git-commit-vandalism/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh

408 lines
10 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
test_description='git status for submodule'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_create_repo_with_commit () {
test_create_repo "$1" &&
(
cd "$1" &&
: >bar &&
git add bar &&
git commit -m " Add bar" &&
: >foo &&
git add foo &&
git commit -m " Add foo"
)
}
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
sanitize_output () {
sed -e "s/$OID_REGEX/HASH/" -e "s/$OID_REGEX/HASH/" output >output2 &&
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
mv output2 output
}
test_expect_success 'setup' '
test_create_repo_with_commit sub &&
echo output > .gitignore &&
git add sub .gitignore &&
git commit -m "Add submodule sub"
'
test_expect_success 'status clean' '
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "nothing to commit" output
'
test_expect_success 'commit --dry-run -a clean' '
test_must_fail git commit --dry-run -a >output &&
test_i18ngrep "nothing to commit" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with modified file in submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "changed" >sub/foo &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (modified content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with modified file in submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "changed" >sub/foo &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
test_expect_success 'status with modified file in submodule (short)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "changed" >sub/foo &&
git status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
m sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (modified content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
test_expect_success 'status with added file in submodule (short)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
m sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (untracked content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status -uno with untracked file in submodule' '
git status -uno >output &&
test_i18ngrep "^nothing to commit" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in submodule (porcelain)' '
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in submodule (short)' '
git status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
? sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added and untracked file in submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (modified content, untracked content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with added and untracked file in submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with modified file in modified submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
rm sub/new-file &&
(cd sub && echo "next change" >foo && git commit -m "next change" foo) &&
echo "changed" >sub/foo &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (new commits, modified content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with modified file in modified submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "changed" >sub/foo &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in modified submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (new commits, modified content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in modified submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in modified submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (new commits, untracked content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in modified submodule (porcelain)' '
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added and untracked file in modified submodule' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (new commits, modified content, untracked content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with added and untracked file in modified submodule (porcelain)' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
echo "content" >sub/new-file &&
git status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'setup .git file for sub' '
(cd sub &&
rm -f new-file
REAL="$(pwd)/../.real" &&
mv .git "$REAL"
echo "gitdir: $REAL" >.git) &&
echo .real >>.gitignore &&
git commit -m "added .real to .gitignore" .gitignore
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in modified submodule with .git file' '
(cd sub && git reset --hard && echo >foo && git add foo) &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "modified: sub (new commits, modified content)" output
'
test_expect_success 'status with a lot of untracked files in the submodule' '
(
cd sub
i=0 &&
while test $i -lt 1024
do
>some-file-$i
i=$(( $i + 1 ))
done
) &&
git status --porcelain sub 2>err.actual &&
test_must_be_empty err.actual &&
rm err.actual
'
test_expect_success 'rm submodule contents' '
rm -rf sub &&
mkdir sub
'
test_expect_success 'status clean (empty submodule dir)' '
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "nothing to commit" output
'
test_expect_success 'status -a clean (empty submodule dir)' '
test_must_fail git commit --dry-run -a >output &&
test_i18ngrep "nothing to commit" output
'
cat >status_expect <<\EOF
AA .gitmodules
A sub1
EOF
test_expect_success 'status with merge conflict in .gitmodules' '
git clone . super &&
test_create_repo_with_commit sub1 &&
test_tick &&
test_create_repo_with_commit sub2 &&
(
cd super &&
prev=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
git checkout -b add_sub1 &&
git submodule add ../sub1 &&
git commit -m "add sub1" &&
git checkout -b add_sub2 $prev &&
git submodule add ../sub2 &&
git commit -m "add sub2" &&
git checkout -b merge_conflict_gitmodules &&
test_must_fail git merge add_sub1 &&
git status -s >../status_actual 2>&1
