t2018: cleanup in current test
Before, in t2018, if do_checkout failed to create `branch2`, the next test-case would run `git branch -D branch2` but then fail because it was expecting `branch2` to exist, even though it doesn't. As a result, an early failure could cause a cascading failure of tests. Make test-case responsible for cleaning up their own branches so that future tests can start with a sane environment. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aeb582a983
commit
27434bf08c
@ -60,38 +60,40 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch, set to HEAD' '
|
||||
test_when_finished "
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
test_might_fail git branch -D branch2" &&
|
||||
do_checkout branch2
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch, set to an explicit ref' '
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
git branch -D branch2 &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_when_finished "
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
test_might_fail git branch -D branch2" &&
|
||||
do_checkout branch2 $HEAD1
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch with unmergeable changes fails' '
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
|
||||
# clean up from previous test
|
||||
git branch -D branch2 &&
|
||||
|
||||
setup_dirty_unmergeable &&
|
||||
test_must_fail do_checkout branch2 $HEAD1 &&
|
||||
test_dirty_unmergeable
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -f -b to a new branch with unmergeable changes discards changes' '
|
||||
test_when_finished "
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
test_might_fail git branch -D branch2" &&
|
||||
|
||||
# still dirty and on branch1
|
||||
do_checkout branch2 $HEAD1 "-f -b" &&
|
||||
test_must_fail test_dirty_unmergeable
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch preserves mergeable changes' '
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
|
||||
# clean up from previous test
|
||||
git branch -D branch2 &&
|
||||
test_when_finished "
|
||||
git reset --hard &&
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
test_might_fail git branch -D branch2" &&
|
||||
|
||||
setup_dirty_mergeable &&
|
||||
do_checkout branch2 $HEAD1 &&
|
||||
@ -99,27 +101,18 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch preserves mergeable changes' '
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -f -b to a new branch with mergeable changes discards changes' '
|
||||
# clean up from previous test
|
||||
git reset --hard &&
|
||||
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
|
||||
# clean up from previous test
|
||||
git branch -D branch2 &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_when_finished git reset --hard HEAD &&
|
||||
setup_dirty_mergeable &&
|
||||
do_checkout branch2 $HEAD1 "-f -b" &&
|
||||
test_must_fail test_dirty_mergeable
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to an existing branch fails' '
|
||||
git reset --hard HEAD &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_when_finished git reset --hard HEAD &&
|
||||
test_must_fail do_checkout branch2 $HEAD2
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -b to @{-1} fails with the right branch name' '
|
||||
git reset --hard HEAD &&
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
git checkout branch2 &&
|
||||
echo >expect "fatal: A branch named '\''branch1'\'' already exists." &&
|
||||
@ -160,6 +153,7 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -f -B to an existing branch with unmergeable chang
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -B to an existing branch preserves mergeable changes' '
|
||||
test_when_finished git reset --hard &&
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
|
||||
setup_dirty_mergeable &&
|
||||
@ -168,9 +162,6 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -B to an existing branch preserves mergeable chang
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'checkout -f -B to an existing branch with mergeable changes discards changes' '
|
||||
# clean up from previous test
|
||||
git reset --hard &&
|
||||
|
||||
git checkout branch1 &&
|
||||
|
||||
setup_dirty_mergeable &&
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user