t3433: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
"Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge" messages.
Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
-m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
bisect back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking
'git commit', 2017-11-24)
After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
--exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
digging any further than that.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19 18:04:06 +01:00
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_description='git rebase across mode change'
|
|
|
|
|
built-ins & libs & helpers: add/move destructors, fix leaks
Fix various leaks in built-ins, libraries and a test helper here we
were missing a call to strbuf_release(), string_list_clear() etc, or
were calling them after a potential "return".
Comments on individual changes:
- builtin/checkout.c: Fix a memory leak that was introduced in [1]. A
sibling leak introduced in [2] was recently fixed in [3]. As with [3]
we should be using the wt_status_state_free_buffers() API introduced
in [4].
- builtin/repack.c: Fix a leak that's been here since this use of
"strbuf_release()" was added in a1bbc6c0176 (repack: rewrite the shell
script in C, 2013-09-15). We don't use the variable for anything
except this loop, so we can instead free it right afterwards.
- builtin/rev-parse: Fix a leak that's been here since this code was
added in 21d47835386 (Add a parseopt mode to git-rev-parse to bring
parse-options to shell scripts., 2007-11-04).
- builtin/stash.c: Fix a couple of leaks that have been here since
this code was added in d4788af875c (stash: convert create to builtin,
2019-02-25), we strbuf_release()'d only some of the "struct strbuf" we
allocated earlier in the function, let's release all of them.
- ref-filter.c: Fix a leak in 482c1191869 (gpg-interface: improve
interface for parsing tags, 2021-02-11), we don't use the "payload"
variable that we ask parse_signature() to populate for us, so let's
free it.
- t/helper/test-fake-ssh.c: Fix a leak that's been here since this
code was added in 3064d5a38c7 (mingw: fix t5601-clone.sh,
2016-01-27). Let's free the "struct strbuf" as soon as we don't need
it anymore.
1. c45f0f525de (switch: reject if some operation is in progress,
2019-03-29)
2. 2708ce62d21 (branch: sort detached HEAD based on a flag,
2021-01-07)
3. abcac2e19fa (ref-filter.c: fix a leak in get_head_description,
2022-09-25)
4. 962dd7ebc3e (wt-status: introduce wt_status_state_free_buffers(),
2020-09-27).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-08 19:17:42 +01:00
|
|
|
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
|
t3433: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
"Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge" messages.
Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
-m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
bisect back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking
'git commit', 2017-11-24)
After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
--exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
digging any further than that.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19 18:04:06 +01:00
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup' '
|
|
|
|
mkdir DS &&
|
|
|
|
>DS/whatever &&
|
|
|
|
git add DS &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m base &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git branch side1 &&
|
|
|
|
git branch side2 &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git checkout side1 &&
|
|
|
|
git rm -rf DS &&
|
|
|
|
test_ln_s_add unrelated DS &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m side1 &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git checkout side2 &&
|
|
|
|
>unrelated &&
|
|
|
|
git add unrelated &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m commit1 &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
echo >>unrelated &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -am commit2
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the apply backend' '
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b apply-backend side2 &&
|
|
|
|
git rebase side1
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-19 18:04:07 +01:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the merge backend' '
|
t3433: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
"Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge" messages.
Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
-m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
bisect back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking
'git commit', 2017-11-24)
After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
--exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
digging any further than that.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19 18:04:06 +01:00
|
|
|
test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b merge-backend side2 &&
|
|
|
|
git rebase -m side1
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the merge backend with a delay' '
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b merge-delay-backend side2 &&
|
|
|
|
git rebase -m --exec "sleep 1" side1
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_done
|