) &&
test_cmp status_actual status_expect
'
sha1_merge_sub1=$(cd sub1 && git rev-parse HEAD)
sha1_merge_sub2=$(cd sub2 && git rev-parse HEAD)
short_sha1_merge_sub1=$(cd sub1 && git rev-parse --short HEAD)
short_sha1_merge_sub2=$(cd sub2 && git rev-parse --short HEAD)
cat >diff_expect <<\EOF
diff --cc .gitmodules
index badaa4c,44f999a..0000000
--- a/.gitmodules
+++ b/.gitmodules
@@@ -1,3 -1,3 +1,9 @@@
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+[submodule "sub2"]
+ path = sub2
+ url = ../sub2
++=======
+ [submodule "sub1"]
+ path = sub1
+ url = ../sub1
++>>>>>>> add_sub1
EOF
cat >diff_submodule_expect <<\EOF
diff --cc .gitmodules
index badaa4c,44f999a..0000000
--- a/.gitmodules
+++ b/.gitmodules
@@@ -1,3 -1,3 +1,9 @@@
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+[submodule "sub2"]
+ path = sub2
+ url = ../sub2
++=======
+ [submodule "sub1"]
+ path = sub1
+ url = ../sub1
++>>>>>>> add_sub1
EOF
test_expect_success 'diff with merge conflict in .gitmodules' '
(
cd super &&
git diff >../diff_actual 2>&1
) &&
test_cmp diff_expect diff_actual
'
test_expect_success 'diff --submodule with merge conflict in .gitmodules' '
(
cd super &&
git diff --submodule >../diff_submodule_actual 2>&1
) &&
test_cmp diff_submodule_expect diff_submodule_actual
'
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
# We'll setup different cases for further testing:
# sub1 will contain a nested submodule,
# sub2 will have an untracked file
# sub3 will have an untracked repository
test_expect_success 'setup superproject with untracked file in nested submodule' '
(
cd super &&
git clean -dfx &&
rm .gitmodules &&
git submodule add -f ./sub1 &&
git submodule add -f ./sub2 &&
git submodule add -f ./sub1 sub3 &&
git commit -a -m "messy merge in superproject" &&
(
cd sub1 &&
git submodule add ../sub2 &&
git commit -a -m "add sub2 to sub1"
) &&
git add sub1 &&
git commit -a -m "update sub1 to contain nested sub"
) &&
echo content >super/sub1/sub2/file &&
echo content >super/sub2/file &&
git -C super/sub3 clone ../../sub2 untracked_repository
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (porcelain)' '
git -C super status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub1
M sub2
M sub3
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (porcelain=2)' '
git -C super status --porcelain=2 >output &&
sanitize_output output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub2
1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub3
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (short)' '
git -C super status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
? sub1
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes If I add an untracked file to a submodule or modify a tracked file, currently "git status --short" treats the change in the same way as changes to the current HEAD of the submodule: $ git clone --quiet --recurse-submodules https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit $ echo hello >gerrit/plugins/replication/stray-file $ sed -i -e 's/.*//' gerrit/plugins/replication/.mailmap $ git -C gerrit status --short M plugins/replication This is by analogy with ordinary files, where "M" represents a change that has not been added yet to the index. But this change cannot be added to the index without entering the submodule, "git add"-ing it, and running "git commit", so the analogy is counterproductive. Introduce new status letters " ?" and " m" for this. These are similar to the existing "??" and " M" but mean that the submodule (not the parent project) has new untracked files and modified files, respectively. The user can use "git add" and "git commit" from within the submodule to add them. Changes to the submodule's HEAD commit can be recorded in the index with a plain "git add -u" and are shown with " M", like today. To avoid excessive clutter, show at most one of " ?", " m", and " M" for the submodule. They represent increasing levels of change --- the last one that applies is shown (e.g., " m" if there are both modified files and untracked files in the submodule, or " M" if the submodule's HEAD has been modified and it has untracked files). While making these changes, we need to make sure to not break porcelain level 1, which shares code with "status --short". We only change "git status --short". Non-short "git status" and "git status --porcelain=2" already handle these cases by showing more detail: $ git -C gerrit status --porcelain=2 1 .M S.MU 160000 160000 160000 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c 305c864db28eb0c77c8499bc04c87de3f849cf3c plugins/replication $ git -C gerrit status [...] modified: plugins/replication (modified content, untracked content) Scripts caring about these distinctions should use --porcelain=2. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-30 00:26:15 +02:00
? sub2
? sub3
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'setup superproject with modified file in nested submodule' '
git -C super/sub1/sub2 add file &&
git -C super/sub2 add file
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (porcelain)' '
git -C super status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub1
M sub2
M sub3
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (porcelain=2)' '
git -C super status --porcelain=2 >output &&
sanitize_output output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
1 .M S.M. 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
1 .M S.M. 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub2
1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub3
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (short)' '
git -C super status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
m sub1
m sub2
? sub3
EOF
'
test_done