When writing the todo script for --rebase-merges, we try to find a label
for certain commits. If the label ends up being a valid object ID, such
as when we merge a detached commit, we want to rewrite it so it is no
longer a valid object ID.
However, the code path that does this checks for its length to be
equivalent to GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ, which isn't correct, since what we are
reading is a hex object ID. Instead, check for the length being
equivalent to that of a hex object ID. Use the_hash_algo so this code
works regardless of the hash size.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running `git rebase --rebase-merges` non-interactively with an
ancestor of HEAD as <upstream> (or leaving the todo list unmodified),
we would ideally recreate the exact same commits as before the rebase.
However, if there are commits in the commit range <upstream>.. that do not
have <upstream> as direct ancestor (i.e. if `git log <upstream>..` would
show commits that are omitted by `git log --ancestry-path <upstream>..`),
this is currently not the case: we would turn them into commits that have
<upstream> as direct ancestor.
Let's illustrate that with a diagram:
C
/ \
A - B - E - F
\ /
D
Currently, after running `git rebase -i --rebase-merges B`, the new branch
structure would be (pay particular attention to the commit `D`):
--- C' --
/ \
A - B ------ E' - F'
\ /
D'
This is not really preserving the branch topology from before! The
reason is that the commit `D` does not have `B` as ancestor, and
therefore it gets rebased onto `B`.
This is unintuitive behavior. Even worse, when recreating branch
structure, most use cases would appear to want cousins *not* to be
rebased onto the new base commit. For example, Git for Windows (the
heaviest user of the Git garden shears, which served as the blueprint
for --rebase-merges) frequently merges branches from `next` early, and
these branches certainly do *not* want to be rebased. In the example
above, the desired outcome would look like this:
--- C' --
/ \
A - B ------ E' - F'
\ /
-- D' --
Let's introduce the term "cousins" for such commits ("D" in the
example), and let's not rebase them by default. For hypothetical
use cases where cousins *do* need to be rebased, `git rebase
--rebase=merges=rebase-cousins` needs to be used.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `git merge` command does not allow merging commits that are already
reachable from HEAD: `git merge HEAD^`, for example, will report that we
are already up to date and not change a thing.
In an interactive rebase, such a merge could occur previously, e.g. when
competing (or slightly modified) versions of a patch series were applied
upstream, and the user had to `git rebase --skip` all of the local
commits, and the topic branch becomes "empty" as a consequence.
Let's teach the todo command `merge` to behave the same as `git merge`.
Seeing as it requires some low-level trickery to create such merges with
Git's commands in the first place, we do not even have to bother to
introduce an option to force `merge` to create such merge commits.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the previous patches, we implemented the basic functionality of the
`git rebase -i --rebase-merges` command, in particular the `merge`
command to create merge commits in the sequencer.
The interactive rebase is a lot more these days, though, than a simple
cherry-pick in a loop. For example, it calls the post-rewrite hook (if
any) after rebasing with a mapping of the old->new commits.
This patch implements the post-rewrite handling for the `merge` command
we just introduced. The other commands that were added recently (`label`
and `reset`) do not create new commits, therefore post-rewrite hooks do
not need to handle them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows for rebases to be run in parallel in separate worktrees
(think: interrupted in the middle of one rebase, being asked to perform
a different rebase, adding a separate worktree just for that job).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there are empty commits on the left hand side of $upstream...HEAD
then the empty commits on the right hand side that we want to keep are
being pruned.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once upon a time, this here developer thought: wouldn't it be nice if,
say, Git for Windows' patches on top of core Git could be represented as
a thicket of branches, and be rebased on top of core Git in order to
maintain a cherry-pick'able set of patch series?
The original attempt to answer this was: git rebase --preserve-merges.
However, that experiment was never intended as an interactive option,
and it only piggy-backed on git rebase --interactive because that
command's implementation looked already very, very familiar: it was
designed by the same person who designed --preserve-merges: yours truly.
