I'm missing the possibility to base a new branch on a tag.
The following adds a tag drop down to the new branch dialog.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Like `git version`, `git gui version` (or `git gui --version`) shows
the version of git-gui, in case the user needs to know this, without
looking at it in the GUI about dialog.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I started to find it confusing that git-gui would refer to itself
as git-citool when it was started through the citool hardlink, or
with the citool subcommand. What was especially confusing was the
options dialog and the about dialog, as both seemed to imply they
were somehow different from the git-gui versions. In actuality
there is no difference at all.
Now we just call our options menu item 'Options...' (skipping the
application name) and our About dialog now always shows git-gui
within the short description (above the copyleft notice) and in
the version field.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
It was pointed out on the git mailing list by Martin Koegler that
we did not show tags as possible things to merge into the current
branch. They actually are, and core Git's Grand Unified Merge
Driver will accept them just like any other commit.
So our merge dialog now requests all refs/heads, refs/remotes and
refs/tags named refs and attempts to match them against the commits
not in HEAD. One complicating factor here is that we must use the
%(*objectname) field when talking about an annotated tag, as they
will not appear in the output of rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a very crude (but hopefully effective) check against the
`git` executable found in our PATH. Some of the subcommands and
options that git-gui requires to be present to operate were created
during the 1.5.0 development cycle, so 1.5 is the minimum version
of git that we can expect to support.
There actually are early releases of 1.5 (e.g. 1.5.0-rc0) that
don't have everything we expect (like `blame --incremental`) but
these are purely academic at this point. 1.5.0 final was tagged
and released just a few hours ago. The release candidates will
(hopefully) fade into the dark quickly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
As we frequently need to execute a Git subcommand and obtain
its returned output we are making heavy use of [exec git foo]
to run foo. As I'm concerned about possibly needing to carry
environment data through a shell on Cygwin for at least some
subcommands, I'm migrating all current calls to a new git
proc. This actually makes the code look cleaner too, as
we aren't saying 'exec git' everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that the decision has been made to treat git-gui as a
subproject, rather than merging it directly into git, we
should use a different substitution for our version value
to avoid any possible confusion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that git 1.5.0 and later contains a version of gitk that uses
correct geometry on Windows platforms, even if ~/.gitk exists, we
should not delete the user's ~/.gitk to work around the bug. It
is downright mean to remove a user's preferences for another app.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than trying to mark the background color of the line numbers
to show which lines have annotated data loaded, we now show a ruler
between the line numbers and the file data. This ruler is just 1
character wide and its background color is set to grey to denote
which lines have annotation ready. I had to make this change as I
kept loosing the annotation marker when a line was no longer colored
as part of the current selection.
We now color the lines blamed on the current commit in yellow, the
lines in the commit which came after (descendant) in red (hotter,
less tested) and the lines in the commit before (ancestor) in blue
(cooler, better tested).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help clue users into the fact that annotation data arrives
incrementally, and that they should try to locate the region
they want while the tool is running, we jump to the first line
of the first annotation if the user has not already clicked on
a line they are interested in and if the window is still looking
at the very top of the file.
Since it takes a second (at least on my PowerBook) to even generate
the first annotation for git-gui.sh, the user should have plenty of
time to adjust the scrollbar or click on a line even before we get
that first annotation record in, which allows the user to bypass
our automatic jumping.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using 180 columns worth of screen space to display just 20 columns of
file data and 160 columns worth of annotation information is not
practically useful. Users need/want to see the file data, and have
the anotation associated with it displayed in a detail pane only when
they have focused on a particular region of the file.
Now our file viewer has a small 10-line high pane below the file
which shows the commit message for the commit this line was blamed
on. The columns have all been removed, except the current line
number column as that has some real value when trying to locate an
interesting block.
To keep the user entertained we have a progress meter in the status
bar of the viewer which lets them know how many lines have been
annotated, and how much has been completed. We use a grey background
on the line numbers for lines which we have obtained annotation from,
and we color all lines in the current commit with a yellow background,
so they stand out when scanning through the file. All other lines
are kept with a white background, making the yellow really pop.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that core Git has "renamed" git-repo-config to git-config,
we should do the same. I don't know how long core Git will
keep the repo-config command, and since git-gui's userbase
is so small and almost entirely on some flavor of 1.5.0-rc2
or later, where the rename has already taken place, it should
be OK to rename now.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
One user that I spoke with recently was confused why the 'Add All'
button did not add all of his 'Changed But Not Updated' files.
The particular files in question were new, and thus not known to
Git. Since the 'Add All' routine only updates files which are
already tracked, they were not added automatically.
I suspect that calling this action 'Add Existing' would be less
confusing, so I'm renaming it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we are invoked as `git-foo`, then we should run the `foo` subcommand,
as the user has made some sort of link from `git-foo` to our actual
program code. So we should honor their request.
If we are invoked as `git-gui foo`, the user has not made a link (or
did, but is not using it right now) so we should execute the `foo`
subcommand.
We now can start the single commit UI mode via `git-citool` and also
through `git gui citool`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Viewing annotated files is one of those tasks that is relatively
difficult to do in a simple vt100 terminal emulator. The user
really wants to be able to browse through a lot of information,
and to interact with it by navigating through revisions.
Now users can start our file viewer with annotations by running
'git gui blame commit path', thereby seeing the contents of the
given file at the given commit. Right now I am being lazy by
not allowing the user to omit the commit name (and have us thus
assume HEAD).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the commit area does not exist, don't save the commit message to
a file, or the window geometry. The reason I'm doing this is I want
to make the main window entirely optional, such as if the user has
asked us to show a blame from the command line. In such cases the
commit area won't exist and trying to get its text would cause an
error.
