Commit Graph

103 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Rast
85551232b5 perf: compare diff algorithms
8c912ee (teach --histogram to diff, 2011-07-12) claimed histogram diff
was faster than both Myers and patience.

We have since incorporated a performance testing framework, so add a
test that compares the various diff tasks performed in a real 'log -p'
workload.  This does indeed show that histogram diff slightly beats
Myers, while patience is much slower than the others.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-06 11:48:11 -08:00
Thomas Rast
134593c8ca Add a performance test for git-grep
The only catch is that we don't really know what our repo contains, so
we have to ignore any possible "not found" status from git-grep.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-17 08:21:34 -08:00
Thomas Rast
342e9ef2d9 Introduce a performance testing framework
This introduces a performance testing framework under t/perf/.  It
tries to be as close to the test-lib.sh infrastructure as possible,
and thus should be easy to get used to for git developers.

The following points were considered for the implementation:

1. You usually want to compare arbitrary revisions/build trees against
   each other.  They may not have the performance test under
   consideration, or even the perf-lib.sh infrastructure.

   To cope with this, the 'run' script lets you specify arbitrary
   build dirs and revisions.  It even automatically builds the revisions
   if it doesn't have them at hand yet.

2. Usually you would not want to run all tests.  It would take too
   long anyway.  The 'run' script lets you specify which tests to run;
   or you can also do it manually.  There is a Makefile for
   discoverability and 'make clean', but it is not meant for
   real-world use.

3. Creating test repos from scratch in every test is extremely
   time-consuming, and shipping or downloading such large/weird repos
   is out of the question.

   We leave this decision to the user.  Two different sizes of test
   repos can be configured, and the scripts just copy one or more of
   those (using hardlinks for the object store).  By default it tries
   to use the build tree's git.git repository.

   This is fairly fast and versatile.  Using a copy instead of a clone
   preserves many properties that the user may want to test for, such
   as lots of loose objects, unpacked refs, etc.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-17 08:21:22 -08:00