;
else
patchsize = 0;
}
else if (!memcmp(" differ\n", buffer + hd + llen - 8, 8)) {
for (i = 0; binhdr[i]; i++) {
int len = strlen(binhdr[i]);
if (len < size - hd &&
!memcmp(binhdr[i], buffer + hd, len)) {
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
linenr++;
patch->is_binary = 1;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
patchsize = llen;
break;
}
}
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
}
/* Empty patch cannot be applied if it is a text patch
* without metadata change. A binary patch appears
* empty to us here.
*/
if ((apply || check) &&
(!patch->is_binary && !metadata_changes(patch)))
die(_("patch with only garbage at line %d"), linenr);
}
return offset + hdrsize + patchsize;
}
#define swap(a,b) myswap((a),(b),sizeof(a))
#define myswap(a, b, size) do { \
unsigned char mytmp[size]; \
memcpy(mytmp, &a, size); \
memcpy(&a, &b, size); \
memcpy(&b, mytmp, size); \
} while (0)
static void reverse_patches(struct patch *p)
{
for (; p; p = p->next) {
struct fragment *frag = p->fragments;
swap(p->new_name, p->old_name);
swap(p->new_mode, p->old_mode);
swap(p->is_new, p->is_delete);
swap(p->lines_added, p->lines_deleted);
swap(p->old_sha1_prefix, p->new_sha1_prefix);
for (; frag; frag = frag->next) {
swap(frag->newpos, frag->oldpos);
swap(frag->newlines, frag->oldlines);
}
}
}
static const char pluses[] =
"++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++";
static const char minuses[]=
"----------------------------------------------------------------------";
static void show_stats(struct patch *patch)
{
struct strbuf qname = STRBUF_INIT;
char *cp = patch->new_name ? patch->new_name : patch->old_name;
int max, add, del;
quote_c_style(cp, &qname, NULL, 0);
/*
* "scale" the filename
*/
max = max_len;
if (max > 50)
max = 50;
if (qname.len > max) {
cp = strchr(qname.buf + qname.len + 3 - max, '/');
if (!cp)
cp = qname.buf + qname.len + 3 - max;
strbuf_splice(&qname, 0, cp - qname.buf, "...", 3);
}
if (patch->is_binary) {
printf(" %-*s | Bin\n", max, qname.buf);
strbuf_release(&qname);
return;
}
printf(" %-*s |", max, qname.buf);
strbuf_release(&qname);
/*
* scale the add/delete
*/
max = max + max_change > 70 ? 70 - max : max_change;
add = patch->lines_added;
del = patch->lines_deleted;
if (max_change > 0) {
int total = ((add + del) * max + max_change / 2) / max_change;
add = (add * max + max_change / 2) / max_change;
del = total - add;
}
printf("%5d %.*s%.*s\n", patch->lines_added + patch->lines_deleted,
add, pluses, del, minuses);
}
static int read_old_data(struct stat *st, const char *path, struct strbuf *buf)
{
switch (st->st_mode & S_IFMT) {
case S_IFLNK:
if (strbuf_readlink(buf, path, st->st_size) < 0)
return error(_("unable to read symlink %s"), path);
return 0;
case S_IFREG:
if (strbuf_read_file(buf, path, st->st_size) != st->st_size)
return error(_("unable to open or read %s"), path);
safecrlf: Add mechanism to warn about irreversible crlf conversions CRLF conversion bears a slight chance of corrupting data. autocrlf=true will convert CRLF to LF during commit and LF to CRLF during checkout. A file that contains a mixture of LF and CRLF before the commit cannot be recreated by git. For text files this is the right thing to do: it corrects line endings such that we have only LF line endings in the repository. But for binary files that are accidentally classified as text the conversion can corrupt data. If you recognize such corruption early you can easily fix it by setting the conversion type explicitly in .gitattributes. Right after committing you still have the original file in your work tree and this file is not yet corrupted. You can explicitly tell git that this file is binary and git will handle the file appropriately. Unfortunately, the desired effect of cleaning up text files with mixed line endings and the undesired effect of corrupting binary files cannot be distinguished. In both cases CRLFs are removed in an irreversible way. For text files this is the right thing to do because CRLFs are line endings, while for binary files converting CRLFs corrupts data. This patch adds a mechanism that can either warn the user about an irreversible conversion or can even refuse to convert. The mechanism is controlled by the variable core.safecrlf, with the following values: - false: disable safecrlf mechanism - warn: warn about irreversible conversions - true: refuse irreversible conversions The default is to warn. Users are only affected by this default if core.autocrlf is set. But the current default of git is to leave core.autocrlf unset, so users will not see warnings unless they deliberately chose to activate the autocrlf mechanism. The safecrlf mechanism's details depend on the git command. The general principles when safecrlf is active (not false) are: - we warn/error out if files in the work tree can modified in an irreversible way without giving the user a chance to backup the original file. - for read-only operations that do not modify files in the work tree we do not not print annoying warnings. There are exceptions. Even though... - "git add" itself does not touch the files in the work tree, the next checkout would, so the safety triggers; - "git apply" to update a text file with a patch does touch the files in the work tree, but the operation is about text files and CRLF conversion is about fixing the line ending inconsistencies, so the safety does not trigger; - "git diff" itself does not touch the files in the work tree, it is often run to inspect the changes you intend to next "git add". To catch potential problems early, safety triggers. The concept of a safety check was originally proposed in a similar way by Linus Torvalds. Thanks to Dimitry Potapov for insisting on getting the naked LF/autocrlf=true case right. Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
2008-02-06 12:25:58 +01:00
convert_to_git(path, buf->buf, buf->len, buf, 0);
return 0;
default:
return -1;
}
}
/*
* Update the preimage, and the common lines in postimage,
* from buffer buf of length len. If postlen is 0 the postimage
* is updated in place, otherwise it's updated on a new buffer
* of length postlen
*/
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
static void update_pre_post_images(struct image *preimage,
struct image *postimage,
char *buf,
size_t len, size_t postlen)
{
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
int i, ctx;
char *new, *old, *fixed;
struct image fixed_preimage;
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/*
* Update the preimage with whitespace fixes. Note that we
* are not losing preimage->buf -- apply_one_fragment() will
* free "oldlines".
*/
prepare_image(&fixed_preimage, buf, len, 1);
assert(fixed_preimage.nr == preimage->nr);
for (i = 0; i < preimage->nr; i++)
fixed_preimage.line[i].flag = preimage->line[i].flag;
free(preimage->line_allocated);
*preimage = fixed_preimage;
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/*
* Adjust the common context lines in postimage. This can be
* done in-place when we are just doing whitespace fixing,
* which does not make the string grow, but needs a new buffer
* when ignoring whitespace causes the update, since in this case
* we could have e.g. tabs converted to multiple spaces.
* We trust the caller to tell us if the update can be done
* in place (postlen==0) or not.
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
*/
old = postimage->buf;
if (postlen)
new = postimage->buf = xmalloc(postlen);
else
new = old;
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
fixed = preimage->buf;
for (i = ctx = 0; i < postimage->nr; i++) {
size_t len = postimage->line[i].len;
if (!(postimage->line[i].flag & LINE_COMMON)) {
/* an added line -- no counterparts in preimage */
memmove(new, old, len);
old += len;
new += len;
continue;
}
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/* a common context -- skip it in the original postimage */
old += len;
/* and find the corresponding one in the fixed preimage */
while (ctx < preimage->nr &&
!(preimage->line[ctx].flag & LINE_COMMON)) {
fixed += preimage->line[ctx].len;
ctx++;
}
if (preimage->nr <= ctx)
die(_("oops"));
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/* and copy it in, while fixing the line length */
len = preimage->line[ctx].len;
memcpy(new, fixed, len);
new += len;
fixed += len;
postimage->line[i].len = len;
ctx++;
}
/* Fix the length of the whole thing */
postimage->len = new - postimage->buf;
}
static int match_fragment(struct image *img,
struct image *preimage,
struct image *postimage,
unsigned long try,
int try_lno,
unsigned ws_rule,
int match_beginning, int match_end)
{
int i;
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
char *fixed_buf, *buf, *orig, *target;
struct strbuf fixed;
size_t fixed_len;
int preimage_limit;
if (preimage->nr + try_lno <= img->nr) {
/*
* The hunk falls within the boundaries of img.
*/
preimage_limit = preimage->nr;
if (match_end && (preimage->nr + try_lno != img->nr))
return 0;
} else if (ws_error_action == correct_ws_error &&
(ws_rule & WS_BLANK_AT_EOF)) {
/*
* This hunk extends beyond the end of img, and we are
* removing blank lines at the end of the file. This
* many lines from the beginning of the preimage must
* match with img, and the remainder of the preimage
* must be blank.
*/
preimage_limit = img->nr - try_lno;
} else {
/*
* The hunk extends beyond the end of the img and
* we are not removing blanks at the end, so we
* should reject the hunk at this position.
*/
return 0;
}
if (match_beginning && try_lno)
return 0;
/* Quick hash check */
for (i = 0; i < preimage_limit; i++)
apply: do not patch lines that were already patched When looking for a place to apply a hunk, we used to check lines that match the preimage of it, starting from the line that the patch wants to apply the hunk at, looking forward and backward with increasing offsets until we find a match. Colin Guthrie found an interesting case where this misapplied a patch that wanted to touch a preimage that consists of } } return 0; } which is a rather unfortunately common pattern. The target version of the file originally had only one such location, but the hunk immediately before that created another instance of such block of lines, and find_pos() happily reported that the preimage of the hunk matched what it wanted to modify. Oops. By marking the lines application of earlier hunks touched and preventing match_fragment() from considering them as a match with preimage of other hunks, we can reduce such an accident. I also considered to teach apply_one_fragment() to take the offset we have found while applying the previous hunk into account when looking for a match with find_pos(), but dismissed that approach, because it would sometimes work better but sometimes worse, depending on the difference between the version the patch was created against and the version the patch is being applied. This does _not_ prevent misapplication of patches to a file that has many similar looking blocks of lines and a preimage cannot identify which one of them should be applied. For that, we would need to scan beyond the first match in find_pos(), and issue a warning (or error out). That will be a separate topic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-04 21:25:34 +01:00
if ((img->line[try_lno + i].flag & LINE_PATCHED) ||
(preimage->line[i].hash != img->line[try_lno + i].hash))
return 0;
if (preimage_limit == preimage->nr) {
/*
* Do we have an exact match? If we were told to match
* at the end, size must be exactly at try+fragsize,
* otherwise try+fragsize must be still within the preimage,
* and either case, the old piece should match the preimage
* exactly.
