We always use 'utf-8' as the encoding, since we currently
have no way of getting the information from the user.
This also refactors the quoting of recipient names, since
both processes can share the rfc2047 quoting code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the compose message contains non-ascii characters, then
we assume it is in utf-8 and include the appropriate MIME
headers. If the user has already included a MIME-Version
header, then we assume they know what they are doing and
don't add any headers.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before this patch no error was printed when "git rev-list --bisect-vars"
failed. This can happen when bad and good revs are mistaken.
This patch prints an error message on stderr that describe the likely
failure cause.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a branch named "bisect" or "new-bisect" already was created in the
repo by other means than git bisect, doing a git bisect used to override
the branch without a warning. Now if the branch "bisect" or
"new-bisect" already exists, and it was not created by git bisect itself,
git bisect start fails with an appropriate error message. Additionally,
if checking out a new bisect state fails due to a merge problem, git
bisect cleans up the temporary branch "new-bisect".
The accidental override has been noticed by Andres Salomon, reported
through
http://bugs.debian.org/478647
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git clone [options] $src $dst excess-garbage" simply ignored
excess-garbage without giving any diagnostic message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since git-remote always uses remote tracking branches, it
should be safe to always force updates of those branches.
I.e., we should generate
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/$remote/*
instead of
fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/$remote/*
This was the behavior of the perl version, which seems to
have been lost in the C rewrite.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, a push like:
git push remote src:dst
would go through the following steps:
1. check for an unambiguous 'dst' on the remote; if it
exists, then push to that ref
2. otherwise, check if 'dst' begins with 'refs/'; if it
does, create a new ref
3. otherwise, complain because we don't know where in the
refs hierarchy to put 'dst'
However, in some cases, we can guess about the ref type of
'dst' based on the ref type of 'src'. Specifically, before
complaining we now check:
2.5. if 'src' resolves to a ref starting with refs/heads
or refs/tags, then prepend that to 'dst'
So now this creates a new branch on the remote, whereas it
previously failed with an error message:
git push master:newbranch
Note that, by design, we limit this DWIM behavior only to
source refs which resolve exactly (including symrefs which
resolve to existing refs). We still complain on a partial
destination refspec if the source is a raw sha1, or a ref
expression such as 'master~10'.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test tried to push into a remote with ambiguous refs in
remotes/$x/master and remotes/$y/master. However, the remote
never actually tells us about the refs/remotes hierarchy, so
we don't even see this ambiguity.
The test happened to pass because we were simply looking for
failure, and the test fails for another reason: the dst
refspec does not exist and does not begin with refs/, making
it invalid.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tomasz Fortuna reported that "git commit" does not error out properly when
it cannot write tree objects out. "git write-tree" shares the same issue,
as the failure to notice the error is deep in the logic to write tree
objects out recursively.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When asked for history of a file which is not present in given branch
("HEAD", i.e. current branch, or given by transient $hash_hase ('hb')
parameter), but is present deeper in the history (meaning that "git
rev-list --full-history $hash_base -- $file_name" is not empty), and
there is no $hash ('h') parameter set for a file, gitweb would spew
multiple of "Use of uninitialized value" warnings, and some links
would be missing. This commit fixes this bug.
This bug occurs in the rare cases when "git log -- <path>" is empty
and "git log --full-history -- <path>" is not, or to be more exact in
the cases when full-history starts later than given branch. It can
happen if you are using handcrafted gitwb URL, or if you follow
generic 'history' link or bookmark for a file which got deleted.
Gitweb tried to get file type ('tree', or 'blob', or even 'commit')
from the commit we start searching from (where the file was not
present), and not among found commits. This was the cause of "Use of
uninitialized value" warnings.
This commit also add tests for such situation to t9500 test.
While we are it, return HTTP error if there is _no_ history; it means
that file or directory was not found (for given branch). Also error
out if type of item could not be found: it should not happen now, but
better be sure.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This can happen if the arguments to git-remote add is switched by the
user, and git would only show an error if fetching was also requested.
Fix it by using the refspec parsing engine to check if the requested
name can be parsed as a remote before add it.
Also cleanup so that the "remote.<name>.url" config name buffer is only
initialized once.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Traditionally git-rebase was implemented in terms of "format-patch" piped
to "am -3", to strike balance between speed (because it avoids a rather
expensive read-tree/merge-recursive machinery most of the time) and
flexibility (the magic "-3" allows it to fall back to 3-way merge as
necessary). However, this combination has one flaw when dealing with a
nonstandard commit log message format that has more than one lines in the
first paragraph.
