Merge branch 'maint'

* maint:
  GIT 1.5.0.3
  glossary: Add definitions for dangling and unreachable objects
  user-manual: more detailed merge discussion
  user-manual: how to replace commits older than most recent
  user-manual: insert earlier of mention content-addressable architecture
  user-manual: ensure generated manual references stylesheet
  user-manual: reset to ORIG_HEAD not HEAD to undo merge
  Documentation: mention module option to git-cvsimport
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2007-03-04 17:24:49 -08:00
commit 784b11cd05
5 changed files with 167 additions and 48 deletions

View File

@ -105,8 +105,11 @@ clean:
user-manual.xml: user-manual.txt user-manual.conf
$(ASCIIDOC) -b docbook -d book $<
XSLT = http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/docbook.xsl
XSLTOPTS = --nonet --xinclude --stringparam html.stylesheet docbook-xsl.css
user-manual.html: user-manual.xml
xmlto html-nochunks $<
xsltproc $(XSLTOPTS) -o $@ $(XSLT) $<
glossary.html : glossary.txt sort_glossary.pl
cat $< | \

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
GIT v1.5.0.2 Release Notes
GIT v1.5.0.3 Release Notes
==========================
Fixes since v1.5.0.2
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ Fixes since v1.5.0.2
path. Earlier it started in the middle of the path, and
incorrectly.
- 'git-merge' did not exit with non-zero status when the
working tree was dirty and cannot fast forward. It does
now.
- 'cvsexportcommit' does not lose yet-to-be-used message file.
- int-vs-size_t typefix when running combined diff on files
@ -38,18 +42,17 @@ Fixes since v1.5.0.2
- 'git index-pack' did not protect itself from getting a short
read out of pread(2).
- 'git http-push' had a few buffer overruns.
- Build dependency fixes to rebuild fetch.o when other headers
change.
* Documentation updates
- options to 'git remote add' were described insufficiently.
- user-manual updates.
- Options to 'git remote add' were described insufficiently.
---
exec >/var/tmp/1
O=v1.5.0.2
O=v1.5.0.2-16-gdb554bf
echo O=`git describe maint`
git shortlog --no-merges $O..maint
- Configuration format.suffix was not documented.
# Local Variables:
# mode: text
# End:
- Other formatting and spelling fixes.

View File

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ sure it is in your path. Then cd to a checked out CVS working directory
of the project you are interested in and run gitlink:git-cvsimport[1]:
-------------------------------------------
$ git cvsimport -C <destination>
$ git cvsimport -C <destination> <module>
-------------------------------------------
This puts a git archive of the named CVS module in the directory

View File

@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ DAG::
objects is acyclic (there is no chain which begins and ends with the
same object).
dangling object::
An unreachable object which is not reachable even from other
unreachable objects; a dangling object has no references to it
from any reference or object in the repository.
dircache::
You are *waaaaay* behind.
@ -350,6 +355,10 @@ tag::
unmerged index::
An index which contains unmerged index entries.
unreachable object::
An object which is not reachable from a branch, tag, or any
other reference.
working tree::
The set of files and directories currently being worked on,
i.e. you can work in your working tree without using git at all.

