sequencer: handle rebase-merges for "onto" message
In order to work correctly, git-rebase --rebase-merges needs to make initial todo list with unique labels. Those unique labels is being handled by employing a hashmap and appending an unique number if any duplicate is found. But, we forget that beside those labels for side branches, we also have a special label `onto' for our so-called new-base. In a special case that any of those labels for side branches named `onto', git will run into trouble. Correct it. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd5522271f
commit
e02058a729
@ -4560,10 +4560,15 @@ static int make_script_with_merges(struct pretty_print_context *pp,
|
||||
strbuf_init(&state.buf, 32);
|
||||
|
||||
if (revs->cmdline.nr && (revs->cmdline.rev[0].flags & BOTTOM)) {
|
||||
struct labels_entry *onto_label_entry;
|
||||
struct object_id *oid = &revs->cmdline.rev[0].item->oid;
|
||||
FLEX_ALLOC_STR(entry, string, "onto");
|
||||
oidcpy(&entry->entry.oid, oid);
|
||||
oidmap_put(&state.commit2label, entry);
|
||||
|
||||
FLEX_ALLOC_STR(onto_label_entry, label, "onto");
|
||||
hashmap_entry_init(&onto_label_entry->entry, strihash("onto"));
|
||||
hashmap_add(&state.labels, &onto_label_entry->entry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -474,4 +474,25 @@ test_expect_success '--rebase-merges with commit that can generate bad character
|
||||
git rebase --rebase-merges --force-rebase E
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success '--rebase-merges with message matched with onto label' '
|
||||
git checkout -b onto-label E &&
|
||||
git merge -m onto G &&
|
||||
git rebase --rebase-merges --force-rebase E &&
|
||||
test_cmp_graph <<-\EOF
|
||||
* onto
|
||||
|\
|
||||
| * G
|
||||
| * F
|
||||
* | E
|
||||
|\ \
|
||||
| * | B
|
||||
* | | D
|
||||
| |/
|
||||
|/|
|
||||
* | C
|
||||
|/
|
||||
* A
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user