git-commit-vandalism/Documentation/merge-options.txt

210 lines
7.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

--commit::
--no-commit::
Perform the merge and commit the result. This option can
be used to override --no-commit.
ifdef::git-pull[]
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]
+
With --no-commit perform the merge and stop just before creating
a merge commit, to give the user a chance to inspect and further
tweak the merge result before committing.
+
Note that fast-forward updates do not create a merge commit and
therefore there is no way to stop those merges with --no-commit.
Thus, if you want to ensure your branch is not changed or updated
by the merge command, use --no-ff with --no-commit.
--edit::
-e::
merge: use editor by default in interactive sessions Traditionally, a cleanly resolved merge was committed by "git merge" using the auto-generated merge commit log message without invoking the editor. After 5 years of use in the field, it turns out that people perform too many unjustified merges of the upstream history into their topic branches. These merges are not just useless, but they are often not explained well, and making the end result unreadable when it gets time for merging their history back to their upstream. Earlier we added the "--edit" option to the command, so that people can edit the log message to explain and justify their merge commits. Let's take it one step further and spawn the editor by default when we are in an interactive session (i.e. the standard input and the standard output are pointing at the same tty device). There may be existing scripts that leave the standard input and the standard output of the "git merge" connected to whatever environment the scripts were started, and such invocation might trigger the above "interactive session" heuristics. GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT environment variable can be set to "no" at the beginning of such scripts to use the historical behaviour while the script runs. Note that this backward compatibility is meant only for scripts, and we deliberately do *not* support "merge.edit = yes/no/auto" configuration option to allow people to keep the historical behaviour. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-11 07:44:45 +01:00
--no-edit::
Invoke an editor before committing successful mechanical merge to
further edit the auto-generated merge message, so that the user
can explain and justify the merge. The `--no-edit` option can be
used to accept the auto-generated message (this is generally
discouraged).
ifndef::git-pull[]
The `--edit` (or `-e`) option is still useful if you are
giving a draft message with the `-m` option from the command line
and want to edit it in the editor.
endif::git-pull[]
+
merge: use editor by default in interactive sessions Traditionally, a cleanly resolved merge was committed by "git merge" using the auto-generated merge commit log message without invoking the editor. After 5 years of use in the field, it turns out that people perform too many unjustified merges of the upstream history into their topic branches. These merges are not just useless, but they are often not explained well, and making the end result unreadable when it gets time for merging their history back to their upstream. Earlier we added the "--edit" option to the command, so that people can edit the log message to explain and justify their merge commits. Let's take it one step further and spawn the editor by default when we are in an interactive session (i.e. the standard input and the standard output are pointing at the same tty device). There may be existing scripts that leave the standard input and the standard output of the "git merge" connected to whatever environment the scripts were started, and such invocation might trigger the above "interactive session" heuristics. GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT environment variable can be set to "no" at the beginning of such scripts to use the historical behaviour while the script runs. Note that this backward compatibility is meant only for scripts, and we deliberately do *not* support "merge.edit = yes/no/auto" configuration option to allow people to keep the historical behaviour. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-11 07:44:45 +01:00
Older scripts may depend on the historical behaviour of not allowing the
user to edit the merge log message. They will see an editor opened when
they run `git merge`. To make it easier to adjust such scripts to the
updated behaviour, the environment variable `GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT` can be
set to `no` at the beginning of them.
--cleanup=<mode>::
This option determines how the merge message will be cleaned up before
committing. See linkgit:git-commit[1] for more details. In addition, if
the '<mode>' is given a value of `scissors`, scissors will be appended
to `MERGE_MSG` before being passed on to the commit machinery in the
case of a merge conflict.
ifdef::git-merge[]
--ff::
--no-ff::
--ff-only::
Specifies how a merge is handled when the merged-in history is
already a descendant of the current history. `--ff` is the
default unless merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag
that is not stored in its natural place in the `refs/tags/`
hierarchy, in which case `--no-ff` is assumed.
endif::git-merge[]
ifdef::git-pull[]
--ff-only::
Only update to the new history if there is no divergent local
history. This is the default when no method for reconciling
divergent histories is provided (via the --rebase=* flags).
--ff::
--no-ff::
When merging rather than rebasing, specifies how a merge is
handled when the merged-in history is already a descendant of
the current history. If merging is requested, `--ff` is the
default unless merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag
that is not stored in its natural place in the `refs/tags/`
hierarchy, in which case `--no-ff` is assumed.
endif::git-pull[]
+
With `--ff`, when possible resolve the merge as a fast-forward (only
update the branch pointer to match the merged branch; do not create a
merge commit). When not possible (when the merged-in history is not a
descendant of the current history), create a merge commit.
+
With `--no-ff`, create a merge commit in all cases, even when the merge
could instead be resolved as a fast-forward.
ifdef::git-merge[]
+
With `--ff-only`, resolve the merge as a fast-forward when possible.
