git-commit-vandalism/builtin/branch.c

850 lines
25 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Builtin "git branch"
*
* Copyright (c) 2006 Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
* Based on git-branch.sh by Junio C Hamano.
*/
#include "cache.h"
#include "config.h"
#include "color.h"
#include "refs.h"
#include "commit.h"
#include "builtin.h"
#include "remote.h"
#include "parse-options.h"
#include "branch.h"
builtin-branch.c: optimize --merged and --no-merged "git branch --no-merged $commit" used to compute the merge base between the tip of each and every branch with the named $commit, but this was wasteful when you have many branches. Inside append_ref() we literally ran has_commit() between the tip of the branch and the merge_filter_ref. Instead, we can let the revision machinery traverse the history as if we are running: $ git rev-list --branches --not $commit by queueing the tips of branches we encounter as positive refs (this mimicks the "--branches" option in the above command line) and then appending the merge_filter_ref commit as a negative one, and finally calling prepare_revision_walk() to limit the list.. After the traversal is done, branch tips that are reachable from $commit are painted UNINTERESTING; they are already fully contained in $commit (i.e. --merged). Tips that are not painted UNINTERESTING still have commits that are not reachable from $commit, thus "--no-merged" will show them. With an artificial repository that has "master" and 1000 test-$i branches where they were created by "git branch test-$i master~$i": (with patch) $ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged master >/dev/null 0.12user 0.02system 0:00.15elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1588minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged test-200 >/dev/null 0.15user 0.03system 0:00.18elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1711minor)pagefaults 0swaps (without patch) $ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged master >/dev/null 0.69user 0.03system 0:00.72elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2229minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged test-200 >/dev/null 0.58user 0.03system 0:00.61elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2248minor)pagefaults 0swaps Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-24 00:13:41 +02:00
#include "diff.h"
#include "revision.h"
#include "string-list.h"
#include "column.h"
#include "utf8.h"
#include "wt-status.h"
#include "ref-filter.h"
#include "worktree.h"
#include "help.h"
static const char * const builtin_branch_usage[] = {
N_("git branch [<options>] [-r | -a] [--merged | --no-merged]"),
N_("git branch [<options>] [-l] [-f] <branch-name> [<start-point>]"),
N_("git branch [<options>] [-r] (-d | -D) <branch-name>..."),
N_("git branch [<options>] (-m | -M) [<old-branch>] <new-branch>"),
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
N_("git branch [<options>] (-c | -C) [<old-branch>] <new-branch>"),
N_("git branch [<options>] [-r | -a] [--points-at]"),
N_("git branch [<options>] [-r | -a] [--format]"),
NULL
};
static const char *head;
static struct object_id head_oid;
branch: deprecate "-l" option The "-l" option is short for "--create-reflog". This has caused much confusion over the years. Most people expect it to work as "--list", because that would match the other "mode" options like -d/--delete and -m/--move, as well as the similar -l/--list option of git-tag. Adding to the confusion, using "-l" _appears_ to work as "--list" in some cases: $ git branch -l * master because the branch command defaults to listing (so even trying to specify --list in the command above is redundant). But that may bite the user later when they add a pattern, like: $ git branch -l foo which does not return an empty list, but in fact creates a new branch (with a reflog, naturally) called "foo". It's also probably quite uncommon for people to actually use "-l" to create a reflog. Since 0bee591869 (Enable reflogs by default in any repository with a working directory., 2006-12-14), this is the default in non-bare repositories. So it's rather unfortunate that the feature squats on the short-and-sweet "-l" (which was only added in 3a4b3f269c (Create/delete branch ref logs., 2006-05-19), meaning there were only 7 months where it was actually useful). Let's deprecate "-l" in hopes of eventually re-purposing it to "--list". Note that we issue the warning only when we're not in list mode. This means that people for whom it works as a happy accident, namely: $ git branch -l master won't see the warning at all. And when we eventually switch to it meaning "--list", that will just continue to work. We do the issue the warning for these important cases: - when we are actually creating a branch, in case the user really did mean it as "--create-reflog" - when we are in some _other_ mode, like deletion. There the "-l" is a noop for now, but it will eventually conflict with any other mode request, and the user should be told that this is changing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 11:24:14 +02:00
static int used_deprecated_reflog_option;
static int branch_use_color = -1;
static char branch_colors[][COLOR_MAXLEN] = {
GIT_COLOR_RESET,
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
GIT_COLOR_NORMAL, /* PLAIN */
GIT_COLOR_RED, /* REMOTE */
GIT_COLOR_NORMAL, /* LOCAL */
GIT_COLOR_GREEN, /* CURRENT */
GIT_COLOR_BLUE, /* UPSTREAM */
};
enum color_branch {
BRANCH_COLOR_RESET = 0,
BRANCH_COLOR_PLAIN = 1,
BRANCH_COLOR_REMOTE = 2,
BRANCH_COLOR_LOCAL = 3,
BRANCH_COLOR_CURRENT = 4,
BRANCH_COLOR_UPSTREAM = 5
};
static const char *color_branch_slots[] = {
[BRANCH_COLOR_RESET] = "reset",
[BRANCH_COLOR_PLAIN] = "plain",
[BRANCH_COLOR_REMOTE] = "remote",
[BRANCH_COLOR_LOCAL] = "local",
[BRANCH_COLOR_CURRENT] = "current",
[BRANCH_COLOR_UPSTREAM] = "upstream",
};
static struct string_list output = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
static unsigned int colopts;
define_list_config_array(color_branch_slots);
static int git_branch_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
{
const char *slot_name;
struct ref_sorting **sorting_tail = (struct ref_sorting **)cb;
if (!strcmp(var, "branch.sort")) {
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(var);
parse_ref_sorting(sorting_tail, value);
return 0;
}
if (starts_with(var, "column."))
