Abbreviating the SHA-1s in the skipList input has never worked, but
the documentation hasn't unambiguously stated that this is an error,
and there was no test for it.
Let's fix both since it would be easy for some later refactoring
e.g. switch to accidentally switch to a looser OID parsing function,
causing the tests before this change to pass, but for older versions
of git to be incompatible with the new skipList format.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is currently no comment syntax for the fsck.skipList, this isn't
really by design, and it would be nice to have support for comments.
Document that this doesn't work, and test for how this errors
out. These tests reveal a current bug, if there's invalid input the
output will emit some of the next line, and then go into uninitialized
memory. This is fixed in a subsequent change.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since the skipList support was first added in cd94c6f91 ("fsck:
git receive-pack: support excluding objects from fsck'ing",
2015-06-22) the documentation for the format has that the file is a
sorted list of object names.
Thus, anyone using the feature would have thought the list needed to
be sorted. E.g. I recently in conjunction with my fetch.fsck.*
implementation in 1362df0d41 ("fetch: implement fetch.fsck.*",
2018-07-27) wrote some code to ship a skipList, and went out of my way
to sort it.
Doing so seems intuitive, since it contains fixed-width records, and
has no support for comments, so one might expect it to be binary
searched in-place on-disk.
However, as documented here this was never a requirement, so let's
change the documentation. Since this is a file format change let's
also document what was said about this in the past, so e.g. someone
like myself reading the new docs can see this never needed to be
sorted ("why do I have all this code to sort this thing...").
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recent 65a836fa6b ("fsck: add stress tests for fsck.skipList",
2018-07-27) added various stress tests for odd invocations of
fsck.skipList, but didn't tests for some very simple ones, such as
asserting that providing to skipList with a bad commit causes fsck to
exit with a non-zero exit code. Add such a test.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Several fsck tests used the exact same git-hash-object output, but had
copy/pasted that part of the setup code. Let's instead do that setup
once and use it in subsequent tests.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When fsck.<msg-id> is set to an unknown value it'll cause "fsck" to
die, but the same is not true of the "fetch" and "receive"
variants. Document this and test for it.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Stress test the parsing logic shared by fsck.skipList and
{fetch,receive}.fsck.skipList added in cd94c6f91e ("fsck: git
receive-pack: support excluding objects from fsck'ing",
2015-06-22). There were no tests for the work done by the
init_skiplist() routine, e.g. how it dies on invalid input.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test and document that the {fetch,receive}.fsck.* family of variables
doesn't fall back on the corresponding .fsck.* variables.
This was alluded to in the existing documentation by saying that
"receive" looks at receive.fsck.* and "fsck" looks at fsck.* etc., but
it wasn't explicitly stated that there was no fallback, and if you'd
e.g. like to configure the skipList you need to do that for all three.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement support for fetch.fsck.* corresponding with the existing
receive.fsck.*. This allows for pedantically cloning repositories with
specific issues without turning off fetch.fsckObjects.
One such repository is https://github.com/robbyrussell/oh-my-zsh.git
which before this change will emit this error when cloned with
fetch.fsckObjects:
error: object 2b7227859263b6aabcc28355b0b994995b7148b6: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
fatal: Error in object
fatal: index-pack failed
Now with fetch.fsck.zeroPaddedFilemode=warn we'll warn about that
issue, but the clone will succeed:
warning: object 2b7227859263b6aabcc28355b0b994995b7148b6: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
warning: object a18c4d13c2a5fa2d4ecd5346c50e119b999b807d: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
warning: object 84df066176c8da3fd59b13731a86d90f4f1e5c9d: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
The motivation for this is to be able to turn on fetch.fsckObjects
globally across a fleet of computers but still be able to manually
clone various legacy repositories by either white-listing specific
issues, or better yet whitelist specific objects.
The use of --git-dir=* instead of -C in the tests could be considered
somewhat archaic, but the tests I'm adding here are duplicating the
corresponding receive.* tests with as few changes as possible.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests for transfer.fsckObjects have grown organically over time to
not make much sense.
Initially when these were added in b10a53583f ("test: fetch/receive
with fsckobjects", 2011-09-04) they were only testing the "corrupt or
missing object" case, but later on in 70a4ae73d8 ("fsck: add a simple
test for receive.fsck.<msg-id>", 2015-06-22) they were expanded to
check for the fsck.<msg-id> feature.
The problem was that we still kept the same corrupt test repo, making
it harder to add new tests that check the entirety of the repository
between operations via "git fsck" to see whether only known issues
that can be ignored with fsck.<msg-id> have occurred.
