This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".
This is useful to
- make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
e.g. SIGSEGV, and
- advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An incorrect command "git mv subdir /outer/space" threw the
subdirectory to outside of the repository and then noticed that
/outer/space/subdir/ would be outside of the repository. The
error checking is backwards.
This fixes the issue by being careful about use of the return
value of get_pathspec(). Since the implementation already has
handcrafted loop to munge each path on the command line, we use
prefix_path() instead.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As pointed out by Junio, it's unnecessary to use "grep -E" and ".+" when we can
just use "grep" and "..*".
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While 'init-db' still is and probably will always remain a valid git
command for obvious backward compatibility reasons, it would be a good
idea to move shipped tools and docs to using 'init' instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A move of a directory should find the entries in the index by
searching for the name _including_ the slash. Otherwise, the
directory can be shadowed by a file when it matches the prefix
and is lexicographically smaller, e.g. "ab.c" shadows "ab/".
Noticed by Sergey Vlasov.
[jc: added Sergey's original reproduction recipe as a test case
at the end of t7001.]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The command updated the cache without invalidating the cache
tree entries while removing an existing entry.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since the normalized basename of "." is "", the check for directory
failed erroneously.
Noticed by Fredrik Kuivinen.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
As noted by Fredrik Kuivinen, without this patch, git-mv fails on
git-mv README README-renamed
because "README" is a prefix of "README-renamed".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fixes the builtin mv for the test which Josef provided, and also
fixes moving directories into existing directories, as noted by Jon Smirl.
In case the destination exists, fail early (this cannot be overridden
by -f).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If dir2 already exists, git-mv should move dir1 _into_dir2/.
Noticed by Jon Smirl.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-mv needs to be run from the base directory so that
the check if a file is under revision also covers files
outside of a subdirectory. Previously, e.g. in the git repo,
cd Documentation; git-mv ../README .
produced the error
Error: '../README' not under version control
The test is extended for this case; it previously only tested
one direction.
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Junio C Hamano, Sat, Nov 26, 2005 03:45:52 +0100:
> I haven't seriously used git-mv myself, so
> somebody needs to test it, and if it actually works and Ack on
> it, please.
It actually works in subdirs.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