If we are running without the commit message area, we cannot save
our window geometry either, as the root window '.' won't be a normal
commit window.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a minor code cleanup to make working with what used to be the
$single_commit flag easier. Its also to better handle various UI
configurations, depending on command line parameters given by the
user, or perhaps user preferences.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We already replace \n with \\n so that Tk widgets don't start a new
display line with part of a file path which is just unlucky enough
to contain an LF. But then its confusing to read a path whose name
actually contains \n as literal characters. Escaping \ to \\ would
make that case display as \\n, clarifying the output.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users want to navigate the file list shown in our branch browser
windows using the keyboard. So we now support basic traversal
with the arrow keys:
Up/Down: Move the "selection bar" to focus on a different name.
Return: Move into the subtree, or open the annotated file.
M1-Right: Ditto.
M1-Up: Move to the parent tree.
M1-Left: Ditto.
Probably the only feature missing from this is to key a leading part
of the file name and jump directly to that file (or subtree).
This change did require a bit of refactoring, to pull the navigation
logic out of the mouse click procedure and into more generic routines
which can also be used in bindings.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user has created (or deleted) a branch through an external tool,
and uses Rescan, they probably are trying to make git-gui update to show
their newly created branch.
So now we load all known heads and update the branch menu during any
rescan operation, just in-case the set of known branches was modified.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help the user visually see which lines are associated with each other
in the file we attempt to sign a unique background color to each commit
and then render all text associated with that commit using that color.
This works out OK for a file which has very few commits in it; but
most files don't have that property.
What we really need to do is look at what colors are used by our
neighboring commits (if known yet) and pick a color which does not
conflict with our neighbor. If we have run out of colors then we
should force our neighbor to recolor too. Yes, its the graph coloring
problem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using a panedwindow to display the blame viewer's individual columns
just doesn't make sense. Most of the important data fits within the
columns we have allocated, and those that don't the leading part fits
and that's good enough. There are just too many columns within this
viewer to let the user sanely control individual column widths. This
change shouldn't really be an issue for most git-gui users as their
displays should be large enough to accept this massive dump of data.
We now also have a properly working horizontal scrollbar for the
current file data area. This makes it easier to get away with a
narrow window when screen space is limited, as you can still scroll
around within the file content.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I started to get confused about what each column meant in the blame
viewer, and I'm the guy who wrote the code! So now git-gui hints to
the user about what each column is by drawing headers at the top.
Unfortunately this meant I had to use those dreaded frame objects
which seem to cause so much pain on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When we annotate a file and show its line data, we're already asking
for copy and movement detection (-M -C). This costs extra time, but
gives extra data. Since we are asking for the extra data we really
should show it to the user.
Now the blame UI has two additional columns, one for the original
filename (in the case of a move/copy between files) and one for the
original line number of the current line of code.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Anytime are about to open a pipe on what may be user data we need to
make sure the value is escaped correctly into a Tcl list, so that the
executed subprocess will receive the right arguments. For the most
part we were already doing this correctly, but a handful of locations
did not.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since we run blame incrementally in the background we might as well get
as much data as we can from the file. Adding -M and -C definately makes
it take longer to compute the revision annotations, but since they are
streamed in and updated as they are discovered we'll get recent data
almost immediately anyway.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may need to be able to alter their user.name or user.email
configuration settings. If they are mostly a git-gui user they
should be able to view/set these important values from within
the git-gui environment, rather than needing to edit a raw text
file on their local filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than using HEAD for the current branch, use the actual name of
the current branch in the browser. This way the user knows what a
browser is browsing if they open up different browsers while on different
branches.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Real icons which seem to indicate going up to the parent (an up arrow)
and a subdirectory (an open folder). Files are now drawn with the
file_mod icon, like a modified file is. This just looks better as it
is more consistent with the rest of our UI.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This rather huge change provides a browser for the current branch. The
browser simply shows the contents of tree HEAD, and lets the user drill
down through the tree. The icons used really stink, as I just copied in
icon which we already had. I really need to replace the file_dir and
file_uplevel icons with something more useful.
If the user double clicks on a file within the browser we open it in
a blame viewer. This makes use of the new incremental blame feature
that Linus just added yesterday to core Git. Fortunately the feature
will be in 1.5.0 final so we can rely on having it available here.
Since the blame engine is incremental the user will get blame data
for groups which can be determined early. Git will slowly fill in
the remaining lines as it goes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Running on Cygwin is different than if we were running through MinGW.
In the Cygwin case we have cygpath available to us, we need to perform
UNIX<->Windows path translation sometimes, and we need to perform odd
things like spawning our own login shells to perform network operations.
But in the MinGW case these don't occur. Git knows native Windows file
paths, and login shells may not even exist.
Now git-gui will avoid running cygpath unless it knows its on Cygwin.
It also uses a different shortcut type when Cygwin is not present, and
it avoids invoking /bin/sh to execute hooks if Cygwin is not present.
This latter part probably needs more testing in the MinGW case.
This change also improves how we start gitk. If the user is on any type
of Windows system its known that gitk won't start right if ~/.gitk exists.
So we delete it before starting if we are running on any type of Windows
operating system. We always use the same wish executable which launched
git-gui to start gitk; this way on Windows we don't have to jump back to
/bin/sh just to go into the first wish found in the user's PATH. This
should help on MinGW when we probably don't want to spawn a shell just
to start gitk.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may want to be able to read Git documentation, even if they
are not command line users. There are many important concepts and
terms covered within the standard Git documentation which would be
useful to even non command line using people.
We now try to offer an 'Online Documentation' menu option within the
Help menu. First we try to guess to see what browser the user has
setup. We default to instaweb.browser, if set, as this is probably
accurate for the user's configuration. If not then we try to guess
based on the operating system and the available browsers for each.
