undef/git-commit-vandalism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8087a62086
git-commit-vandalism/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh

264 lines
7.4 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
#!/bin/sh
test_description='test smart fetching over http via http-backend'
. ./test-lib.sh
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-httpd.sh
start_httpd
test_expect_success 'setup repository' '
t5551: do not assume the "matching" push is the default Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-16 03:05:07 +01:00
git config push.default matching &&
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
echo content >file &&
git add file &&
git commit -m one
'
test_expect_success 'create http-accessible bare repository' '
mkdir "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" &&
(cd "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" &&
git --bare init
) &&
git remote add public "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" &&
git push public master:master
'
t: test basic smart-http authentication We do not currently test authentication over smart-http at all. In theory, it should work exactly as it does for dumb http (which we do test). It does indeed work for these simple tests, but this patch lays the groundwork for more complex tests in future patches. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27 15:25:36 +02:00
setup_askpass_helper
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
cat >exp <<EOF
> GET /smart/repo.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1
> Accept: */*
Enable info/refs gzip decompression in HTTP client Some HTTP servers try to use gzip compression on the /info/refs request to save transfer bandwidth. Repositories with many tags may find the /info/refs request can be gzipped to be 50% of the original size due to the few but often repeated bytes used (hex SHA-1 and commonly digits in tag names). For most HTTP requests enable "Accept-Encoding: gzip" ensuring the /info/refs payload can use this encoding format. Only request gzip encoding from servers. Although deflate is supported by libcurl, most servers have standardized on gzip encoding for compression as that is what most browsers support. Asking for deflate increases request sizes by a few bytes, but is unlikely to ever be used by a server. Disable the Accept-Encoding header on probe RPCs as response bodies are supposed to be exactly 4 bytes long, "0000". The HTTP headers requesting and indicating compression use more space than the data transferred in the body. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20 01:12:02 +02:00
> Accept-Encoding: gzip
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
> Pragma: no-cache
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Pragma: no-cache
< Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate
< Content-Type: application/x-git-upload-pack-advertisement
> POST /smart/repo.git/git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1
Enable info/refs gzip decompression in HTTP client Some HTTP servers try to use gzip compression on the /info/refs request to save transfer bandwidth. Repositories with many tags may find the /info/refs request can be gzipped to be 50% of the original size due to the few but often repeated bytes used (hex SHA-1 and commonly digits in tag names). For most HTTP requests enable "Accept-Encoding: gzip" ensuring the /info/refs payload can use this encoding format. Only request gzip encoding from servers. Although deflate is supported by libcurl, most servers have standardized on gzip encoding for compression as that is what most browsers support. Asking for deflate increases request sizes by a few bytes, but is unlikely to ever be used by a server. Disable the Accept-Encoding header on probe RPCs as response bodies are supposed to be exactly 4 bytes long, "0000". The HTTP headers requesting and indicating compression use more space than the data transferred in the body. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20 01:12:02 +02:00
> Accept-Encoding: gzip
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
> Content-Type: application/x-git-upload-pack-request
remote-curl: Fix Accept header for smart HTTP connections We actually expect to see an application/x-git-upload-pack-result but we lied and said we Accept *-response. This was a typo on my part when I was writing the code. Fortunately the wrong Accept header had no real impact, as the deployed git-http-backend servers were not testing the Accept header before they returned their content. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-12 18:54:04 +01:00
> Accept: application/x-git-upload-pack-result
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
> Content-Length: xxx
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Pragma: no-cache
< Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate
< Content-Type: application/x-git-upload-pack-result
EOF
test_expect_success 'clone http repository' '
GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1 git clone --quiet $HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git clone 2>err &&
test_cmp file clone/file &&
tr '\''\015'\'' Q <err |
sed -e "
s/Q\$//
/^[*] /d
t5551-http-fetch: Work around some libcurl versions Some versions of libcurl report their output when GIT_CURL_VERBOSE is set differently than other versions do. At least one variant (version unknown but likely pre-7.18.1) reports the POST payload to stderr, and omits the blank line after each HTTP request/response. We clip these lines out of the stderr output now before doing the compare, so we aren't surprised by this trivial difference. Reported-by: Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-09 19:10:36 +01:00
