git-commit-vandalism/t/t5520-pull.sh

796 lines
22 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
test_description='pulling into void'
. ./test-lib.sh
modify () {
sed -e "$1" "$2" >"$2.x" &&
mv "$2.x" "$2"
}
test_pull_autostash () {
expect_parent_num="$1" &&
shift &&
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
echo dirty >new_file &&
git add new_file &&
git pull "$@" . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^"$expect_parent_num" copy &&
echo dirty >expect &&
test_cmp expect new_file &&
echo "modified again" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file
}
test_pull_autostash_fail () {
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
echo dirty >new_file &&
git add new_file &&
test_must_fail git pull "$@" . copy 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "uncommitted changes." err
}
test_expect_success setup '
echo file >file &&
git add file &&
git commit -a -m original
'
test_expect_success 'pulling into void' '
git init cloned &&
(
cd cloned &&
git pull ..
) &&
test_path_is_file file &&
test_path_is_file cloned/file &&
test_cmp file cloned/file
'
test_expect_success 'pulling into void using master:master' '
git init cloned-uho &&
(
cd cloned-uho &&
git pull .. master:master
) &&
test_path_is_file file &&
test_path_is_file cloned-uho/file &&
test_cmp file cloned-uho/file
'
test_expect_success 'pulling into void does not overwrite untracked files' '
git init cloned-untracked &&
(
cd cloned-untracked &&
echo untracked >file &&
test_must_fail git pull .. master &&
echo untracked >expect &&
test_cmp expect file
)
'
pull: merge into unborn by fast-forwarding from empty tree The logic for pulling into an unborn branch was originally designed to be used on a newly-initialized repository (d09e79c, git-pull: allow pulling into an empty repository, 2006-11-16). It thus did not initially deal with uncommitted changes in the unborn branch. The case of an _unstaged_ untracked file was fixed by 4b3ffe5 (pull: do not clobber untracked files on initial pull, 2011-03-25). However, it still clobbered existing staged files, both when the file exists in the merged commit (it will be overwritten), and when it does not (it will be deleted). We fix this by doing a two-way merge, where the "current" side of the merge is an empty tree, and the "target" side is HEAD (already updated to FETCH_HEAD at this point). This amounts to claiming that all work in the index was done vs. an empty tree, and thus all content of the index is precious. Note that this use of read-tree just gives us protection against overwriting index and working tree changes. It will not actually result in a 3-way merge conflict in the index. This is fine, as this is a rare situation, and the conflict would not be interesting anyway (it must, by definition, be an add/add conflict with the whole content conflicting). And it makes it simpler for the user to recover, as they have no HEAD to "git reset" back to. Reported-by: Stefan Schüßler <mail@stefanschuessler.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-21 00:38:28 +02:00
test_expect_success 'pulling into void does not overwrite staged files' '
git init cloned-staged-colliding &&
(
cd cloned-staged-colliding &&
echo "alternate content" >file &&
git add file &&
test_must_fail git pull .. master &&
echo "alternate content" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git cat-file blob :file >file.index &&
test_cmp expect file.index
)
'
test_expect_success 'pulling into void does not remove new staged files' '
git init cloned-staged-new &&
(
cd cloned-staged-new &&
echo "new tracked file" >newfile &&
git add newfile &&
git pull .. master &&
echo "new tracked file" >expect &&
test_cmp expect newfile &&
git cat-file blob :newfile >newfile.index &&
test_cmp expect newfile.index
)
'
test_expect_success 'pulling into void must not create an octopus' '
git init cloned-octopus &&
(
cd cloned-octopus &&
test_must_fail git pull .. master master &&
test_path_is_missing file
)
'
test_expect_success 'test . as a remote' '
git branch copy master &&
git config branch.copy.remote . &&
git config branch.copy.merge refs/heads/master &&
echo updated >file &&
git commit -a -m updated &&
git checkout copy &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git pull &&
echo updated >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
sed "s/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*/OBJID/" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
'
test_expect_success 'the default remote . should not break explicit pull' '
git checkout -b second master^ &&
echo modified >file &&
git commit -a -m modified &&
git checkout copy &&
git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git pull . second &&
echo modified >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
sed "s/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*/OBJID/" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull . second: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
'
test_expect_success 'fail if wildcard spec does not match any refs' '