*/
if ((match_end
? (try + preimage->len == img->len)
: (try + preimage->len <= img->len)) &&
!memcmp(img->buf + try, preimage->buf, preimage->len))
return 1;
} else {
/*
* The preimage extends beyond the end of img, so
* there cannot be an exact match.
*
* There must be one non-blank context line that match
* a line before the end of img.
*/
char *buf_end;
buf = preimage->buf;
buf_end = buf;
for (i = 0; i < preimage_limit; i++)
buf_end += preimage->line[i].len;
for ( ; buf < buf_end; buf++)
if (!isspace(*buf))
break;
if (buf == buf_end)
return 0;
}
/*
* No exact match. If we are ignoring whitespace, run a line-by-line
* fuzzy matching. We collect all the line length information because
* we need it to adjust whitespace if we match.
*/
if (ws_ignore_action == ignore_ws_change) {
size_t imgoff = 0;
size_t preoff = 0;
size_t postlen = postimage->len;
size_t extra_chars;
char *preimage_eof;
char *preimage_end;
for (i = 0; i < preimage_limit; i++) {
size_t prelen = preimage->line[i].len;
size_t imglen = img->line[try_lno+i].len;
if (!fuzzy_matchlines(img->buf + try + imgoff, imglen,
preimage->buf + preoff, prelen))
return 0;
if (preimage->line[i].flag & LINE_COMMON)
postlen += imglen - prelen;
imgoff += imglen;
preoff += prelen;
}
/*
* Ok, the preimage matches with whitespace fuzz.
*
* imgoff now holds the true length of the target that
* matches the preimage before the end of the file.
*
* Count the number of characters in the preimage that fall
* beyond the end of the file and make sure that all of them
* are whitespace characters. (This can only happen if
* we are removing blank lines at the end of the file.)
*/
buf = preimage_eof = preimage->buf + preoff;
for ( ; i < preimage->nr; i++)
preoff += preimage->line[i].len;
preimage_end = preimage->buf + preoff;
for ( ; buf < preimage_end; buf++)
if (!isspace(*buf))
return 0;
/*
* Update the preimage and the common postimage context
* lines to use the same whitespace as the target.
* If whitespace is missing in the target (i.e.
* if the preimage extends beyond the end of the file),
* use the whitespace from the preimage.
*/
extra_chars = preimage_end - preimage_eof;
strbuf_init(&fixed, imgoff + extra_chars);
strbuf_add(&fixed, img->buf + try, imgoff);
strbuf_add(&fixed, preimage_eof, extra_chars);
fixed_buf = strbuf_detach(&fixed, &fixed_len);
update_pre_post_images(preimage, postimage,
fixed_buf, fixed_len, postlen);
return 1;
}
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
if (ws_error_action != correct_ws_error)
return 0;
/*
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
* The hunk does not apply byte-by-byte, but the hash says
* it might with whitespace fuzz. We haven't been asked to
* ignore whitespace, we were asked to correct whitespace
* errors, so let's try matching after whitespace correction.
*
* The preimage may extend beyond the end of the file,
* but in this loop we will only handle the part of the
* preimage that falls within the file.
*/
strbuf_init(&fixed, preimage->len + 1);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
orig = preimage->buf;
target = img->buf + try;
for (i = 0; i < preimage_limit; i++) {
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
size_t oldlen = preimage->line[i].len;
size_t tgtlen = img->line[try_lno + i].len;
size_t fixstart = fixed.len;
struct strbuf tgtfix;
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
int match;
/* Try fixing the line in the preimage */
ws_fix_copy(&fixed, orig, oldlen, ws_rule, NULL);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/* Try fixing the line in the target */
strbuf_init(&tgtfix, tgtlen);
ws_fix_copy(&tgtfix, target, tgtlen, ws_rule, NULL);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/*
* If they match, either the preimage was based on
* a version before our tree fixed whitespace breakage,
* or we are lacking a whitespace-fix patch the tree
* the preimage was based on already had (i.e. target
* has whitespace breakage, the preimage doesn't).
* In either case, we are fixing the whitespace breakages
* so we might as well take the fix together with their
* real change.
*/
match = (tgtfix.len == fixed.len - fixstart &&
!memcmp(tgtfix.buf, fixed.buf + fixstart,
fixed.len - fixstart));
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
strbuf_release(&tgtfix);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
if (!match)
goto unmatch_exit;
orig += oldlen;
target += tgtlen;
}
/*
* Now handle the lines in the preimage that falls beyond the
* end of the file (if any). They will only match if they are
* empty or only contain whitespace (if WS_BLANK_AT_EOL is
* false).
*/
for ( ; i < preimage->nr; i++) {
size_t fixstart = fixed.len; /* start of the fixed preimage */
size_t oldlen = preimage->line[i].len;
int j;
/* Try fixing the line in the preimage */
ws_fix_copy(&fixed, orig, oldlen, ws_rule, NULL);
for (j = fixstart; j < fixed.len; j++)
if (!isspace(fixed.buf[j]))
goto unmatch_exit;
orig += oldlen;
}
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
/*
* Yes, the preimage is based on an older version that still
* has whitespace breakages unfixed, and fixing them makes the
* hunk match. Update the context lines in the postimage.
*/
fixed_buf = strbuf_detach(&fixed, &fixed_len);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
update_pre_post_images(preimage, postimage,
fixed_buf, fixed_len, 0);
git-apply --whitespace=fix: fix whitespace fuzz introduced by previous run When you have more than one patch series, an earlier one of which tries to introduce whitespace breakages and a later one of which has such a new line in its context, "git-apply --whitespace=fix" will apply and fix the whitespace breakages in the earlier one, making the resulting file not to match the context of the later patch. A short demonstration is in the new test, t4125. For example, suppose the first patch is: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ Hello world.$ -How Are you$ -Today?$ +How are you $ +today? $ to fix broken case in the string, but it introduces unwanted trailing whitespaces to the result (pretend you are looking at "cat -e" output of the patch --- '$' signs are not in the patch but are shown to make the EOL stand out). And the second patch is to change the wording of the greeting further: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings $ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody. $ How are you $ -today? $ +these days? $ If you apply the first one with --whitespace=fix, you will get this as the result: Hello world.$ How are you$ today?$ and this does not match the preimage of the second patch, which demands extra whitespace after "How are you" and "today?". This series is about teaching "git apply --whitespace=fix" to cope with this situation better. If the patch does not apply, it rewrites the second patch like this and retries: diff a/hello.txt b/hello.txt --- a/hello.txt +++ b/hello.txt @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ Greetings$ -Hello world.$ +Hello, everybody.$ How are you$ -today?$ +these days?$ This is done by rewriting the preimage lines in the hunk (i.e. the lines that begin with ' ' or '-'), using the same whitespace fixing rules as it is using to apply the patches, so that it can notice what it did to the previous ones in the series. A careful reader may notice that the first patch in the example did not touch the "Greetings" line, so the trailing whitespace that is in the original preimage of the second patch is not from the series. Is rewriting this context line a problem? If you think about it, you will realize that the reason for the difference is because the submitter's tree was based on an earlier version of the file that had whitespaces wrong on that "Greetings" line, and the change that introduced the "Greetings" line was added independently of this two-patch series to our tree already with an earlier "git apply --whitespace=fix". So it may appear this logic is rewriting too much, it is not so. It is just rewriting what we would have rewritten in the past. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 00:24:34 +01:00
return 1;
unmatch_exit:
strbuf_release(&fixed);
return 0;
}
static int find_pos(struct image *img,
struct image *preimage,
struct image *postimage,
int line,
unsigned ws_rule,
int match_beginning, int match_end)
{
int i;
unsigned long backwards, forwards, try;
int backwards_lno, forwards_lno, try_lno;
/*
apply: Remove the quick rejection test In the next commit, we will make it possible for blank context lines to match beyond the end of the file. That means that a hunk with a preimage that has more lines than present in the file may be possible to successfully apply. Therefore, we must remove the quick rejection test in find_pos(). find_pos() will already work correctly without the quick rejection test, but that might not be obvious. Therefore, comment the test for handling out-of-range line numbers in find_pos() and cast the "line" variable to the same (unsigned) type as img->nr. What are performance implications of removing the quick rejection test? It can only help "git apply" to reject a patch faster. For example, if I have a file with one million lines and a patch that removes slightly more than 50 percent of the lines and try to apply that patch twice, the second attempt will fail slightly faster with the test than without (based on actual measurements). However, there is the pathological case of a patch with many more context lines than the default three, and applying that patch using "git apply -C1". Without the rejection test, the running time will be roughly proportional to the number of context lines times the size of the file. That could be handled by writing a more complicated rejection test (it would have to count the number of blanks at the end of the preimage), but I don't find that worth doing until there is a real-world use case that would benfit from it. It would be possible to keep the quick rejection test if --whitespace=fix is not given, but I don't like that from a testing point of view. Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-06 15:30:29 +01:00
* If match_beginning or match_end is specified, there is no
* point starting from a wrong line that will never match and
* wander around and wait for a match at the specified end.
