2005-09-08 02:26:23 +02:00
|
|
|
git-pull(1)
|
|
|
|
===========
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
|
|
----
|
2013-07-07 21:02:15 +02:00
|
|
|
git-pull - Fetch from and integrate with another repository or a local branch
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
--------
|
2011-07-02 04:38:26 +02:00
|
|
|
[verse]
|
2018-05-24 22:11:39 +02:00
|
|
|
'git pull' [<options>] [<repository> [<refspec>...]]
|
2005-07-16 09:17:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
2005-08-25 01:23:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
Incorporates changes from a remote repository into the current
|
|
|
|
branch. In its default mode, `git pull` is shorthand for
|
|
|
|
`git fetch` followed by `git merge FETCH_HEAD`.
|
2005-07-16 09:17:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
More precisely, 'git pull' runs 'git fetch' with the given
|
|
|
|
parameters and calls 'git merge' to merge the retrieved branch
|
|
|
|
heads into the current branch.
|
|
|
|
With `--rebase`, it runs 'git rebase' instead of 'git merge'.
|
2005-11-07 06:30:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
<repository> should be the name of a remote repository as
|
|
|
|
passed to linkgit:git-fetch[1]. <refspec> can name an
|
|
|
|
arbitrary remote ref (for example, the name of a tag) or even
|
2010-11-02 16:31:20 +01:00
|
|
|
a collection of refs with corresponding remote-tracking branches
|
2010-12-03 21:04:17 +01:00
|
|
|
(e.g., refs/heads/{asterisk}:refs/remotes/origin/{asterisk}),
|
|
|
|
but usually it is the name of a branch in the remote repository.
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default values for <repository> and <branch> are read from the
|
|
|
|
"remote" and "merge" configuration for the current branch
|
|
|
|
as set by linkgit:git-branch[1] `--track`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
|
|
|
|
"`master`":
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
A---B---C master on origin
|
|
|
|
/
|
|
|
|
D---E---F---G master
|
2013-10-31 21:43:35 +01:00
|
|
|
^
|
|
|
|
origin/master in your repository
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then "`git pull`" will fetch and replay the changes from the remote
|
|
|
|
`master` branch since it diverged from the local `master` (i.e., `E`)
|
|
|
|
until its current commit (`C`) on top of `master` and record the
|
|
|
|
result in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits
|
|
|
|
and a log message from the user describing the changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
2013-10-31 21:43:35 +01:00
|
|
|
A---B---C origin/master
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
/ \
|
|
|
|
D---E---F---G---H master
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See linkgit:git-merge[1] for details, including how conflicts
|
|
|
|
are presented and handled.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-21 20:17:53 +01:00
|
|
|
In Git 1.7.0 or later, to cancel a conflicting merge, use
|
|
|
|
`git reset --merge`. *Warning*: In older versions of Git, running 'git pull'
|
2010-01-07 17:42:27 +01:00
|
|
|
with uncommitted changes is discouraged: while possible, it leaves you
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
in a state that may be hard to back out of in the case of a conflict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If any of the remote changes overlap with local uncommitted changes,
|
2017-04-30 16:54:25 +02:00
|
|
|
the merge will be automatically canceled and the work tree untouched.
|
2010-08-02 23:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
It is generally best to get any local changes in working order before
|
|
|
|
pulling or stash them away with linkgit:git-stash[1].
|
2010-01-07 17:42:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-16 09:17:42 +02:00
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
-------
|
2009-10-22 16:14:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-24 13:50:21 +01:00
|
|
|
-q::
|
|
|
|
--quiet::
|
2010-02-24 13:50:28 +01:00
|
|
|
This is passed to both underlying git-fetch to squelch reporting of
|
|
|
|
during transfer, and underlying git-merge to squelch output during
|
|
|
|
merging.
|
2010-02-24 13:50:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-v::
|
|
|
|
--verbose::
|
|
|
|
Pass --verbose to git-fetch and git-merge.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-06 23:11:21 +01:00
|
|
|
--[no-]recurse-submodules[=yes|on-demand|no]::
|
doc: --recurse-submodules mostly applies to active submodules
The documentation refers to "initialized" or "populated" submodules,
to explain which submodules are affected by '--recurse-submodules', but
the real terminology here is 'active' submodules. Update the
documentation accordingly.