return git_column_config(var, value, "branch", &colopts);
if (!strcmp(var, "color.branch")) {
branch_use_color = git_config_colorbool(var, value);
return 0;
}
if (skip_prefix(var, "color.branch.", &slot_name)) {
int slot = LOOKUP_CONFIG(color_branch_slots, slot_name);
2009-12-12 13:25:24 +01:00
if (slot < 0)
return 0;
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(var);
return color_parse(value, branch_colors[slot]);
}
return git_color_default_config(var, value, cb);
}
static const char *branch_get_color(enum color_branch ix)
{
color: delay auto-color decision until point of use When we read a color value either from a config file or from the command line, we use git_config_colorbool to convert it from the tristate always/never/auto into a single yes/no boolean value. This has some timing implications with respect to starting a pager. If we start (or decide not to start) the pager before checking the colorbool, everything is fine. Either isatty(1) will give us the right information, or we will properly check for pager_in_use(). However, if we decide to start a pager after we have checked the colorbool, things are not so simple. If stdout is a tty, then we will have already decided to use color. However, the user may also have configured color.pager not to use color with the pager. In this case, we need to actually turn off color. Unfortunately, the pager code has no idea which color variables were turned on (and there are many of them throughout the code, and they may even have been manipulated after the colorbool selection by something like "--color" on the command line). This bug can be seen any time a pager is started after config and command line options are checked. This has affected "git diff" since 89d07f7 (diff: don't run pager if user asked for a diff style exit code, 2007-08-12). It has also affect the log family since 1fda91b (Fix 'git log' early pager startup error case, 2010-08-24). This patch splits the notion of parsing a colorbool and actually checking the configuration. The "use_color" variables now have an additional possible value, GIT_COLOR_AUTO. Users of the variable should use the new "want_color()" wrapper, which will lazily determine and cache the auto-color decision. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-18 07:04:23 +02:00
if (want_color(branch_use_color))
return branch_colors[ix];
return "";
}
static int branch_merged(int kind, const char *name,
struct commit *rev, struct commit *head_rev)
{
/*
* This checks whether the merge bases of branch and HEAD (or
* the other branch this branch builds upon) contains the
* branch, which means that the branch has already been merged
* safely to HEAD (or the other branch).
*/
struct commit *reference_rev = NULL;
const char *reference_name = NULL;
void *reference_name_to_free = NULL;
int merged;
if (kind == FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES) {
struct branch *branch = branch_get(name);
const char *upstream = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
struct object_id oid;
if (upstream &&
(reference_name = reference_name_to_free =
resolve_refdup(upstream, RESOLVE_REF_READING,
&oid, NULL)) != NULL)
reference_rev = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository,
&oid);
}
if (!reference_rev)
reference_rev = head_rev;
merged = in_merge_bases(rev, reference_rev);
/*
* After the safety valve is fully redefined to "check with
* upstream, if any, otherwise with HEAD", we should just
* return the result of the in_merge_bases() above without
* any of the following code, but during the transition period,
* a gentle reminder is in order.
*/
if ((head_rev != reference_rev) &&
in_merge_bases(rev, head_rev) != merged) {
if (merged)
warning(_("deleting branch '%s' that has been merged to\n"
" '%s', but not yet merged to HEAD."),
name, reference_name);
else
warning(_("not deleting branch '%s' that is not yet merged to\n"
" '%s', even though it is merged to HEAD."),
name, reference_name);
}
free(reference_name_to_free);
return merged;
}
static int check_branch_commit(const char *branchname, const char *refname,
const struct object_id *oid, struct commit *head_rev,
int kinds, int force)
{
struct commit *rev = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, oid);
if (!rev) {
error(_("Couldn't look up commit object for '%s'"), refname);
return -1;
}
if (!force && !branch_merged(kinds, branchname, rev, head_rev)) {
error(_("The branch '%s' is not fully merged.\n"
"If you are sure you want to delete it, "
"run 'git branch -D %s'."), branchname, branchname);
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
static void delete_branch_config(const char *branchname)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_addf(&buf, "branch.%s", branchname);
if (git_config_rename_section(buf.buf, NULL) < 0)
warning(_("Update of config-file failed"));
strbuf_release(&buf);
}
static int delete_branches(int argc, const char **argv, int force, int kinds,
int quiet)
{
struct commit *head_rev = NULL;
struct object_id oid;
char *name = NULL;
const char *fmt;
int i;
int ret = 0;
int remote_branch = 0;
struct strbuf bname = STRBUF_INIT;
unsigned allowed_interpret;
switch (kinds) {
case FILTER_REFS_REMOTES:
fmt = "refs/remotes/%s";
/* For subsequent UI messages */
remote_branch = 1;
allowed_interpret = INTERPRET_BRANCH_REMOTE;
force = 1;
break;
case FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES:
fmt = "refs/heads/%s";
allowed_interpret = INTERPRET_BRANCH_LOCAL;
break;
default:
die(_("cannot use -a with -d"));
}
if (!force) {
head_rev = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &head_oid);
if (!head_rev)
die(_("Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD"));
}
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_reset(&bname)) {
char *target = NULL;
int flags = 0;
strbuf_branchname(&bname, argv[i], allowed_interpret);
Avoid unnecessary "if-before-free" tests. This change removes all obvious useless if-before-free tests. E.g., it replaces code like this: if (some_expression) free (some_expression); with the now-equivalent: free (some_expression); It is equivalent not just because POSIX has required free(NULL) to work for a long time, but simply because it has worked for so long that no reasonable porting target fails the test. Here's some evidence from nearly 1.5 years ago: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031544.html FYI, the change below was prepared by running the following: git ls-files -z | xargs -0 \ perl -0x3b -pi -e \ 's/\bif\s*\(\s*(\S+?)(?:\s*!=\s*NULL)?\s*\)\s+(free\s*\(\s*\1\s*\))/$2/s' Note however, that it doesn't handle brace-enclosed blocks like "if (x) { free (x); }". But that's ok, since there were none like that in git sources. Beware: if you do use the above snippet, note that it can produce syntactically invalid C code. That happens when the affected "if"-statement has a matching "else". E.g., it would transform this if (x) free (x); else foo (); into this: free (x); else foo (); There were none of those here, either. If you're interested in automating detection of the useless tests, you might like the useless-if-before-free script in gnulib: [it *does* detect brace-enclosed free statements, and has a --name=S option to make it detect free-like functions with different names] http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=build-aux/useless-if-before-free Addendum: Remove one more (in imap-send.c), spotted by Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>. Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 18:26:32 +01:00
free(name);
name = mkpathdup(fmt, bname.buf);
if (kinds == FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES) {
const struct worktree *wt =
find_shared_symref("HEAD", name);
if (wt) {
error(_("Cannot delete branch '%s' "
"checked out at '%s'"),
bname.buf, wt->path);
ret = 1;
continue;
}
}
target = resolve_refdup(name,
RESOLVE_REF_READING
| RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE
| RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME,
&oid, &flags);
if (!target) {
error(remote_branch
? _("remote-tracking branch '%s' not found.")