Some time later, some other developer (I am looking at you, Andreas!
;-)) decided that it would be a good idea to allow --preserve-merges to
be combined with --interactive (with caveats!) and the Git maintainer
(well, the interim Git maintainer during Junio's absence, that is)
agreed, and that is when the glamor of the --preserve-merges design
started to fall apart rather quickly and unglamorously.
The reason? In --preserve-merges mode, the parents of a merge commit (or
for that matter, of *any* commit) were not stated explicitly, but were
*implied* by the commit name passed to the `pick` command.
This made it impossible, for example, to reorder commits. Not to mention
to move commits between branches or, deity forbid, to split topic branches
into two.
Alas, these shortcomings also prevented that mode (whose original
purpose was to serve Git for Windows' needs, with the additional hope
that it may be useful to others, too) from serving Git for Windows'
needs.
Five years later, when it became really untenable to have one unwieldy,
big hodge-podge patch series of partly related, partly unrelated patches
in Git for Windows that was rebased onto core Git's tags from time to
time (earning the undeserved wrath of the developer of the ill-fated
git-remote-hg series that first obsoleted Git for Windows' competing
approach, only to be abandoned without maintainer later) was really
untenable, the "Git garden shears" were born [*1*/*2*]: a script,
piggy-backing on top of the interactive rebase, that would first
determine the branch topology of the patches to be rebased, create a
pseudo todo list for further editing, transform the result into a real
todo list (making heavy use of the `exec` command to "implement" the
missing todo list commands) and finally recreate the patch series on
top of the new base commit.
That was in 2013. And it took about three weeks to come up with the
design and implement it as an out-of-tree script. Needless to say, the
implementation needed quite a few years to stabilize, all the while the
design itself proved itself sound.
With this patch, the goodness of the Git garden shears comes to `git
rebase -i` itself. Passing the `--rebase-merges` option will generate
a todo list that can be understood readily, and where it is obvious
how to reorder commits. New branches can be introduced by inserting
`label` commands and calling `merge <label>`. And once this mode will
have become stable and universally accepted, we can deprecate the design
mistake that was `--preserve-merges`.
Link *1*:
https://github.com/msysgit/msysgit/blob/master/share/msysGit/shears.sh
Link *2*:
https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/shears.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --list" during an interrupted "rebase -i" now lets
users distinguish the case where a detached HEAD is being rebased
and a normal branch is being rebased.
* ks/branch-list-detached-rebase-i:
t3200: verify "branch --list" sanity when rebasing from detached HEAD
branch --list: print useful info whilst interactive rebasing a detached HEAD
"cd sub/dir && git commit ../path" ought to record the changes to
the file "sub/path", but this regressed long time ago.
* bw/commit-partial-from-subdirectory-fix:
commit: allow partial commits with relative paths
Some codepaths, including the refs API, get and keep relative
paths, that go out of sync when the process does chdir(2). The
chdir-notify API is introduced to let these codepaths adjust these
cached paths to the new current directory.
* jk/relative-directory-fix:
refs: use chdir_notify to update cached relative paths
set_work_tree: use chdir_notify
add chdir-notify API
trace.c: export trace_setup_key
set_git_dir: die when setenv() fails
"git rebase" has learned to honor "--signoff" option when using
backends other than "am" (but not "--preserve-merges").
* pw/rebase-signoff:
rebase --keep-empty: always use interactive rebase
rebase -p: error out if --signoff is given
rebase: extend --signoff support
"git rebase --keep-empty" still removed an empty commit if the
other side contained an empty commit (due to the "does an
equivalent patch exist already?" check), which has been corrected.
* pw/rebase-keep-empty-fixes:
rebase: respect --no-keep-empty
rebase -i --keep-empty: don't prune empty commits
rebase --root: stop assuming squash_onto is unset
* 'svn/authors-prog-2' of git://bogomips.org/git-svn:
git-svn: allow empty email-address using authors-prog and authors-file
git-svn: search --authors-prog in PATH too
This reverts commit e4bb62fa1e, reversing
changes made to 468165c1d8.