Some terminology:
- Active is defined in gitsubmodules(7), it only involves the
configuration variables 'submodule.active', 'submodule.<name>.active'
and 'submodule.<name>.url'. The function
submodule.c::is_submodule_active checks that a submodule is active.
- Populated means that the submodule's working tree is present (and the
gitfile correctly points to the submodule repository), i.e. either the
superproject was cloned with ` --recurse-submodules`, or the user ran
`git submodule update --init`, or `git submodule init [<path>]` and
`git submodule update [<path>]` separately which populated the
submodule working tree. This does not involve the 3 configuration
variables above.
- Initialized (at least in the context of the man pages involved in this
patch) means both "populated" and "active" as defined above, i.e. what
`git submodule update --init` does.
The --recurse-submodules option mostly affects active submodules. An
exception is `git fetch` where the option affects populated submodules.
As a consequence, in `git pull --recurse-submodules` the fetch affects
populated submodules, but the resulting working tree update only affects
active submodules.
In the documentation of `git-pull`, let's distinguish between the
fetching part which affects populated submodules, and the updating of
worktrees, which only affects active submodules.
Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-06 15:57:09 +02:00
|
|
|
This option controls if new commits of populated submodules should
|
|
|
|
be fetched, and if the working trees of active submodules should be
|
|
|
|
updated, too (see linkgit:git-fetch[1], linkgit:git-config[1] and
|
pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only)
Teach pull to optionally update submodules when '--recurse-submodules'
is provided. This will teach pull to run 'submodule update --rebase'
when the '--recurse-submodules' and '--rebase' flags are given under
specific circumstances.
On a rebase workflow:
=====================
1. Both sides change the submodule
------------------------------
Let's assume the following history in a submodule:
H---I---J---K---L local branch
\
M---N---O---P remote branch
and the following in the superproject (recorded submodule in parens):
A(H)---B(I)---F(K)---G(L) local branch
\
C(N)---D(N)---E(P) remote branch
In an ideal world this would rebase the submodule and rewrite
the submodule pointers that the superproject points at such that
the superproject looks like
A(H)---B(I) F(K')---G(L') rebased branch
\ /
C(N)---D(N)---E(P) remote branch
and the submodule as:
J---K---L (old dangeling tip)
/
H---I J'---K'---L' rebased branch
\ /
M---N---O---P remote branch
And if a conflict arises in the submodule the superproject rebase
would stop at that commit at which the submodule conflict occurs.
Currently a "pull --rebase" in the superproject produces
a merge conflict as the submodule pointer changes are
conflicting and cannot be resolved.
2. Local submodule changes only
-----------------------
Assuming histories as above, except that the remote branch
would not contain submodule changes, then a result as
A(H)---B(I) F(K)---G(L) rebased branch
\ /
C(I)---D(I)---E(I) remote branch
is desire-able. This is what currently happens in rebase.
If the recursive flag is given, the ideal git would
produce a superproject as:
A(H)---B(I) F(K')---G(L') rebased branch (incl. sub rebase!)
\ /
C(I)---D(I)---E(I) remote branch
and the submodule as:
J---K---L (old dangeling tip)
/
H---I J'---K'---L' locally rebased branch
\ /
M---N---O---P advanced branch
This patch doesn't address this issue, however
a test is added that this fails up front.