*/
if (match_beginning)
line = 0;
else if (match_end)
line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
apply: Remove the quick rejection test In the next commit, we will make it possible for blank context lines to match beyond the end of the file. That means that a hunk with a preimage that has more lines than present in the file may be possible to successfully apply. Therefore, we must remove the quick rejection test in find_pos(). find_pos() will already work correctly without the quick rejection test, but that might not be obvious. Therefore, comment the test for handling out-of-range line numbers in find_pos() and cast the "line" variable to the same (unsigned) type as img->nr. What are performance implications of removing the quick rejection test? It can only help "git apply" to reject a patch faster. For example, if I have a file with one million lines and a patch that removes slightly more than 50 percent of the lines and try to apply that patch twice, the second attempt will fail slightly faster with the test than without (based on actual measurements). However, there is the pathological case of a patch with many more context lines than the default three, and applying that patch using "git apply -C1". Without the rejection test, the running time will be roughly proportional to the number of context lines times the size of the file. That could be handled by writing a more complicated rejection test (it would have to count the number of blanks at the end of the preimage), but I don't find that worth doing until there is a real-world use case that would benfit from it. It would be possible to keep the quick rejection test if --whitespace=fix is not given, but I don't like that from a testing point of view. Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-06 15:30:29 +01:00
/*
* Because the comparison is unsigned, the following test
* will also take care of a negative line number that can
* result when match_end and preimage is larger than the target.
*/
if ((size_t) line > img->nr)
line = img->nr;
try = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
try += img->line[i].len;
/*
* There's probably some smart way to do this, but I'll leave
* that to the smart and beautiful people. I'm simple and stupid.
*/
backwards = try;
backwards_lno = line;
forwards = try;
forwards_lno = line;
try_lno = line;
for (i = 0; ; i++) {
if (match_fragment(img, preimage, postimage,
try, try_lno, ws_rule,
match_beginning, match_end))
return try_lno;
again:
if (backwards_lno == 0 && forwards_lno == img->nr)
break;
if (i & 1) {
if (backwards_lno == 0) {
i++;
goto again;
}
backwards_lno--;
backwards -= img->line[backwards_lno].len;
try = backwards;
try_lno = backwards_lno;
} else {
if (forwards_lno == img->nr) {
i++;
goto again;
}
forwards += img->line[forwards_lno].len;
forwards_lno++;
try = forwards;
try_lno = forwards_lno;
}
}
return -1;
}
static void remove_first_line(struct image *img)
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
{
img->buf += img->line[0].len;
img->len -= img->line[0].len;
img->line++;
img->nr--;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
}
static void remove_last_line(struct image *img)
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
{
img->len -= img->line[--img->nr].len;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
}
/*
* The change from "preimage" and "postimage" has been found to
* apply at applied_pos (counts in line numbers) in "img".
* Update "img" to remove "preimage" and replace it with "postimage".
*/
static void update_image(struct image *img,
int applied_pos,
struct image *preimage,
struct image *postimage)
{
/*
* remove the copy of preimage at offset in img
* and replace it with postimage
*/
int i, nr;
size_t remove_count, insert_count, applied_at = 0;
char *result;
int preimage_limit;
/*
* If we are removing blank lines at the end of img,
* the preimage may extend beyond the end.
* If that is the case, we must be careful only to
* remove the part of the preimage that falls within
* the boundaries of img. Initialize preimage_limit
* to the number of lines in the preimage that falls
* within the boundaries.
*/
preimage_limit = preimage->nr;
if (preimage_limit > img->nr - applied_pos)
preimage_limit = img->nr - applied_pos;
for (i = 0; i < applied_pos; i++)
applied_at += img->line[i].len;
remove_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < preimage_limit; i++)
remove_count += img->line[applied_pos + i].len;
insert_count = postimage->len;
/* Adjust the contents */
result = xmalloc(img->len + insert_count - remove_count + 1);
memcpy(result, img->buf, applied_at);
memcpy(result + applied_at, postimage->buf, postimage->len);
memcpy(result + applied_at + postimage->len,
img->buf + (applied_at + remove_count),
img->len - (applied_at + remove_count));
free(img->buf);
img->buf = result;
img->len += insert_count - remove_count;
result[img->len] = '\0';
/* Adjust the line table */
nr = img->nr + postimage->nr - preimage_limit;
if (preimage_limit < postimage->nr) {
/*
* NOTE: this knows that we never call remove_first_line()
* on anything other than pre/post image.
*/
img->line = xrealloc(img->line, nr * sizeof(*img->line));
img->line_allocated = img->line;
}
if (preimage_limit != postimage->nr)
memmove(img->line + applied_pos + postimage->nr,
img->line + applied_pos + preimage_limit,
(img->nr - (applied_pos + preimage_limit)) *
sizeof(*img->line));
memcpy(img->line + applied_pos,
postimage->line,
postimage->nr * sizeof(*img->line));
if (!allow_overlap)
for (i = 0; i < postimage->nr; i++)
img->line[applied_pos + i].flag |= LINE_PATCHED;
img->nr = nr;
}
/*
* Use the patch-hunk text in "frag" to prepare two images (preimage and
* postimage) for the hunk. Find lines that match "preimage" in "img" and
* replace the part of "img" with "postimage" text.
*/
static int apply_one_fragment(struct image *img, struct fragment *frag,
int inaccurate_eof, unsigned ws_rule,
int nth_fragment)
{
int match_beginning, match_end;
const char *patch = frag->patch;
int size = frag->size;
char *old, *oldlines;
struct strbuf newlines;
int new_blank_lines_at_end = 0;
int found_new_blank_lines_at_end = 0;
int hunk_linenr = frag->linenr;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
unsigned long leading, trailing;
int pos, applied_pos;
struct image preimage;
struct image postimage;
memset(&preimage, 0, sizeof(preimage));
memset(&postimage, 0, sizeof(postimage));
oldlines = xmalloc(size);
strbuf_init(&newlines, size);
old = oldlines;
while (size > 0) {
char first;
int len = linelen(patch, size);
int plen;
int added_blank_line = 0;
int is_blank_context = 0;
size_t start;
if (!len)
break;
/*
* "plen" is how much of the line we should use for
* the actual patch data. Normally we just remove the
* first character on the line, but if the line is
* followed by "\ No newline", then we also remove the
* last one (which is the newline, of course).
*/
plen = len - 1;
if (len < size && patch[len] == '\\')
plen--;
first = *patch;
if (apply_in_reverse) {
if (first == '-')
first = '+';
else if (first == '+')
first = '-';
}
switch (first) {
case '\n':
/* Newer GNU diff, empty context line */
if (plen < 0)
/* ... followed by '\No newline'; nothing */
break;
*old++ = '\n';
strbuf_addch(&newlines, '\n');
add_line_info(&preimage, "\n", 1, LINE_COMMON);
add_line_info(&postimage, "\n", 1, LINE_COMMON);
is_blank_context = 1;
break;
case ' ':
if (plen && (ws_rule & WS_BLANK_AT_EOF) &&
ws_blank_line(patch + 1, plen, ws_rule))
is_blank_context = 1;
case '-':
memcpy(old, patch + 1, plen);
add_line_info(&preimage, old, plen,
(first == ' ' ? LINE_COMMON : 0));
old += plen;
if (first == '-')
break;
/* Fall-through for ' ' */
case '+':
/* --no-add does not add new lines */
if (first == '+' && no_add)
break;
start = newlines.len;
if (first != '+' ||
!whitespace_error ||
ws_error_action != correct_ws_error) {
strbuf_add(&newlines, patch + 1, plen);
}
else {
ws_fix_copy(&newlines, patch + 1, plen, ws_rule, &applied_after_fixing_ws);
}
add_line_info(&postimage, newlines.buf + start, newlines.len - start,
(first == '+' ? 0 : LINE_COMMON));
if (first == '+' &&
(ws_rule & WS_BLANK_AT_EOF) &&
ws_blank_line(patch + 1, plen, ws_rule))
added_blank_line = 1;
break;
case '@': case '\\':
/* Ignore it, we already handled it */
break;
default:
if (apply_verbosely)
error(_("invalid start of line: '%c'"), first);
return -1;
}
if (added_blank_line) {
if (!new_blank_lines_at_end)
found_new_blank_lines_at_end = hunk_linenr;
new_blank_lines_at_end++;
}
else if (is_blank_context)
;
else
new_blank_lines_at_end = 0;
patch += len;
size -= len;
hunk_linenr++;
}
if (inaccurate_eof &&
old > oldlines && old[-1] == '\n' &&
newlines.len > 0 && newlines.buf[newlines.len - 1] == '\n') {
old--;
strbuf_setlen(&newlines, newlines.len - 1);
}
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
leading = frag->leading;
trailing = frag->trailing;
/*
* A hunk to change lines at the beginning would begin with
* @@ -1,L +N,M @@
* but we need to be careful. -U0 that inserts before the second
* line also has this pattern.
*
* And a hunk to add to an empty file would begin with
* @@ -0,0 +N,M @@
*
* In other words, a hunk that is (frag->oldpos <= 1) with or
* without leading context must match at the beginning.
*/
match_beginning = (!frag->oldpos ||
(frag->oldpos == 1 && !unidiff_zero));
/*
* A hunk without trailing lines must match at the end.
* However, we simply cannot tell if a hunk must match end
* from the lack of trailing lines if the patch was generated
* with unidiff without any context.
*/
match_end = !unidiff_zero && !trailing;
pos = frag->newpos ? (frag->newpos - 1) : 0;
preimage.buf = oldlines;
preimage.len = old - oldlines;
postimage.buf = newlines.buf;
postimage.len = newlines.len;
preimage.line = preimage.line_allocated;
postimage.line = postimage.line_allocated;
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
for (;;) {
applied_pos = find_pos(img, &preimage, &postimage, pos,
ws_rule, match_beginning, match_end);
if (applied_pos >= 0)
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
break;
/* Am I at my context limits? */
if ((leading <= p_context) && (trailing <= p_context))
break;
if (match_beginning || match_end) {
match_beginning = match_end = 0;
continue;
}
/*
* Reduce the number of context lines; reduce both
* leading and trailing if they are equal otherwise
* just reduce the larger context.