This teaches "git am --rebasing" to take advantage of the fact that the
mbox message "git rebase" prepares for it records the original commit
object name, to get the log message from the original commit object
instead.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.5.4:
git-bisect: make "start", "good" and "skip" succeed or fail atomically
git-am: cope better with an empty Subject: line
Ignore leading empty lines while summarizing merges
bisect: squelch "fatal: ref HEAD not a symref" misleading message
builtin-apply: Show a more descriptive error on failure when opening a patch
Clarify documentation of git-cvsserver, particularly in relation to git-shell
Before this patch, when "git bisect start", "git bisect good" or
"git bisect skip" were called with many revisions, they could fail
after having already marked some revisions as "good", "bad" or
"skip".
This could be especilally bad for "git bisect start" because as
the file ".git/BISECT_NAMES" would not have been written, there
would have been no attempt to clear the marked revisions on a
"git bisect reset". That's because if there is no
".git/BISECT_NAMES" file, nothing is done to clean things up, as
the bisect session is not supposed to have started.
While at it, let's also create the ".git/BISECT_START" file, only
after ".git/BISECT_NAMES" as been created.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The script had an unconditional output done outside of test_expect_*
construct, which leaked out and contaminated the output without -v.
Squelch it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also tighten test to require it to be correct.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.5.4:
bisect: fix bad rev checking in "git bisect good"
revision.c: make --date-order overriddable
Fix section about backdating tags in the git-tag docs
Document option --only of git commit
Documentation/git-request-pull: Fixed a typo ("send" -> "end")
It seems that "git bisect good" and "git bisect skip" have never
properly checked arguments that have been passed to them. As soon
as one of them can be parsed as a SHA1, no error or warning would
be given.
This is because 'git rev-parse --revs-only --no-flags "$@"' always
"exit 0" and outputs all the SHA1 it can found from parsing "$@".
This patch fix this by using, for each "bisect good" argument, the
same logic as for the "bisect bad" argument.
While at it, this patch teaches "bisect bad" to give a meaningfull
error message when it is passed more than one argument.
Note that if "git bisect good" or "git bisect skip" is given some
proper revs and then something that is not a proper rev, then the
first proper revs will still have been marked as "good" or "skip".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.5.4:
core-tutorial.txt: Fix showing the current behaviour.
git-archive: ignore prefix when checking file attribute
Fix documentation syntax of optional arguments in short options.
Ulrik Sverdrup noticed that git-archive doesn't correctly apply the attribute
export-subst when the option --prefix is given, too.
When it checked if a file has the attribute turned on, git-archive would try
to look up the full path -- including the prefix -- in .gitattributes. That's
wrong, as the prefix doesn't need to have any relation to any existing
directories, tracked or not.
This patch makes git-archive ignore the prefix when looking up if value of the
attribute export-subst for a file.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using git-svn to follow only a single (empty) path per
svn-remote (i.e. not using --stdlayout), following the history
of a renamed path was broken in
c586879cdf.
This reverts the regression for the single (emtpy) path per
svn-remote case.
To avoid breaking the tests in a committed revision, this is an
addendum to a patch originally submitted by
Santhosh Kumar Mani <santhoshmani@gmail.com>:
> git-svn: add test for renamed directory fetch
>
> This test tries to fetch a directory which had renames in the
> history from a SVN repository.
[ew: unneccesary dependency on the starting an HTTP server
removed from Santhosh's original test.]
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit 15387e3 (Test suite: reset TERM to its previous value after
testing., 2007-10-26), I added a workaround to reset TERM to its previous
value before the "test_done" at the end of "t7005-editor.sh" because
otherwise "test_done" would have printed the test result with a bad TERM
env variable (this resulted in output with no color on konsole).
But since commit c2116a1 (test-lib: fix TERM to dumb for test
repeatability, 2008-03-06), colored output is printed in a subshell with
TERM reset to its original value so the earlier workaround is not needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier commit 4be6096 (apply --unidiff-zero: loosen sanity checks for
--unidiff=0 patches, 2006-09-17) made match_beginning and match_end
computed incorrectly. If a hunk inserts at the beginning, old position
recorded at the hunk is line 0, and if a hunk changes at the beginning, it
is line 1. The new test added to t4104 exposes that the old code did not
insist on matching at the beginning for a patch to add a line to an empty
file.
