t6042: add testcase covering long chains of rename conflicts
Each rename is a lego: the source side could be connected to a delete or another rename, and the destination side could be connected to a rename or a conflicting add. Previous tests combined these to get e.g. rename/rename(1to2)/add/add, rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete, and rename/add/delete. But we can also build bigger chains of conflicts. Add a testcase demonstrating this. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
eee73388f2
commit
651f7f3a1b
@ -827,4 +827,115 @@ test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' '
|
||||
)
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
# Testcase mod6, chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename(2to1)
|
||||
# Commit O: one, three, five
|
||||
# Commit A: one->two, three->four, five->six
|
||||
# Commit B: one->six, three->two, five->four
|
||||
# Expected: six CONFLICT(rename/rename) messages, each path in two of the
|
||||
# multi-way merged contents found in two, four, six
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'mod6-setup: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename(2to1)' '
|
||||
test_create_repo mod6 &&
|
||||
(
|
||||
cd mod6 &&
|
||||
test_seq 11 19 >one &&
|
||||
test_seq 31 39 >three &&
|
||||
test_seq 51 59 >five &&
|
||||
git add . &&
|
||||
test_tick &&
|
||||
git commit -m "O" &&
|
||||
|
||||
git branch O &&
|
||||
git branch A &&
|
||||
git branch B &&
|
||||
|
||||
git checkout A &&
|
||||
test_seq 10 19 >one &&
|
||||
echo 40 >>three &&
|
||||
git add one three &&
|
||||
git mv one two &&
|
||||
git mv three four &&
|
||||
git mv five six &&
|
||||
test_tick &&
|
||||
git commit -m "A" &&
|
||||
|
||||
git checkout B &&
|
||||
echo 20 >>one &&
|
||||
echo forty >>three &&
|
||||
echo 60 >>five &&
|
||||
git add one three five &&
|
||||
git mv one six &&
|
||||
git mv three two &&
|
||||
git mv five four &&
|
||||
test_tick &&
|
||||
git commit -m "B"
|
||||
)
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_failure 'mod6-check: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename(2to1)' '
|
||||
(
|
||||
cd mod6 &&
|
||||
|
||||
git checkout A^0 &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
|
||||
test_must_be_empty err &&
|
||||
|
||||
git ls-files -s >file_count &&
|
||||
test_line_count = 6 file_count &&
|
||||
git ls-files -u >file_count &&
|
||||
test_line_count = 6 file_count &&
|
||||
git ls-files -o >file_count &&
|
||||
test_line_count = 3 file_count &&
|
||||
|
||||
test_seq 10 20 >merged-one &&
|
||||
test_seq 51 60 >merged-five &&
|
||||
# Determine what the merge of three would give us.
|
||||
test_seq 30 40 >three-side-A &&
|
||||
test_seq 31 39 >three-side-B &&
|
||||
echo forty >three-side-B &&
|
||||
>empty &&
|
||||
test_must_fail git merge-file \
|
||||
-L "HEAD" \
|
||||
-L "" \
|
||||
-L "B^0" \
|
||||
three-side-A empty three-side-B &&
|
||||
sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1\1/" three-side-A >merged-three &&
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify the index is as expected
|
||||
git rev-parse >actual \
|
||||
:2:two :3:two \
|
||||
:2:four :3:four \
|
||||
:2:six :3:six &&
|
||||
git hash-object >expect \
|
||||
merged-one merged-three \
|
||||
merged-three merged-five \
|
||||
merged-five merged-one &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect actual &&
|
||||
|
||||
git cat-file -p :2:two >expect &&
|
||||
git cat-file -p :3:two >other &&
|
||||
test_must_fail git merge-file \
|
||||
-L "HEAD" -L "" -L "B^0" \
|
||||
expect empty other &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect two &&
|
||||
|
||||
git cat-file -p :2:four >expect &&
|
||||
git cat-file -p :3:four >other &&
|
||||
test_must_fail git merge-file \
|
||||
-L "HEAD" -L "" -L "B^0" \
|
||||
expect empty other &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect four &&
|
||||
|
||||
git cat-file -p :2:six >expect &&
|
||||
git cat-file -p :3:six >other &&
|
||||
test_must_fail git merge-file \
|
||||
-L "HEAD" -L "" -L "B^0" \
|
||||
expect empty other &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect six
|
||||
)
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user