git checkout -b test copy^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D test" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_must_fail git pull . "refs/nonexisting1/*:refs/nonexisting2/*" 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "no candidates for merging" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'fail if no branches specified with non-default remote' '
git remote add test_remote . &&
test_when_finished "git remote remove test_remote" &&
git checkout -b test copy^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D test" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_config branch.test.remote origin &&
test_must_fail git pull test_remote 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "specify a branch on the command line" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'fail if not on a branch' '
git remote add origin . &&
test_when_finished "git remote remove origin" &&
git checkout HEAD^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_must_fail git pull 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "not currently on a branch" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'fail if no configuration for current branch' '
git remote add test_remote . &&
test_when_finished "git remote remove test_remote" &&
git checkout -b test copy^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D test" &&
test_config branch.test.remote test_remote &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_must_fail git pull 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "no tracking information" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'pull --all: fail if no configuration for current branch' '
git remote add test_remote . &&
test_when_finished "git remote remove test_remote" &&
git checkout -b test copy^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D test" &&
test_config branch.test.remote test_remote &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_must_fail git pull --all 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "There is no tracking information" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'fail if upstream branch does not exist' '
git checkout -b test copy^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D test" &&
test_config branch.test.remote . &&
test_config branch.test.merge refs/heads/nonexisting &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_must_fail git pull 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "no such ref was fetched" err &&
test_cmp expect file
'
test_expect_success 'fail if the index has unresolved entries' '
git checkout -b third second^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D third" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_commit modified2 file &&
git ls-files -u >unmerged &&
test_must_be_empty unmerged &&
test_must_fail git pull . second &&
git ls-files -u >unmerged &&
test_file_not_empty unmerged &&
cp file expected &&
test_must_fail git pull . second 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "Pulling is not possible because you have unmerged files." err &&
test_cmp expected file &&
git add file &&
git ls-files -u >unmerged &&
test_must_be_empty unmerged &&
test_must_fail git pull . second 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "You have not concluded your merge" err &&
test_cmp expected file
'
test_expect_success 'fast-forwards working tree if branch head is updated' '
git checkout -b third second^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D third" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
git pull . second:third 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "fetch updated the current branch head" err &&
echo modified >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_cmp_rev third second
'
test_expect_success 'fast-forward fails with conflicting work tree' '
git checkout -b third second^ &&
test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D third" &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo conflict >file &&
test_must_fail git pull . second:third 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "Cannot fast-forward your working tree" err &&
echo conflict >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
test_cmp_rev third second
'
test_expect_success '--rebase' '
git branch to-rebase &&
echo modified again >file &&
git commit -m file file &&
git checkout to-rebase &&
echo new >file2 &&
git add file2 &&
git commit -m "new file" &&
git tag before-rebase &&
git pull --rebase . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--rebase (merge) fast forward' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
git checkout -b ff &&
echo another modification >file &&
git commit -m third file &&
git checkout to-rebase &&
git -c rebase.backend=merge pull --rebase . ff &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD ff &&
# The above only validates the result. Did we actually bypass rebase?
git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
sed "s/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*/OBJID/" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull --rebase . ff: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
'
test_expect_success '--rebase (am) fast forward' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 22:36:41 +01:00
git -c rebase.backend=apply pull --rebase . ff &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD ff &&
