Support POSIX, bashism and mixed function declarations, all four
compound command types, trailing comments and mixed whitespace.
Even though Bash allows locale-dependent characters in function names
<https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/245336/3645>, only detect function
names with characters allowed by POSIX.1-2017
<https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap03.html#tag_03_235>
for simplicity. This should cover the vast majority of use cases, and
produces system-agnostic results.
Since a word pattern has to be specified, but there is no easy way to
know the default word pattern, use the default `IFS` characters for a
starter. A later patch can improve this.
Signed-off-by: Victor Engmark <victor@engmark.name>
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We set "use warnings" in most of our perl code to catch problems. But as
the name implies, warnings just emit a message to stderr and don't
otherwise affect the program. So our tests are quite likely to miss that
warnings are being spewed, as most of them do not look at stderr.
We could ask perl to make all warnings fatal, but this is likely
annoying for non-developers, who would rather have a running program
with a warning than something that refuses to work at all.
So instead, let's teach the perl code to respect an environment variable
(GIT_PERL_FATAL_WARNINGS) to increase the severity of the warnings. This
can be set for day-to-day running if people want to be really pedantic,
but the primary use is to trigger it within the test suite.
We could also trigger that for every test run, but likewise even the
tests failing may be annoying to distro builders, etc (just as -Werror
would be for compiling C code). So we'll tie it to a special test-mode
variable (GIT_TEST_PERL_FATAL_WARNINGS) that can be set in the
environment or as a Makefile knob, and we'll automatically turn the knob
when DEVELOPER=1 is set. That should give developers and CI the more
careful view without disrupting normal users or packagers.
Note that the mapping from the GIT_TEST_* form to the GIT_* form in
test-lib.sh is necessary even if they had the same name: the perl
scripts need it to be normalized to a perl truth value, and we also have
to make sure it's exported (we might have gotten it from the
environment, but we might also have gotten it from GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
directly).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0512eabd91 ("sequencer: stop abbreviating stopped-sha file",
2020-09-25), Git was taught both to write full object names to the
stopped-sha file and to require full object names when reading. However,
a user would experience a problem if they started an interactive rebase
using an old version of Git and then continued with a current version of
Git (for example, if the system version of Git was updated in the
meantime).
Teach Git to allow object names of any length when reading.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit 9ab33150a0 ("perl: create and switch variables for hash
constants", 2020-06-22) converted each instance of the variable
$sha1_short into $oid_short in the Subversion code, since git-svn now
understands SHA-256. However, one conversion was missed.
As a result, Perl complains about the use of this variable:
Use of uninitialized value $sha1_short in regexp compilation at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.30.3/Git/SVN/Log.pm line 301, <$fh>
line 6.
Because we're parsing raw diff output here, the likelihood is very low
that we'll actually misparse the data, since the only lines we're going
to get starting with colons are the ones we're expecting. Even if we
had a newline in a path, we'd end up with a quoted path. Our regex is
just less strict than we'd like it to be.
However, it's obviously undesirable that our code is emitting Perl
warnings, so let's convert it to use the proper variable name.
Reported-by: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The idea of the `SKIP_DASHED_BUILT_INS` option is to stop hard-linking
the built-in commands as separate executables. The patches to do that
specifically excluded the three commands `receive-pack`,
`upload-archive` and `upload-pack`, though: these commands are expected
to be present in the `PATH` in their dashed form on the server side of
any fetch/push.
However, due to an oversight by myself, even if those commands were
still hard-linked, they were not installed into `bin/`.
Noticed-by: Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 2b6ad0f4bc ("rebase --rebase-merges: add support for octopus
merges", 2017-12-21) introduced a case where rollback_lock_file() was
unconditionally called twice in a row with no intervening commands.
Remove the duplicate.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modernize the test by replacing `test -e` instances with
`test_path_is_file` helper functions, and `! test -e` with
`test_path_is_missing`, for better readability and diagnostic messages.
Signed-off-by: Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A patch changing a symlink into a file is written with 2 sections (in
the code, represented as "struct patch"): firstly, the deletion of the
symlink, and secondly, the creation of the file. When applying that
patch with -R, the sections are reversed, so we get:
(1) creation of a symlink, then
(2) deletion of a file.
This causes an issue when the "deletion of a file" section is checked,
because Git observes that the so-called file is not a file but a
symlink, resulting in a "wrong type" error message.
What we want is:
(1) deletion of a file, then
(2) creation of a symlink.