: _("branch '%s' not found."), bname.buf);
ret = 1;
continue;
}
refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named refs We currently do not handle badly named refs well: $ cp .git/refs/heads/master .git/refs/heads/master.....@\*@\\. $ git branch fatal: Reference has invalid format: 'refs/heads/master.....@*@\.' $ git branch -D master.....@\*@\\. error: branch 'master.....@*@\.' not found. Users cannot recover from a badly named ref without manually finding and deleting the loose ref file or appropriate line in packed-refs. Making that easier will make it easier to tweak the ref naming rules in the future, for example to forbid shell metacharacters like '`' and '"', without putting people in a state that is hard to get out of. So allow "branch --list" to show these refs and allow "branch -d/-D" and "update-ref -d" to delete them. Other commands (for example to rename refs) will continue to not handle these refs but can be changed in later patches. Details: In resolving functions, refuse to resolve refs that don't pass the git-check-ref-format(1) check unless the new RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME flag is passed. Even with RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME, refuse to resolve refs that escape the refs/ directory and do not match the pattern [A-Z_]* (think "HEAD" and "MERGE_HEAD"). In locking functions, refuse to act on badly named refs unless they are being deleted and either are in the refs/ directory or match [A-Z_]*. Just like other invalid refs, flag resolved, badly named refs with the REF_ISBROKEN flag, treat them as resolving to null_sha1, and skip them in all iteration functions except for for_each_rawref. Flag badly named refs (but not symrefs pointing to badly named refs) with a REF_BAD_NAME flag to make it easier for future callers to notice and handle them specially. For example, in a later patch for-each-ref will use this flag to detect refs whose names can confuse callers parsing for-each-ref output. In the transaction API, refuse to create or update badly named refs, but allow deleting them (unless they try to escape refs/ and don't match [A-Z_]*). Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-03 20:45:43 +02:00
if (!(flags & (REF_ISSYMREF|REF_ISBROKEN)) &&
check_branch_commit(bname.buf, name, &oid, head_rev, kinds,
force)) {
ret = 1;
goto next;
}
if (delete_ref(NULL, name, is_null_oid(&oid) ? NULL : &oid,
REF_NO_DEREF)) {
error(remote_branch
? _("Error deleting remote-tracking branch '%s'")
: _("Error deleting branch '%s'"),
bname.buf);
ret = 1;
goto next;
}
if (!quiet) {
printf(remote_branch
? _("Deleted remote-tracking branch %s (was %s).\n")
: _("Deleted branch %s (was %s).\n"),
bname.buf,
refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named refs We currently do not handle badly named refs well: $ cp .git/refs/heads/master .git/refs/heads/master.....@\*@\\. $ git branch fatal: Reference has invalid format: 'refs/heads/master.....@*@\.' $ git branch -D master.....@\*@\\. error: branch 'master.....@*@\.' not found. Users cannot recover from a badly named ref without manually finding and deleting the loose ref file or appropriate line in packed-refs. Making that easier will make it easier to tweak the ref naming rules in the future, for example to forbid shell metacharacters like '`' and '"', without putting people in a state that is hard to get out of. So allow "branch --list" to show these refs and allow "branch -d/-D" and "update-ref -d" to delete them. Other commands (for example to rename refs) will continue to not handle these refs but can be changed in later patches. Details: In resolving functions, refuse to resolve refs that don't pass the git-check-ref-format(1) check unless the new RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME flag is passed. Even with RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME, refuse to resolve refs that escape the refs/ directory and do not match the pattern [A-Z_]* (think "HEAD" and "MERGE_HEAD"). In locking functions, refuse to act on badly named refs unless they are being deleted and either are in the refs/ directory or match [A-Z_]*. Just like other invalid refs, flag resolved, badly named refs with the REF_ISBROKEN flag, treat them as resolving to null_sha1, and skip them in all iteration functions except for for_each_rawref. Flag badly named refs (but not symrefs pointing to badly named refs) with a REF_BAD_NAME flag to make it easier for future callers to notice and handle them specially. For example, in a later patch for-each-ref will use this flag to detect refs whose names can confuse callers parsing for-each-ref output. In the transaction API, refuse to create or update badly named refs, but allow deleting them (unless they try to escape refs/ and don't match [A-Z_]*). Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-03 20:45:43 +02:00
(flags & REF_ISBROKEN) ? "broken"
: (flags & REF_ISSYMREF) ? target
: find_unique_abbrev(&oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV));
}
delete_branch_config(bname.buf);
next:
free(target);
}