We prefer documentation which is installed parallel to Git's own
executables, e.g. `git --exec-path`/../Documentation/index.html, as
that is how I typically install the HTML docs. If those are not found
then we open the documentation published on kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
OK, its official, I'm not reading documentation as well as I should be.
Core Git's merge.summary configuration option is used to control the
generation of the text appearing within the merge commit itself. It
is not (and never has been) used to default the --no-summary command
line option, which disables the diffstat at the end of the merge.
I completely blame Git for naming two unrelated options almost the
exact same thing. But its my own fault for allowing git-gui to
confuse the two.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Changed our private merge summary config option to be the same as the
merge.summary option supported by core Git. This means setting the
"Show Merge Summary" flag in git-gui will have the same effect on
the command line.
In the same vein I've also added merge.verbosity to the gui options,
allowing the user to adjust the verbosity level of the recursive
merge strategy. I happen to like level 1 and suggest that other users
use that, but level 2 is the core Git default right now so we'll use
the same default in git-gui.
Unfortunately it appears as though core Git has broken support for
the merge.summary option, even though its still in the documentation
For the time being we should pass along --no-summary to git-merge if
merge.summary is false.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Anytime we use a listbox to show branch names its possible for the
listbox to exceed 10 entries (actually its probably very common).
So we should always offer a scrollbar for the Y axis on these
listboxes. I just forgot to add it when I defined them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user is in the middle of a commit they have files which are
modified. These may conflict with any merge that they may want
to perform, which would cause problems if the user wants to abort
a bad merge as we wouldn't have a checkpoint to roll back onto.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If an octopus merge goes horribly wrong git-merge will leave the
working directory and index dirty, but will not leave behind a
MERGE_HEAD file for a later commit. Consequently we won't know
its a merge commit and instead would let the user resolve the
conflicts and commit a single-parent commit, which is wrong.
So now if an octopus merge fails we notify the user that the
merge did not work, tell them we will reset the working directory,
and suggest that they merge one branch at a time. This prevents
the user from committing a bad octopus merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I got slightly confused when I did two merges in a row, as the status
bar said "merge completed successfully" while the second merge was
still running. Now we show what branches are actively being merged.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If you get into the middle of a merge that turns out to be horrible
and just not something you want to do right now, odds are you need
to run `git reset --hard` to recover your working directory to a
pre-merge state.
We now offer Merge->Abort Merge for exactly this purpose, however
its also useful to thow away a non-merge, as its basically the same
logic as `git reset --hard`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To allow users to merge local heads and tracking branches we now offer
a dialog which lets the user select 1-15 branches and merge them using
the stock `git merge` Grand Unified Merge Driver.
Originally I had wanted to implement this merge internally within git-gui
as I consider GUMD to be mostly Porcelain-ish, but the truth is it does
its job exceedingly well and its a relatively complex chunk of code.
I'll probably circle back later and try to remove the invocation of GUMD
from git-gui, but right now it lets me get the job done faster.
Users cannot start a merge if they are currently in the middle of one,
or if they are amending a commit. Trying to do either is just stupid
and should be stopped as early as possible.
I've also made it simple for users to startup a gitk session prior to
a merge by offering a Visualize button which runs `gitk $revs --not HEAD`,
where $revs is the list of branches currently selected in the merge
dialog. This makes it quite simple to find out what the damage will
be to the current branch if you were to carry out the currently proposed
merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Technically the new git-gc command is strictly Porcelain; its invoking
multiple plumbing commands to do its work. Since git-gui tries to not
rely on Porclain we shouldn't be invoking git-gc directly, instead we
should perform its tasks on our own.
To make this easy I've created console_chain, which takes a list of
tasks to perform and runs them all in the same console window. If
any individual task fails then the chain stops running and the window
shows a failure bar. Only once all tasks have been completed will it
invoke console_done with a successful status.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because I want to be able to run multiple output-producing commands
in a single 'console' window within git-gui I'm refactoring the
console handling routines to require the "after" argument of console_exec.
This should specify a procedure to execute which will receive two args,
the first is the console window handle and the second is the status of
the last command (0 on failure, 1 on success).
A new procedure console_done can be passed to the last console_exec
command to forward perform all cleanup and enable the Close button.
Its status argument is used to update the final status bar on the
bottom of the console window.
This isn't any real logic changing, and no new functionality is in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Right now `git-push -v` is actually not that verbose; it merely adds
the URL it is pushing to. This can be informative if you are pushing
to a configured remote, as you may not actually remember what URL that
remote is connected to. That detail can be important if the push
fails and you attempt to communicate the errors to a 3rd party to help
you resolve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because we aren't going to support single click pulling of changes from
an existing remote anytime in the near future, I'm moving the code which
used to perform that action. Hopefully we'll be able to do something
like it in the near-future, but also support local branches just as
easily.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because its common for some users to push topic branches to a remote
repository for review and merging by other parties, users need an
easy way to push one or more branches to a remote repository without
needing to edit their .git/config file anytime their set of active
branches changes.
