A few simplification and bugfixes to PCRE interface.
* ab/pcre-jit-fixes:
grep: under --debug, show whether PCRE JIT is enabled
grep: do not enter PCRE2_UTF mode on fixed matching
grep: stess test PCRE v2 on invalid UTF-8 data
grep: create a "is_fixed" member in "grep_pat"
grep: consistently use "p->fixed" in compile_regexp()
grep: stop using a custom JIT stack with PCRE v1
grep: stop "using" a custom JIT stack with PCRE v2
grep: remove overly paranoid BUG(...) code
grep: use PCRE v2 for optimized fixed-string search
grep: remove the kwset optimization
grep: drop support for \0 in --fixed-strings <pattern>
grep: make the behavior for NUL-byte in patterns sane
grep tests: move binary pattern tests into their own file
grep tests: move "grep binary" alongside the rest
grep: inline the return value of a function call used only once
t4210: skip more command-line encoding tests on MinGW
grep: don't use PCRE2?_UTF8 with "log --encoding=<non-utf8>"
log tests: test regex backends in "--encode=<enc>" tests
"git clean" fixes.
* en/clean-nested-with-ignored:
dir: special case check for the possibility that pathspec is NULL
clean: fix theoretical path corruption
clean: rewrap overly long line
clean: avoid removing untracked files in a nested git repository
clean: disambiguate the definition of -d
git-clean.txt: do not claim we will delete files with -n/--dry-run
dir: add commentary explaining match_pathspec_item's return value
dir: if our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it
dir: make the DO_MATCH_SUBMODULE code reusable for a non-submodule case
dir: also check directories for matching pathspecs
dir: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item
dir: fix typo in comment
t7300: add testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs
The markup used in user-manual has been updated to work better with
asciidoctor.
* ma/user-manual-markup-update:
user-manual.txt: render ASCII art correctly under Asciidoctor
asciidoctor-extensions.rb: handle "book" doctype in linkgit
user-manual.txt: change header notation
user-manual.txt: add missing section label
Start using DocBook 5 (instead of DocBook 4.5) as Asciidoctor 2.0
no longer works with the older one.
* bc/doc-use-docbook-5:
Documentation: fix build with Asciidoctor 2
Update support for Asciidoctor documentation toolchain.
* ma/asciidoctor-refmiscinfo:
doc-diff: replace --cut-header-footer with --cut-footer
asciidoctor-extensions: provide `<refmiscinfo/>`
Doc/Makefile: give mansource/-version/-manual attributes
The synopsis section in git-rev-list.txt has grown to be a huge list
that probably needs its own synopsis. Since the list is huge, users may
be given the false impression that the list is complete, however it is
not. It is missing many of the available options.
Since the list of options in the synopsis is not only annoying but
actively harmful, replace it with `[<options>]` so users know to
explicitly look through the documentation for further information.
While we're at it, update the optional path notation so that it is more
modern.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A configuration variable tells "git fetch" to write the commit
graph after finishing.
* ds/commit-graph-on-fetch:
fetch: add fetch.writeCommitGraph config setting
The internal code originally invented for ".gitignore" processing
got reshuffled and renamed to make it less tied to "excluding" and
stress more that it is about "matching", as it has been reused for
things like sparse checkout specification that want to check if a
path is "included".
* ds/include-exclude:
unpack-trees: rename 'is_excluded_from_list()'
treewide: rename 'exclude' methods to 'pattern'
treewide: rename 'EXCL_FLAG_' to 'PATTERN_FLAG_'
treewide: rename 'struct exclude_list' to 'struct pattern_list'
treewide: rename 'struct exclude' to 'struct path_pattern'
"git rebase --keep-base <upstream>" tries to find the original base
of the topic being rebased and rebase on top of that same base,
which is useful when running the "git rebase -i" (and its limited
variant "git rebase -x").
The command also has learned to fast-forward in more cases where it
can instead of replaying to recreate identical commits.
* dl/rebase-i-keep-base:
rebase: teach rebase --keep-base
rebase tests: test linear branch topology
rebase: fast-forward --fork-point in more cases
rebase: fast-forward --onto in more cases
rebase: refactor can_fast_forward into goto tower
t3432: test for --no-ff's interaction with fast-forward
t3432: distinguish "noop-same" v.s. "work-same" in "same head" tests
t3432: test rebase fast-forward behavior
t3431: add rebase --fork-point tests
Start discouraging the use of "git filter-branch".
* en/filter-branch-deprecation:
t9902: use a non-deprecated command for testing
Recommend git-filter-repo instead of git-filter-branch
t6006: simplify, fix, and optimize empty message test
The documentation and tests for "git format-patch" have been
cleaned up.