An even older 65aadb9 (apply: force matching at the beginning.,
2006-05-24) was equally wrong in that it tried to take hints from the
number of leading context lines, to decide if the hunk must match at the
beginning, but we can just look at the line number in the hunk to decide.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* dd/cvsserver:
cvsserver: Use the user part of the email in log and annotate results
cvsserver: Add test for update -p
cvsserver: Implement update -p (print to stdout)
cvsserver: Add a few tests for 'status' command
cvsserver: Do not include status output for subdirectories if -l is passed
cvsserver: Only print the file part of the filename in status header
cvsserver: Respond to the 'editors' and 'watchers' commands
This test was already careful enough to skip signed tag tests if gpg
is not available, but it must also skip all verify tests, even those
that are about non-signed tags, because they also invoke gpg.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the verify_tag() function to remove an unnecessary test, and add
additional check for angle brackets in the name and email field, and
spaces in the email field. The timestamp and timezone sections are made
more straight forward by using strspn().
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit d89c1df (filter-branch: don't use xargs -0, 2008-03-12) replaced a
'ls-files | xargs rm' pipeline by 'git clean'. 'git clean' however does
not recurse and remove directories by default.
Now, consider a tree-filter that renames a directory.
1. For the first commit everything works as expected
2. Then filter-branch checks out the files for the next commit. This
leaves the new directory behind because there is no real "branch
switching" involved that would notice that the directory can be
removed.
3. Then filter-branch invokes 'git clean' to remove exactly those
left-overs. But here it does not remove the directory.
4. The next tree-filter does not work as expected because there already
exists a directory with the new name.
Just add -d to 'git clean', so that empty directories are removed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test currently fails.
If b is a directory then 'mv a b' is not a plain "rename", but really a
"move", so we must also test that the directory does not exist with the
old name in the directory with the new name.
There's also some cleanup in the corresponding "rename file" test to avoid
spurious shell syntax errors and "ambigous ref" error from 'git show' (but
these should show up only if the test would fail anyway). Plus we also
test for the non-existence of the old file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Since nearly its birth, git's tags have included a "tagger" field which
describes the name of tagger, email of tagger, and date and time of tagging.
But, this field was only loosely tested by git-mktag. Provide some thorough
testing for this field and also ensure that the tag header is separated
from the tag body by an empty line to reduce the convenience of creating
a flawed tag.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, if you changed a staged path into a directory in the work tree,
we happily ran lstat(2) on it and found that it exists, and declared that
the user changed it to a gitlink.
This is wrong for two reasons:
(1) It may be a directory, but it may not be a submodule, and in the
latter case, the change we need to report is "the blob at the path
has disappeared". We need to check with resolve_gitlink_ref() to be
consistent with what "git add" and "git update-index --add" does.
(2) lstat(2) may have succeeded only because a leading component of the
path was turned into a symbolic link that points at something that
exists in the work tree. In such a case, the path itself does not
exist anymore, as far as the index is concerned.
This fixes these breakages in diff-index that the previous patch has
exposed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diff-index and diff-files can get confused in corner cases when an indexed
blob turns into something else in the work tree. This patch adds tests to
expose such breakages.
The test is classified under t2XXX series instead of t4XXX series, because
the ultimate objective is to fix "add -u" (and "commit -a" that shares the
same issue).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Finally, this resurrects the documented behaviour to protect other
objects listed on the command line from getting pruned.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It seems that git prune changed behaviour with respect to revisions added
from command line, probably when it became a builtin. Currently, it prints
a short usage and exits: instead, it should take those revisions into
account and not prune them. So add a couple of test to point this out.
We'll be fixing this by switching to parse_options(), so add tests to
detect bogus command line parameters as well, to keep ourselves from
introducing regressions.
Signed-off-by: Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Update draft release notes for 1.5.4.5
Documentation: clarify use of .git{ignore,attributes} versus .git/info/*
t/t3800-mktag.sh: use test_must_fail rather than '!'
Conflicts:
t/t3800-mktag.sh
When a git command is run under test_must_fail to make sure that
the argument parser catches bogus command line, it exits with 129.
We need to catch it as a valid "graceful error exit".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This actually sounds like a bug in cvsps, which requires an existing
home directory when asked for the usage through -h
$ HOME=/nonexistent cvsps -h
Cannot create the cvsps directory '.cvsps': No such file or directory
This made t9600 think that cvsps is not available if HOME did not exist,
causing the tests to be skipped
$ HOME=/nonexistent sh t9600-cvsimport.sh
* skipping cvsimport tests, cvsps not found
* passed all 0 test(s)
Now t9600 sets HOME to the current working directory before checking for
the availability of the cvsps program.
This issue has been discovered by Marco Rodrigues, and fixed by Frank
Lichtenheld through
http://bugs.debian.org/471969
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