We now provide a basic 'Push...' menu action in the Push menu which
opens a dialog allowing the user to select from their set of local
branches (refs/heads, minus tracking branches). The user can designate
which repository to send the changes to by selecting from an already
configured remote or by entering any valid Git URL.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Anytime we are using lsearch we are doing [lsearch -sorted] and we
are applying it to file paths (or file path like things). Its valid
for these to contain special glob characters, but when that happens
we do not want globbing to occur. Instead we really need exact
match semantics. Always supplying -exact to lsearch will ensure that
is the case.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I just noticed that a file was always jumping to compare against HEAD
and the index during a refresh, even if the diff viewer was comparing
the index against the working directory prior to the refresh. The
bug turned out to be caused by a foreach loop going through all file
list names searching for the path. Since $ui_index was the first one
searched and the file was contained in that file list the loop broke
out, leaving $w set to $ui_index when it had been set by the caller
to $ui_workdir. Silly bug caused by using a parameter as a loop
index.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its pointless to switch to the current branch, so don't do it. We
are already on it and the current index and working directory should
just be left alone.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The Pull menu as it stands right now is a really horrible idea. Most
users will have too many branches show up in this menu, and what with
the new globbing syntax for fetch entries we were offering up possible
merging that just isn't really valid. So this menu is dead and will
be rewritten to support better merge capabilities.
The Branch menu shouldn't include a separator entry if there are no
branches, it just looks too damn weird. This can happen in an initial
repository before any branches have been created and before the first
commit.
The Fetch and Push menus should just be organized around their own
menus rather than being given the menu to populate.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm a fool and previously used a text widget configured with a height
of 1 and special bindings to handle focus traversal rather than the
already built (and properly behaved) entry widget.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The stat frame was right on the edge of the window on Mac OS X,
making the frame's border blend in with the window border. Not
exactly the effect I had in mind.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that recent versions of gitk (shipping with at least git 1.5.0-rc1
and later) actually accept command line revision specifiers without
crashing on internal Tk errors we can offer the 'Visualize All Branches'
menu item in the Repository menu on Mac OS X.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Apparently a "feature" of Tcl/Tk on Mac OS X is that a disabled text
widget cannot receive focus or receive a selection within it. This
makes the diff viewer almost useless on that platform as you cannot
select individual parts of the buffer.
Now we force focus into the diff viewer when its clicked on with
button 1. This works around the feature and allows selection to
work within the viewer just like it does on other less sane systems,
like Microsoft Windows.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When committing changes its useless to have trailing whitespace on the
end of a line within the commit message itself; this serves no purpose
beyond wasting space in the repository. But it happens a lot on my
Mac OS X system if I copy text out of a Terminal.app window and paste
it into git-gui.
We now clip any trailing whitespace from the commit buffer when loading
it from a file, when saving it out to our backup file, or when making
the actual commit object.
I also fixed a bug where we lost the commit message buffer if you quit
without editing the text region. This can happen if you quit and restart
git-gui frequently in the middle of an editing session.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we are displaying a diff for a DOS-style (CRLF) formatted file then
the Tk text widget would normally show the CR at the end of every line;
in most fonts this will come out as a square box. Rather than showing
this character we'll tag it with a tag which forces the character to
be elided away, so its not displayed. However since the character is
still within the text buffer we can still obtain it and supply it over
to `git apply` when staging or unstaging an individual hunk, ensuring
that the file contents is always fully preserved as-is.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Just like `git-add --interactive` we can now stage and unstage individual
hunks within a file, rather than the entire file at once. This works
on the basic idea of scanning backwards from the mouse position to
find the hunk header, then going forwards to find the end of the hunk.
Everything in that is sent to `git apply --cached`, prefixed by the
diff header lines.
We ignore whitespace errors while applying a hunk, as we expect the
user's pre-commit hook to catch any possible problems. This matches
our existing behavior with regards to adding an entire file with
no whitespace error checking.
Applying hunks means that we now have to capture and save the diff header
lines, rather than chucking them. Not really a big deal, we just needed
a new global to hang onto that current header information. We probably
could have recreated it on demand during apply_hunk but that would mean
we need to implement all of the funny rules about how to encode weird
path names (e.g. ones containing LF) into a diff header so that the
`git apply` process would understand what we are asking it to do. Much
simpler to just store this small amount of data in a global and replay
it when needed.
I'm making absolutely no attempt to correct the line numbers on the
remaining hunk headers after one hunk has been applied. This may
cause some hunks to fail, as the position information would not be
correct. Users can always refresh the current diff before applying a
failing hunk to work around the issue. Perhaps if we ever implement
hunk splitting we could also fix the remaining hunk headers.
Applying hunks directly means that we need to process the diff data in
binary, rather than using the system encoding and an automatic linefeed
translation. This ensures that CRLF formatted files will be able to be
fed directly to `git apply` without failures. Unfortunately it also means
we will see CRs show up in the GUI as ugly little boxes at the end of
each line in a CRLF file.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
There is no reason to attempt refreshing an empty diff viewer, so
the Refresh option of our diff context menu should be disabled when
there is no diff currently shown.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Just as we show the amount of disk space taken by the loose objects,
its interesting to know how much space is taken by the packs directory.
So show that in our Database Statistics dialog.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
In the new branch dialog and delete branch dialog we are using the
system default labelframe border settings (whatever those are) and
they look reasonable on both Windows and Mac OS X. But for some
unknown reason to me I used a raised border for the options dialog.
It doesn't look consistent anymore, so I'm switching it to the
defaults.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user selects a different branch from the Branch menu, or asks
us to create a new branch and immediately checkout that branch we
now perform the update of the working directory by way of a 2 way
read-tree invocation.
This emulates the behavior of `git checkout branch` or the behavior
of `git checkout -b branch initrev`. We don't however support the
-m style behavior, where a switch can occur with file level merging
performed by merge-recursive. Support for this is planned for a
future update.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its nice to know how many loose objects and roughly how much disk space
they are taking up, so that you can guestimate about when might be a
good time to run 'Compress Database'. The same is true of packfiles,
especially once the automatic keep-pack code in git-fetch starts to
be more widely used.