# The above only validates the result. Did we actually bypass rebase?
git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
sed "s/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*/OBJID/" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull --rebase . ff: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
'
test_expect_success '--rebase --autostash fast forward' '
test_when_finished "
git reset --hard
git checkout to-rebase
git branch -D to-rebase-ff
git branch -D behind" &&
git branch behind &&
git checkout -b to-rebase-ff &&
echo another modification >>file &&
git add file &&
git commit -m mod &&
git checkout behind &&
echo dirty >file &&
git pull --rebase --autostash . to-rebase-ff &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD to-rebase-ff
'
test_expect_success '--rebase with conflicts shows advice' '
test_when_finished "git rebase --abort; git checkout -f to-rebase" &&
git checkout -b seq &&
test_seq 5 >seq.txt &&
git add seq.txt &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "Add seq.txt" &&
echo 6 >>seq.txt &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "Append to seq.txt" seq.txt &&
git checkout -b with-conflicts HEAD^ &&
echo conflicting >>seq.txt &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "Create conflict" seq.txt &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase . seq 2>err >out &&
test_i18ngrep "Resolve all conflicts manually" err
'
test_expect_success 'failed --rebase shows advice' '
test_when_finished "git rebase --abort; git checkout -f to-rebase" &&
git checkout -b diverging &&
test_commit attributes .gitattributes "* text=auto" attrs &&
sha1="$(printf "1\\r\\n" | git hash-object -w --stdin)" &&
git update-index --cacheinfo 0644 $sha1 file &&
git commit -m v1-with-cr &&
# force checkout because `git reset --hard` will not leave clean `file`
git checkout -f -b fails-to-rebase HEAD^ &&
test_commit v2-without-cr file "2" file2-lf &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase . diverging 2>err >out &&
test_i18ngrep "Resolve all conflicts manually" err
'
test_expect_success '--rebase fails with multiple branches' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase . copy master 2>err &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD before-rebase &&
test_i18ngrep "Cannot rebase onto multiple branches" err &&
echo modified >expect &&
git show HEAD:file >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase succeeds with dirty working directory and rebase.autostash set' '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
test_pull_autostash 1 --rebase
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --autostash & rebase.autostash=true' '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
test_pull_autostash 1 --rebase --autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --autostash & rebase.autostash=false' '
test_config rebase.autostash false &&
test_pull_autostash 1 --rebase --autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --autostash & rebase.autostash unset' '
test_unconfig rebase.autostash &&
test_pull_autostash 1 --rebase --autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --no-autostash & rebase.autostash=true' '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
test_pull_autostash_fail --rebase --no-autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --no-autostash & rebase.autostash=false' '
test_config rebase.autostash false &&
test_pull_autostash_fail --rebase --no-autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase --no-autostash & rebase.autostash unset' '
test_unconfig rebase.autostash &&
test_pull_autostash_fail --rebase --no-autostash
'
for i in --autostash --no-autostash
do
test_expect_success "pull $i (without --rebase) is illegal" '
test_must_fail git pull $i . copy 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "only valid with --rebase" err
'
done
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase true &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull --autostash & pull.rebase=true' '
test_config pull.rebase true &&
test_pull_autostash 1 --autostash
'
test_expect_success 'pull --no-autostash & pull.rebase=true' '
test_config pull.rebase true &&
test_pull_autostash_fail --no-autostash
'
test_expect_success 'branch.to-rebase.rebase' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
test_config branch.to-rebase.rebase true &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'branch.to-rebase.rebase should override pull.rebase' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase true &&
test_config branch.to-rebase.rebase false &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev ! HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase warns on --verify-signatures' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
git pull --rebase --verify-signatures . copy 2>err &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
test_i18ngrep "ignoring --verify-signatures for rebase" err
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase does not warn on --no-verify-signatures' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
git pull --rebase --no-verify-signatures . copy 2>err &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
echo new >expect &&
git show HEAD:file2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
test_i18ngrep ! "verify-signatures" err
'