Avoid unnecessary "if-before-free" tests. This change removes all obvious useless if-before-free tests. E.g., it replaces code like this: if (some_expression) free (some_expression); with the now-equivalent: free (some_expression); It is equivalent not just because POSIX has required free(NULL) to work for a long time, but simply because it has worked for so long that no reasonable porting target fails the test. Here's some evidence from nearly 1.5 years ago: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031544.html FYI, the change below was prepared by running the following: git ls-files -z | xargs -0 \ perl -0x3b -pi -e \ 's/\bif\s*\(\s*(\S+?)(?:\s*!=\s*NULL)?\s*\)\s+(free\s*\(\s*\1\s*\))/$2/s' Note however, that it doesn't handle brace-enclosed blocks like "if (x) { free (x); }". But that's ok, since there were none like that in git sources. Beware: if you do use the above snippet, note that it can produce syntactically invalid C code. That happens when the affected "if"-statement has a matching "else". E.g., it would transform this if (x) free (x); else foo (); into this: free (x); else foo (); There were none of those here, either. If you're interested in automating detection of the useless tests, you might like the useless-if-before-free script in gnulib: [it *does* detect brace-enclosed free statements, and has a --name=S option to make it detect free-like functions with different names] http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=build-aux/useless-if-before-free Addendum: Remove one more (in imap-send.c), spotted by Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>. Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 18:26:32 +01:00
free(name);
strbuf_release(&bname);
return ret;
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
static int calc_maxwidth(struct ref_array *refs, int remote_bonus)
{
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
int i, max = 0;
for (i = 0; i < refs->nr; i++) {
struct ref_array_item *it = refs->items[i];
const char *desc = it->refname;
int w;
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
skip_prefix(it->refname, "refs/heads/", &desc);
skip_prefix(it->refname, "refs/remotes/", &desc);
if (it->kind == FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD) {
char *head_desc = get_head_description();
w = utf8_strwidth(head_desc);
free(head_desc);
} else
w = utf8_strwidth(desc);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
if (it->kind == FILTER_REFS_REMOTES)
w += remote_bonus;
if (w > max)
max = w;
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
return max;
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
static const char *quote_literal_for_format(const char *s)
{
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
static struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_reset(&buf);
while (*s) {
const char *ep = strchrnul(s, '%');
if (s < ep)
strbuf_add(&buf, s, ep - s);
if (*ep == '%') {
strbuf_addstr(&buf, "%%");
s = ep + 1;
} else {
s = ep;
}
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
return buf.buf;
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
static char *build_format(struct ref_filter *filter, int maxwidth, const char *remote_prefix)
{
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
struct strbuf fmt = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf local = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf remote = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_addf(&local, "%%(if)%%(HEAD)%%(then)* %s%%(else) %s%%(end)",
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_CURRENT),
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_LOCAL));
strbuf_addf(&remote, " %s",
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_REMOTE));
if (filter->verbose) {
struct strbuf obname = STRBUF_INIT;
if (filter->abbrev < 0)
strbuf_addf(&obname, "%%(objectname:short)");
else if (!filter->abbrev)
strbuf_addf(&obname, "%%(objectname)");
else
strbuf_addf(&obname, "%%(objectname:short=%d)", filter->abbrev);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
strbuf_addf(&local, "%%(align:%d,left)%%(refname:lstrip=2)%%(end)", maxwidth);
strbuf_addstr(&local, branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_RESET));
strbuf_addf(&local, " %s ", obname.buf);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
if (filter->verbose > 1)
strbuf_addf(&local, "%%(if)%%(upstream)%%(then)[%s%%(upstream:short)%s%%(if)%%(upstream:track)"
"%%(then): %%(upstream:track,nobracket)%%(end)] %%(end)%%(contents:subject)",
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_UPSTREAM), branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_RESET));
else
strbuf_addf(&local, "%%(if)%%(upstream:track)%%(then)%%(upstream:track) %%(end)%%(contents:subject)");
strbuf_addf(&remote, "%%(align:%d,left)%s%%(refname:lstrip=2)%%(end)%s"
"%%(if)%%(symref)%%(then) -> %%(symref:short)"
"%%(else) %s %%(contents:subject)%%(end)",
maxwidth, quote_literal_for_format(remote_prefix),
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_RESET), obname.buf);
strbuf_release(&obname);
} else {
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
strbuf_addf(&local, "%%(refname:lstrip=2)%s%%(if)%%(symref)%%(then) -> %%(symref:short)%%(end)",
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_RESET));
strbuf_addf(&remote, "%s%%(refname:lstrip=2)%s%%(if)%%(symref)%%(then) -> %%(symref:short)%%(end)",
quote_literal_for_format(remote_prefix),
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
branch_get_color(BRANCH_COLOR_RESET));
}
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
strbuf_addf(&fmt, "%%(if:notequals=refs/remotes)%%(refname:rstrip=-2)%%(then)%s%%(else)%s%%(end)", local.buf, remote.buf);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
strbuf_release(&local);
strbuf_release(&remote);
return strbuf_detach(&fmt, NULL);
}
static void print_ref_list(struct ref_filter *filter, struct ref_sorting *sorting, struct ref_format *format)
{
int i;
struct ref_array array;
int maxwidth = 0;
const char *remote_prefix = "";
char *to_free = NULL;
/*
* If we are listing more than just remote branches,
* then remote branches will have a "remotes/" prefix.
* We need to account for this in the width.
