Even more aggressive commit trimming.
Now we cut out a commit if any of its parents had the same tree; just use that parent in its place. This makes the history look nice, but I don't think it's quite right...
This commit is contained in:
parent
210d083904
commit
d691265880
@ -202,6 +202,29 @@ tree_changed()
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
copy_or_skip()
|
||||
{
|
||||
rev="$1"
|
||||
tree="$2"
|
||||
newparents="$3"
|
||||
assert [ -n "$tree" ]
|
||||
|
||||
p=""
|
||||
for parent in $newparents; do
|
||||
ptree=$(toptree_for_commit $parent) || exit $?
|
||||
if [ "$ptree" = "$tree" ]; then
|
||||
# any identical parent means this commit is unnecessary
|
||||
echo $parent
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
elif [ -n "$ptree" ]; then
|
||||
# an existing, non-identical parent is important
|
||||
p="$p -p $parent"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
copy_commit $rev $tree "$p" || exit $?
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cmd_split()
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug "Splitting $dir..."
|
||||
@ -238,16 +261,7 @@ cmd_split()
|
||||
debug " tree is: $tree"
|
||||
[ -z $tree ] && continue
|
||||
|
||||
p=""
|
||||
for parent in $newparents; do
|
||||
p="$p -p $parent"
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
if tree_changed $tree $newparents; then
|
||||
newrev=$(copy_commit $rev $tree "$p") || exit $?
|
||||
else
|
||||
newrev="$newparents"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
newrev=$(copy_or_skip "$rev" "$tree" "$newparents") || exit $?
|
||||
debug " newrev is: $newrev"
|
||||
cache_set $rev $newrev
|
||||
cache_set latest_new $newrev
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user