# add a feature branch, keep-merge, that is merged into master, so the
# test can try preserving the merge commit (or not) with various
# --rebase flags/pull.rebase settings.
test_expect_success 'preserve merge setup' '
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
git checkout -b keep-merge second^ &&
test_commit file3 &&
git checkout to-rebase &&
git merge keep-merge &&
git tag before-preserve-rebase
'
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase=false create a new merge commit' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase false &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^1 before-preserve-rebase &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^2 copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase=true flattens keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase true &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase=1 is treated as true and flattens keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase 1 &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success REBASE_P \
'pull.rebase=preserve rebases and merges keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase preserve &&
git pull . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^2 keep-merge
'
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase=interactive' '
write_script "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/fake-editor" <<-\EOF &&
echo I was here >fake.out &&
false
EOF
test_set_editor "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/fake-editor" &&
test_when_finished "test_might_fail git rebase --abort" &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase=interactive . copy &&
echo "I was here" >expect &&
test_cmp expect fake.out
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase=i' '
write_script "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/fake-editor" <<-\EOF &&
echo I was here, too >fake.out &&
false
EOF
test_set_editor "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/fake-editor" &&
test_when_finished "test_might_fail git rebase --abort" &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase=i . copy &&
echo "I was here, too" >expect &&
test_cmp expect fake.out
'
test_expect_success 'pull.rebase=invalid fails' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase invalid &&
test_must_fail git pull . copy
'
test_expect_success '--rebase=false create a new merge commit' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase true &&
git pull --rebase=false . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^1 before-preserve-rebase &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^2 copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--rebase=true rebases and flattens keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase preserve &&
git pull --rebase=true . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success REBASE_P \
'--rebase=preserve rebases and merges keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase true &&
git pull --rebase=preserve . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^2 keep-merge
'
test_expect_success '--rebase=invalid fails' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase=invalid . copy
'
test_expect_success '--rebase overrides pull.rebase=preserve and flattens keep-merge' '
git reset --hard before-preserve-rebase &&
test_config pull.rebase preserve &&
git pull --rebase . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^^ copy &&
echo file3 >expect &&
git show HEAD:file3.t >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--rebase with rebased upstream' '
git remote add -f me . &&
git checkout copy &&
git tag copy-orig &&
git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
echo conflicting modification >file &&
git commit -m conflict file &&
git checkout to-rebase &&
echo file >file2 &&
git commit -m to-rebase file2 &&
git tag to-rebase-orig &&
git pull --rebase me copy &&
echo "conflicting modification" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file2
'
test_expect_success '--rebase -f with rebased upstream' '
test_when_finished "test_might_fail git rebase --abort" &&
git reset --hard to-rebase-orig &&
git pull --rebase -f me copy &&
echo "conflicting modification" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file2
'
test_expect_success '--rebase with rebased default upstream' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/me/copy copy-orig &&
git checkout --track -b to-rebase2 me/copy &&
git reset --hard to-rebase-orig &&
git pull --rebase &&
echo "conflicting modification" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file2
'
test_expect_success 'rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/me/copy copy-orig &&
git reset --hard to-rebase-orig &&
git checkout --track -b to-rebase3 me/copy &&
git reset --hard to-rebase-orig &&
git fetch &&
git pull --rebase &&
echo "conflicting modification" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file2
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase dies early with dirty working directory' '
git checkout to-rebase &&
git update-ref refs/remotes/me/copy copy^ &&
COPY="$(git rev-parse --verify me/copy)" &&
git rebase --onto $COPY copy &&
test_config branch.to-rebase.remote me &&
test_config branch.to-rebase.merge refs/heads/copy &&
test_config branch.to-rebase.rebase true &&
echo dirty >>file &&
git add file &&
test_must_fail git pull &&
test_cmp_rev "$COPY" me/copy &&
git checkout HEAD -- file &&
git pull &&
test_cmp_rev ! "$COPY" me/copy
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase works on branch yet to be born' '
git rev-parse master >expect &&
mkdir empty_repo &&
(
cd empty_repo &&
git init &&
git pull --rebase .. master &&
git rev-parse HEAD >../actual
) &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase fails on unborn branch with staged changes' '
test_when_finished "rm -rf empty_repo2" &&
git init empty_repo2 &&