*/
if (filter->kind != FILTER_REFS_REMOTES)
remote_prefix = "remotes/";
branch: clean up commit flags after merge-filter walk When we run `branch --merged`, we use prepare_revision_walk with the merge-filter marked as UNINTERESTING. Any branch tips that are marked UNINTERESTING after it returns must be ancestors of that commit. As we iterate through the list of refs to show, we check item->commit->object.flags to see whether it was marked. This interacts badly with --verbose, which will do a separate walk to find the ahead/behind information for each branch. There are two bad things that can happen: 1. The ahead/behind walk may get the wrong results, because it can see a bogus UNINTERESTING flag leftover from the merge-filter walk. 2. We may omit some branches if their tips are involved in the ahead/behind traversal of a branch shown earlier. The ahead/behind walk carefully cleans up its commit flags, meaning it may also erase the UNINTERESTING flag that we expect to check later. We can solve this by moving the merge-filter state for each ref into its "struct ref_item" as soon as we finish the merge-filter walk. That fixes (2). Then we are free to clear the commit flags we used in the walk, fixing (1). Note that we actually do away with the matches_merge_filter helper entirely here, and inline it between the revision walk and the flag-clearing. This ensures that nobody accidentally calls it at the wrong time (it is only safe to check in that instant between the setting and clearing of the global flag). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-18 12:49:43 +02:00
memset(&array, 0, sizeof(array));
branch: clean up commit flags after merge-filter walk When we run `branch --merged`, we use prepare_revision_walk with the merge-filter marked as UNINTERESTING. Any branch tips that are marked UNINTERESTING after it returns must be ancestors of that commit. As we iterate through the list of refs to show, we check item->commit->object.flags to see whether it was marked. This interacts badly with --verbose, which will do a separate walk to find the ahead/behind information for each branch. There are two bad things that can happen: 1. The ahead/behind walk may get the wrong results, because it can see a bogus UNINTERESTING flag leftover from the merge-filter walk. 2. We may omit some branches if their tips are involved in the ahead/behind traversal of a branch shown earlier. The ahead/behind walk carefully cleans up its commit flags, meaning it may also erase the UNINTERESTING flag that we expect to check later. We can solve this by moving the merge-filter state for each ref into its "struct ref_item" as soon as we finish the merge-filter walk. That fixes (2). Then we are free to clear the commit flags we used in the walk, fixing (1). Note that we actually do away with the matches_merge_filter helper entirely here, and inline it between the revision walk and the flag-clearing. This ensures that nobody accidentally calls it at the wrong time (it is only safe to check in that instant between the setting and clearing of the global flag). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-18 12:49:43 +02:00
filter_refs(&array, filter, filter->kind | FILTER_REFS_INCLUDE_BROKEN);
if (filter->verbose)
maxwidth = calc_maxwidth(&array, strlen(remote_prefix));
if (!format->format)
format->format = to_free = build_format(filter, maxwidth, remote_prefix);
format->use_color = branch_use_color;
if (verify_ref_format(format))
die(_("unable to parse format string"));
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
ref_array_sort(sorting, &array);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
for (i = 0; i < array.nr; i++) {
struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
if (format_ref_array_item(array.items[i], format, &out, &err))
die("%s", err.buf);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
if (column_active(colopts)) {
assert(!filter->verbose && "--column and --verbose are incompatible");
/* format to a string_list to let print_columns() do its job */
string_list_append(&output, out.buf);
} else {
fwrite(out.buf, 1, out.len, stdout);
putchar('\n');
}
strbuf_release(&err);
2017-01-10 09:49:52 +01:00
strbuf_release(&out);
}
ref_array_clear(&array);
free(to_free);
}
static void reject_rebase_or_bisect_branch(const char *target)
{
struct worktree **worktrees = get_worktrees(0);
int i;
for (i = 0; worktrees[i]; i++) {
struct worktree *wt = worktrees[i];
if (!wt->is_detached)
continue;
if (is_worktree_being_rebased(wt, target))
die(_("Branch %s is being rebased at %s"),
target, wt->path);
if (is_worktree_being_bisected(wt, target))
die(_("Branch %s is being bisected at %s"),
target, wt->path);
}
free_worktrees(worktrees);
}
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
static void copy_or_rename_branch(const char *oldname, const char *newname, int copy, int force)
{
struct strbuf oldref = STRBUF_INIT, newref = STRBUF_INIT, logmsg = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf oldsection = STRBUF_INIT, newsection = STRBUF_INIT;
const char *interpreted_oldname = NULL;
const char *interpreted_newname = NULL;
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 21:27:31 +01:00
int recovery = 0;
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (!oldname) {
if (copy)
die(_("cannot copy the current branch while not on any."));
else
die(_("cannot rename the current branch while not on any."));
}
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 21:27:31 +01:00
if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&oldref, oldname)) {
/*
* Bad name --- this could be an attempt to rename a
* ref that we used to allow to be created by accident.
*/
if (ref_exists(oldref.buf))
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 21:27:31 +01:00
recovery = 1;
else
die(_("Invalid branch name: '%s'"), oldname);
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 21:27:31 +01:00
}
/*
* A command like "git branch -M currentbranch currentbranch" cannot
* cause the worktree to become inconsistent with HEAD, so allow it.