/^$/d
/^< $/d
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
/^[^><]/{
s/^/> /
}
/^> User-Agent: /d
/^> Host: /d
t5551-http-fetch: Work around broken Accept header in libcurl Unfortunately at least one version of libcurl has a bug causing it to include "Accept: */*" in the same POST request where we have already asked for "Accept: application/x-git-upload-pack-response". This is a bug in libcurl, not Git, or our test vector. The application has explicitly asked the server for a single content type, but libcurl has mistakenly also told the server the client application will accept */*, which is any content type. Based on the libcurl change log, this "Accept: */*" header bug may have been fixed in version 7.18.1 released March 30, 2008: http://curl.haxx.se/changes.html#7_18_1 Rather than require users to upgrade libcurl we change the test vector to trim this line out of the 2nd request. Reported-by: Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-09 19:10:37 +01:00
/^> POST /,$ {
/^> Accept: [*]\\/[*]/d
}
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
s/^> Content-Length: .*/> Content-Length: xxx/
t5551-http-fetch: Work around some libcurl versions Some versions of libcurl report their output when GIT_CURL_VERBOSE is set differently than other versions do. At least one variant (version unknown but likely pre-7.18.1) reports the POST payload to stderr, and omits the blank line after each HTTP request/response. We clip these lines out of the stderr output now before doing the compare, so we aren't surprised by this trivial difference. Reported-by: Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-09 19:10:36 +01:00
/^> 00..want /d
/^> 00.*done/d
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
/^< Server: /d
/^< Expires: /d
/^< Date: /d
/^< Content-Length: /d
/^< Transfer-Encoding: /d
" >act &&
test_cmp exp act
'
test_expect_success 'fetch changes via http' '
echo content >>file &&
git commit -a -m two &&
t: fix trivial &&-chain breakage These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20 11:07:15 +01:00
git push public &&
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
(cd clone && git pull) &&
test_cmp file clone/file
'
cat >exp <<EOF
GET /smart/repo.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1 200
POST /smart/repo.git/git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1 200
GET /smart/repo.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1 200
POST /smart/repo.git/git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1 200
EOF
test_expect_success 'used upload-pack service' '
sed -e "
s/^.* \"//
s/\"//
s/ [1-9][0-9]*\$//
s/^GET /GET /
" >act <"$HTTPD_ROOT_PATH"/access.log &&
test_cmp exp act
'
smart-http: Don't change POST to GET when following redirect For a long time (29508e1 "Isolate shared HTTP request functionality", Fri Nov 18 11:02:58 2005), we've followed HTTP redirects with CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION. However, when the remote HTTP server returns a redirect the default libcurl action is to change a POST request into a GET request while following the redirect, but the remote http backend does not expect that. Fix this by telling libcurl to always keep the request as type POST with CURLOPT_POSTREDIR. For users of libcurl older than 7.19.1, use CURLOPT_POST301 instead, which only follows 301s instead of both 301s and 302s. Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-25 06:20:35 +02:00
test_expect_success 'follow redirects (301)' '
git clone $HTTPD_URL/smart-redir-perm/repo.git --quiet repo-p
'
test_expect_success 'follow redirects (302)' '
git clone $HTTPD_URL/smart-redir-temp/repo.git --quiet repo-t
'
remote-curl: rewrite base url from info/refs redirects For efficiency and security reasons, an earlier commit in this series taught http_get_* to re-write the base url based on redirections we saw while making a specific request. This commit wires that option into the info/refs request, meaning that a redirect from http://example.com/foo.git/info/refs to https://example.com/bar.git/info/refs will behave as if "https://example.com/bar.git" had been provided to git in the first place. The tests bear some explanation. We introduce two new hierearchies into the httpd test config: 1. Requests to /smart-redir-limited will work only for the initial info/refs request, but not any subsequent requests. As a result, we can confirm whether the client is re-rooting its requests after the initial contact, since otherwise it will fail (it will ask for "repo.git/git-upload-pack", which is not redirected). 2. Requests to smart-redir-auth will redirect, and require auth after the redirection. Since we are using the redirected base for further requests, we also update the credential struct, in order not to mislead the user (or credential helpers) about which credential is needed. We can therefore check the GIT_ASKPASS prompts to make sure we are prompting for the new location. Because we have neither multiple servers nor https support in our test setup, we can only redirect between paths, meaning we need to turn on credential.useHttpPath to see the difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-28 10:35:35 +02:00
test_expect_success 'redirects re-root further requests' '
git clone $HTTPD_URL/smart-redir-limited/repo.git repo-redir-limited
'