View File

@ -391,15 +391,20 @@ index 8be626f..d7aac9d 100644
As you can see, a commit shows who made the latest change, what they
did, and why.
Every commit has a 40-hexdigit id, sometimes called the "object name"
or the "SHA1 id", shown on the first line of the "git show" output.
You can usually refer to a commit by a shorter name, such as a tag or a
branch name, but this longer name can also be useful. Most
importantly, it is a globally unique name for this commit: so if you
tell somebody else the object name (for example in email), then you are
guaranteed that name will refer to the same commit in their repository
that it does in yours (assuming their repository has that commit at
all).
Every commit has a 40-hexdigit id, sometimes called the "object name" or the
"SHA1 id", shown on the first line of the "git show" output. You can usually
refer to a commit by a shorter name, such as a tag or a branch name, but this
longer name can also be useful. Most importantly, it is a globally unique
name for this commit: so if you tell somebody else the object name (for
example in email), then you are guaranteed that name will refer to the same
commit in their repository that it does in yours (assuming their repository
has that commit at all). Since the object name is computed as a hash over the
contents of the commit, you are guaranteed that the commit can never change
without its name also changing.
In fact, in <<git-internals>> we shall see that everything stored in git
history, including file data and directory contents, is stored in an object
with a name that is a hash of its contents.
Understanding history: commits, parents, and reachability
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@ -1163,18 +1168,46 @@ the working tree in a special state that gives you all the
information you need to help resolve the merge.
Files with conflicts are marked specially in the index, so until you
resolve the problem and update the index, git commit will fail:
resolve the problem and update the index, gitlink:git-commit[1] will
fail:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git commit
file.txt: needs merge
-------------------------------------------------
Also, git status will list those files as "unmerged".
Also, gitlink:git-status[1] will list those files as "unmerged", and the
files with conflicts will have conflict markers added, like this:
-------------------------------------------------
<<<<<<< HEAD:file.txt
Hello world
=======
Goodbye
>>>>>>> 77976da35a11db4580b80ae27e8d65caf5208086:file.txt
-------------------------------------------------
All you need to do is edit the files to resolve the conflicts, and then
-------------------------------------------------
$ git add file.txt
$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
Note that the commit message will already be filled in for you with
some information about the merge. Normally you can just use this
default message unchanged, but you may add additional commentary of
your own if desired.
The above is all you need to know to resolve a simple merge. But git
also provides more information to help resolve conflicts:
Getting conflict-resolution help during a merge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All of the changes that git was able to merge automatically are
already added to the index file, so gitlink:git-diff[1] shows only
the conflicts. Also, it uses a somewhat unusual syntax:
the conflicts. It uses an unusual syntax:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git diff
@ -1195,14 +1228,32 @@ conflict will have two parents instead of the usual one: one parent
will be HEAD, the tip of the current branch; the other will be the
tip of the other branch, which is stored temporarily in MERGE_HEAD.
The diff above shows the differences between the working-tree version
of file.txt and two previous versions: one version from HEAD, and one
from MERGE_HEAD. So instead of preceding each line by a single "+"
or "-", it now uses two columns: the first column is used for
differences between the first parent and the working directory copy,
and the second for differences between the second parent and the
working directory copy. Thus after resolving the conflict in the
obvious way, the diff will look like:
During the merge, the index holds three versions of each file. Each of
these three "file stages" represents a different version of the file:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git show :1:file.txt # the file in a common ancestor of both branches
$ git show :2:file.txt # the version from HEAD, but including any
# nonconflicting changes from MERGE_HEAD
$ git show :3:file.txt # the version from MERGE_HEAD, but including any
# nonconflicting changes from HEAD.
-------------------------------------------------
Since the stage 2 and stage 3 versions have already been updated with
nonconflicting changes, the only remaining differences between them are
the important ones; thus gitlink:git-diff[1] can use the information in
the index to show only those conflicts.
The diff above shows the differences between the working-tree version of
file.txt and the stage 2 and stage 3 versions. So instead of preceding
each line by a single "+" or "-", it now uses two columns: the first
column is used for differences between the first parent and the working
directory copy, and the second for differences between the second parent
and the working directory copy. (See the "COMBINED DIFF FORMAT" section
of gitlink:git-diff-files[1] for a details of the format.)
After resolving the conflict in the obvious way (but before updating the
index), the diff will look like:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git diff
@ -1220,26 +1271,37 @@ This shows that our resolved version deleted "Hello world" from the
first parent, deleted "Goodbye" from the second parent, and added
"Goodbye world", which was previously absent from both.
The gitlink:git-log[1] command also provides special help for merges:
Some special diff options allow diffing the working directory against
any of these stages:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git diff -1 file.txt # diff against stage 1
$ git diff --base file.txt # same as the above
$ git diff -2 file.txt # diff against stage 2
$ git diff --ours file.txt # same as the above
$ git diff -3 file.txt # diff against stage 3
$ git diff --theirs file.txt # same as the above.
-------------------------------------------------
The gitlink:git-log[1] and gitk[1] commands also provide special help
for merges:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git log --merge
$ gitk --merge
-------------------------------------------------
This will list all commits which exist only on HEAD or on MERGE_HEAD,
and which touch an unmerged file.
These will display all commits which exist only on HEAD or on
MERGE_HEAD, and which touch an unmerged file.
We can now add the resolved version to the index and commit:
Each time you resolve the conflicts in a file and update the index:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git add file.txt
$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
Note that the commit message will already be filled in for you with
some information about the merge. Normally you can just use this
default message unchanged, but you may add additional commentary of
your own if desired.
the different stages of that file will be "collapsed", after which
git-diff will (by default) no longer show diffs for that file.
[[undoing-a-merge]]
undoing a merge
@ -1255,7 +1317,7 @@ $ git reset --hard HEAD
Or, if you've already commited the merge that you want to throw away,
-------------------------------------------------
$ git reset --hard HEAD^
$ git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD
-------------------------------------------------
However, this last command can be dangerous in some cases--never
@ -1328,6 +1390,7 @@ with the changes to be reverted, then you will be asked to fix
conflicts manually, just as in the case of <<resolving-a-merge,
resolving a merge>>.
[[fixing-a-mistake-by-editing-history]]
Fixing a mistake by editing history
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@ -1930,6 +1993,51 @@ return mywork to the state it had before you started the rebase:
$ git rebase --abort
-------------------------------------------------
Modifying a single commit
-------------------------
We saw in <<fixing-a-mistake-by-editing-history>> that you can replace the
most recent commit using
-------------------------------------------------
$ git commit --amend
-------------------------------------------------
which will replace the old commit by a new commit incorporating your
changes, giving you a chance to edit the old commit message first.
You can also use a combination of this and gitlink:git-rebase[1] to edit
commits further back in your history. First, tag the problematic commit with
-------------------------------------------------
$ git tag bad mywork~5
-------------------------------------------------
(Either gitk or git-log may be useful for finding the commit.)
Then check out a new branch at that commit, edit it, and rebase the rest of
the series on top of it:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git checkout -b TMP bad
$ # make changes here and update the index
$ git commit --amend
$ git rebase --onto TMP bad mywork
-------------------------------------------------
When you're done, you'll be left with mywork checked out, with the top patches
on mywork reapplied on top of the modified commit you created in TMP. You can
then clean up with
-------------------------------------------------
$ git branch -d TMP
$ git tag -d bad
-------------------------------------------------
Note that the immutable nature of git history means that you haven't really
"modified" existing commits; instead, you have replaced the old commits with
new commits having new object names.
Reordering or selecting from a patch series
-------------------------------------------
@ -2155,6 +2263,7 @@ See gitlink:git-config[1] for more details on the configuration
options mentioned above.
[[git-internals]]
Git internals
=============
@ -2936,11 +3045,6 @@ provides.
Simplify beginning by suggesting disconnected head instead of
temporary branch creation?
Explain how to refer to file stages in the "how to resolve a merge"
section: diff -1, -2, -3, --ours, --theirs :1:/path notation. The
"git ls-files --unmerged --stage" thing is sorta useful too,
actually. And note gitk --merge.
Add more good examples. Entire sections of just cookbook examples
might be a good idea; maybe make an "advanced examples" section a
standard end-of-chapter section?