Commit Graph

50 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pavel Roskin
d998a0895f [PATCH] Fix "prefix" mixup in git-rev-list
Recent changes in git have broken cg-log.  git-rev-list no longer
prints "commit" in front of commit hashes.  It turn out a local
"prefix" variable in main() shadows a file-scoped "prefix" variable.

The patch removed the local "prefix" variable since its value is never
used (in the intended way, that is).  The call to
setup_git_directory() is kept since it has useful side effects.

The file-scoped "prefix" variable is renamed to "commit_prefix" just
in case someone reintroduces "prefix" to hold the return value of
setup_git_directory().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-24 16:50:16 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
90e1848113 Make "git-rev-list" work within subdirectories
This trivial patch makes "git-rev-list" able to handle not being in
the top-level directory.  This magically also makes "git-whatchanged"
do the right thing.

Trivial scripting fix to make sure that "git log" also works.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-23 12:43:57 -07:00
Sergey Vlasov
7f1335c74c [PATCH] git-rev-list: avoid crash on broken repository
When following tags, check for parse_object() success and error out
properly instead of segfaulting.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-19 13:07:43 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
d87449c553 Introduce --pretty=oneline format.
This introduces --pretty=oneline to git-rev-tree and
git-rev-list commands to show only the first line of the commit
message, without frills. 

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-09 22:28:23 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
76cd8eb619 [PATCH] add *--no-merges* flag to suppress display of merge commits
As requested by Junio (who suggested --single-parents-only, but this
could forget a no-parent root).

Also, adds a few missing options to the usage string.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-09 22:28:21 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
1215879cdc Teach rev-list since..til notation.
The King Penguin says:

    Now, for extra bonus points, maybe you should make "git-rev-list" also
    understand the "rev..rev" format (which you can't do with just the
    get_sha1() interface, since it expands into more).

The faithful servant makes it so.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-05 01:25:31 -07:00
Petr Baudis
dd53c7ab29 [PATCH] Support for NO_OPENSSL
Support for completely OpenSSL-less builds. FSF considers distributing GPL
binaries with OpenSSL linked in as a legal problem so this is trouble
e.g. for Debian, or some people might not want to install OpenSSL
anyway. If you

	make NO_OPENSSL=1

you get completely OpenSSL-less build, disabling --merge-order and using
Mozilla's SHA1 implementation.

Ported from Cogito.

Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-29 17:21:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
6c3b84c81c [PATCH] Fix interesting git-rev-list corner case
This corner-case was triggered by a kernel commit that was not in date
order, due to a misconfigured time zone that made the commit appear three
hours older than it was.

That caused git-rev-list to traverse the commit tree in a non-obvious
order, and made it parse several of the _parents_ of the misplaced commit
before it actually parsed the commit itself. That's fine, but it meant
that the grandparents of the commit didn't get marked uninteresting,
because they had been reached through an "interesting" branch.

The reason was that "mark_parents_uninteresting()" (which is supposed to
mark all existing parents as being uninteresting - duh) didn't actually
traverse more than one level down the parent chain.

NORMALLY this is fine, since with the date-based traversal order,
grandparents won't ever even have been looked at before their parents (so
traversing the chain down isn't needed, because the next time around when
we pick out the parent we'll mark _its_ parents uninteresting), but since
we'd gotten out of order, we'd already seen the parent and thus never got
around to mark the grandparents.

Anyway, the fix is simple. Just traverse parent chains recursively.
Normally the chain won't even exist (since the parent hasn't been parsed
yet), so this is not actually going to trigger except in this strange
corner-case.

Add a comment to the simple one-liner, since this was a bit subtle, and I
had to really think things through to understand how it could happen.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-29 17:21:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
54c6870ebf Typofix: usage strings fix.
The *_usage strings should not start with "usage: ", since the
usage() function gives its own.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-27 11:53:49 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
4311d328fe Be more aggressive about marking trees uninteresting
We'll mark all the trees at the edges (as deep as we had to go to
realize that we have all the commits needed) as uninteresting.
Otherwise we'll occasionally list a lot of objects that were actually
available at the edge in a commit that we just never ended up parsing
because we could determine early that we had all relevant commits.