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
*/
if (leading >= trailing) {
remove_first_line(&preimage);
remove_first_line(&postimage);
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
pos--;
leading--;
}
if (trailing > leading) {
remove_last_line(&preimage);
remove_last_line(&postimage);
Implement limited context matching in git-apply. Ok this really should be the good version. The option handling has been reworked to be automation safe. Currently to import the -mm tree I have to work around git-apply by using patch. Because some of Andrews patches in quilt will only apply with fuzz. I started out implementing a --fuzz option and then I realized fuzz is not a very safe concept for an automated system. What you really want is a minimum number of context lines that must match. This allows policy to be set without knowing how many lines of context a patch actually provides. By default the policy remains to match all provided lines of context. Allowng git-apply to match a restricted set of context makes it much easier to import the -mm tree into git. I am still only processing 1.5 to 1.6 patches a second for the 692 patches in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 is still painful but it does help. If I just loop through all of Andrews patches in order and run git-apply --index -C1 I process the entire patchset in 1m53s or about 6 patches per second. So running git-mailinfo, git-write-tree, git-commit-tree, and git-update-ref everytime has a measurable impact, and shows things can be speeded up even more. All of these timings were taking on my poor 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of ram. So people with fast machiens should see much better performance. When a match is found after the number of context are reduced a warning is generated. Since this is a rare event and possibly dangerous this seems to make sense. Unless you are patching a single file the error message is a little bit terse at the moment, but it should be easy to go back and fix. I have also updated the documentation for git-apply to reflect the new -C option that sets the minimum number of context lines that must match. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-10 11:33:06 +02:00
trailing--;
}
}
if (applied_pos >= 0) {
if (new_blank_lines_at_end &&
preimage.nr + applied_pos >= img->nr &&
(ws_rule & WS_BLANK_AT_EOF) &&
ws_error_action != nowarn_ws_error) {
record_ws_error(WS_BLANK_AT_EOF, "+", 1,
found_new_blank_lines_at_end);
if (ws_error_action == correct_ws_error) {
while (new_blank_lines_at_end--)
remove_last_line(&postimage);
}
/*
* We would want to prevent write_out_results()
* from taking place in apply_patch() that follows
* the callchain led us here, which is:
* apply_patch->check_patch_list->check_patch->
* apply_data->apply_fragments->apply_one_fragment
*/
if (ws_error_action == die_on_ws_error)
apply = 0;
}
if (apply_verbosely && applied_pos != pos) {
int offset = applied_pos - pos;
if (apply_in_reverse)
offset = 0 - offset;
fprintf_ln(stderr,
Q_("Hunk #%d succeeded at %d (offset %d line).",
"Hunk #%d succeeded at %d (offset %d lines).",
offset),
nth_fragment, applied_pos + 1, offset);
}
/*
* Warn if it was necessary to reduce the number
* of context lines.
*/
if ((leading != frag->leading) ||
(trailing != frag->trailing))
fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Context reduced to (%ld/%ld)"
" to apply fragment at %d"),
leading, trailing, applied_pos+1);
update_image(img, applied_pos, &preimage, &postimage);
} else {
if (apply_verbosely)
error(_("while searching for:\n%.*s"),
(int)(old - oldlines), oldlines);
}
free(oldlines);
strbuf_release(&newlines);
free(preimage.line_allocated);
free(postimage.line_allocated);
return (applied_pos < 0);
}
static int apply_binary_fragment(struct image *img, struct patch *patch)
{
struct fragment *fragment = patch->fragments;
unsigned long len;
void *dst;
if (!fragment)
return error(_("missing binary patch data for '%s'"),
patch->new_name ?
patch->new_name :
patch->old_name);
/* Binary patch is irreversible without the optional second hunk */
if (apply_in_reverse) {
if (!fragment->next)
return error("cannot reverse-apply a binary patch "
"without the reverse hunk to '%s'",
patch->new_name
? patch->new_name : patch->old_name);
fragment = fragment->next;
}
switch (fragment->binary_patch_method) {
case BINARY_DELTA_DEFLATED:
dst = patch_delta(img->buf, img->len, fragment->patch,
fragment->size, &len);
if (!dst)
return -1;
clear_image(img);
img->buf = dst;
img->len = len;
return 0;
case BINARY_LITERAL_DEFLATED:
clear_image(img);
img->len = fragment->size;
img->buf = xmalloc(img->len+1);
memcpy(img->buf, fragment->patch, img->len);
img->buf[img->len] = '\0';
return 0;
}
return -1;
}
/*
* Replace "img" with the result of applying the binary patch.
* The binary patch data itself in patch->fragment is still kept
* but the preimage prepared by the caller in "img" is freed here
* or in the helper function apply_binary_fragment() this calls.
*/
static int apply_binary(struct image *img, struct patch *patch)
{
const char *name = patch->old_name ? patch->old_name : patch->new_name;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
unsigned char sha1[20];
/*
* For safety, we require patch index line to contain
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
* full 40-byte textual SHA1 for old and new, at least for now.
*/
if (strlen(patch->old_sha1_prefix) != 40 ||
strlen(patch->new_sha1_prefix) != 40 ||
get_sha1_hex(patch->old_sha1_prefix, sha1) ||
get_sha1_hex(patch->new_sha1_prefix, sha1))
return error("cannot apply binary patch to '%s' "
"without full index line", name);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (patch->old_name) {
/*
* See if the old one matches what the patch
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
* applies to.
*/
hash_sha1_file(img->buf, img->len, blob_type, sha1);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (strcmp(sha1_to_hex(sha1), patch->old_sha1_prefix))
return error("the patch applies to '%s' (%s), "
"which does not match the "
"current contents.",
name, sha1_to_hex(sha1));
}
else {
/* Otherwise, the old one must be empty. */
if (img->len)
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
return error("the patch applies to an empty "
"'%s' but it is not empty", name);
}
get_sha1_hex(patch->new_sha1_prefix, sha1);
if (is_null_sha1(sha1)) {
clear_image(img);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
return 0; /* deletion patch */
}
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (has_sha1_file(sha1)) {
/* We already have the postimage */
enum object_type type;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
unsigned long size;
char *result;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
result = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size);
if (!result)
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
return error("the necessary postimage %s for "
"'%s' cannot be read",
patch->new_sha1_prefix, name);
clear_image(img);
img->buf = result;
img->len = size;
} else {
/*
* We have verified buf matches the preimage;
* apply the patch data to it, which is stored
* in the patch->fragments->{patch,size}.
*/
if (apply_binary_fragment(img, patch))
return error(_("binary patch does not apply to '%s'"),
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
name);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
/* verify that the result matches */
hash_sha1_file(img->buf, img->len, blob_type, sha1);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (strcmp(sha1_to_hex(sha1), patch->new_sha1_prefix))
return error(_("binary patch to '%s' creates incorrect result (expecting %s, got %s)"),
name, patch->new_sha1_prefix, sha1_to_hex(sha1));
}
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
return 0;
}
static int apply_fragments(struct image *img, struct patch *patch)
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
{
struct fragment *frag = patch->fragments;
const char *name = patch->old_name ? patch->old_name : patch->new_name;
unsigned ws_rule = patch->ws_rule;
unsigned inaccurate_eof = patch->inaccurate_eof;
int nth = 0;
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
if (patch->is_binary)
return apply_binary(img, patch);
binary patch. This adds "binary patch" to the diff output and teaches apply what to do with them. On the diff generation side, traditionally, we said "Binary files differ\n" without giving anything other than the preimage and postimage object name on the index line. This was good enough for applying a patch generated from your own repository (very useful while rebasing), because the postimage would be available in such a case. However, this was not useful when the recipient of such a patch via e-mail were to apply it, even if the preimage was available. This patch allows the diff to generate "binary" patch when operating under --full-index option. The binary patch follows the usual extended git diff headers, and looks like this: "GIT binary patch\n" <length byte><data>"\n" ... "\n" Each line is prefixed with a "length-byte", whose value is upper or lowercase alphabet that encodes number of bytes that the data on the line decodes to (1..52 -- 'A' means 1, 'B' means 2, ..., 'Z' means 26, 'a' means 27, ...). <data> is 1 or more groups of 5-byte sequence, each of which encodes up to 4 bytes in base85 encoding. Because 52 / 4 * 5 = 65 and we have the length byte, an output line is capped to 66 characters. The payload is the same diff-delta as we use in the packfiles. On the consumption side, git-apply now can decode and apply the binary patch when --allow-binary-replacement is given, the diff was generated with --full-index, and the receiving repository has the preimage blob, which is the same condition as it always required when accepting an "Binary files differ\n" patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-05 01:51:44 +02:00
while (frag) {
nth++;
if (apply_one_fragment(img, frag, inaccurate_eof, ws_rule, nth)) {
error(_("patch failed: %s:%ld"), name, frag->oldpos);
if (!apply_with_reject)
return -1;
frag->rejected = 1;
}
frag = frag->next;
}
return 0;
}
static int read_file_or_gitlink(struct cache_entry *ce, struct strbuf *buf)
{
if (!ce)
return 0;
if (S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode)) {
strbuf_grow(buf, 100);
strbuf_addf(buf, "Subproject commit %s\n", sha1_to_hex(ce->sha1));
} else {
enum object_type type;
unsigned long sz;
char *result;
result = read_sha1_file(ce->sha1, &type, &sz);
if (!result)
return -1;
/* XXX read_sha1_file NUL-terminates */
strbuf_attach(buf, result, sz, sz + 1);
}
return 0;
}
static struct patch *in_fn_table(const char *name)
{
struct string_list_item *item;
if (name == NULL)
return NULL;
item = string_list_lookup(&fn_table, name);
if (item != NULL)
return (struct patch *)item->util;
return NULL;
}
/*
* item->util in the filename table records the status of the path.
* Usually it points at a patch (whose result records the contents
* of it after applying it), but it could be PATH_WAS_DELETED for a
* path that a previously applied patch has already removed.
