undef/git-commit-vandalism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remote.c: avoid O(m*n) behavior in match_push_refs

Browse Source 
When pushing using a matching refspec or a pattern refspec, each ref
in the local repository must be paired with a ref advertised by the
remote server.  This is accomplished by using the refspec to transform
the name of the local ref into the name it should have in the remote
repository, and then performing a linear search through the list of
remote refs to see if the remote ref was advertised by the remote
system.

Each of these lookups has O(n) complexity and makes match_push_refs()
be an O(m*n) operation, where m is the number of local refs and n is
the number of remote refs.  If there are many refs 100,000+, then this
ref matching can take a significant amount of time.  Let's prepare an
index of the remote refs to allow searching in O(log n) time and
reduce the complexity of match_push_refs() to O(m log n).

We prepare the index lazily so that it is only created when necessary.
So, there should be no impact when _not_ using a matching or pattern
refspec, i.e. when pushing using only explicit refspecs.

Dry-run push of a repository with 121,913 local and remote refs:

        before     after
real    1m40.582s  0m0.804s
user    1m39.914s  0m0.515s
sys     0m0.125s   0m0.106s

The creation of the index has overhead.  So, if there are very few
local refs, then it could take longer to create the index than it
would have taken to just perform n linear lookups into the remote
ref space.  Using the index should provide some improvement when
the number of local refs is roughly greater than the log of the
number of remote refs (i.e. m >= log n).  The pathological case is
when there is a single local ref and very many remote refs.

Dry-run push of a repository with 121,913 remote refs and a single
local ref:

        before    after
real    0m0.525s  0m0.566s
user    0m0.243s  0m0.279s
sys     0m0.075s  0m0.099s

Using an index takes 41 ms longer, or roughly 7.8% longer.

Jeff King measured a no-op push of a single ref into a remote repo
with 370,000 refs:

        before    after
real    0m1.087s  0m1.156s
user    0m1.344s  0m1.412s
sys     0m0.288s  0m0.284s

Using an index takes 69 ms longer, or roughly 6.3% longer.

None of the measurements above required transferring any objects to
the remote repository.  If the push required transferring objects and
updating the refs in the remote repository, the impact of preparing
the search index would be even smaller.

A similar operation is performed in the reverse direction when pruning
using a matching or pattern refspec.  Let's avoid O(m*n) behavior in
the same way by lazily preparing an index on the local refs.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Brandon Casey 2013-07-08 01:58:39 -07:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent edca415256
commit f1bd15ab15
1 changed files with 25 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
remote.c
View File

@ -1317,6 +1317,14 @@ static void add_missing_tags(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst, struct ref ***ds
free(sent_tips.tip);
}
static void prepare_ref_index(struct string_list *ref_index, struct ref *ref)
{
for ( ; ref; ref = ref->next)
string_list_append_nodup(ref_index, ref->name)->util = ref;
sort_string_list(ref_index);
}
/*
* Given the set of refs the local repository has, the set of refs the
* remote repository has, and the refspec used for push, determine
@ -1335,6 +1343,7 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
int errs;
static const char *default_refspec[] = { ":", NULL };
struct ref *ref, **dst_tail = tail_ref(dst);
struct string_list dst_ref_index = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
if (!nr_refspec) {
nr_refspec = 1;
@ -1345,6 +1354,7 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
/* pick the remainder */
for (ref = src; ref; ref = ref->next) {
struct string_list_item *dst_item;
struct ref *dst_peer;
const struct refspec *pat = NULL;
char *dst_name;
@ -1353,7 +1363,11 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
if (!dst_name)
continue;
dst_peer = find_ref_by_name(*dst, dst_name);
if (!dst_ref_index.nr)
prepare_ref_index(&dst_ref_index, *dst);
dst_item = string_list_lookup(&dst_ref_index, dst_name);
dst_peer = dst_item ? dst_item->util : NULL;
if (dst_peer) {
if (dst_peer->peer_ref)
/* We're already sending something to this ref. */
@ -1370,6 +1384,8 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
/* Create a new one and link it */
dst_peer = make_linked_ref(dst_name, &dst_tail);
hashcpy(dst_peer->new_sha1, ref->new_sha1);
string_list_insert(&dst_ref_index,
dst_peer->name)->util = dst_peer;
}
dst_peer->peer_ref = copy_ref(ref);
dst_peer->force = pat->force;
@ -1377,10 +1393,13 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
free(dst_name);
}
string_list_clear(&dst_ref_index, 0);
if (flags & MATCH_REFS_FOLLOW_TAGS)
add_missing_tags(src, dst, &dst_tail);
if (send_prune) {
struct string_list src_ref_index = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
/* check for missing refs on the remote */
for (ref = *dst; ref; ref = ref->next) {
char *src_name;
@ -1391,11 +1410,15 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
src_name = get_ref_match(rs, nr_refspec, ref, send_mirror, FROM_DST, NULL);
if (src_name) {
if (!find_ref_by_name(src, src_name))
if (!src_ref_index.nr)
prepare_ref_index(&src_ref_index, src);
if (!string_list_has_string(&src_ref_index,
src_name))
ref->peer_ref = alloc_delete_ref();
free(src_name);
}
}
string_list_clear(&src_ref_index, 0);
}
if (errs)
return -1;