git-svn: cache only mergeinfo revisions
This should reduce excessive memory usage from the new mergeinfo caches without hurting performance too much, assuming reasonable latency to the SVN server. Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> Suggested-by: Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0b34f241d
commit
54b95346c1
@ -1713,13 +1713,10 @@ sub mergeinfo_changes {
|
||||
# Initialize cache on the first call.
|
||||
unless (defined $self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev}) {
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev} = {};
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo} = {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
my $cached_rev = $self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev}{$old_path};
|
||||
if (defined $cached_rev && $cached_rev == $old_rev) {
|
||||
$old_minfo = $self->{cached_mergeinfo}{$old_path};
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
unless (defined $cached_rev && $cached_rev == $old_rev) {
|
||||
my $ra = $self->ra;
|
||||
# Give up if $old_path isn't in the repo.
|
||||
# This is probably a merge on a subtree.
|
||||
@ -1728,19 +1725,16 @@ sub mergeinfo_changes {
|
||||
"directory didn't exist in r$old_rev\n";
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
my (undef, undef, $props) =
|
||||
$self->ra->get_dir($old_path, $old_rev);
|
||||
if (defined $props->{"svn:mergeinfo"}) {
|
||||
my %omi = map {split ":", $_ } split "\n",
|
||||
$props->{"svn:mergeinfo"};
|
||||
$old_minfo = \%omi;
|
||||
}
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo}{$old_path} = $old_minfo;
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev}{$old_path} = $old_rev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
my (undef, undef, $props) = $self->ra->get_dir($old_path, $old_rev);
|
||||
if (defined $props->{"svn:mergeinfo"}) {
|
||||
my %omi = map {split ":", $_ } split "\n",
|
||||
$props->{"svn:mergeinfo"};
|
||||
$old_minfo = \%omi;
|
||||
}
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev}{$old_path} = $old_rev;
|
||||
|
||||
# Cache the new mergeinfo.
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo}{$path} = \%minfo;
|
||||
$self->{cached_mergeinfo_rev}{$path} = $rev;
|
||||
|
||||
my %changes = ();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user