*/
#define PATH_TO_BE_DELETED ((struct patch *) -2)
#define PATH_WAS_DELETED ((struct patch *) -1)
static int to_be_deleted(struct patch *patch)
{
return patch == PATH_TO_BE_DELETED;
}
static int was_deleted(struct patch *patch)
{
return patch == PATH_WAS_DELETED;
}
static void add_to_fn_table(struct patch *patch)
{
struct string_list_item *item;
/*
* Always add new_name unless patch is a deletion
* This should cover the cases for normal diffs,
* file creations and copies
*/
if (patch->new_name != NULL) {
item = string_list_insert(&fn_table, patch->new_name);
item->util = patch;
}
/*
* store a failure on rename/deletion cases because
* later chunks shouldn't patch old names
*/
if ((patch->new_name == NULL) || (patch->is_rename)) {
item = string_list_insert(&fn_table, patch->old_name);
item->util = PATH_WAS_DELETED;
}
}
static void prepare_fn_table(struct patch *patch)
{
/*
* store information about incoming file deletion
*/
while (patch) {
if ((patch->new_name == NULL) || (patch->is_rename)) {
struct string_list_item *item;
item = string_list_insert(&fn_table, patch->old_name);
item->util = PATH_TO_BE_DELETED;
}
patch = patch->next;
}
}
static int apply_data(struct patch *patch, struct stat *st, struct cache_entry *ce)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct image image;
size_t len;
char *img;
struct patch *tpatch;
if (!(patch->is_copy || patch->is_rename) &&
(tpatch = in_fn_table(patch->old_name)) != NULL && !to_be_deleted(tpatch)) {
if (was_deleted(tpatch)) {
return error(_("patch %s has been renamed/deleted"),
patch->old_name);
}
/* We have a patched copy in memory; use that. */
strbuf_add(&buf, tpatch->result, tpatch->resultsize);
} else if (cached) {
if (read_file_or_gitlink(ce, &buf))
return error(_("read of %s failed"), patch->old_name);
} else if (patch->old_name) {
if (S_ISGITLINK(patch->old_mode)) {
if (ce) {
read_file_or_gitlink(ce, &buf);
} else {
/*
* There is no way to apply subproject
* patch without looking at the index.
* NEEDSWORK: shouldn't this be flagged
* as an error???
*/
free_fragment_list(patch->fragments);
patch->fragments = NULL;
}
} else {
if (read_old_data(st, patch->old_name, &buf))
return error(_("read of %s failed"), patch->old_name);
}
}
img = strbuf_detach(&buf, &len);
prepare_image(&image, img, len, !patch->is_binary);
if (apply_fragments(&image, patch) < 0)
return -1; /* note with --reject this succeeds. */
patch->result = image.buf;
patch->resultsize = image.len;
add_to_fn_table(patch);
free(image.line_allocated);
if (0 < patch->is_delete && patch->resultsize)
return error(_("removal patch leaves file contents"));
return 0;
}
apply: do not get confused by symlinks in the middle HPA noticed that git-rebase fails when changes involve symlinks in the middle of the hierarchy. Consider: * The tree state before the patch is applied has arch/x86_64/boot as a symlink pointing at ../i386/boot/ * The patch tries to remove arch/x86_64/boot symlink, and create bunch of files there: .gitignore, Makefile, etc. git-apply tries to be careful while applying patches; it never touches the working tree until it is convinced that the patch would apply cleanly. One of the check it does is that when it knows a path is going to be created by the patch, it runs lstat() on the path to make sure it does not exist. This leads to a false alarm. Because we do not touch the working tree before all the check passes, when we try to make sure that arch/x86_64/boot/.gitignore does not exist yet, we haven't removed the arch/x86_64/boot symlink. The lstat() check ends up seeing arch/i386/boot/.gitignore through the yet-to-be-removed symlink, and says "Hey, you already have a file there, but what you fed me is a patch to create a new file. I am not going to clobber what you have in the working tree." We have similar checks to see a file we are going to modify does exist and match the preimage of the diff, which is done by directly opening and reading the file. For a file we are going to delete, we make sure that it does exist and matches what is going to be removed (a removal patch records the full preimage, so we check what you have in your working tree matches it in full -- otherwise we would risk losing your local changes), which again is done by directly opening and reading the file. These checks need to be adjusted so that they are not fooled by symlinks in the middle. - To make sure something does not exist, first lstat(). If it does not exist, it does not, so be happy. If it _does_, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so break leading paths and see if there are symlinks involved. When we are checking for a path a/b/c/d, if any of a, a/b, a/b/c is a symlink, then a/b/c/d does _NOT_ exist, for the purpose of our test. This would fix this particular case you saw, and would not add extra overhead in the usual case. - To make sure something already exists, first lstat(). If it does not exist, barf (up to this, we already do). Even if it does seem to exist, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so make sure leading paths are not symlinks. This would make the normal codepath much more expensive for deep trees, which is a bit worrisome. This patch implements the first side of the check "making sure it does not exist". The latter "making sure it exists" check is not done yet, so applying the patch in reverse would still fail, but we have to start from somewhere. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-12 07:26:08 +02:00
static int check_to_create_blob(const char *new_name, int ok_if_exists)
{
struct stat nst;
if (!lstat(new_name, &nst)) {
if (S_ISDIR(nst.st_mode) || ok_if_exists)
return 0;
/*
* A leading component of new_name might be a symlink
* that is going to be removed with this patch, but
* still pointing at somewhere that has the path.
* In such a case, path "new_name" does not exist as
* far as git is concerned.
*/
if (has_symlink_leading_path(new_name, strlen(new_name)))
apply: do not get confused by symlinks in the middle HPA noticed that git-rebase fails when changes involve symlinks in the middle of the hierarchy. Consider: * The tree state before the patch is applied has arch/x86_64/boot as a symlink pointing at ../i386/boot/ * The patch tries to remove arch/x86_64/boot symlink, and create bunch of files there: .gitignore, Makefile, etc. git-apply tries to be careful while applying patches; it never touches the working tree until it is convinced that the patch would apply cleanly. One of the check it does is that when it knows a path is going to be created by the patch, it runs lstat() on the path to make sure it does not exist. This leads to a false alarm. Because we do not touch the working tree before all the check passes, when we try to make sure that arch/x86_64/boot/.gitignore does not exist yet, we haven't removed the arch/x86_64/boot symlink. The lstat() check ends up seeing arch/i386/boot/.gitignore through the yet-to-be-removed symlink, and says "Hey, you already have a file there, but what you fed me is a patch to create a new file. I am not going to clobber what you have in the working tree." We have similar checks to see a file we are going to modify does exist and match the preimage of the diff, which is done by directly opening and reading the file. For a file we are going to delete, we make sure that it does exist and matches what is going to be removed (a removal patch records the full preimage, so we check what you have in your working tree matches it in full -- otherwise we would risk losing your local changes), which again is done by directly opening and reading the file. These checks need to be adjusted so that they are not fooled by symlinks in the middle. - To make sure something does not exist, first lstat(). If it does not exist, it does not, so be happy. If it _does_, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so break leading paths and see if there are symlinks involved. When we are checking for a path a/b/c/d, if any of a, a/b, a/b/c is a symlink, then a/b/c/d does _NOT_ exist, for the purpose of our test. This would fix this particular case you saw, and would not add extra overhead in the usual case. - To make sure something already exists, first lstat(). If it does not exist, barf (up to this, we already do). Even if it does seem to exist, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so make sure leading paths are not symlinks. This would make the normal codepath much more expensive for deep trees, which is a bit worrisome. This patch implements the first side of the check "making sure it does not exist". The latter "making sure it exists" check is not done yet, so applying the patch in reverse would still fail, but we have to start from somewhere. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-12 07:26:08 +02:00
return 0;
return error(_("%s: already exists in working directory"), new_name);
apply: do not get confused by symlinks in the middle HPA noticed that git-rebase fails when changes involve symlinks in the middle of the hierarchy. Consider: * The tree state before the patch is applied has arch/x86_64/boot as a symlink pointing at ../i386/boot/ * The patch tries to remove arch/x86_64/boot symlink, and create bunch of files there: .gitignore, Makefile, etc. git-apply tries to be careful while applying patches; it never touches the working tree until it is convinced that the patch would apply cleanly. One of the check it does is that when it knows a path is going to be created by the patch, it runs lstat() on the path to make sure it does not exist. This leads to a false alarm. Because we do not touch the working tree before all the check passes, when we try to make sure that arch/x86_64/boot/.gitignore does not exist yet, we haven't removed the arch/x86_64/boot symlink. The lstat() check ends up seeing arch/i386/boot/.gitignore through the yet-to-be-removed symlink, and says "Hey, you already have a file there, but what you fed me is a patch to create a new file. I am not going to clobber what you have in the working tree." We have similar checks to see a file we are going to modify does exist and match the preimage of the diff, which is done by directly opening and reading the file. For a file we are going to delete, we make sure that it does exist and matches what is going to be removed (a removal patch records the full preimage, so we check what you have in your working tree matches it in full -- otherwise we would risk losing your local changes), which again is done by directly opening and reading the file. These checks need to be adjusted so that they are not fooled by symlinks in the middle. - To make sure something does not exist, first lstat(). If it does not exist, it does not, so be happy. If it _does_, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so break leading paths and see if there are symlinks involved. When we are checking for a path a/b/c/d, if any of a, a/b, a/b/c is a symlink, then a/b/c/d does _NOT_ exist, for the purpose of our test. This would fix this particular case you saw, and would not add extra overhead in the usual case. - To make sure something already exists, first lstat(). If it does not exist, barf (up to this, we already do). Even if it does seem to exist, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so make sure leading paths are not symlinks. This would make the normal codepath much more expensive for deep trees, which is a bit worrisome. This patch implements the first side of the check "making sure it does not exist". The latter "making sure it exists" check is not done yet, so applying the patch in reverse would still fail, but we have to start from somewhere. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-12 07:26:08 +02:00
}
else if ((errno != ENOENT) && (errno != ENOTDIR))
return error("%s: %s", new_name, strerror(errno));
return 0;
}
static int verify_index_match(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st)
{
if (S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode)) {
if (!S_ISDIR(st->st_mode))
return -1;
return 0;
}
return ce_match_stat(ce, st, CE_MATCH_IGNORE_VALID|CE_MATCH_IGNORE_SKIP_WORKTREE);
}
static int check_preimage(struct patch *patch, struct cache_entry **ce, struct stat *st)
{
const char *old_name = patch->old_name;
struct patch *tpatch = NULL;
int stat_ret = 0;
unsigned st_mode = 0;
/*
* Make sure that we do not have local modifications from the
* index when we are looking at the index. Also make sure
* we have the preimage file to be patched in the work tree,
* unless --cached, which tells git to apply only in the index.