3. Remote submodule changes only
----------------------
Assuming histories as in (1) except that the local superproject branch
would not have touched the submodule the rebase already works out in the
superproject with no conflicts:
A(H)---B(I) F(P)---G(P) rebased branch (no sub changes)
\ /
C(N)---D(N)---E(P) remote branch
The recurse flag as presented in this patch would additionally
update the submodule as:
H---I J'---K'---L' rebased branch
\ /
M---N---O---P remote branch
As neither J, K, L nor J', K', L' are referred to from the superproject,
no rewriting of the superproject commits is required.
Conclusion for 'pull --rebase --recursive'
-----------------------------------------
If there are no local superproject changes it is sufficient to call
"submodule update --rebase" as this produces the desired results. In case
of conflicts, the behavior is the same as in 'submodule update --recursive'
which is assumed to be sane.
This patch implements (3) only.
On a merge workflow:
====================
We'll start off with the same underlying DAG as in (1) in the rebase
workflow. So in an ideal world a 'pull --merge --recursive' would
produce this:
H---I---J---K---L----X
\ /
M---N---O---P
with X as the new merge-commit in the submodule and the superproject
as:
A(H)---B(I)---F(K)---G(L)---Y(X)
\ /
C(N)---D(N)---E(P)
However modifying the submodules on the fly is not supported in git-merge
such that Y(X) is not easy to produce in a single patch. In fact git-merge
doesn't know about submodules at all.
However when at least one side does not contain commits touching the
submodule at all, then we do not need to perform the merge for the
submodule but a fast-forward can be done via checking out either L or P
in the submodule. This strategy is implemented in 68d03e4a6e (Implement
automatic fast-forward merge for submodules, 2010-07-07) already, so
to align with the rebase behavior we need to also update the worktree
of the submodule.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-23 21:13:02 +02:00
|
|
|
linkgit:gitmodules[5]).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
If the checkout is done via rebase, local submodule commits are rebased as well.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
If the update is done via merge, the submodule conflicts are resolved and checked out.
|
2011-02-07 23:24:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-22 16:14:57 +02:00
|
|
|
Options related to merging
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-25 11:17:38 +01:00
|
|
|
:git-pull: 1
|
2005-11-04 09:06:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-14 19:26:21 +01:00
|
|
|
include::merge-options.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-16 11:50:18 +02:00
|
|
|
-r::
|
2018-04-25 14:29:38 +02:00
|
|
|
--rebase[=false|true|merges|preserve|interactive]::
|
2013-08-13 05:43:42 +02:00
|
|
|
When true, rebase the current branch on top of the upstream
|
|
|
|
branch after fetching. If there is a remote-tracking branch
|
|
|
|
corresponding to the upstream branch and the upstream branch
|
|
|
|
was rebased since last fetched, the rebase uses that information
|
|
|
|
to avoid rebasing non-local changes.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2018-04-25 14:29:38 +02:00
|
|
|
When set to `merges`, rebase using `git rebase --rebase-merges` so that
|
|
|
|
the local merge commits are included in the rebase (see
|
|
|
|
linkgit:git-rebase[1] for details).
|
|
|
|
+
|
2019-05-28 14:42:15 +02:00
|
|
|
When set to `preserve` (deprecated in favor of `merges`), rebase with the
|
|
|
|
`--preserve-merges` option passed to `git rebase` so that locally created
|
|
|
|
merge commits will not be flattened.
|
2013-08-13 05:43:42 +02:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
When false, merge the current branch into the upstream branch.
|
2010-11-12 19:55:58 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
2016-01-13 13:17:15 +01:00
|
|
|
When `interactive`, enable the interactive mode of rebase.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2015-03-11 21:32:45 +01:00
|
|
|
See `pull.rebase`, `branch.<name>.rebase` and `branch.autoSetupRebase` in
|
2010-12-03 09:20:54 +01:00
|
|
|
linkgit:git-config[1] if you want to make `git pull` always use
|
docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literal
In asciidoc 7, backticks like `foo` produced a typographic
effect, but did not otherwise affect the syntax. In asciidoc
8, backticks introduce an "inline literal" inside which markup
is not interpreted. To keep compatibility with existing
documents, asciidoc 8 has a "no-inline-literal" attribute to
keep the old behavior. We enabled this so that the
documentation could be built on either version.
