git tag documentation grammar fixes and readability updates

... with help from Eric Raible.

In addition, describe the use of GIT_COMMITTER_DATE more comprehensively
by including "date-formats.txt"

Signed-off-by: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Documentation/git-tag.txt

@@ -165,13 +165,12 @@ You can test which tag you have by doing
 
 which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
 
-Sorry for inconvenience.
+Sorry for the inconvenience.
 ------------
 
 Does this seem a bit complicated?  It *should* be. There is no
-way that it would be correct to just "fix" it behind peoples
+way that it would be correct to just "fix" it automatically.
-backs. People need to know that their tags might have been
+People need to know that their tags might have been changed.
-changed.
 
 
 On Automatic following
@@ -189,9 +188,10 @@ the toplevel but not limited to them.  Mere mortals when pulling
 from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
 private anchor point tags from the other person.
 
-You would notice "please pull" messages on the mailing list says
+Often, "please pull" messages on the mailing list just provide
-repo URL and branch name alone.  This is designed to be easily
+two pieces of information: a repo URL and a branch name; this
-cut&pasted to a 'git fetch' command line:
+is designed to be easily cut&pasted at the end of a 'git fetch'
+command line:
 
 ------------
 Linus, please pull from
@@ -207,14 +207,14 @@ becomes:
 $ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
 ------------
 
-In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow other's
+In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow the other
-tags.
+person's tags.
 
-One important aspect of git is it is distributed, and being
+One important aspect of git is its distributed nature, which
-distributed largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
+largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
 "downstream" in the system.  On the face of it, the above
 example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
-by upper echelon of people and tags only flow downwards, but
+by the upper echelon of people and that tags only flow downwards, but
 that is not the case.  It only shows that the usage pattern
 determines who are interested in whose tags.
 
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ this case.
 
 It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
 exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
-they are most likely tracking with each other's progress by
+they are most likely tracking each other's progress by
 having remote-tracking branches.  Again, the heuristic to automatically
 follow such tags is a good thing.
 
@@ -242,21 +242,21 @@ On Backdating Tags
 
 If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
 to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
-to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object.  The data in
+to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object; such data in
 the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
 gitweb interface.
 
 To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
-variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE to one or more of the date and time.  The
+variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE (see the later discussion of possible
-date and time can be specified in a number of ways; the most common
+values; the most common form is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM").
-is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM".
 
-An example follows.
+For example:
 
 ------------
 $ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
 ------------
 
+include::date-formats.txt[]
 
 SEE ALSO
 --------