When not possible, refuse to merge and exit with a non-zero status.
endif::git-merge[]
-S[<keyid>]::
--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]::
--no-gpg-sign::
GPG-sign the resulting merge commit. The `keyid` argument is
optional and defaults to the committer identity; if specified,
it must be stuck to the option without a space. `--no-gpg-sign`
is useful to countermand both `commit.gpgSign` configuration variable,
and earlier `--gpg-sign`.
--log[=<n>]::
--no-log::
In addition to branch names, populate the log message with
one-line descriptions from at most <n> actual commits that are being
merged. See also linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1].
ifdef::git-pull[]
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]
+
With --no-log do not list one-line descriptions from the
actual commits being merged.
include::signoff-option.txt[]
--stat::
-n::
--no-stat::
Show a diffstat at the end of the merge. The diffstat is also
controlled by the configuration option merge.stat.
+
With -n or --no-stat do not show a diffstat at the end of the
merge.
git-merge --squash Some people tend to do many little commits on a topic branch, recording all the trials and errors, and when the topic is reasonably cooked well, would want to record the net effect of the series as one commit on top of the mainline, removing the cruft from the history. The topic is then abandoned or forked off again from that point at the mainline. The barebone porcelainish that comes with core git tools does not officially support such operation, but you can fake it by using "git pull --no-merge" when such a topic branch is not a strict superset of the mainline, like this: git checkout mainline git pull --no-commit . that-topic-branch : fix conflicts if any rm -f .git/MERGE_HEAD git commit -a -m 'consolidated commit log message' git branch -f that-topic-branch ;# now fully merged This however does not work when the topic branch is a fast forward of the mainline, because normal "git pull" will never create a merge commit in such a case, and there is nothing special --no-commit could do to begin with. This patch introduces a new option, --squash, to support such a workflow officially in both fast-forward case and true merge case. The user-level operation would be the same in both cases: git checkout mainline git pull --squash . that-topic-branch : fix conflicts if any -- naturally, there would be : no conflict if fast forward. git commit -a -m 'consolidated commit log message' git branch -f that-topic-branch ;# now fully merged When the current branch is already up-to-date with respect to the other branch, there truly is nothing to do, so the new option does not have any effect. This was brought up in #git IRC channel recently. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-23 10:37:02 +02:00
--squash::
--no-squash::
Produce the working tree and index state as if a real merge
happened (except for the merge information), but do not actually
make a commit, move the `HEAD`, or record `$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD`
(to cause the next `git commit` command to create a merge
commit). This allows you to create a single commit on top of
the current branch whose effect is the same as merging another
branch (or more in case of an octopus).
+
With --no-squash perform the merge and commit the result. This
option can be used to override --squash.
+
With --squash, --commit is not allowed, and will fail.
ifdef::git-pull[]
+
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]
--no-verify::
This option bypasses the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks.
See also linkgit:githooks[5].
ifdef::git-pull[]
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]
-s <strategy>::
--strategy=<strategy>::
Use the given merge strategy; can be supplied more than
once to specify them in the order they should be tried.
If there is no `-s` option, a built-in list of strategies
is used instead (`ort` when merging a single head,
`octopus` otherwise).
-X <option>::
--strategy-option=<option>::
Pass merge strategy specific option through to the merge
strategy.
--verify-signatures::
--no-verify-signatures::
Verify that the tip commit of the side branch being merged is
signed with a valid key, i.e. a key that has a valid uid: in the
default trust model, this means the signing key has been signed by
a trusted key. If the tip commit of the side branch is not signed
with a valid key, the merge is aborted.
ifdef::git-pull[]
+
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]
--summary::
--no-summary::
Synonyms to --stat and --no-stat; these are deprecated and will be
removed in the future.
ifndef::git-pull[]
-q::
--quiet::
Operate quietly. Implies --no-progress.
-v::
--verbose::
Be verbose.
--progress::
--no-progress::
Turn progress on/off explicitly. If neither is specified,
progress is shown if standard error is connected to a terminal.
Note that not all merge strategies may support progress
reporting.
endif::git-pull[]
--autostash::
--no-autostash::
Automatically create a temporary stash entry before the operation
begins, record it in the special ref `MERGE_AUTOSTASH`
and apply it after the operation ends. This means
that you can run the operation on a dirty worktree. However, use
with care: the final stash application after a successful
merge might result in non-trivial conflicts.
--allow-unrelated-histories::
By default, `git merge` command refuses to merge histories
that do not share a common ancestor. This option can be
used to override this safety when merging histories of two
projects that started their lives independently. As that is
a very rare occasion, no configuration variable to enable
this by default exists and will not be added.
ifdef::git-pull[]
+
Only useful when merging.
endif::git-pull[]