In the code, this is reflected in the behavior of previous_patch() when
invoked from check_preimage() when the deletion is checked. Creation
then deletion means that when the deletion is checked, previous_patch()
returns the creation section, triggering a mode conflict resulting in
the "wrong type" error message. But deletion then creation means that
when the deletion is checked, previous_patch() returns NULL, so the
deletion mode is checked against lstat, which is what we want.
There are also other ways a patch can contain 2 sections referencing the
same file, for example, in 7a07841c0b ("git-apply: handle a patch that
touches the same path more than once better", 2008-06-27). "git apply
-R" fails in the same way, and this commit makes this case succeed.
Therefore, when building the list of sections, build them in reverse
order (by adding to the front of the list instead of the back) when -R
is passed.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was pretty tricky to verify that incomplete sideband messages are
handled correctly by the `recv_sideband()`/`demultiplex_sideband()`
code: they have to be flushed out at the end of the loop in
`recv_sideband()`, but the actual flushing is done by the
`demultiplex_sideband()` function (which therefore has to know somehow
that the loop will be done after it returns).
To catch future bugs where incomplete sideband messages might not be
shown by mistake, let's catch that condition and report a bug.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 2b695ecd74 (t5500: count objects through stderr, not trace,
2020-05-06) we tried to ensure that the "Total 3" message could be
grepped in Git's output, even if it sometimes got chopped up into
multiple lines in the trace machinery.
However, the first instance where this mattered now goes through the
sideband machinery, where it is _still_ possible for messages to get
chopped up: it *is* possible for the standard error stream to be sent
byte-for-byte and hence it can be easily interrupted. Meaning: it is
possible for the single line that we're looking for to be chopped up
into multiple sideband packets, with a primary packet being delivered
between them.
This seems to happen occasionally in the `vs-test` part of our CI
builds, i.e. with binaries built using Visual C, but not when building
with GCC or clang; The symptom is that t5500.43 fails to find a line
matching `remote: Total 3` in the `log` file, which ends in something
along these lines:
remote: Tota
remote: l 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
This should not happen, though: we have code in `demultiplex_sideband()`
_specifically_ to stitch back together lines that were delivered in
separate sideband packets.
However, this stitching was broken in a subtle way in fbd76cd450
(sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16): before that
change, incomplete sideband lines would not be flushed upon receiving a
primary packet, but after that patch, they would be.
The subtleness of this bug comes from the fact that it is easy to get
confused by the ambiguous meaning of the `break` keyword: after writing
the primary packet contents, the `break;` in the original version of
`recv_sideband()` does _not_ break out of the `while` loop, but instead
only ends the `switch` case:
while (!retval) {
[...]
switch (band) {
[...]
case 1:
/* Write the contents of the primary packet */
write_or_die(out, buf + 1, len);
/* Here, we do *not* break out of the loop, `retval` is unchanged */
break;
[...]
}
if (outbuf.len) {
/* Write any remaining sideband messages lacking a trailing LF */
strbuf_addch(&outbuf, '\n');
xwrite(2, outbuf.buf, outbuf.len);
}
In contrast, after fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on
pkt-line, 2019-01-16), the body of the `while` loop was extracted into
`demultiplex_sideband()`, crucially _including_ the logic to write
incomplete sideband messages:
switch (band) {
[...]
case 1:
*sideband_type = SIDEBAND_PRIMARY;
/* This does not break out of the loop: the loop is in the caller */
break;
[...]
}
cleanup:
[...]
/* This logic is now no longer _outside_ the loop but _inside_ */
if (scratch->len) {
strbuf_addch(scratch, '\n');
xwrite(2, scratch->buf, scratch->len);
}
The correct way to fix this is to return from `demultiplex_sideband()`
early. The caller will then write out the contents of the primary packet
and continue looping. The `scratch` buffer for incomplete sideband
messages is owned by that caller, and will continue to accumulate the
remainder(s) of those messages. The loop will only end once
`demultiplex_sideband()` returned non-zero _and_ did not indicate a
primary packet, which is the case only when we hit the `cleanup:` path,
in which we take care of flushing any unfinished sideband messages and
release the `scratch` buffer.
To ensure that this does not get broken again, we introduce a pair of
subcommands of the `pkt-line` test helper that specifically chop up the
sideband message and squeeze a primary packet into the middle.