NOTE! The object listing is still just a _heuristic_.  It's guaranteed
to list a superset of the actual new objects, but there might be the
occasional old object in the list, just because the commit that
referenced it was much further back in the history.

For example, let's say that a recent commit is a revert of part of the
tree to much older state: since we didn't walk _that_ far back in the
commit history tree to list the commits necessary, git-rev-tree will
never have marked the old objects uninteresting, and we'll end up
listing them as "new".

That's ok.
2005-07-23 10:01:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
013aab8265 [PATCH] Dereference tag repeatedly until we get a non-tag.
When we allow a tag object in place of a commit object, we only
dereferenced the given tag once, which causes a tag that points at a tag
that points at a commit to be rejected.  Instead, dereference tag
repeatedly until we get a non-tag.

This patch makes change to two functions:

 - commit.c::lookup_commit_reference() is used by merge-base,
   rev-tree and rev-parse to convert user supplied SHA1 to that of
   a commit.
 - rev-list uses its own get_commit_reference() to do the same.

Dereferencing tags this way helps both of these uses.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-11 10:13:09 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
454fbbcde3 git-rev-list: allow missing objects when the parent is marked UNINTERESTING
We still want the "top-most" uninteresting object to exist, so that we
know that we have reached it.
2005-07-10 15:09:46 -07:00
Jon Seymour
a7336ae514 [PATCH] Ensure list insertion method does not depend on position of --merge-order argument
This change ensures that git-rev-list --merge-order produces the same result
irrespective of what position the --merge-order argument appears in the argument
list.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-06 18:03:53 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
960cea2dd1 git-rev-list: remove the DUPCHECK logic, use SEEN instead
That's what we should have done in the first place, since it not only
avoids another unnecessary flag, it also protects the commits from
showing up as duplicates later when they show up as parents of another
commit (in the pop_most_recent_commit() path).

This will hopefully also fix --topo-sort.
2005-07-06 16:52:49 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
e6c3505b44 Make sure we generate the whole commit list before trying to sort it topologically
This was my cherry-pickng merge bug.  But topo-order still shows strange
behaviour with multiple heads, so keep gitk using --merge-order for now.
2005-07-06 10:51:43 -07:00
Jon Seymour
d2775a817a [PATCH] Tidy up - slight simplification of rev-list.c
This patch implements a small tidy up of rev-list.c to reduce
(but not eliminate) the amount of ugliness associated
with the merge_order flag.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-06 10:28:02 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
d2d02a4906 Add "--topo-order" flag to use new topological sort 2005-07-06 10:25:04 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
bce6286670 Remove insane overlapping bit ranges from epoch.c
..and move the DUPCHECK to rev-list.c since both the merge-order and the
upcoming topo-sort get confused by dups.
2005-07-06 09:56:16 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
7e21c29b56 Clean up commit insertion in git-rev-list
Jon wants the commits in a different order for merge-order.
2005-07-06 09:38:06 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
f755494cec Make "insert_by_date()" match "commit_list_insert()"
Same argument order, same return type.  This allows us to use a function
pointer to choose one over the other.
2005-07-06 09:31:17 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
12ba7eaf1d Remove unnecessary usage of strncmp() in git-rev-list arg parsing.
Not only is it unnecessary, it incorrectly allows extraneous characters
at the end of the argument.