t: test basic smart-http authentication We do not currently test authentication over smart-http at all. In theory, it should work exactly as it does for dumb http (which we do test). It does indeed work for these simple tests, but this patch lays the groundwork for more complex tests in future patches. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27 15:25:36 +02:00
test_expect_success 'clone from password-protected repository' '
echo two >expect &&
use distinct username/password for http auth tests The httpd server we set up to test git's http client code knows about a single account, in which both the username and password are "user@host" (the unusual use of the "@" here is to verify that we handle the character correctly when URL escaped). This means that we may miss a certain class of errors in which the username and password are mixed up internally by git. We can make our tests more robust by having distinct values for the username and password. In addition to tweaking the server passwd file and the client URL, we must teach the "askpass" harness to accept multiple values. As a bonus, this makes the setup of some tests more obvious; when we are expecting git to ask only about the password, we can seed the username askpass response with a bogus value. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-02 08:38:35 +01:00
set_askpass user@host pass@host &&
t: test basic smart-http authentication We do not currently test authentication over smart-http at all. In theory, it should work exactly as it does for dumb http (which we do test). It does indeed work for these simple tests, but this patch lays the groundwork for more complex tests in future patches. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27 15:25:36 +02:00
git clone --bare "$HTTPD_URL/auth/smart/repo.git" smart-auth &&
expect_askpass both user@host &&
git --git-dir=smart-auth log -1 --format=%s >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
t: test http access to "half-auth" repositories Some sites set up http access to repositories such that fetching is anonymous and unauthenticated, but pushing is authenticated. While there are multiple ways to do this, the technique advertised in the git-http-backend manpage is to block access to locations matching "/git-receive-pack$". Let's emulate that advice in our test setup, which makes it clear that this advice does not actually work. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27 15:25:53 +02:00
test_expect_success 'clone from auth-only-for-push repository' '
echo two >expect &&
set_askpass wrong &&
git clone --bare "$HTTPD_URL/auth-push/smart/repo.git" smart-noauth &&
expect_askpass none &&
git --git-dir=smart-noauth log -1 --format=%s >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
remote-curl: retry failed requests for auth even with gzip Commit b81401c taught the post_rpc function to retry the http request after prompting for credentials. However, it did not handle two cases: 1. If we have a large request, we do not retry. That's OK, since we would have sent a probe (with retry) already. 2. If we are gzipping the request, we do not retry. That was considered OK, because the intended use was for push (e.g., listing refs is OK, but actually pushing objects is not), and we never gzip on push. This patch teaches post_rpc to retry even a gzipped request. This has two advantages: 1. It is possible to configure a "half-auth" state for fetching, where the set of refs and their sha1s are advertised, but one cannot actually fetch objects. This is not a recommended configuration, as it leaks some information about what is in the repository (e.g., an attacker can try brute-forcing possible content in your repository and checking whether it matches your branch sha1). However, it can be slightly more convenient, since a no-op fetch will not require a password at all. 2. It future-proofs us should we decide to ever gzip more requests. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2012-10-31 12:29:16 +01:00
test_expect_success 'clone from auth-only-for-objects repository' '
echo two >expect &&
use distinct username/password for http auth tests The httpd server we set up to test git's http client code knows about a single account, in which both the username and password are "user@host" (the unusual use of the "@" here is to verify that we handle the character correctly when URL escaped). This means that we may miss a certain class of errors in which the username and password are mixed up internally by git. We can make our tests more robust by having distinct values for the username and password. In addition to tweaking the server passwd file and the client URL, we must teach the "askpass" harness to accept multiple values. As a bonus, this makes the setup of some tests more obvious; when we are expecting git to ask only about the password, we can seed the username askpass response with a bogus value. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-02 08:38:35 +01:00
set_askpass user@host pass@host &&