Final note: The other test case touched by 2b695ecd74 (t5500: count
objects through stderr, not trace, 2020-05-06) is not affected by this
issue because the sideband machinery is not involved there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t7102 and t7201 still follow the old style of having blank
lines around test body, which is not consistence with our
current practice.
Let's remove those unnecessary blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some tests in these scripts are formatted using a very old style:
test_expect_success \
'title' \
'body line 1 &&
body line 2'
Updating the formatting to the modern style:
test_expect_success 'title' '
body line 1 &&
body line 2
'
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new diff option that enables ignoring changes whose all lines
(changed, removed, and added) match a given regular expression. This is
similar to the -I/--ignore-matching-lines option in standalone diff
utilities and can be used e.g. to ignore changes which only affect code
comments or to look for unrelated changes in commits containing a large
number of automatically applied modifications (e.g. a tree-wide string
replacement). The difference between -G/-S and the new -I option is
that the latter filters output on a per-change basis.
Use the 'ignore' field of xdchange_t for marking a change as ignored or
not. Since the same field is used by --ignore-blank-lines, identical
hunk emitting rules apply for --ignore-blank-lines and -I. These two
options can also be used together in the same git invocation (they are
complementary to each other).
Rename xdl_mark_ignorable() to xdl_mark_ignorable_lines(), to indicate
that it is logically a "sibling" of xdl_mark_ignorable_regex() rather
than its "parent".
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <michal@isc.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
xpparam_t structures are usually zero-initialized before their specific
fields are assigned to, but there are three locations in the tree where
that does not happen. Add the missing memset() calls in order to make
initialization of xpparam_t structures consistent tree-wide and to
prevent stack garbage from being used as field values.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <michal@isc.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Much of the benchmark code is redundant. This is
easier to understand and edit.
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Perf tests have not been linted for some time.
They've grown some seq instead of test_seq. This
runs the existing lints on the perf tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Results for the git-diff fsmonitor optimization
in patch in the parent-rev (using a 400k file repo to test)
As you can see here - git diff with fsmonitor running is
significantly better with this patch series (80% faster on my
workload)!
GIT_PERF_LARGE_REPO=~/src/server ./run v2.29.0-rc1 . -- p7519-fsmonitor.sh
Test v2.29.0-rc1 this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.46(0.82+0.64) 1.47(0.83+0.62) +0.7%
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.16(0.12+0.04) 0.17(0.12+0.05) +6.3%
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.36(0.73+0.62) 1.37(0.76+0.60) +0.7%
7519.5: diff (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.85(0.22+0.63) 0.14(0.10+0.05) -83.5%
7519.6: diff -- 0_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.08+0.05) 0.13(0.11+0.02) +8.3%
7519.7: diff -- 10_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.08+0.04) 0.13(0.09+0.04) +8.3%
7519.8: diff -- 100_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.07+0.05) 0.13(0.07+0.06) +8.3%
7519.9: diff -- 1000_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.09+0.04) 0.13(0.08+0.05) +8.3%
7519.10: diff -- 10000_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.14(0.09+0.05) 0.13(0.10+0.03) -7.1%
7519.12: status (fsmonitor=) 1.67(0.93+1.49) 1.67(0.99+1.42) +0.0%
7519.13: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.30+0.82) 0.37(0.33+0.79) +0.0%
7519.14: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.58(0.97+1.35) 1.57(0.86+1.45) -0.6%
7519.15: diff (fsmonitor=) 0.34(0.28+0.83) 0.34(0.27+0.83) +0.0%
7519.16: diff -- 0_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.08+0.02) +0.0%
7519.17: diff -- 10_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.07+0.03) 0.09(0.06+0.05) +0.0%
7519.18: diff -- 100_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.06+0.04) +0.0%
7519.19: diff -- 1000_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.05+0.05) +0.0%
7519.20: diff -- 10000_files (fsmonitor=) 0.10(0.08+0.04) 0.10(0.06+0.05) +0.0%
I also added a benchmark for a tiny git diff workload w/ a pathspec.
I see an approximately .02 second overhead added w/ and w/o fsmonitor
From looking at these results, I suspected that refresh_fsmonitor
is already happening during git diff - independent of this patch
series' optimization. Confirmed that suspicion by breaking on
refresh_fsmonitor.