We now offer the output of count-objects -v in a nice little dialog
hung off the Repository menu. Our labels are slightly more verbose
than those of `count-objects -v`, so users will hopefully be able
to make better sense of what we are showing them here.
We probably should also offer pack file size information, and data
about *.idx files which exist which lack corresponding *.pack files
(a situation caused by the HTTP fetch client). But in the latter
case we should only offer the data once we have way to let the user
clean up old and inactive index files.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Git prefers that all log messages are encoding in UTF-8. So now when
git-gui generates the commit message it converts the commit message
text from the internal Tcl Unicode representation into a UTF-8 file.
The file is then fed as stdin to git-commit-tree. I had to start
using a file here rather than feeding the message in with << as
<< uses the system encoding, which we may not want.
When we reload a commit message via git-cat-file we are getting the
raw byte stream, with no encoding performed by Git itself. So unless
the new 'encoding' header appears in the message we should probably
assume it is utf-8 encoded; but if the header is present we need to
use whatever it claims.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since git operates on filenames using the operating system encoding
any data we are receiving from it by way of a pipe, or sending to it
by way of a pipe must be formatted in that encoding. This should
be the same as the Tcl system encoding, as its the encoding that
applications should be using to converse with the operating system.
Sadly this does not fix the gitweb/test file in git.git on Macs;
that's due to something really broken happening in the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This newline is stupid; it doesn't get put here unless the file
is very large, and then its just sort of out of place.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may want to know what a file is before they add it to the
repository, especially if its a binary file. So when possible
invoke 'file' on the path and try to get its output. Since
this is strictly advice to the user we won't bother to report
any failures from our attempt to run `file`.
Since some file commands also output the path name they were
given we look for that case and strip it off the front of the
returned output before placing it into the diff viewer.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Our internal diff viewer displays untracked files to help users see if
they should become tracked, or not. It is not meant as a full file
viewer that handles any sort of input. Consequently it is rather
unreasonable for users to expect us to show them very large files.
Some users may click on a very big file (and not know its very big)
then get surprised when Tk takes a long time to load the content and
render it, especially if their memory is tight and their OS starts to
swap processes out.
Instead we now limit the amount of data we load to the first 128 KiB
of any untracked file. If the file is larger than 128 KiB we display
a warning message at the top of our diff viewer to notify the user
that we are not going to load the entire thing. Users should be able
to recognize a file just by its first 128 KiB and determine if it
should be added to the repository or not.
Since we are loading 128 KiB we may as well scan it to see if the
file is binary. So I've removed the "first 8000 bytes" rule and
just allowed git-gui to scan the entire data chunk that it read in.
This is probably faster anyway if Tcl's [string range] command winds
up making a copy of the data.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A binary file can be very large, and showing the complete content of
one is horribly ugly and confusing. So we now use the same rule that
core Git uses; if there is a NUL byte (\0) within the first 8000 bytes
of the file we assume it is binary and refuse to show the content.
Given that we have loaded the entire content of the file into memory
we probably could just afford to search the whole thing, but we also
probably should not load multi-megabyte binary files either.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we got an empty diff its probably because the modification time of
the file was changed but the file content hasn't been changed. Typically
this happens because an outside program modified the file and git-gui
was told to not run 'update-index --refresh', as the user generally
trusts file modification timestamps. But we can also get an empty diff
when a program undos a file change and still updates the modification
timestamp upon saving, but has undone the file back to the same as what
is in the index or in PARENT.
So even if gui.trustmtime is false we should still run a rescan on
an empty diff. This change also lets us cleanup the dialog message
that we show when this case occurs, as its no longer got anything to
do with Trust File Modification Timestamps.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If one or both versions of the file don't have a newline at the end
of the file we get a line telling us so in the diff output. This
shouldn't be tagged, nor should it generate a warning about not
being tagged.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Sometimes the Select All action from our context menus doesn't work
unless the text field its supposed to act on has focus. I'm not
really sure why adding the sel tag requires having focus. It
technically should not be required to update the sel tag membership,
but perhaps there is a bug in Tcl/Tk 8.4.1 on Windows which is
causing this odd behavior.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We don't want to tag these new file/delete file lines, as they aren't
actually that interesting. Its quite clear from the diff itself that
the file is a new file or is a deleted file (as the entire thing will
appear in the diff).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its possible for external programs to update file modification dates of
many files within a repository. I've seen this on Windows with a popular
virus scanner, sadly enough. If the user has Trust File Modification
Timestamp enabled and the virus scanner touches a large number of files
it can be annoying trying to clear them out of the 'Changed But Not
Updated' file list by clicking on them one at a time to load the diff.
So now we force a rescan as soon as one such file is found, and for
just that rescan we disable the Trust File Modification Timestamp option
thereby allowing Git to update the modification dates in the index.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We sometimes see a mode line show up in a diff if the file mode was
changed. But its not something we format specially.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we are making an initial commit our branch head did not exist when
we scanned for all heads during startup. Consequently we won't have
it in our branch menu. So force it to be put there after the ref was
created.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I didn't really like the way a new git-gui launched in a new repository
as the window geometry wasn't quite the best layou. So this is a minor
tweak to try and get space distributed around the window better.
