Merge branch 'fk/use-kwset-pickaxe-grep-f'
* fk/use-kwset-pickaxe-grep-f: obstack.c: Fix some sparse warnings sparse: Fix an "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warning
This commit is contained in:
commit
6cf5b81f32
@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ _obstack_begin (struct obstack *h,
|
||||
alignment - 1);
|
||||
h->chunk_limit = chunk->limit
|
||||
= (char *) chunk + h->chunk_size;
|
||||
chunk->prev = 0;
|
||||
chunk->prev = NULL;
|
||||
/* The initial chunk now contains no empty object. */
|
||||
h->maybe_empty_object = 0;
|
||||
h->alloc_failed = 0;
|
||||
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ _obstack_begin_1 (struct obstack *h, int size, int alignment,
|
||||
alignment - 1);
|
||||
h->chunk_limit = chunk->limit
|
||||
= (char *) chunk + h->chunk_size;
|
||||
chunk->prev = 0;
|
||||
chunk->prev = NULL;
|
||||
/* The initial chunk now contains no empty object. */
|
||||
h->maybe_empty_object = 0;
|
||||
h->alloc_failed = 0;
|
||||
@ -321,12 +321,12 @@ _obstack_allocated_p (struct obstack *h, void *obj)
|
||||
/* We use >= rather than > since the object cannot be exactly at
|
||||
the beginning of the chunk but might be an empty object exactly
|
||||
at the end of an adjacent chunk. */
|
||||
while (lp != 0 && ((void *) lp >= obj || (void *) (lp)->limit < obj))
|
||||
while (lp != NULL && ((void *) lp >= obj || (void *) (lp)->limit < obj))
|
||||
{
|
||||
plp = lp->prev;
|
||||
lp = plp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return lp != 0;
|
||||
return lp != NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Free objects in obstack H, including OBJ and everything allocate
|
||||
@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ obstack_free (struct obstack *h, void *obj)
|
||||
/* We use >= because there cannot be an object at the beginning of a chunk.
|
||||
But there can be an empty object at that address
|
||||
at the end of another chunk. */
|
||||
while (lp != 0 && ((void *) lp >= obj || (void *) (lp)->limit < obj))
|
||||
while (lp != NULL && ((void *) lp >= obj || (void *) (lp)->limit < obj))
|
||||
{
|
||||
plp = lp->prev;
|
||||
CALL_FREEFUN (h, lp);
|
||||
@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ obstack_free (struct obstack *h, void *obj)
|
||||
h->chunk_limit = lp->limit;
|
||||
h->chunk = lp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (obj != 0)
|
||||
else if (obj != NULL)
|
||||
/* obj is not in any of the chunks! */
|
||||
abort ();
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ _obstack_memory_used (struct obstack *h)
|
||||
register struct _obstack_chunk* lp;
|
||||
register int nbytes = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (lp = h->chunk; lp != 0; lp = lp->prev)
|
||||
for (lp = h->chunk; lp != NULL; lp = lp->prev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nbytes += lp->limit - (char *) lp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -395,7 +395,6 @@ _obstack_memory_used (struct obstack *h)
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
__attribute__ ((noreturn))
|
||||
print_and_abort (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Don't change any of these strings. Yes, it would be possible to add
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user