*/
if (!old_name)
return 0;
assert(patch->is_new <= 0);
if (!(patch->is_copy || patch->is_rename) &&
(tpatch = in_fn_table(old_name)) != NULL && !to_be_deleted(tpatch)) {
if (was_deleted(tpatch))
return error(_("%s: has been deleted/renamed"), old_name);
st_mode = tpatch->new_mode;
} else if (!cached) {
stat_ret = lstat(old_name, st);
if (stat_ret && errno != ENOENT)
return error(_("%s: %s"), old_name, strerror(errno));
}
if (to_be_deleted(tpatch))
tpatch = NULL;
if (check_index && !tpatch) {
int pos = cache_name_pos(old_name, strlen(old_name));
if (pos < 0) {
if (patch->is_new < 0)
goto is_new;
return error(_("%s: does not exist in index"), old_name);
}
*ce = active_cache[pos];
if (stat_ret < 0) {
struct checkout costate;
/* checkout */
memset(&costate, 0, sizeof(costate));
costate.base_dir = "";
costate.refresh_cache = 1;
if (checkout_entry(*ce, &costate, NULL) ||
lstat(old_name, st))
return -1;
}
if (!cached && verify_index_match(*ce, st))
return error(_("%s: does not match index"), old_name);
if (cached)
st_mode = (*ce)->ce_mode;
} else if (stat_ret < 0) {
if (patch->is_new < 0)
goto is_new;
return error(_("%s: %s"), old_name, strerror(errno));
}
if (!cached && !tpatch)
st_mode = ce_mode_from_stat(*ce, st->st_mode);
if (patch->is_new < 0)
patch->is_new = 0;
if (!patch->old_mode)
patch->old_mode = st_mode;
if ((st_mode ^ patch->old_mode) & S_IFMT)
return error(_("%s: wrong type"), old_name);
if (st_mode != patch->old_mode)
warning(_("%s has type %o, expected %o"),
old_name, st_mode, patch->old_mode);
if (!patch->new_mode && !patch->is_delete)
builtin-apply: prevent non-explicit permission changes A git patch that does not change the executable bit records the mode bits on its "index" line. "git apply" used to interpret this mode exactly the same way as it interprets the mode recorded on "new mode" line, as the wish by the patch submitter to set the mode to the one recorded on the line. The reason the mode does not agree between the submitter and the receiver in the first place is because there is _another_ commit that only appears on one side but not the other since their histories diverged, and that commit changes the mode. The patch has "index" line but not "new mode" line because its change is about updating the contents without affecting the mode. The application of such a patch is an explicit wish by the submitter to only cherry-pick the commit that updates the contents without cherry-picking the commit that modifies the mode. Viewed this way, the current behaviour is problematic, even though the command does warn when the mode of the path being patched does not match this mode, and a careful user could detect this inconsistencies between the patch submitter and the patch receiver. This changes the semantics of the mode recorded on the "index" line; instead of interpreting it as the submitter's wish to set the mode to the recorded value, it merely informs what the mode submitter happened to have, and the presense of the "index" line is taken as submitter's wish to keep whatever the mode is on the receiving end. This is based on the patch originally done by Alexander Potashev with a minor fix; the tests are mine. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-02 11:55:37 +01:00
patch->new_mode = st_mode;
return 0;
is_new:
patch->is_new = 1;
patch->is_delete = 0;
free(patch->old_name);
patch->old_name = NULL;
return 0;
}
/*
* Check and apply the patch in-core; leave the result in patch->result
* for the caller to write it out to the final destination.
*/
static int check_patch(struct patch *patch)
{
struct stat st;
const char *old_name = patch->old_name;
const char *new_name = patch->new_name;
const char *name = old_name ? old_name : new_name;
struct cache_entry *ce = NULL;
struct patch *tpatch;
int ok_if_exists;
int status;
patch->rejected = 1; /* we will drop this after we succeed */
status = check_preimage(patch, &ce, &st);
if (status)
return status;
old_name = patch->old_name;
if ((tpatch = in_fn_table(new_name)) &&
(was_deleted(tpatch) || to_be_deleted(tpatch)))
/*
* A type-change diff is always split into a patch to
* delete old, immediately followed by a patch to
* create new (see diff.c::run_diff()); in such a case
* it is Ok that the entry to be deleted by the
* previous patch is still in the working tree and in
* the index.
*/
ok_if_exists = 1;
else
ok_if_exists = 0;
if (new_name &&
((0 < patch->is_new) | (0 < patch->is_rename) | patch->is_copy)) {
if (check_index &&
cache_name_pos(new_name, strlen(new_name)) >= 0 &&
!ok_if_exists)
return error(_("%s: already exists in index"), new_name);
if (!cached) {
apply: do not get confused by symlinks in the middle HPA noticed that git-rebase fails when changes involve symlinks in the middle of the hierarchy. Consider: * The tree state before the patch is applied has arch/x86_64/boot as a symlink pointing at ../i386/boot/ * The patch tries to remove arch/x86_64/boot symlink, and create bunch of files there: .gitignore, Makefile, etc. git-apply tries to be careful while applying patches; it never touches the working tree until it is convinced that the patch would apply cleanly. One of the check it does is that when it knows a path is going to be created by the patch, it runs lstat() on the path to make sure it does not exist. This leads to a false alarm. Because we do not touch the working tree before all the check passes, when we try to make sure that arch/x86_64/boot/.gitignore does not exist yet, we haven't removed the arch/x86_64/boot symlink. The lstat() check ends up seeing arch/i386/boot/.gitignore through the yet-to-be-removed symlink, and says "Hey, you already have a file there, but what you fed me is a patch to create a new file. I am not going to clobber what you have in the working tree." We have similar checks to see a file we are going to modify does exist and match the preimage of the diff, which is done by directly opening and reading the file. For a file we are going to delete, we make sure that it does exist and matches what is going to be removed (a removal patch records the full preimage, so we check what you have in your working tree matches it in full -- otherwise we would risk losing your local changes), which again is done by directly opening and reading the file. These checks need to be adjusted so that they are not fooled by symlinks in the middle. - To make sure something does not exist, first lstat(). If it does not exist, it does not, so be happy. If it _does_, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so break leading paths and see if there are symlinks involved. When we are checking for a path a/b/c/d, if any of a, a/b, a/b/c is a symlink, then a/b/c/d does _NOT_ exist, for the purpose of our test. This would fix this particular case you saw, and would not add extra overhead in the usual case. - To make sure something already exists, first lstat(). If it does not exist, barf (up to this, we already do). Even if it does seem to exist, we might be getting fooled by a symlink in the middle, so make sure leading paths are not symlinks. This would make the normal codepath much more expensive for deep trees, which is a bit worrisome. This patch implements the first side of the check "making sure it does not exist". The latter "making sure it exists" check is not done yet, so applying the patch in reverse would still fail, but we have to start from somewhere. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-12 07:26:08 +02:00
int err = check_to_create_blob(new_name, ok_if_exists);
if (err)
return err;
}
if (!patch->new_mode) {
if (0 < patch->is_new)
patch->new_mode = S_IFREG | 0644;
else
patch->new_mode = patch->old_mode;
}
}
if (new_name && old_name) {
int same = !strcmp(old_name, new_name);
if (!patch->new_mode)
patch->new_mode = patch->old_mode;
if ((patch->old_mode ^ patch->new_mode) & S_IFMT) {
if (same)
return error(_("new mode (%o) of %s does not "
"match old mode (%o)"),
patch->new_mode, new_name,
patch->old_mode);
else
return error(_("new mode (%o) of %s does not "
"match old mode (%o) of %s"),
patch->new_mode, new_name,
patch->old_mode, old_name);
}
}
if (apply_data(patch, &st, ce) < 0)
return error(_("%s: patch does not apply"), name);
patch->rejected = 0;
return 0;
}
static int check_patch_list(struct patch *patch)
{
int err = 0;
prepare_fn_table(patch);
while (patch) {
if (apply_verbosely)
say_patch_name(stderr,
_("Checking patch %s..."), patch);
err |= check_patch(patch);
patch = patch->next;
}
return err;
}
/* This function tries to read the sha1 from the current index */
static int get_current_sha1(const char *path, unsigned char *sha1)
{
int pos;
if (read_cache() < 0)
return -1;
pos = cache_name_pos(path, strlen(path));
if (pos < 0)
return -1;
hashcpy(sha1, active_cache[pos]->sha1);
return 0;
}
/* Build an index that contains the just the files needed for a 3way merge */
static void build_fake_ancestor(struct patch *list, const char *filename)
{
struct patch *patch;
struct index_state result = { NULL };
int fd;
/* Once we start supporting the reverse patch, it may be
* worth showing the new sha1 prefix, but until then...
