Declare both git-switch and git-restore experimental
These two commands are basically redesigned git-checkout. We will not have that many opportunities to redo (because we run out of verbs, and that would also increase maintenance cost). To play it safe, let's declare the two commands experimental in one or two releases. If there is a serious flaw in the UI, we could still fix it. If everything goes well and nobody complains loudly, we can remove the experimental status by reverting this patch. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1235875594
commit
4e43b7ff1e
@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ commit as the restore source.
|
||||
See "Reset, restore and revert" in linkgit:git[1] for the differences
|
||||
between the three commands.
|
||||
|
||||
THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. THE BEHAVIOR MAY CHANGE.
|
||||
|
||||
OPTIONS
|
||||
-------
|
||||
-s <tree>::
|
||||
|
@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ Switching branches does not require a clean index and working tree
|
||||
however if the operation leads to loss of local changes, unless told
|
||||
otherwise with `--discard-changes` or `--merge`.
|
||||
|
||||
THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. THE BEHAVIOR MAY CHANGE.
|
||||
|
||||
OPTIONS
|
||||
-------
|
||||
<branch>::
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user