This commit makes git_patchset_body easier to read, and reduces level of
nesting and indent level. It adds more lines that it removes because of
extra parameter passing in subroutines, and subroutine calls in
git_patchset_body. Also because there are few added comments.
Below there are descriptions of all split-off subroutines:
Separate formatting "git diff" header into format_git_diff_header_line.
While at it fix it so it always escapes pathname. It would be even more
useful if we decide to use `--cc' for merges, and need to generate by
hand empty patches for anchors.
Separate formatting extended (git) diff header lines into
format_extended_diff_header_line. This one is copied without changes.
Separate formatting two-lines from-file/to-file diff header into
format_diff_from_to_header subroutine. While at it fix it so it always
escapes pathname. Beware calling convention: it takes _two_ lines.
Separate generating %from and %to hashes (with info used among others to
generate hyperlinks) into parse_from_to_diffinfo subroutine. This one is
copied without changes.
Separate checking if file was deleted (and among others therefore does
not have link to the result file) into is_deleted subroutine. This would
allow us to easily change the algotithm to find if file is_deleted in
the result.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Check if 'hp' (hash_parent) parameter to 'commitdiff' view is one of
'h' (hash) commit parents, i.e. if commitdiff is of the form
"<commit>^<n> <commit>", and mark it as such in the bottom part of
navigation bar. The "next" link in commitdiff view was introduced
in commit 151602df00
If 'hb' is n-th parent of 'h', show the following at the bottom
of navigation bar:
(from parent n: _commit_)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since commit-fb1dde4a we show combined diff for merges in 'commitdiff'
view, and since commit-208ecb2e also in 'commit' view. Sometimes
though one would want to see diff to one of merge commit parents. It
is easy in 'commit' view: in the commit header part there are "diff"
links for each of parent header. This commit adds such links also for
'commitdiff' view.
Add to difftree / whatchanged table row with "1", "2", ... links to
'commitdiff' view for diff with n-th parent for merge commits, as a
table header. This is visible only in 'comitdiff' view, and only for
a merge commit (comit with more than one parent).
To save space links are shown as "n", where "n" is number of a parent,
and not as for example shortened (to 7 characters) sha1 of a parent
commit. To make it easier to discover what links is for, each link
has 'title' attribute explaining the link.
Note that one would need to remember that difftree table in 'commit'
view has one less column (it doesn't have "patch" link column), if one
would want to add such table header also in 'commit' view.
Example output:
1 2 3
Makefile patch | diff1 | diff2 | diff3 | blob | history
cache.h patch | diff1 | diff2 | diff3 | blob | history
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
tutorial: use "project history" instead of "changelog" in header
Documentation: user-manual todo
user-manual: add a missing section ID
Fix typo in remote branch example in git user manual
user-manual: quick-start updates
In the kernel we have a rule for *.c -> *.s files exactly because
it's nice to be able to easily say "ok, what does that generate".
Here's a patch to add such a rule to git too, in case anybody is
interested. It makes it much simpler to just do
make sha1_file.s
and look at the compiler-generated output that way, rather than having to
fire up gdb on the resulting binary.
(Add -fverbose-asm or something if you want to, it can make the result
even more readable)
[jc: add *.s to .gitignore]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The word "changelog" seems a little too much like jargon to me, and beginners
must understand section headers so they know where to look for help.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
In Documentation/user-manual.txt the example
$ git checkout --track -b origin/maint maint
under "Getting updates with git pull", should read
$ git checkout --track -b maint origin/maint
This was noticed by Ron, and reported through
http://bugs.debian.org/427502
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Update text to reflect new position in appendix.
Update the name to reflect the fact that this is closer to reference
than tutorial documentation (as suggested by Jonas Fonseca).
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Make git-mergetool prefer meld under GNOME, and kdiff3 under KDE. When
considering emerge and vimdiff, check $VISUAL and $EDITOR to see which the
user might prefer.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
When refactoring code to split one iteration of a too deeply
nested loop into a separate function, it inevitably makes the
indentation levels shallower (that's the sole point of such a
refactoring). With "git blame -w", you can ignore such
re-indentation and pass blame for such moved lines to the
parent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When two branches are merged that modify a subdirectory (possibly in
different intermediate steps) such that both end up identical, then
rev-list chooses only one branch. But when we filter history, we want to
keep both branches. Therefore, we must use --full-history.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We can use git rev-list --parents when we list the commits to rewrite.