* dl/format-patch-doc-test-cleanup:
config/format.txt: specify default value of format.coverLetter
Doc: add more detail for git-format-patch
t4014: stop losing return codes of git commands
t4014: remove confusing pipe in check_threading()
t4014: use test_line_count() where possible
t4014: let sed open its own files
t4014: drop redirections to /dev/null
t4014: use indentable here-docs
t4014: remove spaces after redirect operators
t4014: use sq for test case names
t4014: move closing sq onto its own line
t4014: s/expected/expect/
t4014: drop unnecessary blank lines from test cases
This commit is similar to 379805051d ("Documentation: render revisions
correctly under Asciidoctor", 2018-05-06) and is a no-op with AsciiDoc.
When creating a literal block from an indented block without any sort of
delimiters, Asciidoctor strips off all leading whitespace, resulting in
a misrendered ASCII drawing. Use an explicit literal block to indicate
to Asciidoctor that we want to keep the leading whitespace. Drop the
common indentation for all lines to make this a no-op with AsciiDoc.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
user-manual.txt is the only file we process using the "book" doctype.
When we use AsciiDoc, user-manual.conf ensures that the linkgit macro
expands into something like
<ulink url="git-foo.html">git-foo(1)</ulink>
in user-manual.xml, which we then process into a clickable link, both in
user-manual.html and user-manual.pdf. With Asciidoctor,
user-manual.conf is ignored (this is expected) and our
Asciidoctor-specific implementation of linkgit kicks in:
<citerefentry>
<refentrytitle>git-foo</refentrytitle><manvolnum>1</manvolnum>
</citerefentry>
This eventually renders as "git-foo(1)", which is not bad, but it
doesn't turn into a link.
Teach our Asciidoctor-specific implementation of the linkgit macro that
if the doctype is "book", we should emit <ulink .../> just like we do
with AsciiDoc. While we're doing this, future-proof by supporting a
"prefix". The implementation in user-manual.conf doesn't support this,
and we don't need this for now because user-manual.txt is the only file
we process this way (and it's immediately in Documentation/).
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When AsciiDoc processes user-manual.txt, it generates a book containing
chapters containing sections. So for example, we have chapter 6,
"Advanced branch management", which contains four relatively short
sections, 6.1-6.4. Asciidoctor generates a book containing *parts*
containing *chapters* instead. So part 6, "Advanced branch management"
contains four short chapters, 1-4. This looks a bit odd.
To make AsciiDoc (8.6.10) and Asciidoctor (1.5.5) handle these the same,
change from indicating chapters like so:
[[foobar]]
Foobar
======
to doing it like so:
[[foobar]]
== Foobar
Same thing for sections (line of dashes to ===), subsections (line of
tildes to ====) and subsubsections (line of carets to =====). Mark the
appendices with "[appendix]", which both AsciiDoc and Asciidoctor
understand. This means we need to drop the "Appendix X: " from their
titles, or those "Appendix X: " would be included literally in the name
of the appendix.
This commit is a no-op for AsciiDoc: The generated user-manual.xml is
identical before and after this patch. Asciidoctor now creates the same
chapter-section-subsection structure as AsciiDoc.
Changing the book title at the start of the document to similarly use
"=" instead of a line of equal signs makes no difference with any of the
engines, but let's do that change anyway for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We provide a label for each chapter and section except for the "Pitfalls
with submodules" section. Since we're doing it everywhere else, let's do
it here, too.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using the pull command instead of push is more accurate when giving
instructions on placing the psuh command in alphabetical order.
Signed-off-by: Pedro Sousa <pedroteosousa@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add --[no-]progress to git commit-graph write and verify.
The progress feature was introduced in 7b0f229
("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17) but
the ability to opt-out was overlooked.
Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The list-objects-filter API (used to create a sparse/lazy clone)
learned to take a combined filter specification.
* md/list-objects-filter-combo:
list-objects-filter-options: make parser void
list-objects-filter-options: clean up use of ALLOC_GROW
list-objects-filter-options: allow mult. --filter
strbuf: give URL-encoding API a char predicate fn
list-objects-filter-options: make filter_spec a string_list
list-objects-filter-options: move error check up
list-objects-filter: implement composite filters
list-objects-filter-options: always supply *errbuf
list-objects-filter: put omits set in filter struct
list-objects-filter: encapsulate filter components
Teach the lazy clone machinery that there can be more than one
promisor remote and consult them in order when downloading missing
objects on demand.
