merge-recursive: fix remainder of was_dirty() to use original index
was_dirty() uses was_tracked(), which has been updated to use the original index rather than the current one. However, was_dirty() also had a separate call to cache_file_exists(), causing it to still implicitly use the current index. Update that to instead use index_file_exists(). Also, was_dirty() had a hack where it would mark any file as non-dirty if we simply didn't know its modification time. This was due to using the current index rather than the original index, because D/F conflicts and such would cause unpack_trees() to not copy the modification times from the original index to the current one. Now that we are using the original index, we can dispense with this hack. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a35edc84bd
commit
277292d5ae
@ -842,9 +842,9 @@ static int was_dirty(struct merge_options *o, const char *path)
|
||||
if (o->call_depth || !was_tracked(o, path))
|
||||
return !dirty;
|
||||
|
||||
ce = cache_file_exists(path, strlen(path), ignore_case);
|
||||
dirty = (ce->ce_stat_data.sd_mtime.sec > 0 &&
|
||||
verify_uptodate(ce, &o->unpack_opts) != 0);
|
||||
ce = index_file_exists(o->unpack_opts.src_index,
|
||||
path, strlen(path), ignore_case);
|
||||
dirty = verify_uptodate(ce, &o->unpack_opts) != 0;
|
||||
return dirty;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user