*/
for (patch = list; patch; patch = patch->next) {
const unsigned char *sha1_ptr;
unsigned char sha1[20];
struct cache_entry *ce;
const char *name;
name = patch->old_name ? patch->old_name : patch->new_name;
if (0 < patch->is_new)
continue;
else if (get_sha1(patch->old_sha1_prefix, sha1))
/* git diff has no index line for mode/type changes */
if (!patch->lines_added && !patch->lines_deleted) {
if (get_current_sha1(patch->old_name, sha1))
die("mode change for %s, which is not "
"in current HEAD", name);
sha1_ptr = sha1;
} else
die("sha1 information is lacking or useless "
"(%s).", name);
else
sha1_ptr = sha1;
ce = make_cache_entry(patch->old_mode, sha1_ptr, name, 0, 0);
if (!ce)
die(_("make_cache_entry failed for path '%s'"), name);
if (add_index_entry(&result, ce, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD))
die ("Could not add %s to temporary index", name);
}
fd = open(filename, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666);
if (fd < 0 || write_index(&result, fd) || close(fd))
die ("Could not write temporary index to %s", filename);
discard_index(&result);
}
static void stat_patch_list(struct patch *patch)
{
int files, adds, dels;
for (files = adds = dels = 0 ; patch ; patch = patch->next) {
files++;
adds += patch->lines_added;
dels += patch->lines_deleted;
show_stats(patch);
}
print_stat_summary(stdout, files, adds, dels);
}
static void numstat_patch_list(struct patch *patch)
{
for ( ; patch; patch = patch->next) {
const char *name;
name = patch->new_name ? patch->new_name : patch->old_name;
if (patch->is_binary)
printf("-\t-\t");
else
printf("%d\t%d\t", patch->lines_added, patch->lines_deleted);
write_name_quoted(name, stdout, line_termination);
}
}
static void show_file_mode_name(const char *newdelete, unsigned int mode, const char *name)
{
if (mode)
printf(" %s mode %06o %s\n", newdelete, mode, name);
else
printf(" %s %s\n", newdelete, name);
}
static void show_mode_change(struct patch *p, int show_name)
{
if (p->old_mode && p->new_mode && p->old_mode != p->new_mode) {
if (show_name)
printf(" mode change %06o => %06o %s\n",
p->old_mode, p->new_mode, p->new_name);
else
printf(" mode change %06o => %06o\n",
p->old_mode, p->new_mode);
}
}
static void show_rename_copy(struct patch *p)
{
const char *renamecopy = p->is_rename ? "rename" : "copy";
const char *old, *new;
/* Find common prefix */
old = p->old_name;
new = p->new_name;
while (1) {
const char *slash_old, *slash_new;
slash_old = strchr(old, '/');
slash_new = strchr(new, '/');
if (!slash_old ||
!slash_new ||
slash_old - old != slash_new - new ||
memcmp(old, new, slash_new - new))
break;
old = slash_old + 1;
new = slash_new + 1;
}
/* p->old_name thru old is the common prefix, and old and new
* through the end of names are renames
*/
if (old != p->old_name)
printf(" %s %.*s{%s => %s} (%d%%)\n", renamecopy,
(int)(old - p->old_name), p->old_name,
old, new, p->score);
else
printf(" %s %s => %s (%d%%)\n", renamecopy,
p->old_name, p->new_name, p->score);
show_mode_change(p, 0);
}
static void summary_patch_list(struct patch *patch)
{
struct patch *p;
for (p = patch; p; p = p->next) {
if (p->is_new)
show_file_mode_name("create", p->new_mode, p->new_name);
else if (p->is_delete)
show_file_mode_name("delete", p->old_mode, p->old_name);
else {
if (p->is_rename || p->is_copy)
show_rename_copy(p);
else {
if (p->score) {
printf(" rewrite %s (%d%%)\n",
p->new_name, p->score);
show_mode_change(p, 0);
}
else
show_mode_change(p, 1);
}
}
}
}
static void patch_stats(struct patch *patch)
{
int lines = patch->lines_added + patch->lines_deleted;
if (lines > max_change)
max_change = lines;
if (patch->old_name) {
int len = quote_c_style(patch->old_name, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (!len)
len = strlen(patch->old_name);
if (len > max_len)
max_len = len;
}
if (patch->new_name) {
int len = quote_c_style(patch->new_name, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (!len)
len = strlen(patch->new_name);
if (len > max_len)
max_len = len;
}
}
static void remove_file(struct patch *patch, int rmdir_empty)
{
if (update_index) {
if (remove_file_from_cache(patch->old_name) < 0)
die(_("unable to remove %s from index"), patch->old_name);
}
if (!cached) {
if (!remove_or_warn(patch->old_mode, patch->old_name) && rmdir_empty) {
remove_path(patch->old_name);
}
}
}
static void add_index_file(const char *path, unsigned mode, void *buf, unsigned long size)
{
struct stat st;
struct cache_entry *ce;
int namelen = strlen(path);
unsigned ce_size = cache_entry_size(namelen);
if (!update_index)
return;
ce = xcalloc(1, ce_size);
memcpy(ce->name, path, namelen);
ce->ce_mode = create_ce_mode(mode);
ce->ce_flags = namelen;
if (S_ISGITLINK(mode)) {
const char *s = buf;
if (get_sha1_hex(s + strlen("Subproject commit "), ce->sha1))
die(_("corrupt patch for subproject %s"), path);
} else {
if (!cached) {
if (lstat(path, &st) < 0)
die_errno(_("unable to stat newly created file '%s'"),
path);
fill_stat_cache_info(ce, &st);
}
if (write_sha1_file(buf, size, blob_type, ce->sha1) < 0)
die(_("unable to create backing store for newly created file %s"), path);
}
if (add_cache_entry(ce, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD) < 0)
die(_("unable to add cache entry for %s"), path);
}
static int try_create_file(const char *path, unsigned int mode, const char *buf, unsigned long size)
{
int fd;
struct strbuf nbuf = STRBUF_INIT;
if (S_ISGITLINK(mode)) {
struct stat st;
if (!lstat(path, &st) && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode))
return 0;
return mkdir(path, 0777);
}
if (has_symlinks && S_ISLNK(mode))
/* Although buf:size is counted string, it also is NUL
* terminated.
*/
return symlink(buf, path);
fd = open(path, O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY, (mode & 0100) ? 0777 : 0666);
if (fd < 0)
return -1;
if (convert_to_working_tree(path, buf, size, &nbuf)) {
size = nbuf.len;
buf = nbuf.buf;
}
write_or_die(fd, buf, size);
strbuf_release(&nbuf);
if (close(fd) < 0)
die_errno(_("closing file '%s'"), path);
return 0;
}
/*
* We optimistically assume that the directories exist,
* which is true 99% of the time anyway. If they don't,
* we create them and try again.
*/
static void create_one_file(char *path, unsigned mode, const char *buf, unsigned long size)
{
if (cached)
return;
if (!try_create_file(path, mode, buf, size))
return;
if (errno == ENOENT) {
if (safe_create_leading_directories(path))
return;
if (!try_create_file(path, mode, buf, size))
return;
}
if (errno == EEXIST || errno == EACCES) {
/* We may be trying to create a file where a directory
* used to be.
*/
struct stat st;
if (!lstat(path, &st) && (!S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) || !rmdir(path)))
errno = EEXIST;
}
if (errno == EEXIST) {
unsigned int nr = getpid();
for (;;) {
char newpath[PATH_MAX];
mksnpath(newpath, sizeof(newpath), "%s~%u", path, nr);
if (!try_create_file(newpath, mode, buf, size)) {
if (!rename(newpath, path))
return;
unlink_or_warn(newpath);
break;
}
if (errno != EEXIST)
break;
++nr;
}
}
die_errno(_("unable to write file '%s' mode %o"), path, mode);
}
static void create_file(struct patch *patch)
{
char *path = patch->new_name;
unsigned mode = patch->new_mode;
unsigned long size = patch->resultsize;
char *buf = patch->result;
if (!mode)
mode = S_IFREG | 0644;
create_one_file(path, mode, buf, size);
add_index_file(path, mode, buf, size);
}
/* phase zero is to remove, phase one is to create */
static void write_out_one_result(struct patch *patch, int phase)
{
if (patch->is_delete > 0) {
if (phase == 0)
remove_file(patch, 1);
return;
}
if (patch->is_new > 0 || patch->is_copy) {
if (phase == 1)
create_file(patch);
return;
}
/*
* Rename or modification boils down to the same
* thing: remove the old, write the new
*/
if (phase == 0)
remove_file(patch, patch->is_rename);
if (phase == 1)
create_file(patch);
}
static int write_out_one_reject(struct patch *patch)
{
FILE *rej;
char namebuf[PATH_MAX];
struct fragment *frag;
int cnt = 0;
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
for (cnt = 0, frag = patch->fragments; frag; frag = frag->next) {
if (!frag->rejected)
continue;
cnt++;
}
if (!cnt) {
if (apply_verbosely)
say_patch_name(stderr,
_("Applied patch %s cleanly."), patch);
return 0;
}
/* This should not happen, because a removal patch that leaves
* contents are marked "rejected" at the patch level.
*/
if (!patch->new_name)
die(_("internal error"));
/* Say this even without --verbose */
strbuf_addf(&sb, Q_("Applying patch %%s with %d reject...",
"Applying patch %%s with %d rejects...",
cnt),
cnt);
say_patch_name(stderr, sb.buf, patch);
strbuf_release(&sb);
cnt = strlen(patch->new_name);
if (ARRAY_SIZE(namebuf) <= cnt + 5) {
cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(namebuf) - 5;
warning(_("truncating .rej filename to %.*s.rej"),
cnt - 1, patch->new_name);
}
memcpy(namebuf, patch->new_name, cnt);
memcpy(namebuf + cnt, ".rej", 5);
rej = fopen(namebuf, "w");
if (!rej)
return error(_("cannot open %s: %s"), namebuf, strerror(errno));
/* Normal git tools never deal with .rej, so do not pretend
* this is a git patch by saying --git nor give extended
* headers. While at it, maybe please "kompare" that wants
* the trailing TAB and some garbage at the end of line ;-).
