list-objects-filter: treat NULL filter_options as "disabled"
In most callers, we have an actual list_objects_filter_options struct, and if no filtering is desired its "choice" element will be LOFC_DISABLED. However, some code may have only a pointer to such a struct which may be NULL (because _their_ callers didn't care about filtering, either). Rather than forcing them to handle this explicitly like: if (filter_options) traverse_commit_list_filtered(filter_options, revs, show_commit, show_object, show_data, NULL); else traverse_commit_list(revs, show_commit, show_object, show_data); let's just treat a NULL filter_options the same as LOFC_DISABLED. We only need a small change, since that option struct is converted into a real filter only in the "init" function. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b34789c0b0
commit
5bf7f1eaa5
@ -663,6 +663,9 @@ struct filter *list_objects_filter__init(
|
||||
|
||||
assert((sizeof(s_filters) / sizeof(s_filters[0])) == LOFC__COUNT);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!filter_options)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (filter_options->choice >= LOFC__COUNT)
|
||||
BUG("invalid list-objects filter choice: %d",
|
||||
filter_options->choice);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user