It is not necessary to run git rev-list --parents for each commit in the
loop.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With git-filter-branch --subdirectory-filter <subdirectory> you can
get at the history, as seen by a certain subdirectory. The history
of the rewritten branch will only contain commits that touched that
subdirectory, and the subdirectory will be rewritten to be the new
project root.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, when the local repository has a branch "frotz" and the
remote repository has a tag "frotz" (but not branch "frotz"),
"git-push frotz" mistakenly updated the tag at the remote side.
This was because the partial refname matching code was applied
independently on both source and destination side.
With this fix, when a colon-less refspec is given to git-push,
we first match it with the refs in the source repository, and
update the matching ref in the destination repository.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git push A:B" is given, and A (or B) is not a full refname
that begins with refs/, we require an unambiguous match with an
existing ref. For this purpose, a match with a local branch or
a tag (i.e. refs/heads/A and refs/tags/A) is called a "strong
match", and any other match is called a "weak match". A partial
refname is unambiguous when there is only one strong match with
any number of weak matches, or when there is only one weak match
and no other match.
However, as reported by Sparse with Ramsay Jones recently,
count_refspec_match() function had a bug where a variable in an
inner block masked a different variable of the same name, which
caused the weak matches to be ignored.
This fixes it, and adds tests for the fix.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When checking what ref the source refspec matches, we have no
business setting the default for the destination, so move that
code lower. Also simplify the result from the code block that
matches the source side by making it set matched_src only upon
unambiguous match.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This refactors open-coded sequence to create a new "struct ref"
and link it to the tail of dst list into a new function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This does not change functionality; just splits one block that
is deeply nested and indented out of a huge loop into a separate
function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In several of the text messages, the tense of the verb is inconsistent.
For example, "Add" vs "Creates". It is customary to use imperative for
command description.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
unzip -v on (at least) Ubuntu prints a screenful of version info
to stdout. Get rid of it since we only want to know if unzip is
installed or not.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
This was moved to the setup_revisions parsing in 7cbcf4d5, so it was
never being triggered.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make git-cvsserver understand some options inspired by
git-daemon, namely --base-path, --export-all, --strict-paths.
Also allow the caller to specify a whitelist of allowed
directories, again similar to git-daemon.
While already adding option parsing also support the common
--help and --version options.
Rationale:
While the gitcvs.enabled configuration option already
offers means to limit git-cvsserver access to a repository,
there are some use cases where other methods of access
control prove to be more useful.
E.g. if setting up a pserver for a collection of public
repositories one might want limit the exported repositories
to exactly the directory this collection is located whithout
having to worry about other repositories that might lie around
with the configuration variable set (never trust your users ;)
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The path submitted with the Root request has to be absolute
(cvs does it this way and it may save us some sanity checks
later)
If multiple roots are specified (e.g. because we use
pserver authentication which will already include the
root), ensure that they say all the same.
Probably neither is a security risk, and neither should ever
be triggered by a sane client, but when validating
input data, it's better to be save than sorry.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Define __slots__ for the Commit class. This reserves space in each Commit
object for only the defined variables. On my system this reduces heap usage
when viewing a kernel repo by 12% ~= 55868 KB.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This changes the Commit class to use new-style class, which has
been available since Python 2.2 (Dec 2001). This is a necessary
step in order to use __slots__[] declaration, so that we can
reduce the memory footprint in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Although it is not advisable, we have always allowed a branch
and a tag to have the same basename (i.e. it is not illegal to
have refs/heads/frotz and refs/tags/frotz at the same time).
When talking about a specific commit, the interpretation of
'frotz' has always been "use tag and then check branch",
although we warn when ambiguities exist.
However "git checkout $name" is defined to (1) first see if it
matches the branch name, and if so switch to that branch; (2)
otherwise it is an instruction to detach HEAD to point at the
commit named by $name. We did not follow this definition when
$name appeared under both refs/heads/ and refs/tags/ -- we
switched to the branch but read the tree from the tagged commit,
which was utterly bogus.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
