merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames

Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Elijah Newren 2018-02-14 10:52:01 -08:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 3b9616f149
commit 7b3d3b0681
2 changed files with 43 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1141,6 +1141,26 @@ static int conflict_rename_dir(struct merge_options *o,
{
const struct diff_filespec *dest = pair->two;
if (!o->call_depth && would_lose_untracked(dest->path)) {
char *alt_path = unique_path(o, dest->path, rename_branch);
output(o, 1, _("Error: Refusing to lose untracked file at %s; "
"writing to %s instead."),
dest->path, alt_path);
/*
* Write the file in worktree at alt_path, but not in the
* index. Instead, write to dest->path for the index but
* only at the higher appropriate stage.
*/
if (update_file(o, 0, &dest->oid, dest->mode, alt_path))
return -1;
free(alt_path);
return update_stages(o, dest->path, NULL,
rename_branch == o->branch1 ? dest : NULL,
rename_branch == o->branch1 ? NULL : dest);
}
/* Update dest->path both in index and in worktree */
if (update_file(o, 1, &dest->oid, dest->mode, dest->path))
return -1;
return 0;
@ -1159,7 +1179,8 @@ static int handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
const char *update_path = path;
int ret = 0;
if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth, 0)) {
if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth, 0) ||
(!o->call_depth && would_lose_untracked(path))) {
update_path = alt_path = unique_path(o, path, change_branch);
}
@ -1285,6 +1306,12 @@ static int handle_file(struct merge_options *o,
dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
output(o, 1, _("%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead"),
rename->path, other_branch, dst_name);
} else if (!o->call_depth &&
would_lose_untracked(rename->path)) {
dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file at %s; "
"adding as %s instead"),
rename->path, dst_name);
}
}
if ((ret = update_file(o, 0, &rename->oid, rename->mode, dst_name)))
@ -1410,7 +1437,18 @@ static int conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o,
char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2);
output(o, 1, _("Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead"),
a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2);
remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
if (would_lose_untracked(path))
/*
* Only way we get here is if both renames were from
* a directory rename AND user had an untracked file
* at the location where both files end up after the
* two directory renames. See testcase 10d of t6043.
*/
output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file at "
"%s, even though it's in the way."),
path);
else
remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
ret = update_file(o, 0, &mfi_c1.oid, mfi_c1.mode, new_path1);
if (!ret)
ret = update_file(o, 0, &mfi_c2.oid, mfi_c2.mode,

View File

@ -2992,7 +2992,7 @@ test_expect_success '10b-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
)
'
test_expect_failure '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
test_expect_success '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
(
cd 10b &&
@ -3070,7 +3070,7 @@ test_expect_success '10c-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)
)
'
test_expect_failure '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
(
cd 10c &&
@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@ test_expect_success '10d-setup: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
)
'
test_expect_failure '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
(
cd 10d &&