The topic appears to inflict severe regression in renaming merges,
even though the promise of it was that it would improve them.
We do not yet know which exact change in the topic was wrong, but in
the meantime, let's play it safe and revert it out of 'master'
before real Git-using projects are harmed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The new bisect_regression script can be used to automatically bisect
performance regressions. It will pass the new bisect_run_script to
`git bisect run`.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new option makes it possible to run perf tests as defined
in only one subsection of a config file.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git submodule status" misbehaved on a submodule that has been
removed from the working tree.
* rs/status-with-removed-submodule:
submodule: check for NULL return of get_submodule_ref_store()
Small test-helper programs have been consolidated into a single
binary.
* nd/combined-test-helper: (36 commits)
t/helper: merge test-write-cache into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-wildmatch into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-urlmatch-normalization into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-subprocess into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-submodule-config into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-string-list into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-strcmp-offset into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-sigchain into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-sha1-array into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-scrap-cache-tree into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-run-command into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-revision-walking into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-regex into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-ref-store into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-read-cache into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-prio-queue into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-path-utils into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-online-cpus into test-tool
t/helper: merge test-mktemp into test-tool
t/helper: merge (unused) test-mergesort into test-tool
...
Refactoring the internal global data structure to make it possible
to open multiple repositories, work with and then close them.
Rerolled by Duy on top of a separate preliminary clean-up topic.
The resulting structure of the topics looked very sensible.
* sb/object-store: (27 commits)
sha1_file: allow sha1_loose_object_info to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow map_sha1_file to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow map_sha1_file_1 to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow open_sha1_file to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow stat_sha1_file to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow sha1_file_name to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: add repository argument to sha1_loose_object_info
sha1_file: add repository argument to map_sha1_file
sha1_file: add repository argument to map_sha1_file_1
sha1_file: add repository argument to open_sha1_file
sha1_file: add repository argument to stat_sha1_file
sha1_file: add repository argument to sha1_file_name
sha1_file: allow prepare_alt_odb to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: allow link_alt_odb_entries to handle arbitrary repositories
sha1_file: add repository argument to prepare_alt_odb
sha1_file: add repository argument to link_alt_odb_entries
sha1_file: add repository argument to read_info_alternates
sha1_file: add repository argument to link_alt_odb_entry
sha1_file: add raw_object_store argument to alt_odb_usable
pack: move approximate object count to object store
...
when refs that do not point at committish are given, "git
filter-branch" gave a misleading error messages. This has been
corrected.
* yk/filter-branch-non-committish-refs:
filter-branch: fix errors caused by refs that point at non-committish
The mechanism to use parse-options API to automate the command line
completion continues to get extended and polished.
* nd/parseopt-completion-more:
completion: use __gitcomp_builtin in _git_cherry
completion: use __gitcomp_builtin in _git_ls_tree
completion: delete option-only completion commands
completion: add --option completion for most builtin commands
completion: factor out _git_xxx calling code
completion: mention the oldest version we need to support
git.c: add hidden option --list-parseopt-builtins
git.c: move cmd_struct declaration up
"git tag --contains no-such-commit" gave a full list of options
after giving an error message.
* ps/contains-id-error-message:
parse-options: do not show usage upon invalid option value
"git stash push -u -- <pathspec>" gave an unnecessary and confusing
error message when there was no tracked files that match the
<pathspec>, which has been fixed.
* tg/stash-untracked-with-pathspec-fix:
stash: drop superfluos pathspec parameter
stash push -u: don't create empty stash
stash push: avoid printing errors
stash: fix nonsense pipeline
The way "git worktree prune" worked internally has been simplified,
by assuming how "git worktree move" moves an existing worktree to a
different place.