(gdb) bt [simplified]
0 refresh_fsmonitor at fsmonitor.c:176
1 ie_match_stat at read-cache.c:375
2 match_stat_with_submodule at diff-lib.c:237
4 builtin_diff_files at builtin/diff.c:260
5 cmd_diff at builtin/diff.c:541
6 run_builtin at git.c:450
7 handle_builtin at git.c:700
8 run_argv at git.c:767
9 cmd_main at git.c:898
10 main at common-main.c:52
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first git status would be inflated due to warming of
filesystem cache. This makes the results comparable.
Before
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 2.52(1.59+1.56)
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.18(0.12+0.06)
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.36(0.73+0.62)
7519.7: status (fsmonitor=) 0.69(0.52+0.90)
7519.8: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.28+0.81)
7519.9: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.53(0.93+1.32)
After
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.39(0.33+0.06)
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.17(0.13+0.05)
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.34(0.77+0.56)
7519.7: status (fsmonitor=) 0.70(0.53+0.90)
7519.8: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.32+0.78)
7519.9: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.55(1.01+1.25)
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With fsmonitor enabled, the first call to match_stat_with_submodule
calls refresh_fsmonitor, incurring the overhead of reading the list of
updated files -- but run_diff_files does not respect the
CE_FSMONITOR_VALID flag.
Make use of the fsmonitor extension to skip lstat() calls on files
that fsmonitor judged as unmodified.
Notably, this change improves performance of the git shell prompt when
GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE is set.
Signed-off-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The name of the tool is 'git-filter-repo' not
'git-repo-filter'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit d572f52a64c6a69990f72ad6a09504b9b615d2e4; the
idea to detect that "test_cmp expect actual" was fed a misspelt
filename meant well, but when the version of Git tested exhibits a
bug, the reason why these two files do not match may be because one
of them did not get created as expected, in which case missing file
is not a sign of misspelt filename but is a genuine test failure.
Acked-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ted reported an old typo in the git-commit.txt and merge-options.txt.
Namely, the phrase "Signed-off-by line" was used without either a
definite nor indefinite article.
Upon examination, it seems that the documentation (including items in
Documentation/, but also option help strings) have been quite
inconsistent on usage when referring to `Signed-off-by`.
First, very few places used a definite or indefinite article with the
phrase "Signed-off-by line", but that was the initial typo that led
to this investigation. So, normalize using either an indefinite or
definite article consistently.
The original phrasing, in Commit 3f971fc425 (Documentation updates,
2005-08-14), is "Add Signed-off-by line". Commit 6f855371a5 (Add
--signoff, --check, and long option-names. 2005-12-09) switched to
using "Add `Signed-off-by:` line", but didn't normalize the former
commit to match. Later commits seem to have cut and pasted from one
or the other, which is likely how the usage became so inconsistent.
Junio stated on the git mailing list in
<xmqqy2k1dfoh.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> a preference to leave off
the colon. Thus, prefer `Signed-off-by` (with backticks) for the
documentation files and Signed-off-by (without backticks) for option
help strings.
Additionally, Junio argued that "trailer" is now the standard term to
refer to `Signed-off-by`, saying that "becomes plenty clear that we
are not talking about any random line in the log message". As such,
prefer "trailer" over "line" anywhere the former word fits.
However, leave alone those few places in documentation that use
Signed-off-by to refer to the process (rather than the specific
trailer), or in places where mail headers are generally discussed in
comparison with Signed-off-by.
Reported-by: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description on sign-off and DCO was written back in the days
where there was only a choice between "use sign-off and it means the
contributor agrees to the Linux-kernel style DCO" and "not using
sign-off at all will make your patch unusable". These days, we are
trying to clarify that the exact meaning of a sign-off varies
project to project.
Let's be more explicit when presenting what _our_ rules are. It is
of secondary importance that it originally came from the kernel
project, so move the description as a historical note at the end,
while cautioning that what a sign-off means to us may be different from
what it means to other projects contributors may have been used to.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Building on past documentation improvements in b2c150d3aa (Expand
documentation describing --signoff, 2016-01-05), further clarify
that any project using Git may and often does set its own policy.
However, leave intact reference to the Linux DCO, which Git also
uses. It is reasonable for Git to advocate for its own Signed-off-by
methodology in its documentation, as long as the documentation
remains respectful that YMMV and other projects may well have very
different contributor representations tied to Signed-off-by.
Signed-off-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Almost identical text on the signed-off-by trailer appears in the
documentation for "git commit" and "git merge" and its friends.
Introduce a new signoff-option.txt file to be shared. A couple of
things of note are:
- The short-form "-s" is available only in "git commit", but not in
commands that are friends of "git merge", as it is used as a
short-hand for "--strategy".