It has been several years now, and asciidoc 7 is no longer
in wide use. We can now decide whether or not we want
inline literals on their own merits, which are:
1. The source is much easier to read when the literal
contains punctuation. You can use `master~1` instead
of `master{tilde}1`.
2. They are less error-prone. Because of point (1), we
tend to make mistakes and forget the extra layer of
quoting.
This patch removes the no-inline-literal attribute from the
Makefile and converts every use of backticks in the
documentation to an inline literal (they must be cleaned up,
or the example above would literally show "{tilde}" in the
output).
Problematic sites were found by grepping for '`.*[{\\]' and
examined and fixed manually. The results were then verified
by comparing the output of "html2text" on the set of
generated html pages. Doing so revealed that in addition to
making the source more readable, this patch fixes several
formatting bugs:
- HTML rendering used the ellipsis character instead of
literal "..." in code examples (like "git log A...B")
- some code examples used the right-arrow character
instead of '->' because they failed to quote
- api-config.txt did not quote tilde, and the resulting
HTML contained a bogus snippet like:
<tt><sub></tt> foo <tt></sub>bar</tt>
which caused some parsers to choke and omit whole
sections of the page.
- git-commit.txt confused ``foo`` (backticks inside a
literal) with ``foo'' (matched double-quotes)
- mentions of `A U Thor <author@example.com>` used to
erroneously auto-generate a mailto footnote for
author@example.com
- the description of --word-diff=plain incorrectly showed
the output as "[-removed-] and {added}", not "{+added+}".
- using "prime" notation like:
commit `C` and its replacement `C'`
confused asciidoc into thinking that everything between
the first backtick and the final apostrophe were meant
to be inside matched quotes
- asciidoc got confused by the escaping of some of our
asterisks. In particular,
`credential.\*` and `credential.<url>.\*`
properly escaped the asterisk in the first case, but
literally passed through the backslash in the second
case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-26 10:51:57 +02:00
|
|
|
`--rebase` instead of merging.
|
2008-02-11 20:22:01 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
2008-06-12 23:19:09 +02:00
|
|
|
[NOTE]
|
|
|
|
This is a potentially _dangerous_ mode of operation.
|
2008-02-11 20:22:01 +01:00
|
|
|
It rewrites history, which does not bode well when you
|
|
|
|
published that history already. Do *not* use this option
|
|
|
|
unless you have read linkgit:git-rebase[1] carefully.
|
2007-11-28 14:11:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
--no-rebase::
|
|
|
|
Override earlier --rebase.
|
2007-11-28 14:11:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-22 16:14:57 +02:00
|
|
|
Options related to fetching
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-19 20:24:32 +01:00
|
|
|
include::fetch-options.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include::pull-fetch-param.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include::urls-remotes.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include::merge-strategies.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
DEFAULT BEHAVIOUR
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Often people use `git pull` without giving any parameter.
|
|
|
|
Traditionally, this has been equivalent to saying `git pull
|
|
|
|
origin`. However, when configuration `branch.<name>.remote` is
|
|
|
|
present while on branch `<name>`, that value is used instead of
|
|
|
|
`origin`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to determine what URL to use to fetch from, the value
|
|
|
|
of the configuration `remote.<origin>.url` is consulted
|
2017-06-01 12:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
and if there is not any such variable, the value on the `URL:` line
|
|
|
|
in `$GIT_DIR/remotes/<origin>` is used.
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to determine what remote branches to fetch (and
|
2010-11-02 16:31:23 +01:00
|
|
|
optionally store in the remote-tracking branches) when the command is
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
run without any refspec parameters on the command line, values
|
|
|
|
of the configuration variable `remote.<origin>.fetch` are
|
|
|
|
consulted, and if there aren't any, `$GIT_DIR/remotes/<origin>`
|
2017-06-01 12:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
is consulted and its `Pull:` lines are used.