* nd/worktree-prune:
worktree prune: improve prune logic when worktree is moved
worktree: delete dead code
gc.txt: more details about what gc does
"git shortlog cruft" aborted with a BUG message when run outside a
Git repository. The command has been taught to complain about
extra and unwanted arguments on its command line instead in such a
case.
* ma/shortlog-revparse:
shortlog: disallow left-over arguments outside repo
shortlog: add usage-string for stdin-reading
git-shortlog.txt: reorder usages
Rename detection logic in "diff" family that is used in "merge" has
learned to guess when all of x/a, x/b and x/c have moved to z/a,
z/b and z/c, it is likely that x/d added in the meantime would also
want to move to z/d by taking the hint that the entire directory
'x' moved to 'z'. A bug causing dirty files involved in a rename
to be overwritten during merge has also been fixed as part of this
work.
* en/rename-directory-detection: (29 commits)
merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed file
merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames
directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs
merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases
merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames
merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames
merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames
merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees
merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name
merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging
merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts
merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()
merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames
merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs
merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious
merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs
merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic
merge-recursive: move the get_renames() function
directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty files
directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked files
...
Compared to 'test-chmtime -v +0 file' which prints the mtime and
and the file name, 'test-chmtime --get file' displays only the mtime.
If it is used in combination with (+|=|=+|=-|-)seconds, it changes
and prints the new value.
test-chmtime -v +0 file | sed 's/[^0-9].*$//'
is now equivalent to:
test-chmtime --get file
Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0b294c0abf (make deleting a missing ref more quiet, 2008-07-08), we
added a test to verify that deleting an already-deleted ref does not
show an error.
Our test simply looks for the substring 'error' in the output of the
`git push`, which might look innocuous on the face of it.
Suppose, however, that you are a big fan of whales. Or even better: your
IT administrator has a whale of a time picking cute user names, e.g.
referring to you (due to your like of India Pale Ales) as "one of the
cuter rorquals" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorqual to learn a
thing or two about rorquals) and hence your home directory becomes
/home/cuterrorqual. If you now run t5404, it fails! Why? Because the
test calls `git push origin :b3` which outputs:
To /home/cuterrorqual/git/t/trash directory.t5404-tracking-branches/.
- [deleted] b3
Note how there is no error displayed in that output? But of course
"error" is a substring of "cuterrorqual". And so that `grep error
output` finds something.
This bug was not, actually, caught having "error" as a substring of the
user name but while working in a worktree called "colorize-push-errors",
whose name was part of that output, too, suggesting that not even
testing for the *word* `error` via `git grep -w error output` would fix
the underlying issue.
This patch chooses instead to look for the prefix "error:" at the
beginning of the line, so that there can be no ambiguity that any catch
was indeed a message generated by Git's `error_builtin()` function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The email address in --authors-file and --authors-prog can be empty but
git-svn translated it into a fictional email address in the form
jondoe <jondoe@6aafaa21e0fb4338a68ab372a049893d>
containing the SVN repository UUID. Now git-svn behaves like git-commit:
If the email is *explicitly* set to the empty string using '<>', the
commit does not contain an email address, only the name:
jondoe <>
Allowing to remove the email address *intentionally* prevents automatic
systems from sending emails to those fictional addresses and avoids
cluttering the log output with unnecessary stuff.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Commit 8894d53580 (commit: allow partial commits with relative paths,
2011-07-30) ensured that partial commits were allowed when a user
supplies a relative pathspec but then this was regressed in 5879f5684c
(remove prefix argument from pathspec_prefix, 2011-09-04) when the
prefix argument to 'pathspec_prefix' removed and the 'list_paths'
function wasn't properly adjusted to cope with the change, resulting in
over-eager pruning of the tree that is overlayed on the index.