- The original lacks description on the negated "--no-signoff" form
on "git commit" side, but it equally is applicable. It however
was unclear in the original text that not adding a Signed-off-by
trailer is the default, so rephrase to explain it as a way to
countermand a --signoff option that appeared earlier on the same
command line.
This is in preparation to apply a further clarification on what
exactly the Signed-off-by trailer means.
Suggested-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid placing `git` upstream in a pipe since doing so throws away
its exit code, thus an unexpected failure may go unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Amanda Shafack <shafack.likhene@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the --run flag to run just two or three tests from a test
file which contains several dozen tests, having every skipped test print
out dozens of lines of output for the test code for that skipped test
(in addition to the TAP output line) adds up to hundreds or thousands of
lines of irrelevant output that make it very hard to fish out the
relevant results you were looking for. Simplify the output for skipped
tests to remove this extra output, leaving only the TAP output line
(i.e. the line reading "ok <number> # skip <test-description>", which
already mentions that the test was "skip"ped).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the new ability to pass --run=setup to select which tests to run,
it is more convenient if tests use the term "setup" instead of synonyms
like 'prepare' or 'rebuild'. There are undoubtedly many other tests in
our testsuite that could be changed over too, these are just a couple
that I ran into.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many of our test scripts have several "setup" tests. It's a lot easier
to say
./t0050-filesystem.sh --run=setup,9
in order to run all the setup tests as well as test #9, than it is to
track down what all the setup tests are and enter all their numbers in
the list. Also, I often find myself wanting to run just one or a couple
tests from the test file, but I don't know the numbering of any of the
tests -- to get it I either have to first run the whole test file (or
start counting by hand or figure out some other clever but non-obvious
tricks). It's really convenient to be able to just look at the test
description(s) and then run
./t6416-recursive-corner-cases.sh --run=symlink
or
./t6402-merge-rename.sh --run='setup,unnecessary update'
Add such an ability to test selection which relies on merely matching
against the test description.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t7518.1 added in commit 862e80a413 ("ident: handle NULL email when
complaining of empty name", 2017-02-23), was trying to make sure that
the test with an empty ident did not segfault and did not result in
glibc quiety translating a NULL pointer into a name of "(null)". It did
the latter by ensuring that a grep for "null" didn't appear in the
output, but on one automatic CI run I observed the following output:
fatal: empty ident name (for <runner@fv-az128-670.gcliasfzo2nullsdbrimjtbyhg.cx.internal.cloudapp.net>) not allowed
Note that 'null' appears as a substring of the domain name, found
within 'gcliasfzo2nullsdbrimjtbyhg'. Tighten the test by searching for
"(null)" rather than "null".
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add test cases of various combinations of the commit.gpgsign option and
--gpg-sign, --no-gpg-sign flags with rebase -r with the default merge
strategy. This excercises a different code-path from those with octopus
merges or overridden merge strategy with rebase -s.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Čavoj <samuel@cavoj.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The merge subcommand launched for merges with non-default strategy would
use its own default behaviour to decide how to sign commits, regardless
of what opts->gpg_sign was set to. For example the --no-gpg-sign flag
given to rebase explicitly would get ignored, if commit.gpgsign was set
to true.
Fix the issue and add a test case excercising this behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Čavoj <samuel@cavoj.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When performing a rebase with --rebase-merges using either a custom
strategy specified with -s or an octopus merge, and at the same time
having gpgsign enabled (either rebase -S or config commit.gpgsign), the
operation would fail on making the merge commit. Instead of "-S%s" with
the key id substituted, only the bare key id would get passed to the
underlying merge command, which tried to interpret it as a ref.
Fix the issue and add test cases as suggested by Johannes Schindelin and
Junio C Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Čavoj <samuel@cavoj.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* https://github.com/prati0100/git-gui:
git-gui: blame: prevent tool tips from sticking around after Command-Tab
git-gui: improve dark mode support
git-gui: fix mixed tabs and spaces; prefer tabs
Make sure `git gui blame` tooltips are destroyed once the window loses
focus on MacOS.
* sh/blame-tooltip:
git-gui: blame: prevent tool tips from sticking around after Command-Tab
On Mac, tooltips are not automatically removed when a window loses
focus. Furthermore, mouse-move events are only dispatched to the active
window, which means that if we Command-tab to another application while
a tool tip is showing, the tool tip will stay there forever (in front of
other applications). So we must hide it manually when we lose focus.