Junio noticed the --merge-order thing, and Jon points out that if we fix
that one, we should fix --show-breaks too.
2005-07-05 12:12:50 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
7a662e896b git-rev-list: make sure the output is sorted by recency
We didn't sort the refs by date, so if you had multiple refs, the end
result would not be properly sorted.
2005-07-04 16:49:37 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
7620d39fcb Make rev-list flush the stdio buffers after each rev.
We'd rather get the revisions in a slow but timely manner than
have to wait for them.
2005-07-04 16:36:48 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
12d2a18780 "git rev-list --unpacked" shows only unpacked commits
More infrastructure to do efficient incremental packs.
2005-07-03 13:29:54 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
960bba0d8c Add "--all" flag to rev-parse that shows all refs
And make git-rev-list just silently ignore non-commit refs if we're not
asking for all objects.
2005-07-03 13:07:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
6da4016aea Fix sparse warnings.
Mainly making a lot of local functions and variables be marked "static",
but there was a "zero as NULL" warning in there too.
2005-07-03 10:10:45 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
36f8d17445 Teach git-rev-list about non-commit objects
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the
proper reachability for them all. Knock wood.

Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain
commits.
2005-06-29 11:30:24 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
3c90f03d32 Prepare git-rev-list for tracking tag objects too
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these
objects", rather than limiting it to commits only.  This isn't there
yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
2005-06-29 10:40:14 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
9b66ec0474 Add "--pretty=full" format that also shows committer.
Also move the common implementation of parsing the --pretty argument
format into commit.c rather than having duplicates in diff-tree.c and
rev-list.c.
2005-06-26 17:50:46 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
9ce43d1c90 Ooh. Make git-rev-list --object associate a name with objects.
The name isn't unique, it's just the first name that object is reached
through, so it's really nothing more than a hint.
2005-06-26 15:26:05 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
9de48752fe git-rev-list: add option to list all objects (not just commits)
When you do

	git-rev-list --objects $(git-rev-parse HEAD^..HEAD)

it now lists not only the "commit difference" between the parent of HEAD
and HEAD itself (which is normally just the parent, but in the case of a
merge will be all the newly merged commits), but also all the new tree
and blob objects that weren't in the original.

NOTE! It doesn't walk all the way to the root, so it doesn't do a full
object search in the full old history.  Instead, it will only look as
far back in the history as it needs to resolve the commits.  Thus, if
the commit reverts a blob (or tree) back to a state much further back in
history, we may end up listing some blobs (or trees) as "new" even
though they exist further back.

Regardless, the list of objects will be a superset (usually exact) list
of objects needed to go from the beginning commit to ending commit.

As a particularly obvious special case,

	git-rev-list --objects HEAD

will end up listing every single object that is reachable from the HEAD
commit.

Side note: the objects are sorted by "recency", with commits first.
2005-06-24 22:56:58 -07:00
Jon Seymour
5e749e259b [PATCH] Fix for --merge-order, --max-age interaction issue
This patch fixes a problem reported by Paul Mackerras regarding the interaction
of the --merge-order and --max-age switches of git-rev-list.

This patch applies to the current Linus HEAD. A cleaner fix for the same problem
in my current HEAD will follow later.

With this change, --merge-order produces the same result as no --merge-order
on the linux-2.6 git repository, to wit:

$> git-rev-list --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655
$> git-rev-list --merge-order --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-19 20:13:18 -07:00
Jon Seymour
51b1e1713b [PATCH] Prevent git-rev-list without --merge-order producing duplicates in output
If b is reachable from a, then:

	 git-rev-list a b

argument would print one of the commits twice.