This fixes the regression and adds a regression test so this can be
prevented in the future.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's possible to have libcurl installed but not the curl
command-line utility. The latter is not generally needed for
Git's http support, but we use it in t5561 for basic tests
of http-backend's functionality. Let's detect when it's
missing and skip this test.
Note that we can't mark the individual tests with the CURL
prerequisite. They're in a shared t556x_common that uses the
GET and POST functions as a level of indirection, and it's
only our implementations of those functions in t5561 that
requires curl. It's not a problem, though, as literally
every test in the script would depend on the prerequisite
anyway.
Reported-by: Jens Krüger <Jens.Krueger@frm2.tum.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For a normal test run, stderr is already redirected to
/dev/null by the test suite. When used with "-v",
suppressing stderr is actively harmful, as it may hide the
reason for curl failing.
Reported-by: Jens Krüger <Jens.Krueger@frm2.tum.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Following a rename of worktree "source" to "destination", the "move
worktree" test uses grep to verify that the output of "git worktree list
--porcelain" does not contain "source" (and does contain "destination").
Unfortunately, the grep expression is too loose and can match
unexpectedly. For example, if component of the test trash directory path
matches "source" (e.g. "/home/me/sources/git/t/trash*"), then the test
will be fooled into thinking that "source" still exists. Tighten the
expression to avoid such accidental matches.
While at it, drop an unused variable ("toplevel") from the test and
tighten a similarly too-loose expression in a related test.
Reported-by: Jens Krüger <Jens.Krueger@frm2.tum.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --list" shows an in-progress rebase as:
* (no branch, rebasing <branch>)
master
...
However, if the rebase is started from a detached HEAD, then there is no
<branch>, and it would attempt to print a NULL pointer. The previous
commit fixed this problem, so add a test to verify that the output is
sane in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit f57f37e2e1 (files-backend: remove the use of
git_path(), 2017-03-26) introduced a regression when a
relative $GIT_DIR is used in a working tree:
- when we initialize the ref backend, we make a copy of
get_git_dir(), which may be relative
- later, we may call setup_work_tree() and chdir to the
root of the working tree
- further calls to the ref code will use the stored git
directory, but relative paths will now point to the
wrong place
The new test in t1501 demonstrates one such instance (the
bug causes us to write the ref update to the nonsense
"relative/relative/.git").
Since setup_work_tree() now uses chdir_notify, we can just
ask it update our relative paths when necessary.
Reported-by: Rafael Ascensao <rafa.almas@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase --merge accepts --keep-empty but just ignores it, by using an
implicit interactive rebase the user still gets the rename detection
of a merge based rebase but with with --keep-empty support.
If rebase --keep-empty without --interactive or --merge stops for the
user to resolve merge conflicts then 'git rebase --continue' will
fail. This is because it uses a different code path that does not
create $git_dir/rebase-apply. As rebase --keep-empty was implemented
using cherry-pick it has never supported the am options and now that
interactive rebases support --signoff there is no loss of
functionality by using an implicit interactive rebase.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow --signoff to be used with --interactive and --merge. In
interactive mode only commits marked to be picked, edited or reworded
will be signed off.
The main motivation for this patch was to allow one to run 'git rebase
--exec "make check" --signoff' which is useful when preparing a patch
series for publication and is more convenient than doing the signoff
with another --exec command.
This change also allows --root without --onto to work with --signoff
as well (--root with --onto was already supported).
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there are empty commits on the left hand side of $upstream...HEAD
then the empty commits on the right hand side that we want to keep are
pruned by --cherry-pick. Fix this by using --cherry-mark instead of
--cherry-pick and keeping the commits that are empty or are not marked
as cherry-picks.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we can't find a ref store for a submodule then assume the latter
is not initialized (or was removed). Print a status line accordingly
instead of causing a segmentation fault by passing NULL as the first
parameter of refs_head_ref().
Reported-by: Jeremy Feusi <jeremy@feusi.co>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Initial-Test-By: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