remote-curl: retry failed requests for auth even with gzip Commit b81401c taught the post_rpc function to retry the http request after prompting for credentials. However, it did not handle two cases: 1. If we have a large request, we do not retry. That's OK, since we would have sent a probe (with retry) already. 2. If we are gzipping the request, we do not retry. That was considered OK, because the intended use was for push (e.g., listing refs is OK, but actually pushing objects is not), and we never gzip on push. This patch teaches post_rpc to retry even a gzipped request. This has two advantages: 1. It is possible to configure a "half-auth" state for fetching, where the set of refs and their sha1s are advertised, but one cannot actually fetch objects. This is not a recommended configuration, as it leaks some information about what is in the repository (e.g., an attacker can try brute-forcing possible content in your repository and checking whether it matches your branch sha1). However, it can be slightly more convenient, since a no-op fetch will not require a password at all. 2. It future-proofs us should we decide to ever gzip more requests. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2012-10-31 12:29:16 +01:00
git clone --bare "$HTTPD_URL/auth-fetch/smart/repo.git" half-auth &&
expect_askpass both user@host &&
git --git-dir=half-auth log -1 --format=%s >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'no-op half-auth fetch does not require a password' '
set_askpass wrong &&
git --git-dir=half-auth fetch &&
expect_askpass none
'
remote-curl: rewrite base url from info/refs redirects For efficiency and security reasons, an earlier commit in this series taught http_get_* to re-write the base url based on redirections we saw while making a specific request. This commit wires that option into the info/refs request, meaning that a redirect from http://example.com/foo.git/info/refs to https://example.com/bar.git/info/refs will behave as if "https://example.com/bar.git" had been provided to git in the first place. The tests bear some explanation. We introduce two new hierearchies into the httpd test config: 1. Requests to /smart-redir-limited will work only for the initial info/refs request, but not any subsequent requests. As a result, we can confirm whether the client is re-rooting its requests after the initial contact, since otherwise it will fail (it will ask for "repo.git/git-upload-pack", which is not redirected). 2. Requests to smart-redir-auth will redirect, and require auth after the redirection. Since we are using the redirected base for further requests, we also update the credential struct, in order not to mislead the user (or credential helpers) about which credential is needed. We can therefore check the GIT_ASKPASS prompts to make sure we are prompting for the new location. Because we have neither multiple servers nor https support in our test setup, we can only redirect between paths, meaning we need to turn on credential.useHttpPath to see the difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-28 10:35:35 +02:00
test_expect_success 'redirects send auth to new location' '
use distinct username/password for http auth tests The httpd server we set up to test git's http client code knows about a single account, in which both the username and password are "user@host" (the unusual use of the "@" here is to verify that we handle the character correctly when URL escaped). This means that we may miss a certain class of errors in which the username and password are mixed up internally by git. We can make our tests more robust by having distinct values for the username and password. In addition to tweaking the server passwd file and the client URL, we must teach the "askpass" harness to accept multiple values. As a bonus, this makes the setup of some tests more obvious; when we are expecting git to ask only about the password, we can seed the username askpass response with a bogus value. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-02 08:38:35 +01:00
set_askpass user@host pass@host &&
remote-curl: rewrite base url from info/refs redirects For efficiency and security reasons, an earlier commit in this series taught http_get_* to re-write the base url based on redirections we saw while making a specific request. This commit wires that option into the info/refs request, meaning that a redirect from http://example.com/foo.git/info/refs to https://example.com/bar.git/info/refs will behave as if "https://example.com/bar.git" had been provided to git in the first place. The tests bear some explanation. We introduce two new hierearchies into the httpd test config: 1. Requests to /smart-redir-limited will work only for the initial info/refs request, but not any subsequent requests. As a result, we can confirm whether the client is re-rooting its requests after the initial contact, since otherwise it will fail (it will ask for "repo.git/git-upload-pack", which is not redirected). 2. Requests to smart-redir-auth will redirect, and require auth after the redirection. Since we are using the redirected base for further requests, we also update the credential struct, in order not to mislead the user (or credential helpers) about which credential is needed. We can therefore check the GIT_ASKPASS prompts to make sure we are prompting for the new location. Because we have neither multiple servers nor https support in our test setup, we can only redirect between paths, meaning we need to turn on credential.useHttpPath to see the difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-28 10:35:35 +02:00
git -c credential.useHttpPath=true \
clone $HTTPD_URL/smart-redir-auth/repo.git repo-redir-auth &&
expect_askpass both user@host auth/smart/repo.git
'
