rebase --exec: make it work with --rebase-merges
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`. Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of its corresponding `fixup` or `squash` lines. The current implementation uses a dirty trick to achieve that: it assumes that there are only pick/fixup/squash commands, and then *inserts* the `exec` lines before any `pick` but the first, and appends a final one. With the todo lists generated by `git rebase --rebase-merges`, this simple implementation shows its problems: it produces the exact wrong thing when there are `label`, `reset` and `merge` commands. Let's change the implementation to do exactly what we want: look for `pick` lines, skip any fixup/squash chains, and then insert the `exec` line. Lather, rinse, repeat. Note: we take pains to insert *before* comment lines whenever possible, as empty commits are represented by commented-out pick lines (and we want to insert a preceding pick's exec line *before* such a line, not afterward). While at it, also add `exec` lines after `merge` commands, because they are similar in spirit to `pick` commands: they add new commits. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0880f77ab
commit
1ace63bc39
42
sequencer.c
42
sequencer.c
@ -4244,10 +4244,9 @@ int sequencer_add_exec_commands(const char *commands)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *todo_file = rebase_path_todo();
|
||||
struct todo_list todo_list = TODO_LIST_INIT;
|
||||
struct todo_item *item;
|
||||
struct strbuf *buf = &todo_list.buf;
|
||||
size_t offset = 0, commands_len = strlen(commands);
|
||||
int i, first;
|
||||
int i, insert;
|
||||
|
||||
if (strbuf_read_file(&todo_list.buf, todo_file, 0) < 0)
|
||||
return error(_("could not read '%s'."), todo_file);
|
||||
@ -4257,19 +4256,40 @@ int sequencer_add_exec_commands(const char *commands)
|
||||
return error(_("unusable todo list: '%s'"), todo_file);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
first = 1;
|
||||
/* insert <commands> before every pick except the first one */
|
||||
for (item = todo_list.items, i = 0; i < todo_list.nr; i++, item++) {
|
||||
if (item->command == TODO_PICK && !first) {
|
||||
strbuf_insert(buf, item->offset_in_buf + offset,
|
||||
commands, commands_len);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Insert <commands> after every pick. Here, fixup/squash chains
|
||||
* are considered part of the pick, so we insert the commands *after*
|
||||
* those chains if there are any.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
insert = -1;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < todo_list.nr; i++) {
|
||||
enum todo_command command = todo_list.items[i].command;
|
||||
|
||||
if (insert >= 0) {
|
||||
/* skip fixup/squash chains */
|
||||
if (command == TODO_COMMENT)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
else if (is_fixup(command)) {
|
||||
insert = i + 1;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
strbuf_insert(buf,
|
||||
todo_list.items[insert].offset_in_buf +
|
||||
offset, commands, commands_len);
|
||||
offset += commands_len;
|
||||
insert = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
first = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (command == TODO_PICK || command == TODO_MERGE)
|
||||
insert = i + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* append final <commands> */
|
||||
strbuf_add(buf, commands, commands_len);
|
||||
/* insert or append final <commands> */
|
||||
if (insert >= 0 && insert < todo_list.nr)
|
||||
strbuf_insert(buf, todo_list.items[insert].offset_in_buf +
|
||||
offset, commands, commands_len);
|
||||
else if (insert >= 0 || !offset)
|
||||
strbuf_add(buf, commands, commands_len);
|
||||
|
||||
i = write_message(buf->buf, buf->len, todo_file, 0);
|
||||
todo_list_release(&todo_list);
|
||||
|
@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ test_expect_success 'octopus merges' '
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_failure 'with --autosquash and --exec' '
|
||||
test_expect_success 'with --autosquash and --exec' '
|
||||
git checkout -b with-exec H &&
|
||||
echo Booh >B.t &&
|
||||
test_tick &&
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user