vcs-svn: rename check_overflow arguments for clarity
Code using the argument names a and b just doesn't look right (not sure why!). Use more explicit names "offset" and "len" to make their type and meaning clearer. Also rename check_overflow() to check_offset_overflow() to clarify that we are making sure that "len" bytes beyond "offset" still fits the type to represent an offset. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
58ebd9865d
commit
173223aa62
@ -31,15 +31,15 @@ static int read_to_fill_or_whine(struct line_buffer *file,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int check_overflow(off_t a, size_t b)
|
||||
static int check_offset_overflow(off_t offset, size_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (b > maximum_signed_value_of_type(off_t))
|
||||
if (len > maximum_signed_value_of_type(off_t))
|
||||
return error("unrepresentable length in delta: "
|
||||
"%"PRIuMAX" > OFF_MAX", (uintmax_t) b);
|
||||
if (signed_add_overflows(a, (off_t) b))
|
||||
"%"PRIuMAX" > OFF_MAX", (uintmax_t) len);
|
||||
if (signed_add_overflows(offset, (off_t) len))
|
||||
return error("unrepresentable offset in delta: "
|
||||
"%"PRIuMAX" + %"PRIuMAX" > OFF_MAX",
|
||||
(uintmax_t) a, (uintmax_t) b);
|
||||
(uintmax_t) offset, (uintmax_t) len);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ int move_window(struct sliding_view *view, off_t off, size_t width)
|
||||
off_t file_offset;
|
||||
assert(view);
|
||||
assert(view->width <= view->buf.len);
|
||||
assert(!check_overflow(view->off, view->buf.len));
|
||||
assert(!check_offset_overflow(view->off, view->buf.len));
|
||||
|
||||
if (check_overflow(off, width))
|
||||
if (check_offset_overflow(off, width))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
if (off < view->off || off + width < view->off + view->width)
|
||||
return error("invalid delta: window slides left");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user