remote-curl: let users turn off smart http Usually there is no need for users to specify whether an http remote is smart or dumb; the protocol is designed so that a single initial request is made, and the client can determine the server's capability from the response. However, some misconfigured dumb-only servers may not like the initial request by a smart client, as it contains a query string. Until recently, commit 703e6e7 worked around this by making a second request. However, that commit was recently reverted due to its side effect of masking the initial request's error code. Since git has had that workaround for several years, we don't know exactly how many such misconfigured servers are out there. The reversion of 703e6e7 assumes they are rare enough not to worry about. Still, that reversion leaves somebody who does run into such a server with no escape hatch at all. Let's give them an environment variable they can tweak to perform the "dumb" request. This is intentionally not a documented interface. It's overly simple and is really there for debugging in case somebody does complain about git not working with their server. A real user-facing interface would entail a per-remote or per-URL config variable. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20 23:30:58 +02:00
test_expect_success 'disable dumb http on server' '
git --git-dir="$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" \
config http.getanyfile false
'
test_expect_success 'GIT_SMART_HTTP can disable smart http' '
(GIT_SMART_HTTP=0 &&
export GIT_SMART_HTTP &&
cd clone &&
test_must_fail git fetch)
'
Verify Content-Type from smart HTTP servers Before parsing a suspected smart-HTTP response verify the returned Content-Type matches the standard. This protects a client from attempting to process a payload that smells like a smart-HTTP server response. JGit has been doing this check on all responses since the dawn of time. I mistakenly failed to include it in git-core when smart HTTP was introduced. At the time I didn't know how to get the Content-Type from libcurl. I punted, meant to circle back and fix this, and just plain forgot about it. Signed-off-by: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-31 22:02:07 +01:00
test_expect_success 'invalid Content-Type rejected' '
t: fix severe &&-chain breakage These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, in a location which causes a significant portion of the test to be missed (e.g., the test effectively does nothing, or consists of a long string of actions and output comparisons, and we throw away the exit code of at least one part of the string). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20 11:06:15 +01:00
test_must_fail git clone $HTTPD_URL/broken_smart/repo.git 2>actual &&
t5551: fix expected error output We should probably get rid of the check of message instead, but in the meantime this should do. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-05 01:21:42 +01:00
grep "not valid:" actual
Verify Content-Type from smart HTTP servers Before parsing a suspected smart-HTTP response verify the returned Content-Type matches the standard. This protects a client from attempting to process a payload that smells like a smart-HTTP server response. JGit has been doing this check on all responses since the dawn of time. I mistakenly failed to include it in git-core when smart HTTP was introduced. At the time I didn't know how to get the Content-Type from libcurl. I punted, meant to circle back and fix this, and just plain forgot about it. Signed-off-by: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-31 22:02:07 +01:00
'
http-backend: respect GIT_NAMESPACE with dumb clients Filter the list of refs returned via the dumb HTTP protocol according to the active namespace, consistent with other clients of the upload-pack service. Signed-off-by: John Koleszar <jkoleszar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-10 02:55:08 +02:00
test_expect_success 'create namespaced refs' '
test_commit namespaced &&
git push public HEAD:refs/namespaces/ns/refs/heads/master &&
git --git-dir="$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" \
symbolic-ref refs/namespaces/ns/HEAD refs/namespaces/ns/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success 'smart clone respects namespace' '
git clone "$HTTPD_URL/smart_namespace/repo.git" ns-smart &&
echo namespaced >expect &&
git --git-dir=ns-smart/.git log -1 --format=%s >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'dumb clone via http-backend respects namespace' '
git --git-dir="$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" \
config http.getanyfile true &&
GIT_SMART_HTTP=0 git clone \
"$HTTPD_URL/smart_namespace/repo.git" ns-dumb &&
echo namespaced >expect &&
git --git-dir=ns-dumb/.git log -1 --format=%s >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
http: add http.savecookies option to write out HTTP cookies HTTP servers may send Set-Cookie headers in a response and expect them to be set on subsequent requests. By default, libcurl behavior is to store such cookies in memory and reuse them across requests within a single session. However, it may also make sense, depending on the server and the cookies, to store them across sessions. Provide users an option to enable this behavior, writing cookies out to the same file specified in http.cookiefile. Signed-off-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-24 00:40:17 +02:00
cat >cookies.txt <<EOF
127.0.0.1 FALSE /smart_cookies/ FALSE 0 othername othervalue
EOF
cat >expect_cookies.txt <<EOF
127.0.0.1 FALSE /smart_cookies/ FALSE 0 othername othervalue
127.0.0.1 FALSE /smart_cookies/repo.git/info/ FALSE 0 name value
EOF
test_expect_success 'cookies stored in http.cookiefile when http.savecookies set' '
git config http.cookiefile cookies.txt &&
git config http.savecookies true &&
git ls-remote $HTTPD_URL/smart_cookies/repo.git master &&
