undef/git-commit-vandalism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

read-cache.c: fix writing "link" index ext with null base oid

Browse Source 
Since commit 7db118303a (unpack_trees: fix breakage when o->src_index !=
o->dst_index - 2018-04-23) and changes in merge code to use separate
index_state for source and destination, when doing a merge with split
index activated, we may run into this line in unpack_trees():

    o->result.split_index = init_split_index(&o->result);

This is by itself not wrong. But this split index information is not
fully populated (and it's only so when move_cache_to_base_index() is
called, aka force splitting the index, or loading index_state from a
file). Both "base_oid" and "base" in this case remain null.

So when writing the main index down, we link to this index with null
oid (default value after init_split_index()), which also means "no split
index" internally. This triggers an incorrect base index refresh:

    warning: could not freshen shared index '.../sharedindex.0{40}'

This patch makes sure we will not refresh null base_oid (because the
file is never there). It also makes sure not to write "link" extension
with null base_oid in the first place (no point having it at
all). Read code already has protection against null base_oid.

There is also another side fix in remove_split_index() that causes a
crash when doing "git update-index --no-split-index" when base_oid in
the index file is null. In this case we will not load
istate->split_index->base but we dereference it anyway and are rewarded
with a segfault. This should not happen anymore, but it's still wrong to
dereference a potential NULL pointer, especially when we do check for
NULL pointer in the next code.

Reported-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 2019-02-13 16:51:29 +07:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 98cdfbb84a
commit 6e37c8ed3c
3 changed files with 39 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
read-cache.c
View File

@ -2520,7 +2520,8 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, struct tempfile *tempfile,
return err;
/* Write extension data here */
if (!strip_extensions && istate->split_index) {
if (!strip_extensions && istate->split_index &&
!is_null_oid(&istate->split_index->base_oid)) {
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
err = write_link_extension(&sb, istate) < 0 ||
@ -2794,7 +2795,7 @@ int write_locked_index(struct index_state *istate, struct lock_file *lock,
ret = write_split_index(istate, lock, flags);
/* Freshen the shared index only if the split-index was written */
if (!ret && !new_shared_index) {
if (!ret && !new_shared_index && !is_null_oid(&si->base_oid)) {
const char *shared_index = git_path("sharedindex.%s",
oid_to_hex(&si->base_oid));
freshen_shared_index(shared_index, 1);

34
split-index.c
View File

@ -440,24 +440,26 @@ void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
if (istate->split_index) {
/*
* When removing the split index, we need to move
* ownership of the mem_pool associated with the
* base index to the main index. There may be cache entries
* allocated from the base's memory pool that are shared with
* the_index.cache[].
*/
mem_pool_combine(istate->ce_mem_pool, istate->split_index->base->ce_mem_pool);
if (istate->split_index->base) {
/*
* When removing the split index, we need to move
* ownership of the mem_pool associated with the
* base index to the main index. There may be cache entries
* allocated from the base's memory pool that are shared with
* the_index.cache[].
*/
mem_pool_combine(istate->ce_mem_pool,
istate->split_index->base->ce_mem_pool);
/*
* The split index no longer owns the mem_pool backing
* its cache array. As we are discarding this index,
* mark the index as having no cache entries, so it
* will not attempt to clean up the cache entries or
* validate them.
*/
if (istate->split_index->base)
/*
* The split index no longer owns the mem_pool backing
* its cache array. As we are discarding this index,
* mark the index as having no cache entries, so it
* will not attempt to clean up the cache entries or
* validate them.
*/
istate->split_index->base->cache_nr = 0;
}
/*
* We can discard the split index because its

18
t/t1700-split-index.sh
View File

@ -447,4 +447,22 @@ test_expect_success 'writing split index with null sha1 does not write cache tre
test_line_count = 0 cache-tree.out
'
test_expect_success 'do not refresh null base index' '
test_create_repo merge &&
(
cd merge &&
test_commit initial &&
git checkout -b side-branch &&
test_commit extra &&
git checkout master &&
git update-index --split-index &&
test_commit more &&
# must not write a new shareindex, or we wont catch the problem
git -c splitIndex.maxPercentChange=100 merge --no-edit side-branch 2>err &&
# i.e. do not expect warnings like
# could not freshen shared index .../shareindex.00000...
test_must_be_empty err
)
'
test_done