This patch fixes that problem. A previous problem fixed it for the
--merge-order switch.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-19 20:13:18 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
3d958064e0 Avoid warning about function without return.
Strangely, this warning only shows up when not compiling with "-O2",
which is why I didn't see it originally.
2005-06-18 20:02:49 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
8b3a1e056f git-rev-list: add "--bisect" flag to find the "halfway" point
This is useful for doing binary searching for problems.  You start with
a known good and known bad point, and you then test the "halfway" point
in between:

	git-rev-list --bisect bad ^good

and you test that.  If that one tests good, you now still have a known
bad case, but two known good points, and you can bisect again:

	git-rev-list --bisect bad ^good1 ^good2

and test that point.  If that point is bad, you now use that as your
known-bad starting point:

	git-rev-list --bisect newbad ^good1 ^good2

and basically at every iteration you shrink your list of commits by
half: you're binary searching for the point where the troubles started,
even though there isn't a nice linear ordering.
2005-06-17 22:54:50 -07:00
Petr Baudis
17ebe977d7 [PATCH] Tidy up some rev-list-related stuff
This patch tidies up the git-rev-list documentation and epoch.c, which
are in severe clash with the unwritten coding style now, and quite
unreadable.

It also fixes up compile failures with older compilers due to variable
declarations after code.

The patch mostly wraps lines before or on the 80th column, removes
plenty of superfluous empty lines and changes comments from // to /* */.

Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 15:59:09 -07:00
jon@blackcubes.dyndns.org
a3437b8c26 [PATCH] Modify git-rev-list to linearise the commit history in merge order.
This patch linearises the GIT commit history graph into merge order
which is defined by invariants specified in Documentation/git-rev-list.txt.

The linearisation produced by this patch is superior in an objective sense
to that produced by the existing git-rev-list implementation in that
the linearisation produced is guaranteed to have the minimum number of
discontinuities, where a discontinuity is defined as an adjacent pair of
commits in the output list which are not related in a direct child-parent
relationship.

With this patch a graph like this:

	a4 ---
	| \   \
	|  b4 |
	|/ |  |
	a3 |  |
	|  |  |
	a2 |  |
	|  |  c3
	|  |  |
	|  |  c2
	|  b3 |
	|  | /|
	|  b2 |
	|  |  c1
	|  | /
	|  b1
	a1 |
	|  |
	a0 |
	| /
	root

Sorts like this:

	= a4
	| c3
	| c2
	| c1
	^ b4
	| b3
	| b2
	| b1
	^ a3
	| a2
	| a1
	| a0
	= root

Instead of this:

	= a4
	| c3
	^ b4
	| a3
	^ c2
	^ b3
	^ a2
	^ b2
	^ c1
	^ a1
	^ b1
	^ a0
	= root

A test script, t/t6000-rev-list.sh, includes a test which demonstrates
that the linearisation produced by --merge-order has less discontinuities
than the linearisation produced by git-rev-list without the --merge-order
flag specified. To see this, do the following:

	cd t
	./t6000-rev-list.sh
	cd trash
	cat actual-default-order
	cat actual-merge-order

The existing behaviour of git-rev-list is preserved, by default. To obtain
the modified behaviour, specify --merge-order or --merge-order --show-breaks
on the command line.

This version of the patch has been tested on the git repository and also on the linux-2.6
repository and has reasonable performance on both - ~50-100% slower than the original algorithm.

This version of the patch has incorporated a functional equivalent of the Linus' output limiting
algorithm into the merge-order algorithm itself. This operates per the notes associated
with Linus' commit 337cb3fb8d.

This version has incorporated Linus' feedback regarding proposed changes to rev-list.c.
(see: [PATCH] Factor out filtering in rev-list.c)

This version has improved the way sort_first_epoch marks commits as uninteresting.

For more details about this change, refer to Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
and http://blackcubes.dyndns.org/epoch/.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-06 09:07:26 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
000182eacf pretty_print_commit: add different formats
You can ask to print out "raw" format (full headers, full body),
"medium" format (author and date, full body) or "short" format
(author only, condensed body).

Use "git-rev-list --pretty=short HEAD | less -S" for an example.
2005-06-05 09:02:03 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
337cb3fb8d git-rev-list: allow arbitrary head selections, use git-rev-tree syntax
This makes git-rev-list use the same command line syntax to mark the
commits as git-rev-tree does, and instead of just allowing a start and
end commit, it allows an arbitrary list of "interesting" and "uninteresting"
commits.