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
In addition to the refspec formats described in the OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
section, you can have a globbing refspec that looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A globbing refspec must have a non-empty RHS (i.e. must store
|
2010-11-02 16:31:23 +01:00
|
|
|
what were fetched in remote-tracking branches), and its LHS and RHS
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
must end with `/*`. The above specifies that all remote
|
2010-11-02 16:31:23 +01:00
|
|
|
branches are tracked using remote-tracking branches in
|
2007-02-09 08:35:43 +01:00
|
|
|
`refs/remotes/origin/` hierarchy under the same name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rule to determine which remote branch to merge after
|
|
|
|
fetching is a bit involved, in order not to break backward
|
|
|
|
compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If explicit refspecs were given on the command
|
|
|
|
line of `git pull`, they are all merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When no refspec was given on the command line, then `git pull`
|
|
|
|
uses the refspec from the configuration or
|
|
|
|
`$GIT_DIR/remotes/<origin>`. In such cases, the following
|
|
|
|
rules apply:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. If `branch.<name>.merge` configuration for the current
|
|
|
|
branch `<name>` exists, that is the name of the branch at the
|
|
|
|
remote site that is merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. If the refspec is a globbing one, nothing is merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Otherwise the remote branch of the first refspec is merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-04 09:06:20 +01:00
|
|
|
EXAMPLES
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 06:29:28 +02:00
|
|
|
* Update the remote-tracking branches for the repository
|
|
|
|
you cloned from, then merge one of them into your
|
|
|
|
current branch:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
2017-04-30 16:54:25 +02:00
|
|
|
$ git pull
|
|
|
|
$ git pull origin
|
2008-05-07 06:29:28 +02:00
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Normally the branch merged in is the HEAD of the remote repository,
|
|
|
|
but the choice is determined by the branch.<name>.remote and
|
|
|
|
branch.<name>.merge options; see linkgit:git-config[1] for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Merge into the current branch the remote branch `next`:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
$ git pull origin next
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
2020-04-05 17:50:19 +02:00
|
|
|
This leaves a copy of `next` temporarily in FETCH_HEAD, and
|
|
|
|
updates the remote-tracking branch `origin/next`.
|
|
|
|
The same can be done by invoking fetch and merge:
|
2008-05-07 06:29:28 +02:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
2009-10-21 19:21:23 +02:00
|
|
|
$ git fetch origin
|
|
|
|
$ git merge origin/next
|
2008-05-07 06:29:28 +02:00
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
2005-11-05 03:36:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-04 09:06:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-27 12:04:51 +01:00
|
|
|
If you tried a pull which resulted in complex conflicts and
|
2010-01-10 00:33:00 +01:00
|
|
|
would want to start over, you can recover with 'git reset'.
|
2005-12-17 03:23:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-14 19:20:24 +01:00
|
|
|
include::transfer-data-leaks.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-06 23:14:15 +01:00
|
|
|
BUGS
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
Using --recurse-submodules can only fetch new commits in already checked
|
|
|
|
out submodules right now. When e.g. upstream added a new submodule in the
|
2019-08-03 07:33:51 +02:00
|
|
|
just fetched commits of the superproject the submodule itself cannot be
|
2011-03-06 23:14:15 +01:00
|
|
|
fetched, making it impossible to check out that submodule later without
|
2013-01-21 20:17:53 +01:00
|
|
|
having to do a fetch again. This is expected to be fixed in a future Git
|
2011-03-06 23:14:15 +01:00
|
|
|
version.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-05 10:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
--------
|
2007-12-29 07:20:38 +01:00
|
|
|
linkgit:git-fetch[1], linkgit:git-merge[1], linkgit:git-config[1]
|
2005-11-05 10:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-10 23:32:30 +02:00
|
|
|
GIT
|
|
|
|
---
|
2008-06-06 09:07:32 +02:00
|
|
|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
|