(
cd empty_repo2 &&
echo staged-file >staged-file &&
git add staged-file &&
echo staged-file >expect &&
git ls-files >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase .. master 2>err &&
git ls-files >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
git show :staged-file >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
test_i18ngrep "unborn branch with changes added to the index" err
)
'
has_uncommitted_changes(): fall back to empty tree If has_uncommitted_changes() can't resolve HEAD (e.g., because it's unborn or corrupt), then we end up calling run_diff_index() with an empty revs.pending array. This causes a segfault, as run_diff_index() blindly looks at the first pending item. Fixing this raises a question of fault: should run_diff_index() handle this case, or is the caller wrong to pass an empty pending list? Looking at the other callers of run_diff_index(), they handle this in one of three ways: - they resolve the object themselves, and avoid doing the diff if it's not valid - they resolve the object themselves, and fall back to the empty tree - they use setup_revisions(), which will die() if the object isn't valid Since this is the only broken caller, that argues that the fix should go there. Falling back to the empty tree makes sense here, as we'd claim uncommitted changes if and only if the index is non-empty. This may be a little funny in the case of corruption (the corrupt HEAD probably _isn't_ empty), but: - we don't actually know the reason here that HEAD didn't resolve (the much more likely case is that we have an unborn HEAD, in which case the empty tree comparison is the right thing) - this matches how other code, like "git diff", behaves While we're thinking about it, let's add an assertion to run_diff_index(). It should always be passed a single object, and as this bug shows, it's easy to get it wrong (and an assertion is easier to hunt down than a segfault, or a quietly ignored extra tree). Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-11 16:14:06 +02:00
test_expect_success 'pull --rebase fails on corrupt HEAD' '
test_when_finished "rm -rf corrupt" &&
git init corrupt &&
(
cd corrupt &&
test_commit one &&
git rev-parse --verify HEAD >head &&
obj=$(sed "s#^..#&/#" head) &&
has_uncommitted_changes(): fall back to empty tree If has_uncommitted_changes() can't resolve HEAD (e.g., because it's unborn or corrupt), then we end up calling run_diff_index() with an empty revs.pending array. This causes a segfault, as run_diff_index() blindly looks at the first pending item. Fixing this raises a question of fault: should run_diff_index() handle this case, or is the caller wrong to pass an empty pending list? Looking at the other callers of run_diff_index(), they handle this in one of three ways: - they resolve the object themselves, and avoid doing the diff if it's not valid - they resolve the object themselves, and fall back to the empty tree - they use setup_revisions(), which will die() if the object isn't valid Since this is the only broken caller, that argues that the fix should go there. Falling back to the empty tree makes sense here, as we'd claim uncommitted changes if and only if the index is non-empty. This may be a little funny in the case of corruption (the corrupt HEAD probably _isn't_ empty), but: - we don't actually know the reason here that HEAD didn't resolve (the much more likely case is that we have an unborn HEAD, in which case the empty tree comparison is the right thing) - this matches how other code, like "git diff", behaves While we're thinking about it, let's add an assertion to run_diff_index(). It should always be passed a single object, and as this bug shows, it's easy to get it wrong (and an assertion is easier to hunt down than a segfault, or a quietly ignored extra tree). Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-11 16:14:06 +02:00
rm -f .git/objects/$obj &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase
)
'
test_expect_success 'setup for detecting upstreamed changes' '
mkdir src &&
(
cd src &&
git init &&
printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n" > stuff &&
git add stuff &&
git commit -m "Initial revision"
) &&
git clone src dst &&
(
cd src &&
modify s/5/43/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "5->43" &&
modify s/6/42/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "Make it bigger"
) &&
(
cd dst &&
modify s/5/43/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "Independent discovery of 5->43"
)
'
pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches Prior to c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26), pull --rebase would run git rebase $merge_head which resulted in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $merge_head..$cur_branch This resulted in patches from $merge_head..$cur_branch being applied, as long as they did not already exist in $cur_branch..$merge_head. Unfortunately, when upstream is rebased, $merge_head..$cur_branch also refers to "old" commits that have already been rebased upstream, meaning that many patches that were already fixed upstream would be reapplied. This could result in many spurious conflicts, as well as reintroduce patches that were intentionally dropped upstream. So the algorithm was changed in c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26) and d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19). Defining $old_remote_ref to be the most recent entry in the reflog for @{upstream} that is an ancestor of $cur_branch, pull --rebase was changed to run git rebase --onto $merge_head $old_remote_ref which results in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $old_remote_ref..$cur_branch The whole point of this change was to reduce the number of commits being reapplied, by avoiding commits that upstream already has or had. In the rebased upstream case, this change achieved that purpose. It is worth noting, though, that since $old_remote_ref is always an ancestor of $cur_branch (by its definition), format-patch will not know what upstream is and thus will not be able to determine if any patches are already upstream; they will all be reapplied. In the non-rebased upstream case, this new form is usually the same as the original code but in some cases $old_remote_ref can be an ancestor of $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch) meaning that instead of avoiding reapplying commits that upstream already has, it actually includes more such commits. Combined with the fact that format-patch can no longer detect commits that are already upstream (since it is no longer told what upstream is), results in lots of confusion for users (e.g. "git is giving me lots of conflicts in stuff I didn't even change since my last push.") Cases where additional commits could be reapplied include forking from a commit other than the tracking branch, or amending/rebasing after pushing. Cases where the inability to detect upstreamed commits cause problems include independent discovery of a fix and having your patches get upstreamed by some alternative route (e.g. pulling your changes to a third machine, pushing from there, and then going back to your original machine and trying to pull --rebase). Fix the non-rebased upstream case by ignoring $old_remote_ref whenever it is contained in $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch). This should have no affect on the rebased upstream case. Acked-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-13 03:50:50 +02:00
test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase detects upstreamed changes' '
(
cd dst &&
git pull --rebase &&
git ls-files -u >untracked &&
test_must_be_empty untracked
)
'
test_expect_success 'setup for avoiding reapplying old patches' '
(
cd dst &&
test_might_fail git rebase --abort &&
git reset --hard origin/master
) &&
git clone --bare src src-replace.git &&
rm -rf src &&
mv src-replace.git src &&
(
cd dst &&
modify s/2/22/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "Change 2" &&
modify s/3/33/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "Change 3" &&
modify s/4/44/ stuff &&
git commit -a -m "Change 4" &&
git push &&
modify s/44/55/ stuff &&
git commit --amend -a -m "Modified Change 4"
)
'
pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches Prior to c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26), pull --rebase would run git rebase $merge_head which resulted in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $merge_head..$cur_branch This resulted in patches from $merge_head..$cur_branch being applied, as long as they did not already exist in $cur_branch..$merge_head. Unfortunately, when upstream is rebased, $merge_head..$cur_branch also refers to "old" commits that have already been rebased upstream, meaning that many patches that were already fixed upstream would be reapplied. This could result in many spurious conflicts, as well as reintroduce patches that were intentionally dropped upstream. So the algorithm was changed in c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26) and d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19). Defining $old_remote_ref to be the most recent entry in the reflog for @{upstream} that is an ancestor of $cur_branch, pull --rebase was changed to run git rebase --onto $merge_head $old_remote_ref which results in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $old_remote_ref..$cur_branch The whole point of this change was to reduce the number of commits being reapplied, by avoiding commits that upstream already has or had. In the rebased upstream case, this change achieved that purpose. It is worth noting, though, that since $old_remote_ref is always an ancestor of $cur_branch (by its definition), format-patch will not know what upstream is and thus will not be able to determine if any patches are already upstream; they will all be reapplied. In the non-rebased upstream case, this new form is usually the same as the original code but in some cases $old_remote_ref can be an ancestor of $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch) meaning that instead of avoiding reapplying commits that upstream already has, it actually includes more such commits. Combined with the fact that format-patch can no longer detect commits that are already upstream (since it is no longer told what upstream is), results in lots of confusion for users (e.g. "git is giving me lots of conflicts in stuff I didn't even change since my last push.") Cases where additional commits could be reapplied include forking from a commit other than the tracking branch, or amending/rebasing after pushing. Cases where the inability to detect upstreamed commits cause problems include independent discovery of a fix and having your patches get upstreamed by some alternative route (e.g. pulling your changes to a third machine, pushing from there, and then going back to your original machine and trying to pull --rebase). Fix the non-rebased upstream case by ignoring $old_remote_ref whenever it is contained in $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch). This should have no affect on the rebased upstream case. Acked-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-13 03:50:50 +02:00
test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase does not reapply old patches' '
(
cd dst &&
test_must_fail git pull --rebase &&
cat .git/rebase-merge/done .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo >work &&
grep -v -e \# -e ^$ work >patches &&
test_line_count = 1 patches &&
rm -f work
)
'
test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase against local branch' '
git checkout -b copy2 to-rebase-orig &&
git pull --rebase . to-rebase &&
echo "conflicting modification" >expect &&
test_cmp expect file &&
echo file >expect &&
test_cmp expect file2
'
test_done