sparse-index: silently return when cache tree fails
If cache_tree_update() returns a non-zero value, then it could not create the cache tree. This is likely due to a path having a merge conflict. Since we are already returning early, let's return silently to avoid making it seem like we failed to write the index at all. If we remove our dependence on the cache tree within convert_to_sparse(), then we could still recover from this scenario and have a sparse index. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72d84ea347
commit
5dc16756b2
@ -178,10 +178,12 @@ int convert_to_sparse(struct index_state *istate)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clear and recompute the cache-tree */
|
||||
cache_tree_free(&istate->cache_tree);
|
||||
if (cache_tree_update(istate, 0)) {
|
||||
warning(_("unable to update cache-tree, staying full"));
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Silently return if there is a problem with the cache tree update,
|
||||
* which might just be due to a conflict state in some entry.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cache_tree_update(istate, 0))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
remove_fsmonitor(istate);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user