*/
fprintf(rej, "diff a/%s b/%s\t(rejected hunks)\n",
patch->new_name, patch->new_name);
for (cnt = 1, frag = patch->fragments;
frag;
cnt++, frag = frag->next) {
if (!frag->rejected) {
fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Hunk #%d applied cleanly."), cnt);
continue;
}
fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Rejected hunk #%d."), cnt);
fprintf(rej, "%.*s", frag->size, frag->patch);
if (frag->patch[frag->size-1] != '\n')
fputc('\n', rej);
}
fclose(rej);
return -1;
}
static int write_out_results(struct patch *list)
{
int phase;
int errs = 0;
struct patch *l;
for (phase = 0; phase < 2; phase++) {
l = list;
while (l) {
if (l->rejected)
errs = 1;
else {
write_out_one_result(l, phase);
if (phase == 1 && write_out_one_reject(l))
errs = 1;
}
l = l->next;
}
}
return errs;
}
static struct lock_file lock_file;
static struct string_list limit_by_name;
static int has_include;
static void add_name_limit(const char *name, int exclude)
{
struct string_list_item *it;
it = string_list_append(&limit_by_name, name);
it->util = exclude ? NULL : (void *) 1;
}
static int use_patch(struct patch *p)
{
const char *pathname = p->new_name ? p->new_name : p->old_name;
int i;
/* Paths outside are not touched regardless of "--include" */
if (0 < prefix_length) {
int pathlen = strlen(pathname);
if (pathlen <= prefix_length ||
memcmp(prefix, pathname, prefix_length))
return 0;
}
/* See if it matches any of exclude/include rule */
for (i = 0; i < limit_by_name.nr; i++) {
struct string_list_item *it = &limit_by_name.items[i];
if (!fnmatch(it->string, pathname, 0))
return (it->util != NULL);
}
/*
* If we had any include, a path that does not match any rule is
* not used. Otherwise, we saw bunch of exclude rules (or none)
* and such a path is used.
*/
return !has_include;
}
static void prefix_one(char **name)
{
char *old_name = *name;
if (!old_name)
return;
*name = xstrdup(prefix_filename(prefix, prefix_length, *name));
free(old_name);
}
static void prefix_patches(struct patch *p)
{
if (!prefix || p->is_toplevel_relative)
return;
for ( ; p; p = p->next) {
prefix_one(&p->new_name);
prefix_one(&p->old_name);
}
}
#define INACCURATE_EOF (1<<0)
#define RECOUNT (1<<1)
static int apply_patch(int fd, const char *filename, int options)
{
size_t offset;
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; /* owns the patch text */
struct patch *list = NULL, **listp = &list;
int skipped_patch = 0;
patch_input_file = filename;
read_patch_file(&buf, fd);
offset = 0;
while (offset < buf.len) {
struct patch *patch;
int nr;
patch = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*patch));
patch->inaccurate_eof = !!(options & INACCURATE_EOF);
patch->recount = !!(options & RECOUNT);
nr = parse_chunk(buf.buf + offset, buf.len - offset, patch);
if (nr < 0)
break;
if (apply_in_reverse)
reverse_patches(patch);
if (prefix)
prefix_patches(patch);
if (use_patch(patch)) {
patch_stats(patch);
*listp = patch;
listp = &patch->next;
}
else {
free_patch(patch);
skipped_patch++;
}
offset += nr;
}
if (!list && !skipped_patch)
die(_("unrecognized input"));
if (whitespace_error && (ws_error_action == die_on_ws_error))
apply = 0;
update_index = check_index && apply;
if (update_index && newfd < 0)
newfd = hold_locked_index(&lock_file, 1);
if (check_index) {
if (read_cache() < 0)
die(_("unable to read index file"));
}
if ((check || apply) &&
check_patch_list(list) < 0 &&
!apply_with_reject)
exit(1);
if (apply && write_out_results(list))
exit(1);
if (fake_ancestor)
build_fake_ancestor(list, fake_ancestor);
if (diffstat)
stat_patch_list(list);
if (numstat)
numstat_patch_list(list);
if (summary)
summary_patch_list(list);
free_patch_list(list);
strbuf_release(&buf);
string_list_clear(&fn_table, 0);
return 0;
}
static int git_apply_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
{
if (!strcmp(var, "apply.whitespace"))
return git_config_string(&apply_default_whitespace, var, value);
else if (!strcmp(var, "apply.ignorewhitespace"))
return git_config_string(&apply_default_ignorewhitespace, var, value);
return git_default_config(var, value, cb);
}
static int option_parse_exclude(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
add_name_limit(arg, 1);
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_include(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
add_name_limit(arg, 0);
has_include = 1;
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_p(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
p_value = atoi(arg);
p_value_known = 1;
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_z(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
if (unset)
line_termination = '\n';
else
line_termination = 0;
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_space_change(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
if (unset)
ws_ignore_action = ignore_ws_none;
else
ws_ignore_action = ignore_ws_change;
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_whitespace(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
const char **whitespace_option = opt->value;
*whitespace_option = arg;
parse_whitespace_option(arg);
return 0;
}
static int option_parse_directory(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
root_len = strlen(arg);
if (root_len && arg[root_len - 1] != '/') {
char *new_root;
root = new_root = xmalloc(root_len + 2);
strcpy(new_root, arg);
strcpy(new_root + root_len++, "/");
} else
root = arg;
return 0;
}
int cmd_apply(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix_)
{
int i;
int errs = 0;
int is_not_gitdir = !startup_info->have_repository;
int force_apply = 0;
const char *whitespace_option = NULL;
struct option builtin_apply_options[] = {
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "exclude", NULL, N_("path"),
N_("don't apply changes matching the given path"),
0, option_parse_exclude },
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "include", NULL, N_("path"),
N_("apply changes matching the given path"),
0, option_parse_include },
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 'p', NULL, NULL, N_("num"),
N_("remove <num> leading slashes from traditional diff paths"),
0, option_parse_p },
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "no-add", &no_add,
N_("ignore additions made by the patch")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "stat", &diffstat,
N_("instead of applying the patch, output diffstat for the input")),
OPT_NOOP_NOARG(0, "allow-binary-replacement"),
OPT_NOOP_NOARG(0, "binary"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "numstat", &numstat,
N_("shows number of added and deleted lines in decimal notation")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "summary", &summary,
N_("instead of applying the patch, output a summary for the input")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "check", &check,
N_("instead of applying the patch, see if the patch is applicable")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "index", &check_index,
N_("make sure the patch is applicable to the current index")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "cached", &cached,
N_("apply a patch without touching the working tree")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "apply", &force_apply,
N_("also apply the patch (use with --stat/--summary/--check)")),
OPT_FILENAME(0, "build-fake-ancestor", &fake_ancestor,
N_("build a temporary index based on embedded index information")),
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 'z', NULL, NULL, NULL,
N_("paths are separated with NUL character"),
PARSE_OPT_NOARG, option_parse_z },
OPT_INTEGER('C', NULL, &p_context,
N_("ensure at least <n> lines of context match")),
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "whitespace", &whitespace_option, N_("action"),
N_("detect new or modified lines that have whitespace errors"),
0, option_parse_whitespace },
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "ignore-space-change", NULL, NULL,
N_("ignore changes in whitespace when finding context"),
PARSE_OPT_NOARG, option_parse_space_change },
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "ignore-whitespace", NULL, NULL,
N_("ignore changes in whitespace when finding context"),
PARSE_OPT_NOARG, option_parse_space_change },
OPT_BOOLEAN('R', "reverse", &apply_in_reverse,
N_("apply the patch in reverse")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "unidiff-zero", &unidiff_zero,
N_("don't expect at least one line of context")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "reject", &apply_with_reject,
N_("leave the rejected hunks in corresponding *.rej files")),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "allow-overlap", &allow_overlap,
N_("allow overlapping hunks")),
OPT__VERBOSE(&apply_verbosely, N_("be verbose")),
OPT_BIT(0, "inaccurate-eof", &options,
N_("tolerate incorrectly detected missing new-line at the end of file"),
INACCURATE_EOF),
OPT_BIT(0, "recount", &options,
N_("do not trust the line counts in the hunk headers"),
RECOUNT),
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "directory", NULL, N_("root"),
N_("prepend <root> to all filenames"),
0, option_parse_directory },
OPT_END()
};
prefix = prefix_;
prefix_length = prefix ? strlen(prefix) : 0;
git_config(git_apply_config, NULL);
if (apply_default_whitespace)
parse_whitespace_option(apply_default_whitespace);
if (apply_default_ignorewhitespace)
parse_ignorewhitespace_option(apply_default_ignorewhitespace);
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, builtin_apply_options,
apply_usage, 0);
if (apply_with_reject)
apply = apply_verbosely = 1;
if (!force_apply && (diffstat || numstat || summary || check || fake_ancestor))
apply = 0;
if (check_index && is_not_gitdir)
die(_("--index outside a repository"));
if (cached) {
if (is_not_gitdir)
die(_("--cached outside a repository"));
check_index = 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
const char *arg = argv[i];
int fd;
if (!strcmp(arg, "-")) {
errs |= apply_patch(0, "<stdin>", options);
read_stdin = 0;
continue;
} else if (0 < prefix_length)
arg = prefix_filename(prefix, prefix_length, arg);
fd = open(arg, O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0)
die_errno(_("can't open patch '%s'"), arg);
read_stdin = 0;
set_default_whitespace_mode(whitespace_option);
errs |= apply_patch(fd, arg, options);
close(fd);
}
set_default_whitespace_mode(whitespace_option);
if (read_stdin)
errs |= apply_patch(0, "<stdin>", options);
if (whitespace_error) {
if (squelch_whitespace_errors &&
squelch_whitespace_errors < whitespace_error) {
int squelched =
whitespace_error - squelch_whitespace_errors;
warning(Q_("squelched %d whitespace error",
"squelched %d whitespace errors",
squelched),
squelched);
}
if (ws_error_action == die_on_ws_error)
die(Q_("%d line adds whitespace errors.",
"%d lines add whitespace errors.",
whitespace_error),
whitespace_error);
if (applied_after_fixing_ws && apply)
warning("%d line%s applied after"
" fixing whitespace errors.",
applied_after_fixing_ws,
applied_after_fixing_ws == 1 ? "" : "s");
else if (whitespace_error)
warning(Q_("%d line adds whitespace errors.",
"%d lines add whitespace errors.",
whitespace_error),
whitespace_error);
}
if (update_index) {
if (write_cache(newfd, active_cache, active_nr) ||
commit_locked_index(&lock_file))
die(_("Unable to write new index file"));
}
return !!errs;
}