Add explanation why we do not allow to sparse checkout to empty working tree
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17d26a4d04
commit
a7bc906f2e
@ -1119,8 +1119,13 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (ret < 0)
|
if (ret < 0)
|
||||||
goto return_failed;
|
goto return_failed;
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Sparse checkout is meant to narrow down checkout area
|
||||||
|
* but it does not make sense to narrow down to empty working
|
||||||
|
* tree. This is usually a mistake in sparse checkout rules.
|
||||||
|
* Do not allow users to do that.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
if (o->result.cache_nr && empty_worktree) {
|
if (o->result.cache_nr && empty_worktree) {
|
||||||
/* dubious---why should this fail??? */
|
|
||||||
ret = unpack_failed(o, "Sparse checkout leaves no entry on working directory");
|
ret = unpack_failed(o, "Sparse checkout leaves no entry on working directory");
|
||||||
goto done;
|
goto done;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user