* cc/multi-promisor:
Move core_partial_clone_filter_default to promisor-remote.c
Move repository_format_partial_clone to promisor-remote.c
Remove fetch-object.{c,h} in favor of promisor-remote.{c,h}
remote: add promisor and partial clone config to the doc
partial-clone: add multiple remotes in the doc
t0410: test fetching from many promisor remotes
builtin/fetch: remove unique promisor remote limitation
promisor-remote: parse remote.*.partialclonefilter
Use promisor_remote_get_direct() and has_promisor_remote()
promisor-remote: use repository_format_partial_clone
promisor-remote: add promisor_remote_reinit()
promisor-remote: implement promisor_remote_get_direct()
Add initial support for many promisor remotes
fetch-object: make functions return an error code
t0410: remove pipes after git commands
A new "pre-merge-commit" hook has been introduced.
* js/pre-merge-commit-hook:
merge: --no-verify to bypass pre-merge-commit hook
git-merge: honor pre-merge-commit hook
merge: do no-verify like commit
t7503: verify proper hook execution
"git rebase --rebase-merges" learned to drive different merge
strategies and pass strategy specific options to them.
* js/rebase-r-strategy:
t3427: accelerate this test by using fast-export and fast-import
rebase -r: do not (re-)generate root commits with `--root` *and* `--onto`
t3418: test `rebase -r` with merge strategies
t/lib-rebase: prepare for testing `git rebase --rebase-merges`
rebase -r: support merge strategies other than `recursive`
t3427: fix another incorrect assumption
t3427: accommodate for the `rebase --merge` backend having been replaced
t3427: fix erroneous assumption
t3427: condense the unnecessarily repetitive test cases into three
t3427: move the `filter-branch` invocation into the `setup` case
t3427: simplify the `setup` test case significantly
t3427: add a clarifying comment
rebase: fold git-rebase--common into the -p backend
sequencer: the `am` and `rebase--interactive` scripts are gone
.gitignore: there is no longer a built-in `git-rebase--interactive`
t3400: stop referring to the scripted rebase
Drop unused git-rebase--am.sh
Users expect files in a nested git repository to be left alone unless
sufficiently forced (with two -f's). Unfortunately, in certain
circumstances, git would delete both tracked (and possibly dirty) files
and untracked files within a nested repository. To explain how this
happens, let's contrast a couple cases. First, take the following
example setup (which assumes we are already within a git repo):
git init nested
cd nested
>tracked
git add tracked
git commit -m init
>untracked
cd ..
In this setup, everything works as expected; running 'git clean -fd'
will result in fill_directory() returning the following paths:
nested/
nested/tracked
nested/untracked
and then correct_untracked_entries() would notice this can be compressed
to
nested/
and then since "nested/" is a directory, we would call
remove_dirs("nested/", ...), which would
check is_nonbare_repository_dir() and then decide to skip it.
However, if someone also creates an ignored file:
>nested/ignored
then running 'git clean -fd' would result in fill_directory() returning
the same paths:
nested/
nested/tracked
nested/untracked
but correct_untracked_entries() will notice that we had ignored entries
under nested/ and thus simplify this list to
nested/tracked
nested/untracked
Since these are not directories, we do not call remove_dirs() which was
the only place that had the is_nonbare_repository_dir() safety check --
resulting in us deleting both the untracked file and the tracked (and
possibly dirty) file.
One possible fix for this issue would be walking the parent directories
of each path and checking if they represent nonbare repositories, but
that would be wasteful. Even if we added caching of some sort, it's
still a waste because we should have been able to check that "nested/"
represented a nonbare repository before even descending into it in the
first place. Add a DIR_SKIP_NESTED_GIT flag to dir_struct.flags and use
it to prevent fill_directory() and friends from descending into nested
git repos.
With this change, we also modify two regression tests added in commit
91479b9c72 ("t7300: add tests to document behavior of clean and nested
git", 2015-06-15). That commit, nor its series, nor the six previous
iterations of that series on the mailing list discussed why those tests
coded the expectation they did. In fact, it appears their purpose was
simply to test _existing_ behavior to make sure that the performance
changes didn't change the behavior. However, these two tests directly
contradicted the manpage's claims that two -f's were required to delete
files/directories under a nested git repository. While one could argue
that the user gave an explicit path which matched files/directories that
were within a nested repository, there's a slippery slope that becomes
very difficult for users to understand once you go down that route (e.g.
what if they specified "git clean -f -d '*.c'"?) It would also be hard
to explain what the exact behavior was; avoid such problems by making it
really simple.
Also, clean up some grammar errors describing this functionality in the
git-clean manpage.
Finally, there are still a couple bugs with -ffd not cleaning out enough
(e.g. missing the nested .git) and with -ffdX possibly cleaning out the
wrong files (paying attention to outer .gitignore instead of inner).