*/
if (!strcmp(oldname, newname))
validate_branchname(newname, &newref);
else
validate_new_branchname(newname, &newref, force);
reject_rebase_or_bisect_branch(oldref.buf);
if (!skip_prefix(oldref.buf, "refs/heads/", &interpreted_oldname) ||
!skip_prefix(newref.buf, "refs/heads/", &interpreted_newname)) {
BUG("expected prefix missing for refs");
}
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (copy)
strbuf_addf(&logmsg, "Branch: copied %s to %s",
oldref.buf, newref.buf);
else
strbuf_addf(&logmsg, "Branch: renamed %s to %s",
oldref.buf, newref.buf);
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (!copy && rename_ref(oldref.buf, newref.buf, logmsg.buf))
die(_("Branch rename failed"));
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (copy && copy_existing_ref(oldref.buf, newref.buf, logmsg.buf))
die(_("Branch copy failed"));
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (recovery) {
if (copy)
warning(_("Created a copy of a misnamed branch '%s'"),
interpreted_oldname);
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
else
warning(_("Renamed a misnamed branch '%s' away"),
interpreted_oldname);
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
}
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 21:27:31 +01:00
if (!copy &&
replace_each_worktree_head_symref(oldref.buf, newref.buf, logmsg.buf))
die(_("Branch renamed to %s, but HEAD is not updated!"), newname);
strbuf_release(&logmsg);
strbuf_addf(&oldsection, "branch.%s", interpreted_oldname);
strbuf_release(&oldref);
strbuf_addf(&newsection, "branch.%s", interpreted_newname);
strbuf_release(&newref);
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (!copy && git_config_rename_section(oldsection.buf, newsection.buf) < 0)
die(_("Branch is renamed, but update of config-file failed"));
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (copy && strcmp(oldname, newname) && git_config_copy_section(oldsection.buf, newsection.buf) < 0)
die(_("Branch is copied, but update of config-file failed"));
strbuf_release(&oldsection);
strbuf_release(&newsection);
}
static GIT_PATH_FUNC(edit_description, "EDIT_DESCRIPTION")
static int edit_branch_description(const char *branch_name)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
read_branch_desc(&buf, branch_name);
if (!buf.len || buf.buf[buf.len-1] != '\n')
strbuf_addch(&buf, '\n');
strbuf_commented_addf(&buf,
_("Please edit the description for the branch\n"
" %s\n"
"Lines starting with '%c' will be stripped.\n"),
branch_name, comment_line_char);
write_file_buf(edit_description(), buf.buf, buf.len);
strbuf_reset(&buf);
if (launch_editor(edit_description(), &buf, NULL)) {
strbuf_release(&buf);
return -1;
}
strbuf_stripspace(&buf, 1);
strbuf_addf(&name, "branch.%s.description", branch_name);
git_config_set(name.buf, buf.len ? buf.buf : NULL);
strbuf_release(&name);
strbuf_release(&buf);
return 0;
}
branch: deprecate "-l" option The "-l" option is short for "--create-reflog". This has caused much confusion over the years. Most people expect it to work as "--list", because that would match the other "mode" options like -d/--delete and -m/--move, as well as the similar -l/--list option of git-tag. Adding to the confusion, using "-l" _appears_ to work as "--list" in some cases: $ git branch -l * master because the branch command defaults to listing (so even trying to specify --list in the command above is redundant). But that may bite the user later when they add a pattern, like: $ git branch -l foo which does not return an empty list, but in fact creates a new branch (with a reflog, naturally) called "foo". It's also probably quite uncommon for people to actually use "-l" to create a reflog. Since 0bee591869 (Enable reflogs by default in any repository with a working directory., 2006-12-14), this is the default in non-bare repositories. So it's rather unfortunate that the feature squats on the short-and-sweet "-l" (which was only added in 3a4b3f269c (Create/delete branch ref logs., 2006-05-19), meaning there were only 7 months where it was actually useful). Let's deprecate "-l" in hopes of eventually re-purposing it to "--list". Note that we issue the warning only when we're not in list mode. This means that people for whom it works as a happy accident, namely: $ git branch -l master won't see the warning at all. And when we eventually switch to it meaning "--list", that will just continue to work. We do the issue the warning for these important cases: - when we are actually creating a branch, in case the user really did mean it as "--create-reflog" - when we are in some _other_ mode, like deletion. There the "-l" is a noop for now, but it will eventually conflict with any other mode request, and the user should be told that this is changing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 11:24:14 +02:00
static int deprecated_reflog_option_cb(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg, int unset)
{
used_deprecated_reflog_option = 1;
*(int *)opt->value = !unset;
return 0;
}
int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
{
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
int delete = 0, rename = 0, copy = 0, force = 0, list = 0;
int reflog = 0, edit_description = 0;
int quiet = 0, unset_upstream = 0;
const char *new_upstream = NULL;
enum branch_track track;
struct ref_filter filter;
int icase = 0;
static struct ref_sorting *sorting = NULL, **sorting_tail = &sorting;
struct ref_format format = REF_FORMAT_INIT;
struct option options[] = {
OPT_GROUP(N_("Generic options")),
OPT__VERBOSE(&filter.verbose,
N_("show hash and subject, give twice for upstream branch")),
OPT__QUIET(&quiet, N_("suppress informational messages")),
OPT_SET_INT('t', "track", &track, N_("set up tracking mode (see git-pull(1))"),
BRANCH_TRACK_EXPLICIT),
OPT_SET_INT_F(0, "set-upstream", &track, N_("do not use"),
BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE, PARSE_OPT_HIDDEN),
OPT_STRING('u', "set-upstream-to", &new_upstream, N_("upstream"), N_("change the upstream info")),
OPT_BOOL(0, "unset-upstream", &unset_upstream, N_("Unset the upstream info")),
OPT__COLOR(&branch_use_color, N_("use colored output")),
OPT_SET_INT('r', "remotes", &filter.kind, N_("act on remote-tracking branches"),
FILTER_REFS_REMOTES),
OPT_CONTAINS(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only branches that contain the commit")),
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 19:40:57 +01:00