For example, imagine that you had three branches (a, b and c) that you
are interested in, but you don't want to see stuff that already exists
in another persons three releases (x, y and z). You can do

	git-rev-list a b c ^x ^y ^z

(order doesn't matter, btw - feel free to put the uninteresting ones
first or otherwise swithc them around), and it will show all the
commits that are reachable from a/b/c but not reachable from x/y/z.

The old syntax "git-rev-list start end" would not be written as
"git-rev-list start ^end", or "git-rev-list ^end start".

There's no limit to the number of heads you can specify (unlike
git-rev-tree, which can handle a maximum of 16 heads).
2005-06-04 14:38:28 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
3b42a63cb5 git-rev-list: split out commit limiting from main() too.
Ok, now I'm happier.
2005-06-02 09:25:44 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
81f2bb1f54 git-rev-list: factor out the commit printing from "main()"
Functions that do many things are bad. We should basically
just parse the arguments in main(). We're not quite there
yet, but it's a step in the right direction.
2005-06-02 09:19:53 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
9d97aa6466 git-rev-list: add "--pretty" command line option
That pretty-prints the resulting commit messages, so

	git-rev-list --pretty HEAD v2.6.12-rc5 | less -S

basically ends up being a log of the changes between -rc5
and current head.

It uses the pretty-printing helper function I just extracted
from diff-tree.c.
2005-06-01 08:42:22 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
97658004c3 git-rev-list: add "--parents" command line flag
It makes rev-list show the list of parents, the same
way git-rev-tree does (but without the expense).
2005-05-30 19:30:07 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
8906300f65 git-rev-list: use proper lazy reachability analysis
This mean sthat you can give a beginning/end pair to git-rev-list,
and it will show all entries that are reachable from the beginning
but not the end.

For example

	git-rev-list v2.6.12-rc5 v2.6.12-rc4

shows all commits that are in -rc5 but are not in -rc4.
2005-05-30 18:46:32 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
a6f68d4767 git-rev-list: add "end" commit and "--header" flag
The "end" commit is just faking it right now, it's sorting things
purely by date, so this is _not_ a reachability analysis. Some day.

The "--header" flag causes the commit message to be printed out,
with a NUL character separator after it for parseability. This
allows you to do things like use "grep -z" to grep for certain
authors etc.
2005-05-25 18:29:09 -07:00
Alexey Nezhdanov
667bb59b2d [PATCH] cleanup of in-code names
Fixes all in-code names that leaved during "big name change".

Signed-off-by: Alexey Nezhdanov <snake@penza-gsm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-19 10:52:00 -07:00
Kay Sievers
fcfda02bc7 [PATCH] control/limit output of git-rev-list
gitweb.cgi's default view is the log of the last day and git-rev-list
can stop crawling the whole repo if we have all our data to display in the
browser. Also the rss-feed query needs only the last 20 items. This
will speeds up these queries dramatically.

  usage: rev-list [OPTION] commit-id
    --max-count=nr
    --max-age=epoch
    --min-age=epoch

Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-06 09:01:27 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
3c249c9506 Add "get_sha1()" helper function.
This allows the programs to use various simplified versions of
the SHA1 names, eg just say "HEAD" for the SHA1 pointed to by
the .git/HEAD file etc.

For example, this commit has been done with

	git-commit-tree $(git-write-tree) -p HEAD

instead of the traditional "$(cat .git/HEAD)" syntax.
2005-05-01 16:36:56 -07:00
Daniel Barkalow
58e28af6a4 [PATCH] Allow multiple date-ordered lists
Make pop_most_recent_commit() return the same objects multiple times, but only
if called with different bits to mark.

This is necessary to make merge-base work again.

Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-23 20:29:22 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
64745109c4 Add "rev-list" program that uses the new time-based commit listing.
This is probably what you'd want to see for "git log".
2005-04-23 19:04:40 -07:00