By decreasing the widths we're also able to shrink the gui smaller
without Tk clipping content at the edge of the window. A nice feature.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Up until now git-gui did not support the new wildcard syntax used to
fetch any remote branch into a tracking branch during 'git fetch'. Now
if we identify a tracking branch as ending with the string '/*' then
we use for-each-ref to print out the reference names which may have
been fetched by that pattern. We also now correctly filter any
tracking branches out of refs/heads, if they user has placed any there.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When the user selects a starting revision from one of our offered popup
lists (local branches or tracking branches) or enters in an expression
in the expression input field we should automatically activate the
corresponding radio button for them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user is tabbing through fields in the options dialog they are
likely to want to just enter a new value for the field, rather than
edit the value in-place. This is easier if we select the entire value
upon focusing into the field.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When we are in a dialog such as the new branch dialog or our options
dialog we should permit the user to traverse around through the available
widgets with their Tab/Shift-Tab key combinations. So in any single
line text field where we don't want tab characters to actually be
inserted into the value rebind Tab and Shift-Tab to honor what the
tk_focusPrev and tk_focusNext scripts recommend.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Typically I'm creating all new branches with the same prefix, e.g. 'sp/'.
So its handy to be able to setup a repository (or global) level config
option for git gui which contains this initial prefix. Once set then
git-gui will load it into the new branch name field whenever a new
branch is being created.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
New branches must have a name. An empty one is not a valid ref, but the
generic message "We do not like '' as a branch name." is just too vague
or difficult to read. So detect the missing name early and tell the
user it must be entered.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I refactored the common code related to tracking branch listing into
a new procedure all_tracking_branches. This saves a few lines and
should make the create and delete dialogs easier to maintain.
We now don't offer a radio button to create from a tracking branch
or merge-check a tracking branch if there are no tracking branches
known to git-gui. This prevents us from creating an empty option
list and letting the user try to shoot themselves in the foot by
asking us to work against an empty initial revision.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Some of my file paths in some of my repositories are very long, this
is rather typical in Java projects where the path name contains a deep
package structure and then the file name itself is rather long and
(hopefully) descriptive. Seeing these paths line wrap in the file lists
looks absolutely horrible. The entire rendering is almost unreadable.
Now we draw both horizontal and vertical scrollbars for both file lists,
and we never line wrap within the list text itself.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because users who use git-gui are likely to also be using gitk, we
should at least match gitk's default colors and formatting within the
diff viewer.
Unfortunately this meant that I needed to change the background colors
of the hunks in a 'diff --cc' output, as the green used for 'added line'
was completely unreadable on the old color. We now use ivory1 to show
hunks which came from HEAD/parent^1, which are the portions that the
current branch has contributed, and are probably the user's own changes.
We use a very light blue for the portions which came from FETCH_HEAD,
as this makes the changes made by the other branch stand out more in the
diff.
I've also modified the hunk header lines to be blue, as that is how gitk
is showing them.
Apparently I forgot to raise the sel tag above everything else in the
diff viewer, which meant that selections in the diff viewer were not
visible if they were made on a 'diff --cc' hunk which had a background.
Its now the higest priority tag, ensuring the selection is always visible
and readable.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If a path is really unmerged, such as because it has been deleted and
also modifed, we cannot obtain a diff for it. Instead Git is sending
back '* Unmerged path <blah>' for file <blah>. We should display this
line as-is as our tag selecting switches don't recognize it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user has not added any files yet they cannot commit. But
telling them this isn't an error, its really just an informational
note meant to push the user in the correct direction.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Just like how we split out the local and remote branches into two
different pick lists for branch creation, we should do the same
thing for branch deletion. This means that there are really 3
modes of operation here:
* delete only if merged into designated local branch;
* delete only if merged into designated tracking (remote) branch;
* delete no matter what
So we now use radio buttons to select between these operations.
We still default to checking for merge into the current branch,
as that is probably the most commonly used behavior. It also is
what core Git's command line tools do.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using a stack of frames in the Starting Revision section of the new
branch dialog turned out to be a mess. The varying lengths of each
label caused the optionMenu widgets to be spread around the screen
at unaligned locations, making the interface very kludgy looking.
Now we layout the major sections of the branch dialog using grid
rather than pack, allowing these widgets to line up vertically in
a nice neat column. All extra space is given to column 1, which is
where we have located the text fields.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The new branch name input box was showing up too close to the labelframe
border, it was basically right on top of it on Windows. This didn't
look right when compared to the Starting Revision's expression input
field, as that had a 5 pixel padding.
So I've put the new name input box into its own frame and padded that
frame by 5 pixels, making the UI more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its impossible to commit an index which has unmerged stages.
Unfortunately a bug in git-gui allowed the user to try to do exactly that,
as we broke out of our file scanning loop as soon as we found a valid AMD
index state. That's wrong, as the files are coming back from our array
in pseudo-random order; an unmerged file may get returned only after all
merged files.
I also noticed the grammer around here in our dialog boxes still used
the term 'include', so this has been updated to reflect current usage.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Sometimes you want to just force the diff to redisplay itself without
rescanning every file in the filesystem (as that can be very costly
on large projects and slow operating systems). Now you can force a
diff-only refresh from the context menu. Previously you could also
do this by reclicking on the file name in the UI, but it may not be
obvious to all users, having a context menu option makes it more
clear.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A prior commit tried to use the old index state for the old working
directory state during a UI refresh of a file. This caused files
which were being unstaged (and thus becoming unmodified) to drop
out of the working directory side of the display, at least until
the user performed a rescan to force the UI to redisplay everything.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user switches the currently shown file from one side of the UI
to the other then how its diff is presented would be different. And
leaving the old diff up is downright confusing.
Since the diff is probably not interesting to the user after the switch
we should just clear the diff viewer. This saves the user time, as they
won't need to wait for us to reload the diff.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We were not correctly setting the old state of an index display to
_ if the index was previously unmerged. This caused us to try and
update a U->M when resolving a merge conflict but we were unable to
do so as the icon did not exist in the index viewer. Tk did not
like being asked to modify an icon which was undefined.