OPT_NO_CONTAINS(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only branches that don't contain the commit")),
OPT_WITH(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only branches that contain the commit")),
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 19:40:57 +01:00
OPT_WITHOUT(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only branches that don't contain the commit")),
OPT__ABBREV(&filter.abbrev),
OPT_GROUP(N_("Specific git-branch actions:")),
OPT_SET_INT('a', "all", &filter.kind, N_("list both remote-tracking and local branches"),
FILTER_REFS_REMOTES | FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES),
OPT_BIT('d', "delete", &delete, N_("delete fully merged branch"), 1),
OPT_BIT('D', NULL, &delete, N_("delete branch (even if not merged)"), 2),
OPT_BIT('m', "move", &rename, N_("move/rename a branch and its reflog"), 1),
OPT_BIT('M', NULL, &rename, N_("move/rename a branch, even if target exists"), 2),
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
OPT_BIT('c', "copy", &copy, N_("copy a branch and its reflog"), 1),
OPT_BIT('C', NULL, &copy, N_("copy a branch, even if target exists"), 2),
OPT_BOOL(0, "list", &list, N_("list branch names")),
branch: deprecate "-l" option The "-l" option is short for "--create-reflog". This has caused much confusion over the years. Most people expect it to work as "--list", because that would match the other "mode" options like -d/--delete and -m/--move, as well as the similar -l/--list option of git-tag. Adding to the confusion, using "-l" _appears_ to work as "--list" in some cases: $ git branch -l * master because the branch command defaults to listing (so even trying to specify --list in the command above is redundant). But that may bite the user later when they add a pattern, like: $ git branch -l foo which does not return an empty list, but in fact creates a new branch (with a reflog, naturally) called "foo". It's also probably quite uncommon for people to actually use "-l" to create a reflog. Since 0bee591869 (Enable reflogs by default in any repository with a working directory., 2006-12-14), this is the default in non-bare repositories. So it's rather unfortunate that the feature squats on the short-and-sweet "-l" (which was only added in 3a4b3f269c (Create/delete branch ref logs., 2006-05-19), meaning there were only 7 months where it was actually useful). Let's deprecate "-l" in hopes of eventually re-purposing it to "--list". Note that we issue the warning only when we're not in list mode. This means that people for whom it works as a happy accident, namely: $ git branch -l master won't see the warning at all. And when we eventually switch to it meaning "--list", that will just continue to work. We do the issue the warning for these important cases: - when we are actually creating a branch, in case the user really did mean it as "--create-reflog" - when we are in some _other_ mode, like deletion. There the "-l" is a noop for now, but it will eventually conflict with any other mode request, and the user should be told that this is changing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 11:24:14 +02:00
OPT_BOOL(0, "create-reflog", &reflog, N_("create the branch's reflog")),
{
OPTION_CALLBACK, 'l', NULL, &reflog, NULL,
N_("deprecated synonym for --create-reflog"),
PARSE_OPT_NOARG | PARSE_OPT_HIDDEN,
deprecated_reflog_option_cb
},
OPT_BOOL(0, "edit-description", &edit_description,
N_("edit the description for the branch")),
OPT__FORCE(&force, N_("force creation, move/rename, deletion"), PARSE_OPT_NOCOMPLETE),
OPT_MERGED(&filter, N_("print only branches that are merged")),
OPT_NO_MERGED(&filter, N_("print only branches that are not merged")),
OPT_COLUMN(0, "column", &colopts, N_("list branches in columns")),
OPT_CALLBACK(0 , "sort", sorting_tail, N_("key"),
N_("field name to sort on"), &parse_opt_ref_sorting),
{
OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "points-at", &filter.points_at, N_("object"),
N_("print only branches of the object"), 0, parse_opt_object_name
},
OPT_BOOL('i', "ignore-case", &icase, N_("sorting and filtering are case insensitive")),
OPT_STRING( 0 , "format", &format.format, N_("format"), N_("format to use for the output")),
OPT_END(),
};
setup_ref_filter_porcelain_msg();
memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
filter.kind = FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES;
filter.abbrev = -1;
if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h"))
usage_with_options(builtin_branch_usage, options);
git_config(git_branch_config, sorting_tail);
track = git_branch_track;
head = resolve_refdup("HEAD", 0, &head_oid, NULL);
if (!head)
die(_("Failed to resolve HEAD as a valid ref."));
if (!strcmp(head, "HEAD"))
filter.detached = 1;
else if (!skip_prefix(head, "refs/heads/", &head))
die(_("HEAD not found below refs/heads!"));
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_branch_usage,
0);
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (!delete && !rename && !copy && !edit_description && !new_upstream && !unset_upstream && argc == 0)
list = 1;
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 19:40:57 +01:00
if (filter.with_commit || filter.merge != REF_FILTER_MERGED_NONE || filter.points_at.nr ||
filter.no_commit)
list = 1;
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
if (!!delete + !!rename + !!copy + !!new_upstream +
list + unset_upstream > 1)
usage_with_options(builtin_branch_usage, options);
if (filter.abbrev == -1)
filter.abbrev = DEFAULT_ABBREV;
filter.ignore_case = icase;
finalize_colopts(&colopts, -1);
if (filter.verbose) {
if (explicitly_enable_column(colopts))
die(_("--column and --verbose are incompatible"));
colopts = 0;
}
if (force) {
delete *= 2;
rename *= 2;
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
copy *= 2;
}
if (list)
setup_auto_pager("branch", 1);
