undef/git-commit-vandalism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategy

Browse Source 
Make it clear in the docs that the merge takes the tree of HEAD and
ignores everything in the other branches.  This should hopefully clear
up confusion, usually caused by the user looking for a strategy that
resolves all conflict hunks in favour of HEAD (which is completely
different and currently not supported).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Rast 2009-11-15 19:25:30 +01:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 78d553b7d7
commit d4cbaa12a7
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
View File

@ -29,8 +29,9 @@ octopus::
pulling or merging more than one branch.
ours::
This resolves any number of heads, but the result of the
merge is always the current branch head. It is meant to
This resolves any number of heads, but the resulting tree of the
merge is always that of the current branch head, effectively
ignoring all changes from all other branches. It is meant to
be used to supersede old development history of side
branches.