Now we always transform both the old and the new states for both
sides (index and working directory) prior to updating the UI.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that we are using 'git diff' to display unmerged working directory
files we are getting 'diff --cc' output rather than 'diff --combined'
output. Further the markers in the first two columns actually make
sense here, we shouldn't attempt to rewrite them to something else.
I've added 'diff --cc *' to the skip list in our diff viewer, as that
particular line is not very interesting to display.
I've completely refactored how we perform detection of the state of a
line during diff parsing; we now report an error message if we don't
understand the particular state of any given line. This way we know
if we aren't tagging something we maybe should have tagged in the UI.
I've also added special display of the standard conflict hunk markers
(<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>). These are formatted without a patch op
as the patch op is always '+' or '++' (meaning the line has been added
relative to the committed state) and are displayed in orange bold text,
sort of like the @@ or @@@ marker line is at the start of each hunk.
In a 3 way merge diff hunks which came from our HEAD are shown with a
azure2 background, and hunks which came from the incoming MERGE_HEAD
are displayed with a 'light goldenrod yellow' background. This makes
the two different hunks clearly visible within the file. Hunks which
are ++ or -- (added or deleted relative to both parents) are shown
without any background at all.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If a file has a merge conflict we want it to show up in the 'Changed
But Not Updated' file list rather than the 'Changes To Be Committed'
file list. This way the user can mostly ignore the left side (the
HEAD<->index comparsion) while resolving a merge and instead focus
on the merge conflicts, which are just shown on the right hand side.
This requires detecting the U state in the index side and drawing
it as though it were _, then forcing the working directory side to
have a U state. We have to delay this until presentation time as
we don't want to change our internal state data to be different
from what Git is telling us (I tried, the patch for that was ugly
and didn't work).
When showing a working directory diff and its a merge conflict we
don't want to use diff-files as this would wind up showing any
automatically merged hunks obtained from MERGE_HEAD in the diff.
These are not usually very interesting as they were completed by
the system. Instead we just want to see the conflicts. Fortunately
the diff porcelain-ish frontend (aka 'git diff') detects the case of
an unmerged file and generates a --cc diff against HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
So we now force any working directory diff with an index state of 'U'
to go through that difference path.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The combined diff format can be very confusing, especially to new users
who may not even be familiar with a standard two way diff format. So
for files which are already staged for commit and which are modifed in
the working directory we should show two different diffs, depending on
which side the user clicked on.
If the user clicks on the "Changes To Be Committed" side then we should
show them the PARENT<->index difference. This is the set of changes they
will actually commit.
If the user clicks on the "Changed But Not Updated" side we should show
them the index<->working directory difference. This is the set of changes
which will not be committed, as they have not been staged into the index.
This is especially useful when merging, as the "Changed But Not Updated"
files are the ones that need merge conflict resolution, and the diff here
is the conflict hunks and/or any evil merge created by the user.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We now need to keep track of which side the current diff is for,
HEAD<->index or index<->working directory. Consequently we need
an additional "current diff" variable to tell us which side the
diff is for. Since this is really only necessary in reshow_diff
I'm going to declare a new global, rather than try to shove both
the path and the side into current_diff.
To keep things clear later on, I'm renaming current_diff to
current_diff_path. There is no functionality change in this
commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user asked us to checkout the branch after creating it then
we should try to do so. This may fail, especially right now since
branch switching from within git-gui is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its possible for the user to select a branch for the merge test
(while deleting branches) and also select that branch for deletion.
Doing so would have bypassed our merge check for that branch, as
a branch is always a strict subset of itself. So we will simply
skip over a branch and not delete it if that is the branch which
the user selected for the merge check.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user is deleting a branch which is fully merged into the
selected test branch we should not confirm the delete with them,
the fact that the branch is fully merged means we can recover the
branch and no work will be lost.
If a branch is not fully merged, we should warn the user about which
branch(es) that is and continue deleting those which are fully merged.
We should only delete a branch if the user disables the merge check,
and in that case we should confirm with the user that a delete should
occur as this may cause them to lose changes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The only reason the commit_prehook logic was broken out into its own
proc was so it could be invoked after the current set of files that
were already added to the commit could be refreshed if 'Allow Partially
Added Files' was set to false. Now that we no longer even offer that
option to the user there is no reason to keep this code broken out
into its own procedure.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that we take the approach of core Git where we allow the user to
stage their changes directly into the index all of the time there is
absolutely no reason to have the Allow Partially Added Files option,
nor is there a reason or desire to default that option to false.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
On Mac OS X wish does not draw borders around text fields, making the
field look like its not even there until the user focuses into it. I
don't know the Mac OS X UI standards very well, but that just seems
wrong. Other applications (e.g. Terminal.app) show their input boxes
with a sunken relief, so we should do the same.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Sometimes you want to create a branch from a remote tracking branch.
Needing to enter it in the revision expression field is very annoying,
so instead let the user select it from a list of known tracking branches.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Most of the time when you are deleting branches you want to delete
those which have been merged into your upstream source. Typically
that means it has been merged into the tip commit of some tracking
branch, and the current branch (or any other head) doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users can now delete a local branch by selecting from a list of
available branches. The list automatically does not include
the current branch, as deleting the current branch could be quite
dangerous and should not be supported.
The user may also chose to have us verify the branches are fully
merged into another branch before deleting them. By default we
select the current branch, matching 'git branch -d' behavior,
but the user could also select any other local branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Creating branches is a common enough activity within a Git project
that we probably should give it a keyboard accelerator. N is not
currently used and seems reasonable to stand for "New Branch". To
bad our menu calls it create.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may now create new branches by activating the Branch->Create menu
item. This opens a dialog which lets the user enter the new branch
name and select the starting revision for the new branch.