t: fix moderate &&-chain breakage These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but in a way that probably does not effect the outcome of the test. Most of these are of the form: some_cmd >actual test_cmp expect actual The main point of the test is to verify the output, and a failure in some_cmd would probably be noticed by bogus output. But it is good for the tests to also confirm that "some_cmd" does not die unexpectedly after producing its output. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20 11:06:44 +01:00
tail -3 cookies.txt >cookies_tail.txt &&
t5551: Remove header from curl cookie file The URL included in the header appears to vary from curl version to curl version. Since we only care about the final few lines, only test them. However, make sure the blank line after the header is still included to make sure there are no extra cookie lines. Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-05 17:59:24 +02:00
test_cmp expect_cookies.txt cookies_tail.txt
http: add http.savecookies option to write out HTTP cookies HTTP servers may send Set-Cookie headers in a response and expect them to be set on subsequent requests. By default, libcurl behavior is to store such cookies in memory and reuse them across requests within a single session. However, it may also make sense, depending on the server and the cookies, to store them across sessions. Provide users an option to enable this behavior, writing cookies out to the same file specified in http.cookiefile. Signed-off-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-24 00:40:17 +02:00
'
upload-pack: fix transfer.hiderefs over smart-http When upload-pack advertises the refs (either for a normal, non-stateless request, or for the initial contact in a stateless one), we call for_each_ref with the send_ref function as its callback. send_ref, in turn, calls mark_our_ref, which checks whether the ref is hidden, and sets OUR_REF or HIDDEN_REF on the object as appropriate. If it is hidden, mark_our_ref also returns "1" to signal send_ref that the ref should not be advertised. If we are not advertising refs, (i.e., the follow-up invocation by an http client to send its "want" lines), we use mark_our_ref directly as a callback to for_each_ref. Its marking does the right thing, but when it then returns "1" to for_each_ref, the latter interprets this as an error and stops iterating. As a result, we skip marking all of the refs that come lexicographically after it. Any "want" lines from the client asking for those objects will fail, as they were not properly marked with OUR_REF. To solve this, we introduce a wrapper callback around mark_our_ref which always returns 0 (even if the ref is hidden, we want to keep iterating). We also tweak the signature of mark_our_ref to exclude unnecessary parameters that were present only to conform to the callback interface. This should make it less likely for somebody to accidentally use it as a callback in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:42:12 +01:00
test_expect_success 'transfer.hiderefs works over smart-http' '
test_commit hidden &&
test_commit visible &&
git push public HEAD^:refs/heads/a HEAD:refs/heads/b &&
git --git-dir="$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" \
config transfer.hiderefs refs/heads/a &&
git clone --bare "$HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git" hidden.git &&
test_must_fail git -C hidden.git rev-parse --verify a &&
git -C hidden.git rev-parse --verify b
'
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper We create 50,000 tags to check that we don't overflow the command-line of fetch-pack. But by using run_with_cmdline_limit, we can get the same effect with a much smaller number of tags. This makes the test fast enough that we can drop the EXPENSIVE prereq, which means people will actually run it. It was not documented to do so, but this test was also the only test of a clone-over-http that requires multiple POSTs during the conversation. We can continue to test that by dropping http.postbuffer to its minimum size, and checking that we get two POSTs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:57:05 +01:00
test_expect_success 'create 2,000 tags in the repo' '
remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow This is main test case for the original problem that triggered this patch series. We create a repo with 50k tags and then test whether git-clone over the smart HTTP protocol succeeds. Note that we construct the repo in a slightly different way than the original script used to reproduce the problem. This is because the original script just created 50k tags all pointing to the same commit, so if there was a bug where remote-curl.c was not passing all the refs to fetch-pack we wouldn't know. The clone would succeed even if only one tag was passed, because all the other tags were pointing at the same SHA and would be considered present. Instead we create a repo with 50k independent (dangling) commits and then tag each of those commits with a unique tag. This way if one of the tags is not given to fetch-pack, later stages of the clone would complain about it. This allows us to test both that the command line overflow was fixed, as well as that it was fixed in a way that doesn't leave out any of the refs. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-02 17:17:03 +02:00
(
cd "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" &&
