Consolidate codepaths that inspect log-message-to-be and decide to
add a new Signed-off-by line in various commands.
* bc/append-signed-off-by:
git-commit: populate the edit buffer with 2 blank lines before s-o-b
Unify appending signoff in format-patch, commit and sequencer
format-patch: update append_signoff prototype
t4014: more tests about appending s-o-b lines
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff to avoid adding a duplicate newline
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b
sequencer.c: always separate "(cherry picked from" from commit body
sequencer.c: require a conforming footer to be preceded by a blank line
sequencer.c: recognize "(cherry picked from ..." as part of s-o-b footer
t/t3511: add some tests of 'cherry-pick -s' functionality
t/test-lib-functions.sh: allow to specify the tag name to test_commit
commit, cherry-pick -s: remove broken support for multiline rfc2822 fields
sequencer.c: rework search for start of footer to improve clarity
The <message> part of test_commit() may not be appropriate for a tag name.
So let's allow test_commit to accept a fourth argument to specify the tag
name.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A function for checking that two given parameters refer to the same
revision was defined in several places, so move the definition to
test-lib-functions.sh instead.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can set and test a prerequisite like this:
test_set_prereq FOO
test_have_prereq FOO && echo yes
You can negate the test in the shell like this:
! test_have_prereq && echo no
However, when you are using the automatic prerequisite
checking in test_expect_*, there is no opportunity to use
the shell negation. This patch introduces the syntax "!FOO"
to indicate that the test should only run if a prerequisite
is not meant.
One alternative is to set an explicit negative prerequisite,
like:
if system_has_foo; then
test_set_prereq FOO
else
test_set_prereq NO_FOO
fi
However, this doesn't work for lazy prerequisites, which
associate a single test with a single name. We could teach
the lazy prereq evaluator to set both forms, but the code
change ends up quite similar to this one (because we still
need to convert NO_FOO into FOO to find the correct lazy
script).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In case 'git cherry-pick -s <commit>' failed, the user had to use 'git
commit -s' (i.e. state the -s option again), which is easy to forget
about. Instead, write the signed-off-by line early, so plain 'git
commit' will have the same result.
Also update 'git commit -s', so that in case there is already a relevant
Signed-off-by line before the Conflicts: line, it won't add one more at
the end of the message. If there is no such line, then add it before the
the Conflicts: line.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King wrote:
The seq command is GNU-ism, and is missing at least in older BSD
releases and their derivatives, not to mention antique
commercial Unixes.
We already purged it in b3431bc (Don't use seq in tests, not
everyone has it, 2007-05-02), but a few new instances have crept
in. They went unnoticed because they are in scripts that are not
run by default.
Replace them with test_seq that is implemented with a Perl snippet
(proposed by Jeff). This is better than inlining this snippet
everywhere it's needed because it's easier to read and it's easier
to change the implementation (e.g. to C) if we ever decide to remove
Perl from the test suite.
Note that test_seq is not a complete replacement for seq(1). It
just has what we need now, in addition that it makes it possible for
us to do something like "test_seq a m" if we wanted to in the
future.
There are also many places that do `for i in 1 2 3 ...` but I'm not sure
if it's worth converting them to test_seq. That would introduce running
more processes of Perl.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 1.7.9 era, we taught "git rebase" about the raw timestamp format
but we did not teach the same trick to "filter-branch", which rolled
a similar logic on its own.
* jc/maint-filter-branch-epoch-date:
t7003: add test to filter a branch with a commit at epoch
date.c: Fix off by one error in object-header date parsing
filter-branch: do not forget the '@' prefix to force git-timestamp
The test prerequisite mechanism is a useful way to allow some tests
in a test script to be skipped in environments that do not support
certain features (e.g. it is pointless to attempt checking how well
symbolic links are handled by Git on filesystems that do not support
them). It is OK for commonly used prerequisites to be always tested
during start-up of a test script by having a codeblock that tests a
feature and calls test_set_prereq, but for an uncommon feature,
forcing 90% of scripts to pay the same probing overhead for
prerequisite they do not care about is wasteful.
Introduce a mechanism to probe the prerequiste lazily. Changes are:
- test_lazy_prereq () function, which takes the name of the
prerequisite it probes and the script to probe for it, is
added. This only registers the name of the prerequiste that can
be lazily probed and the script to eval (without running).
- test_have_prereq() function (which is used by test_expect_success
and also can be called directly by test scripts) learns to look
at the list of prerequisites that can be lazily probed, and the
prerequisites that have already been probed that way. When asked
for a prerequiste that can be but haven't been probed, the script
registered with an earlier call to test_lazy_prereq is evaluated
and the prerequisite is set.
- test_run_lazy_prereq_() function is a helper to run the probe
script with the same kind of sandbox as regular tests, helped by
Jeff King.
Update the codeblock to probe and set SYMLINKS prerequisite using
the new mechanism as an example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All other shell variables that are used to globally keep track of
states related to prerequisite have "prereq" somewhere in their
names. Be consistent and avoid potential name crashes with other
kinds of satisfaction in the future.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 1.7.9 era, we taught "git rebase" about the raw timestamp format
but we did not teach the same trick to "filter-branch", which rolled
a similar logic on its own. Because of this, "filter-branch" failed
to rewrite commits with ancient timestamps.
* jc/maint-filter-branch-epoch-date:
t7003: add test to filter a branch with a commit at epoch
date.c: Fix off by one error in object-header date parsing
filter-branch: do not forget the '@' prefix to force git-timestamp
Otherwise it will be split at a space after "Program" when it is set
to "\\Program Files\perl" or something silly like that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS defines PERL_PATH to be used in the test suite. Only a
few tests already actually use this variable when perl is needed. The
other test just call 'perl' and it might happen that the wrong perl
interpreter is used.
This becomes problematic on Windows, when the perl interpreter that is
compiled and installed on the Windows system is used, because this perl
interpreter might introduce some unexpected LF->CRLF conversions.
This patch makes sure that $PERL_PATH is used everywhere in the test suite
and that the correct perl interpreter is used.
Signed-off-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This just moves all the user-facing functions to a separate file and
sources that instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
