undef/git-commit-vandalism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

checkout -m: attempt merge when deletion of path was staged

Browse Source 
twoway_merge() is missing an o->gently check in the case where a file
that needs to be modified is missing from the index but present in the
old and new trees.  As a result, in this case 'git checkout -m' errors
out instead of trying to perform a merge.

Fix it by checking o->gently.  While at it, inline the o->gently check
into reject_merge to prevent future call sites from making the same
mistake.

Noticed by code inspection.  The test for the motivating case was
added by JC.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Nieder 2014-08-12 17:03:18 -07:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 6c1db1b388
commit 6a143aa2b2
2 changed files with 23 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
t/t7201-co.sh
View File

@ -223,6 +223,23 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
test_cmp two expect
'
test_expect_success 'switch to another branch while carrying a deletion' '
git checkout -f master && git reset --hard && git clean -f &&
git rm two &&
test_must_fail git checkout simple 2>errs &&
test_i18ngrep overwritten errs &&
git checkout --merge simple 2>errs &&
test_i18ngrep ! overwritten errs &&
git ls-files -u &&
test_must_fail git cat-file -t :0:two &&
test "$(git cat-file -t :1:two)" = blob &&
test "$(git cat-file -t :2:two)" = blob &&
test_must_fail git cat-file -t :3:two
'
test_expect_success 'checkout to detach HEAD (with advice declined)' '
git config advice.detachedHead false &&

11
unpack-trees.c
View File

@ -1178,7 +1178,8 @@ return_failed:
static int reject_merge(const struct cache_entry *ce,
struct unpack_trees_options *o)
{
return add_rejected_path(o, ERROR_WOULD_OVERWRITE, ce->name);
return o->gently ? -1 :
add_rejected_path(o, ERROR_WOULD_OVERWRITE, ce->name);
}
static int same(const struct cache_entry *a, const struct cache_entry *b)
@ -1633,7 +1634,7 @@ int threeway_merge(const struct cache_entry * const *stages,
/* #14, #14ALT, #2ALT */
if (remote && !df_conflict_head && head_match && !remote_match) {
if (index && !same(index, remote) && !same(index, head))
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(index, o);
return reject_merge(index, o);
return merged_entry(remote, index, o);
}
/*
@ -1641,7 +1642,7 @@ int threeway_merge(const struct cache_entry * const *stages,
* make sure that it matches head.
*/
if (index && !same(index, head))
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(index, o);
return reject_merge(index, o);
if (head) {
/* #5ALT, #15 */
@ -1770,7 +1771,7 @@ int twoway_merge(const struct cache_entry * const *src,
else
return merged_entry(newtree, current, o);
}
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(current, o);
return reject_merge(current, o);
} else if ((!oldtree && !newtree) || /* 4 and 5 */
(!oldtree && newtree &&
same(current, newtree)) || /* 6 and 7 */
@ -1788,7 +1789,7 @@ int twoway_merge(const struct cache_entry * const *src,
/* 20 or 21 */
return merged_entry(newtree, current, o);
} else
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(current, o);
return reject_merge(current, o);
}
else if (newtree) {
if (oldtree && !o->initial_checkout) {