The tests only did the right thing because such a full "git fsck" was
never done after a certain point, and instead we were only
manipulating specific refs. This makes it harder to add new tests, and
none of the fsck.<msg-id> tests relied on this.
So let's not confuse the two and repair the corrupt repository before
we run the fsck.<msg-id> tests.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove the setting of a receive.fsck.badDate config variable to
"ignore". This was added in efaba7cc77 ("fsck: optionally ignore
specific fsck issues completely", 2015-06-22) but never did anything,
presumably it was part of some work-in-progress code that never made
it into git.git.
None of these tests will emit the "invalid author/committer line - bad
date" warning. The dates on the commit objects we're setting up are
not invalid.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test_must_fail should only be used for testing git commands. To test the
failure of other commands use `!`.
Reported-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is a special SHA1. Let's keep it at one place, easier to replace
later when the hash change comes, easier to recognize.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These were added by 8bf4bec (add "ok=sigpipe" to
test_must_fail and use it to fix flaky tests, 2015-11-27)
because we would racily die via SIGPIPE when the pack was
rejected by the other side.
But since we have recently de-flaked send-pack, we should be
able to tighten up these tests (including re-adding the
expected output checks).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 8bf4bec (add "ok=sigpipe" to test_must_fail and use
it to fix flaky tests, 2015-11-27) taught t5504 to handle
"git push" racily exiting with SIGPIPE rather than failing.
However, one of the tests checks the output of the command,
as well. In the SIGPIPE case, we will not have produced any
output. If we want the test to be truly non-flaky, we have
to accept either output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t5516 "75 - deny fetch unreachable SHA1, allowtipsha1inwant=true" is
flaky in the following case:
1. remote upload-pack finds out "not our ref"
2. remote sends a response and closes the pipe
3. fetch-pack still tries to write commands to the remote upload-pack
4. write call in wrapper.c dies with SIGPIPE
The test is flaky because the sending fetch-pack may or may
not have finished writing its output by step (3). If it did,
then we see a closed pipe on the next read() call. If it
didn't, then we get the SIGPIPE from step (4) above. Both
are fine, but the latter fools test_must_fail.
t5504 "9 - push with transfer.fsckobjects" is flaky, too, and returns
SIGPIPE once in a while. I had to remove the final "To dst..." output
check because there is no output if the process dies with SIGPIPE.
Accept such a death-with-sigpipe also as OK when we are expecting a
failure.
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The optional new config option `receive.fsck.skipList` specifies the path
to a file listing the names, i.e. SHA-1s, one per line, of objects that
are to be ignored by `git receive-pack` when `receive.fsckObjects = true`.
This is extremely handy in case of legacy repositories where it would
cause more pain to change incorrect objects than to live with them
(e.g. a duplicate 'author' line in an early commit object).
The intended use case is for server administrators to inspect objects
that are reported by `git push` as being too problematic to enter the
repository, and to add the objects' SHA-1 to a (preferably sorted) file
when the objects are legitimate, i.e. when it is determined that those
problematic objects should be allowed to enter the server.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An fsck issue in a legacy repository might be so common that one would
like not to bother the user with mentioning it at all. With this change,
that is possible by setting the respective message type to "ignore".
This change "abuses" the missingEmail=warn test to verify that "ignore"
is also accepted and works correctly. And while at it, it makes sure
that multiple options work, too (they are passed to unpack-objects or
index-pack as a comma-separated list via the --strict=... command-line
option).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some kinds of errors are intrinsically unrecoverable (e.g. errors while
uncompressing objects). It does not make sense to allow demoting them to
mere warnings.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The output from git push currently looks like this:
$ git push dest HEAD
fatal: [some message from index-pack]
error: unpack failed: index-pack abnormal exit
To dest
! [remote rejected] HEAD -> master (n/a (unpacker error))
That n/a is meant to be "the per-ref status is not
available" but the nested parentheses just make it look
ugly. Let's turn the final line into just:
! [remote rejected] HEAD -> master (unpacker error)
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Receive runs rev-list --verify-objects in order to detect missing
objects. However, such errors are ignored and overridden later.
Instead, consequently ignore all update commands for which an error has
already been detected.
Some tests in t5504 are obsoleted by this change, because invalid
objects are detected even if fsck is not enabled. Instead, they now test
for different error messages depending on whether or not fsck is turned
on. A better fix would be to force a corruption that will be detected by
fsck but not by rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/fetch-verify:
fetch: verify we have everything we need before updating our ref
rev-list --verify-object
list-objects: pass callback data to show_objects()
Add tests for the new fetch.fsckobjects, and also tests for
receive.fsckobjects we have had for quite some time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