For the starting revision we allow the user to either select from a
list of known heads (aka local branches) or to enter an arbitrary
SHA1 expression. For either creation technique we run the starting
revision through rev-parse to verify it is valid before trying to
create the ref with update-ref.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
It looks horrible to have the cancel and save buttons wedged up against
each other in our options dialog. Therefore toss a 5 pixel pad between
them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that our lists represent more defined states it no longer makes any
sense to permit a user to make selections from both lists at once, as
the each available operation acts only on files whose status corresponds
to only one of the lists.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
During unstaging we can simplify the way we perform the output by
combining our four puts into a single call.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The list of states which are valid for update-index were a little
too verbose and fed a few too many cases to the program. We can
do better with less lines of code by using more pattern matching,
and since we already were globbing here there's little change in
runtime cost.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We can revert any file which has a valid stage 0 (is not unmerged)
and which is has a working directory status of M or D. This vastly
simplifies our pattern matching on file status when building up the
list of files to perform a checkout-index against.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than relying on the file state and just inverting it, we should
look at which file icon the user clicked on. If they clicked on the
one in the "Changes To Be Committed" list then they want to unstage
the file. If they clicked on the icon in the "Changed But Not Updated"
list then they want to add the file to the commit. This should be much
more reliable about capturing the user's intent then looking at the file
state.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that core Git refers to resetting paths in the index as "unstaging"
the paths we should do the same in git-gui, both internally in our code
and also within the menu action name. The same follows for our staging
logic, as core Git refers to this as 'add'.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Updated the state descriptions for individual file states to try and
make them more closely align with what git-runstatus might display.
This way a user who is reading Git documentation will be less confused
by our descriptions.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The DM state cannot really happen. Its implying that the file has
been deleted in the index, but the file in the working directory has
been modified relative to the file in the index. This is complete
nonsense, the file doesn't exist in the index for it to be different
against!
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Apparently my earlier suspicion that the file state DD was a bug was
correct. A file which has been deleted from the working directory and
from the index will always get the state of D_ during a rescan. Thus
the only valid state for this to have is D_. We should always use only
D_ internally during our state changes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a rather drastic change to the git-gui user interface, but it
doesn't really look any different yet. I've taken the two lists and
converted them to being "changes to be committed" and "changed but
not updated". These lists correspond to the same lists output by
git-runstatus based on how files differ in the HEAD<->index and the
index<->working directory comparsions it performs.
This change is meant to correlate with the change in Git 1.5.0 where
we have brought the index more into the foreground and are trying to
teach users to make use of it as part of their daily operations.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm going to refactor the way file status information gets displayed
so it more closely aligns with the way 'git-runstatus' displays the
differences between HEAD<->index and index<->working directory. To
that end the other file list is going to be changed to be the working
directory difference. So this change renames it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user has many git-gui icons it may be confusing when they
start one which git-gui is still coming up. So on the windows
systems we now include an echo statement which displays the full
pathname of the working directory we are trying to enter into.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because we usually say "Operation... please wait..." we should do
the same thing when starting gitk.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because it is such a common idiom to use [gitdir] along with [file join]
to locate the path of an item within the .git directory of the current
repository we might as well allow gitdir to act as a wrapper for the
file join operation.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The gitdir global variable is essentially read-only, and is used rather
frequently. So are appname and reponame. Needing to constantly declare
'global appname' just so we can access the value as $appname is downright
annoying and redundant. So instead I'm declaring these as procedures and
changing all uses to invoke the procedure rather than access the global
directly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We use reponame in a number of locations, and every time its always the
same value. Instead of computing this multiple times with code that was
copied and pasted around we can compute it once immediately after the
global gitdir has been computed and set.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users often forget to repack their object database, then start to
complain about how slow it is to perform common operations after
they have collected thousands of loose objects in their objects
directory. A simple repack usually restores performance.
During startup git-gui now asks git-count-objects how many loose
objects exist, and if this number exceeds a hardcoded threshold
we suggest that the user compress the database (aka run 'git gc')
at this time. I've hardcoded this to 2000 objects on non-Windows
systems as there the filesystems tend to handle the ~8 objects
per directory just fine. On Windows NTFS and FAT are just so slow
that we really start to lag when more than 200 loose objects exist,
so the hardcoded threshold is much lower there.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I really hate that I have this specialized hack within git-gui, but
its here. The hack shouldn't be offered unless miga's required .pvcsrc
file is in the top level of the repository's working directory. If
this file is missing miga will fail to startup properly, and the user
cannot wouldn't be able to use it within this directory.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If a user wants to report an issue they will likely want to include
the version number with their issue report. This may be difficult
to enter if the version number includes an abbreviated commit SHA1
on the end of it. So we now give the user a context menu option
on the version box which allows them to copy all of the relevant
version data to the clipboard, ready for pasting into a report.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm stealing the exact logic used by core Git within its own Makefile to
setup the version number within scripts and executables. This way we
can be sure that the version number is always updated after a commit,
and that the version number also reflects when it is coming from a dirty
working directory (and is thus pretty worthless).
I've cleaned up some of the version display code in the about dialog too.
There were simply too many blank lines in the bottom section where we
showed the version data.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We're a true GPL program, and we're interactive. We should show the
entire GPL notice and disclaimer of warranty in our about dialog upon
request by the user, as well as include it in the header of our source.
Perhaps overkill, but is recommended by our license.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that we know what version git-gui is, the about dialog should
display it to the end-user. This way users can find out what version
they have before they report a problem or request a feature.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We want to embed the version of git-gui directly into the script file,
so that we can display it properly in the about dialog. Consequently
I've refactored the Makefile process to act like the one in core git.git
with regards to shell scripts, allowing git-gui to be constructed by a
sed replacement performed on git-gui.sh.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