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper We create 50,000 tags to check that we don't overflow the command-line of fetch-pack. But by using run_with_cmdline_limit, we can get the same effect with a much smaller number of tags. This makes the test fast enough that we can drop the EXPENSIVE prereq, which means people will actually run it. It was not documented to do so, but this test was also the only test of a clone-over-http that requires multiple POSTs during the conversation. We can continue to test that by dropping http.postbuffer to its minimum size, and checking that we get two POSTs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:57:05 +01:00
for i in $(test_seq 2000)
remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow This is main test case for the original problem that triggered this patch series. We create a repo with 50k tags and then test whether git-clone over the smart HTTP protocol succeeds. Note that we construct the repo in a slightly different way than the original script used to reproduce the problem. This is because the original script just created 50k tags all pointing to the same commit, so if there was a bug where remote-curl.c was not passing all the refs to fetch-pack we wouldn't know. The clone would succeed even if only one tag was passed, because all the other tags were pointing at the same SHA and would be considered present. Instead we create a repo with 50k independent (dangling) commits and then tag each of those commits with a unique tag. This way if one of the tags is not given to fetch-pack, later stages of the clone would complain about it. This allows us to test both that the command line overflow was fixed, as well as that it was fixed in a way that doesn't leave out any of the refs. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-02 17:17:03 +02:00
do
echo "commit refs/heads/too-many-refs"
echo "mark :$i"
echo "committer git <git@example.com> $i +0000"
echo "data 0"
echo "M 644 inline bla.txt"
echo "data 4"
echo "bla"
# make every commit dangling by always
# rewinding the branch after each commit
echo "reset refs/heads/too-many-refs"
echo "from :1"
done | git fast-import --export-marks=marks &&
# now assign tags to all the dangling commits we created above
t: use perl instead of "$PERL_PATH" where applicable As of the last commit, we can use "perl" instead of "$PERL_PATH" when running tests, as the former is now a function which uses the latter. As the shorter "perl" is easier on the eyes, let's switch to using it everywhere. This is not quite a mechanical s/$PERL_PATH/perl/ replacement, though. There are some places where we invoke perl from a script we generate on the fly, and those scripts do not have access to our internal shell functions. The result can be double-checked by running: ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl make test which continues to pass even after this patch. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-29 02:23:03 +01:00
tag=$(perl -e "print \"bla\" x 30") &&
t5551: do not use unportable sed '\+' The set-up step to prepare a repository with 50000 tags used a non-porable '\+' to match one-or-more. The error was not caught because the next test that uses that repository did not even bother to check if these expected tags were actually cloned to the resulting repository. Fix the sed construct to use BRE and update the "clone" test that wanted to test cloning from such a repository with many refs to check the resulting repository. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-13 00:50:59 +02:00
sed -e "s|^:\([^ ]*\) \(.*\)$|\2 refs/tags/$tag-\1|" <marks >>packed-refs
remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow This is main test case for the original problem that triggered this patch series. We create a repo with 50k tags and then test whether git-clone over the smart HTTP protocol succeeds. Note that we construct the repo in a slightly different way than the original script used to reproduce the problem. This is because the original script just created 50k tags all pointing to the same commit, so if there was a bug where remote-curl.c was not passing all the refs to fetch-pack we wouldn't know. The clone would succeed even if only one tag was passed, because all the other tags were pointing at the same SHA and would be considered present. Instead we create a repo with 50k independent (dangling) commits and then tag each of those commits with a unique tag. This way if one of the tags is not given to fetch-pack, later stages of the clone would complain about it. This allows us to test both that the command line overflow was fixed, as well as that it was fixed in a way that doesn't leave out any of the refs. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-02 17:17:03 +02:00
)
'
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper We create 50,000 tags to check that we don't overflow the command-line of fetch-pack. But by using run_with_cmdline_limit, we can get the same effect with a much smaller number of tags. This makes the test fast enough that we can drop the EXPENSIVE prereq, which means people will actually run it. It was not documented to do so, but this test was also the only test of a clone-over-http that requires multiple POSTs during the conversation. We can continue to test that by dropping http.postbuffer to its minimum size, and checking that we get two POSTs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:57:05 +01:00
test_expect_success CMDLINE_LIMIT \
'clone the 2,000 tag repo to check OS command line overflow' '
run_with_limited_cmdline git clone $HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git too-many-refs &&
