[PATCH] Use SHA1 for git-update-cache --refresh
Change git-update-cache --refresh behaviour to use sha1's rather than comparing byte by byte. [JC demangled whitespace from the posted patch himself because he liked it so much. Also adjusted to the index_fd() interface slightly done differently from the original one.] Signed-off-by: Bryan Larsen <bryan.larsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
df6e151636
commit
69a97f1d9b
@ -94,36 +94,15 @@ static int add_file_to_cache(char *path)
|
||||
return add_cache_entry(ce, option);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int match_data(int fd, void *buffer, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (size) {
|
||||
char compare[1024];
|
||||
int ret = read(fd, compare, sizeof(compare));
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret <= 0 || ret > size || memcmp(buffer, compare, ret))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
size -= ret;
|
||||
buffer += ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int compare_data(struct cache_entry *ce, unsigned long expected_size)
|
||||
static int compare_data(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int match = -1;
|
||||
int fd = open(ce->name, O_RDONLY);
|
||||
|
||||
if (fd >= 0) {
|
||||
void *buffer;
|
||||
unsigned long size;
|
||||
char type[20];
|
||||
|
||||
buffer = read_sha1_file(ce->sha1, type, &size);
|
||||
if (buffer) {
|
||||
if (size == expected_size && !strcmp(type, "blob"))
|
||||
match = match_data(fd, buffer, size);
|
||||
free(buffer);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsigned char sha1[20];
|
||||
if (!index_fd(sha1, fd, st, 0, NULL))
|
||||
match = memcmp(sha1, ce->sha1, 20);
|
||||
close(fd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return match;
|
||||
@ -189,7 +168,7 @@ static struct cache_entry *refresh_entry(struct cache_entry *ce)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (st.st_mode & S_IFMT) {
|
||||
case S_IFREG:
|
||||
if (compare_data(ce, st.st_size))
|
||||
if (compare_data(ce, &st))
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case S_IFLNK:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user