This patch does not address these cases at all (and does not change the
behavior relative to those flags), it only fixes the handling when given
a single -f. See
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190905212043.GC32087@szeder.dev/ for more
discussion of the -ffd[X?] bugs.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The -d flag pre-dated git-clean's ability to have paths specified. As
such, the default for git-clean was to only remove untracked files in
the current directory, and -d existed to allow it to recurse into
subdirectories.
The interaction of paths and the -d option appears to not have been
carefully considered, as evidenced by numerous bugs and a dearth of
tests covering such pairings in the testsuite. The definition turns out
to be important, so let's look at some of the various ways one could
interpret the -d option:
A) Without -d, only look in subdirectories which contain tracked
files under them; with -d, also look in subdirectories which
are untracked for files to clean.
B) Without specified paths from the user for us to delete, we need to
have some kind of default, so...without -d, only look in
subdirectories which contain tracked files under them; with -d,
also look in subdirectories which are untracked for files to clean.
The important distinction here is that choice B says that the presence
or absence of '-d' is irrelevant if paths are specified. The logic
behind option B is that if a user explicitly asked us to clean a
specified pathspec, then we should clean anything that matches that
pathspec. Some examples may clarify. Should
git clean -f untracked_dir/file
remove untracked_dir/file or not? It seems crazy not to, but a strict
reading of option A says it shouldn't be removed. How about
git clean -f untracked_dir/file1 tracked_dir/file2
or
git clean -f untracked_dir_1/file1 untracked_dir_2/file2
? Should it remove either or both of these files? Should it require
multiple runs to remove both the files listed? (If this sounds like a
crazy question to even ask, see the commit message of "t7300: Add some
testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs" added earlier in
this patch series.) What if -ffd were used instead of -f -- should that
allow these to be removed? Should it take multiple invocations with
-ffd? What if a glob (such as '*tracked*') were used instead of
spelling out the directory names? What if the filenames involved globs,
such as
git clean -f '*.o'
or
git clean -f '*/*.o'
?
The current documentation actually suggests a definition that is
slightly different than choice A, and the implementation prior to this
series provided something radically different than either choices A or
B. (The implementation, though, was clearly just buggy). There may be
other choices as well. However, for almost any given choice of
definition for -d that I can think of, some of the examples above will
appear buggy to the user. The only case that doesn't have negative
surprises is choice B: treat a user-specified path as a request to clean
all untracked files which match that path specification, including
recursing into any untracked directories.
Change the documentation and basic implementation to use this
definition.
There were two regression tests that indirectly depended on the current
implementation, but neither was about subdirectory handling. These two
tests were introduced in commit 5b7570cfb4 ("git-clean: add tests for
relative path", 2008-03-07) which was solely created to add coverage for
the changes in commit fb328947c8e ("git-clean: correct printing relative
path", 2008-03-07). Both tests specified a directory that happened to
have an untracked subdirectory, but both were only checking that the
resulting printout of a file that was removed was shown with a relative
path. Update these tests appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It appears that the wrong option got included in the list of what will
cause git-clean to actually take action. Correct the list.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Replace "SHA-1" by "object name", the modern name for hashes.
- Correct a few grammar weaknesses.
- Do not accidentally format a phrase in teletype font where quotes are
intended.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diff, log doc: say "patch text" instead of "patches"
A poster on Stackoverflow was confused that the documentation of git-log
promised to generate "patches" or "patch files" with -p, but there were
none to be found. Rewrite the corresponding paragraph to talk about
"patch text" to avoid the confusion.
Shorten the language to say "X does Y" in place of "X does not Z, but Y".
Cross-reference the referred-to commands like the rest of the file does.
Enumerate git-show because it includes the description as well.
Mention porcelain commands before plumbing commands because I guess that
the paragraph is read more frequently in their context.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Acked-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After the previous commit, AsciiDoc and Asciidoctor render the manpage
headers identically, so we no longer need the "cut the header" part of
our `--cut-header-footer` option. We do still need the "cut the footer"
part, though. The previous commits improved the rendering of the footer
in Asciidoctor by quite a bit, but the two programs still disagree on
how to format the date in the footer: 01/01/1970 vs 1970-01-01.
We could keep using `--cut-header-footer`, but it would be nice if we
had a slightly smaller hammer `--cut-footer` that would be less likely
to hide regressions. Rather than simply adding such an option, let's
also drop `--cut-header-footer`, i.e., rework it to lose the "header"
part of its name and functionality.
`--cut-header-footer` is just a developer tool and it probably has no
more than a handful of users, so we can afford to be aggressive.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As can be seen from the previous commit, there are three attributes that
we provide to AsciiDoc through asciidoc.conf. Asciidoctor ignores that
file. After that patch, newer versions of Asciidoctor pick up the
`manmanual` and `mansource` attributes as we invoke `asciidoctor`, but
they don't pick up `manversion`. ([1] says: "Not used by Asciidoctor.")
Older versions (<1.5.7) don't handle these attributes at all. As a
result, we are missing one or three `<refmiscinfo/>` tags in each
xml-file produced when we build with Asciidoctor.
Because of this, xmlto doesn't include the Git version number in the
rendered manpages. And in particular, with versions <1.5.7, the manpage
footers instead contain the fairly ugly "[FIXME: source]".
That Asciidoctor ignores asciidoc.conf is nothing new. This is why we
implement the `linkgit:` macro in asciidoc.conf *and* in
asciidoctor-extensions.rb. Follow suit and provide these tags in
asciidoctor-extensions.rb, using a "postprocessor" extension where we
just search and replace in the XML, treated as text.
We may consider a few alternatives:
* Inject these lines into the xml-files from the *Makefile*, e.g.,
using `sed`. That would reduce repetition, but it feels wrong to
impose another step and another risk on the AsciiDoc-processing only
to benefit the Asciidoctor-one.
* I tried providing a "docinfo processor" to inject these tags, but
could not figure out how to "merge" the two <refmeta/> sections that
resulted. To avoid xmlto barfing on the result, I needed to use
`xmlto --skip-validation ...`, which seems unfortunate.
Let's instead inject the missing tags using a postprocessor. We'll make
it fairly obvious that we aim to inject the exact same three lines of
`<refmiscinfo/>` that asciidoc.conf provides. We inject them in
*post*-processing so we need to do the variable expansion ourselves. We
do introduce the bug that asciidoc.conf already has in that we won't do
any escaping, e.g., of funky versions like "some v <2.25, >2.20".
The postprocessor we add here works on the XML as raw text and doesn't
really use the full potential of XML to do a more structured injection.
This is actually precisely what the Asciidoctor User Manual does in its
postprocessor example [2]. I looked into two other approaches:
1. The nokogiri library is apparently the "modern" way of doing XML
in ruby. I got it working fairly easily:
require 'nokogiri'
doc = Nokogiri::XML(output)
doc.search("refmeta").each { |n| n.add_child(new_tags) }
output = doc.to_xml
However, this adds another dependency (e.g., the "ruby-nokogiri"
package on Ubuntu). Using Asciidoctor is not our default, but it
will probably need to become so soon. Let's avoid adding a
dependency just so that we can say "search...add_child" rather than
"sub(regex...)".
2. The older REXML is apparently always(?) bundled with ruby, but I
couldn't even parse the original document:
require 'rexml/document'
doc = REXML::Document.new(output)
...
The error was "no implicit conversion of nil into String" and I
stopped there.
I don't think it's unlikely that doing a plain old search-and-replace
will work just as fine or better compared to parsing XML and worrying
about libraries and library versions.
[1] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#builtin-attributes
[2] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#postprocessor-example
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rather than hardcoding "Git Manual" and "Git" as the manual and source
in asciidoc.conf, provide them as attributes `manmanual` and
`mansource`. Rename the `git_version` attribute to `manversion`.
These new attribute names are not arbitrary, see, e.g., [1].
For AsciiDoc (8.6.10) and Asciidoctor <1.5.7, this is a no-op. Starting
with Asciidoctor 1.5.7, `manmanual` and `mansource` actually end up in
the xml-files and eventually in the rendered manpages. In particular,
the manpage headers now render just as with AsciiDoc.
No versions of Asciidoctor pick up the `manversion` [2], and older
versions don't pick up any of these attributes. -- We'll fix that with a
bit of a hack in the next commit.
[1] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#man-pages
[2] Note how [1] says "Not used by Asciidoctor".
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In b57e8119e6 (submodule: teach set-branch subcommand, 2019-02-08), the
`set-branch` subcommand was added for submodules. When the documentation
was written, the syntax for a "index term" in AsciiDoc was
accidentally used. This caused the documentation to be rendered as
set-branch -d|--default)|(-b|--branch <branch> [--] <path>
instead of
set-branch ((-d|--default)|(-b|--branch <branch>)) [--] <path>
In addition to this, the original documentation was possibly confusing
as it made it seem as if the `-b` option didn't accept a `<branch>`
argument.
Break `--default` and `--branch` into their own separate invocations to
make it obvious that these options are mutually exclusive. Also, this
removes the surrounding parentheses so that the "index term" syntax is
not triggered.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