t5551: do not use unportable sed '\+' The set-up step to prepare a repository with 50000 tags used a non-porable '\+' to match one-or-more. The error was not caught because the next test that uses that repository did not even bother to check if these expected tags were actually cloned to the resulting repository. Fix the sed construct to use BRE and update the "clone" test that wanted to test cloning from such a repository with many refs to check the resulting repository. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-13 00:50:59 +02:00
(
cd too-many-refs &&
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper We create 50,000 tags to check that we don't overflow the command-line of fetch-pack. But by using run_with_cmdline_limit, we can get the same effect with a much smaller number of tags. This makes the test fast enough that we can drop the EXPENSIVE prereq, which means people will actually run it. It was not documented to do so, but this test was also the only test of a clone-over-http that requires multiple POSTs during the conversation. We can continue to test that by dropping http.postbuffer to its minimum size, and checking that we get two POSTs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:57:05 +01:00
git for-each-ref refs/tags >actual &&
test_line_count = 2000 actual
t5551: do not use unportable sed '\+' The set-up step to prepare a repository with 50000 tags used a non-porable '\+' to match one-or-more. The error was not caught because the next test that uses that repository did not even bother to check if these expected tags were actually cloned to the resulting repository. Fix the sed construct to use BRE and update the "clone" test that wanted to test cloning from such a repository with many refs to check the resulting repository. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-13 00:50:59 +02:00
)
remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow This is main test case for the original problem that triggered this patch series. We create a repo with 50k tags and then test whether git-clone over the smart HTTP protocol succeeds. Note that we construct the repo in a slightly different way than the original script used to reproduce the problem. This is because the original script just created 50k tags all pointing to the same commit, so if there was a bug where remote-curl.c was not passing all the refs to fetch-pack we wouldn't know. The clone would succeed even if only one tag was passed, because all the other tags were pointing at the same SHA and would be considered present. Instead we create a repo with 50k independent (dangling) commits and then tag each of those commits with a unique tag. This way if one of the tags is not given to fetch-pack, later stages of the clone would complain about it. This allows us to test both that the command line overflow was fixed, as well as that it was fixed in a way that doesn't leave out any of the refs. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-02 17:17:03 +02:00
'
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper We create 50,000 tags to check that we don't overflow the command-line of fetch-pack. But by using run_with_cmdline_limit, we can get the same effect with a much smaller number of tags. This makes the test fast enough that we can drop the EXPENSIVE prereq, which means people will actually run it. It was not documented to do so, but this test was also the only test of a clone-over-http that requires multiple POSTs during the conversation. We can continue to test that by dropping http.postbuffer to its minimum size, and checking that we get two POSTs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 05:57:05 +01:00
test_expect_success 'large fetch-pack requests can be split across POSTs' '
GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1 git -c http.postbuffer=65536 \
clone --bare "$HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git" split.git 2>err &&
grep "^> POST" err >posts &&
test_line_count = 2 posts
'
test smart http fetch and push The top level directory "/smart/" of the test Apache server is mapped through our git-http-backend CGI, but uses the same underlying repository space as the server's document root. This is the most simple installation possible. Server logs are checked to verify the client has accessed only the smart URLs during the test. During fetch testing the headers are also logged from libcurl to ensure we are making a reasonably sane HTTP request, and getting back reasonably sane response headers from the CGI. When validating the request headers used during smart fetch we munge away the actual Content-Length and replace it with the placeholder "xxx". This avoids unnecessary varability in the test caused by an unrelated change in the requested capabilities in the first want line of the request. However, we still want to look for and verify that Content-Length was used, because smaller payloads should be using Content-Length and not "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". When validating the server response headers we must discard both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, as Apache2 can use either format to return our response. During development of this test I observed Apache returning both forms, depending on when the processes got CPU time. If our CGI returned the pack data quickly, Apache just buffered the whole thing and returned a Content-Length. If our CGI took just a bit too long to complete, Apache flushed its buffer and instead used "Transfer-Encoding: chunked". Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-31 01:47:47 +01:00
stop_httpd
test_done
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink