simple-ipc: design documentation for new IPC mechanism
Brief design documentation for new IPC mechanism allowing foreground Git client to talk with an existing daemon process at a known location using a named pipe or unix domain socket. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c2efa5d76
commit
066d5234d0
105
Documentation/technical/api-simple-ipc.txt
Normal file
105
Documentation/technical/api-simple-ipc.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
Simple-IPC API
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
The Simple-IPC API is a collection of `ipc_` prefixed library routines
|
||||
and a basic communication protocol that allow an IPC-client process to
|
||||
send an application-specific IPC-request message to an IPC-server
|
||||
process and receive an application-specific IPC-response message.
|
||||
|
||||
Communication occurs over a named pipe on Windows and a Unix domain
|
||||
socket on other platforms. IPC-clients and IPC-servers rendezvous at
|
||||
a previously agreed-to application-specific pathname (which is outside
|
||||
the scope of this design) that is local to the computer system.
|
||||
|
||||
The IPC-server routines within the server application process create a
|
||||
thread pool to listen for connections and receive request messages
|
||||
from multiple concurrent IPC-clients. When received, these messages
|
||||
are dispatched up to the server application callbacks for handling.
|
||||
IPC-server routines then incrementally relay responses back to the
|
||||
IPC-client.
|
||||
|
||||
The IPC-client routines within a client application process connect
|
||||
to the IPC-server and send a request message and wait for a response.
|
||||
When received, the response is returned back the caller.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, the `fsmonitor--daemon` feature will be built as a server
|
||||
application on top of the IPC-server library routines. It will have
|
||||
threads watching for file system events and a thread pool waiting for
|
||||
client connections. Clients, such as `git status` will request a list
|
||||
of file system events since a point in time and the server will
|
||||
respond with a list of changed files and directories. The formats of
|
||||
the request and response are application-specific; the IPC-client and
|
||||
IPC-server routines treat them as opaque byte streams.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Comparison with sub-process model
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The Simple-IPC mechanism differs from the existing `sub-process.c`
|
||||
model (Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.txt) and
|
||||
used by applications like Git-LFS. In the LFS-style sub-process model
|
||||
the helper is started by the foreground process, communication happens
|
||||
via a pair of file descriptors bound to the stdin/stdout of the
|
||||
sub-process, the sub-process only serves the current foreground
|
||||
process, and the sub-process exits when the foreground process
|
||||
terminates.
|
||||
|
||||
In the Simple-IPC model the server is a very long-running service. It
|
||||
can service many clients at the same time and has a private socket or
|
||||
named pipe connection to each active client. It might be started
|
||||
(on-demand) by the current client process or it might have been
|
||||
started by a previous client or by the OS at boot time. The server
|
||||
process is not associated with a terminal and it persists after
|
||||
clients terminate. Clients do not have access to the stdin/stdout of
|
||||
the server process and therefore must communicate over sockets or
|
||||
named pipes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Server startup and shutdown
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
How an application server based upon IPC-server is started is also
|
||||
outside the scope of the Simple-IPC design and is a property of the
|
||||
application using it. For example, the server might be started or
|
||||
restarted during routine maintenance operations, or it might be
|
||||
started as a system service during the system boot-up sequence, or it
|
||||
might be started on-demand by a foreground Git command when needed.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly, server shutdown is a property of the application using
|
||||
the simple-ipc routines. For example, the server might decide to
|
||||
shutdown when idle or only upon explicit request.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Simple-IPC protocol
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The Simple-IPC protocol consists of a single request message from the
|
||||
client and an optional response message from the server. Both the
|
||||
client and server messages are unlimited in length and are terminated
|
||||
with a flush packet.
|
||||
|
||||
The pkt-line routines (Documentation/technical/protocol-common.txt)
|
||||
are used to simplify buffer management during message generation,
|
||||
transmission, and reception. A flush packet is used to mark the end
|
||||
of the message. This allows the sender to incrementally generate and
|
||||
transmit the message. It allows the receiver to incrementally receive
|
||||
the message in chunks and to know when they have received the entire
|
||||
message.
|
||||
|
||||
The actual byte format of the client request and server response
|
||||
messages are application specific. The IPC layer transmits and
|
||||
receives them as opaque byte buffers without any concern for the
|
||||
content within. It is the job of the calling application layer to
|
||||
understand the contents of the request and response messages.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Summary
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
Conceptually, the Simple-IPC protocol is similar to an HTTP REST
|
||||
request. Clients connect, make an application-specific and
|
||||
stateless request, receive an application-specific
|
||||
response, and disconnect. It is a one round trip facility for
|
||||
querying the server. The Simple-IPC routines hide the socket,
|
||||
named pipe, and thread pool details and allow the application
|
||||
layer to focus on the application at hand.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user