RelNotes/2.26.0: fix various typos
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be8661a328
commit
7fcb965970
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Backward compatibility notes
|
||||
|
||||
* "git rebase" uses a different backend that is based on the 'merge'
|
||||
machinery by default. There are a few known differences in the
|
||||
behaviour from the traditional machniery based on patch+apply.
|
||||
behaviour from the traditional machinery based on patch+apply.
|
||||
|
||||
If your workflow is negatively affected by this change, please
|
||||
report it to git@vger.kernel.org so that we can take a look into
|
||||
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ UI, Workflows & Features
|
||||
* "git rm" and "git stash" learns the new "--pathspec-from-file"
|
||||
option.
|
||||
|
||||
* "git am --short-current-patch" is a way to show the piece of e-mail
|
||||
* "git am --show-current-patch" is a way to show the piece of e-mail
|
||||
for the stopped step, which is not suitable to directly feed "git
|
||||
apply" (it is designed to be a good "git am" input). It learned a
|
||||
new option to show only the patch part.
|
||||
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Performance, Internal Implementation, Development Support etc.
|
||||
with tabs.
|
||||
|
||||
* The test-lint machinery knew to check "VAR=VAL shell_function"
|
||||
construct, but did not check "VAR= shell_funciton", which has been
|
||||
construct, but did not check "VAR= shell_function", which has been
|
||||
corrected.
|
||||
|
||||
* Replace "git config --bool" calls with "git config --type=bool" in
|
||||
@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Fixes since v2.25
|
||||
* Unhelpful warning messages during documentation build have been squelched.
|
||||
|
||||
* "git rebase -i" identifies existing commits in its todo file with
|
||||
their abbreviated object name, which could become ambigous as it
|
||||
their abbreviated object name, which could become ambiguous as it
|
||||
goes to create new commits, and has a mechanism to avoid ambiguity
|
||||
in the main part of its execution. A few other cases however were
|
||||
not covered by the protection against ambiguity, which has been
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user