branch: deprecate "-l" option The "-l" option is short for "--create-reflog". This has caused much confusion over the years. Most people expect it to work as "--list", because that would match the other "mode" options like -d/--delete and -m/--move, as well as the similar -l/--list option of git-tag. Adding to the confusion, using "-l" _appears_ to work as "--list" in some cases: $ git branch -l * master because the branch command defaults to listing (so even trying to specify --list in the command above is redundant). But that may bite the user later when they add a pattern, like: $ git branch -l foo which does not return an empty list, but in fact creates a new branch (with a reflog, naturally) called "foo". It's also probably quite uncommon for people to actually use "-l" to create a reflog. Since 0bee591869 (Enable reflogs by default in any repository with a working directory., 2006-12-14), this is the default in non-bare repositories. So it's rather unfortunate that the feature squats on the short-and-sweet "-l" (which was only added in 3a4b3f269c (Create/delete branch ref logs., 2006-05-19), meaning there were only 7 months where it was actually useful). Let's deprecate "-l" in hopes of eventually re-purposing it to "--list". Note that we issue the warning only when we're not in list mode. This means that people for whom it works as a happy accident, namely: $ git branch -l master won't see the warning at all. And when we eventually switch to it meaning "--list", that will just continue to work. We do the issue the warning for these important cases: - when we are actually creating a branch, in case the user really did mean it as "--create-reflog" - when we are in some _other_ mode, like deletion. There the "-l" is a noop for now, but it will eventually conflict with any other mode request, and the user should be told that this is changing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 11:24:14 +02:00
if (used_deprecated_reflog_option && !list) {
warning("the '-l' alias for '--create-reflog' is deprecated;");
warning("it will be removed in a future version of Git");
}
if (delete) {
if (!argc)
die(_("branch name required"));
return delete_branches(argc, argv, delete > 1, filter.kind, quiet);
} else if (list) {
/* git branch --local also shows HEAD when it is detached */
if ((filter.kind & FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES) && filter.detached)
filter.kind |= FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD;
filter.name_patterns = argv;
/*
* If no sorting parameter is given then we default to sorting
* by 'refname'. This would give us an alphabetically sorted
* array with the 'HEAD' ref at the beginning followed by
* local branches 'refs/heads/...' and finally remote-tracking
* branches 'refs/remotes/...'.
*/
if (!sorting)
sorting = ref_default_sorting();
sorting->ignore_case = icase;
print_ref_list(&filter, sorting, &format);
print_columns(&output, colopts, NULL);
string_list_clear(&output, 0);
return 0;
}
else if (edit_description) {
const char *branch_name;
struct strbuf branch_ref = STRBUF_INIT;
if (!argc) {
if (filter.detached)
die(_("Cannot give description to detached HEAD"));
branch_name = head;
} else if (argc == 1)
branch_name = argv[0];
else
die(_("cannot edit description of more than one branch"));
strbuf_addf(&branch_ref, "refs/heads/%s", branch_name);
if (!ref_exists(branch_ref.buf)) {
strbuf_release(&branch_ref);
if (!argc)
return error(_("No commit on branch '%s' yet."),
branch_name);
else
return error(_("No branch named '%s'."),
branch_name);
}
strbuf_release(&branch_ref);
if (edit_branch_description(branch_name))
return 1;
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
} else if (copy) {
if (!argc)
die(_("branch name required"));
else if (argc == 1)
copy_or_rename_branch(head, argv[0], 1, copy > 1);
else if (argc == 2)
copy_or_rename_branch(argv[0], argv[1], 1, copy > 1);
else
die(_("too many branches for a copy operation"));
} else if (rename) {
if (!argc)
die(_("branch name required"));
else if (argc == 1)
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
copy_or_rename_branch(head, argv[0], 0, rename > 1);
else if (argc == 2)
branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration, this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved. This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version, e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted branch around for reference. Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of --move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we are doing it in similar way for --copy too. The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't unexpectedly behave differently than --move would. One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that: git checkout maint && git checkout master && git branch -c topic && git checkout - Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N} feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a future change. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 23:19:16 +02:00
copy_or_rename_branch(argv[0], argv[1], 0, rename > 1);
else
die(_("too many arguments for a rename operation"));
} else if (new_upstream) {
struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
if (argc > 1)
die(_("too many arguments to set new upstream"));
if (!branch) {
if (!argc || !strcmp(argv[0], "HEAD"))
die(_("could not set upstream of HEAD to %s when "
"it does not point to any branch."),
new_upstream);
die(_("no such branch '%s'"), argv[0]);
}
if (!ref_exists(branch->refname))
die(_("branch '%s' does not exist"), branch->name);
/*
* create_branch takes care of setting up the tracking
* info and making sure new_upstream is correct
*/
create_branch(branch->name, new_upstream, 0, 0, 0, quiet, BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE);
} else if (unset_upstream) {
struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
if (argc > 1)
die(_("too many arguments to unset upstream"));
if (!branch) {
if (!argc || !strcmp(argv[0], "HEAD"))
die(_("could not unset upstream of HEAD when "
"it does not point to any branch."));
die(_("no such branch '%s'"), argv[0]);
}
if (!branch_has_merge_config(branch))
die(_("Branch '%s' has no upstream information"), branch->name);
strbuf_addf(&buf, "branch.%s.remote", branch->name);
git_config_set_multivar(buf.buf, NULL, NULL, 1);
strbuf_reset(&buf);
strbuf_addf(&buf, "branch.%s.merge", branch->name);
git_config_set_multivar(buf.buf, NULL, NULL, 1);
strbuf_release(&buf);
} else if (argc > 0 && argc <= 2) {
struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
if (!branch)
die(_("no such branch '%s'"), argv[0]);
if (filter.kind != FILTER_REFS_BRANCHES)
die(_("-a and -r options to 'git branch' do not make sense with a branch name"));
if (track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE)
die(_("the '--set-upstream' option is no longer supported. Please use '--track' or '--set-upstream-to' instead."));
create_branch(argv[0], (argc == 2) ? argv[1] : head,
force, 0, reflog, quiet, track);
} else
usage_with_options(builtin_branch_usage, options);
return 0;
}