submodule: don't add submodule as odb for push
In push_submodule(), because we do not actually need access to objects in the submodule, do not invoke add_submodule_odb(). (for_each_remote_ref_submodule() does not require access to those objects, and the actual push is done by spawning another process, which handles object access by itself.) This code of push_submodule() is exercised in t5531 and continues to work, showing that the submodule odbc is not needed. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
605f0ec135
commit
142e9f4432
@ -1023,9 +1023,6 @@ static int push_submodule(const char *path,
|
||||
const struct string_list *push_options,
|
||||
int dry_run)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (add_submodule_odb(path))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (for_each_remote_ref_submodule(path, has_remote, NULL) > 0) {
|
||||
struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
|
||||
argv_array_push(&cp.args, "push");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user