Do this unconditionally here (i.e. without if {[is_MacOSX]}); it
shouldn't hurt on other platforms, even though they don't seem to have
this problem.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@haller-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <me@yadavpratyush.com>
Per IRC:
[19:52] <lkmandy> With respect to the MyFirstContribution tutorial, I
will like to suggest this - Under the section "Adding Documentation",
just before the "make all doc" command, it will be really helpful to
prompt a user to check if they have the asciidoc package installed, if
they don't, the command should be provided or they can just be pointed
to install it
So, let's move the note about the dependency to before the build command
blockquote.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make `git credential fill` honour the core.askPass variable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Koutcher <thomas.koutcher@online.fr>
[jk: added test]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Testcases 12b and 12c were both slightly weird; they were marked as
having a weird resolution, but with the note that even straightforward
simple rules can give weird results when the input is bizarre.
However, during optimization work for merge-ort, I discovered a
significant speedup that is possible if we add one more fairly
straightforward rule: we don't bother doing directory rename detection
if there are no new files added to the directory on the other side of
the history to be affected by the directory rename. This seems like an
obvious and straightforward rule, but there was one funny corner case
where directory rename detection could affect only existing files: the
funny corner case where two directories are renamed into each other on
opposite sides of history. In other words, it only results in a
different output for testcases 12b and 12c.
Since we already thought testcases 12b and 12c were weird anyway, and
because the optimization often has a significant effect on common cases
(but is entirely prevented if we can't change how 12b and 12c function),
let's add the additional rule and tweak how 12b and 12c work. Split
both testcases into two (one where we add no new files, and one where
the side that doesn't rename a given directory will add files to it),
and mark them with the new expectation.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While investigating the issues highlighted by the testcase in the
previous patch, I also found a shortcoming in the directory rename
detection rules. Split testcase 6b into two to explain this issue
and update directory-rename-detection.txt to remove one of the previous
rules that I know believe to be detrimental. Also, update the wording
around testcase 8e; while we are not modifying the results of that
testcase, we were previously unsure of the appropriate resolution of
that test and the new rule makes the previously chosen resolution for
that testcase a bit more solid.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new testcase modelled on a real world repository example that
served multiple purposes:
* it uncovered a bug in the current directory rename detection
implementation.
* it is a good test of needing to do directory rename detection for
a series of commits instead of just one (and uses rebase instead
of just merge like all the other tests in this testfile).
* it is an excellent stress test for some of the optimizations in
my new merge-ort engine
I can expand on the final item later when I have submitted more of
merge-ort, but the bug is the main immediate concern. It arises as
follows:
* dir/subdir/ has several files
* almost all files in dir/subdir/ are renamed to folder/subdir/
* one of the files in dir/subdir/ is renamed to folder/subdir/newsubdir/
* If the other side of history (that doesn't do the renames) adds a
new file to dir/subdir/, where should it be placed after the merge?
The most obvious two choices are: (1) leave the new file in dir/subdir/,
don't make it follow the rename, and (2) move the new file to
folder/subdir/, following the rename of most the files. However,
there's a possible third choice here: (3) move the new file to
folder/subdir/newsubdir/. The choice reinforce the fact that
merge.directoryRenames=conflict is a good default, but when the merge
machinery needs to stick it somewhere and notify the user of the
possibility that they might want to place it elsewhere. Surprisingly,
the current code would always choose (3), while the real world
repository was clearly expecting (2) -- move the file along with where
the herd of files was going, not with the special exception.
The problem here is that for the majority of the file renames,
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/
is actually represented as
dir/ -> folder/
This directory rename would have a big weight associated with it since
most the files followed that rename. However, we always consult the
most immediate directory first, and there is only one rename rule for
it:
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
Since this rule is the only one for mapping from dir/subdir/, it
automatically wins and that directory rename was followed instead of the
desired dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/.
Unfortunately, the fix is a bit involved so for now just add the
testcase documenting the issue.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The regression tests for directory rename detection were renamed from
t6043 to t6423 in commit 919df31955 ("Collect merge-related tests to
t64xx", 2020-08-10); update this file to match. Also, add a small
clarification to nearby text while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `--bisect-autostart` subcommand is no longer used from the
git-bisect.sh shell script. Instead the function
`bisect_autostart()` is directly called from the C implementation.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Mentored-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanushree Tumane <tanushreetumane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miriam Rubio <mirucam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
