The existence of hashmap_free() and hashmap_free_entries() confused me,
and the docs weren't clear enough. We are dealing with a map table,
entries in that table, and possibly also things each of those entries
point to. I had to consult other source code examples and the
implementation. Add a brief note to clarify the differences. This will
become even more important once we introduce a new
hashmap_partial_clear() function which will add the question of whether
the table itself has been freed.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 7d78d5fc1a (ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested
commits/trees, 2020-10-08), we added a check that determines whether
there is already a workflow run for the given commit (or at least tree),
and if found, skips the current run.
We just worked around an issue with this check where older runs might
unexpectedly miss the `head_commit` attribute.
Let's be even more defensive by catching all kinds of exceptions,
logging them as warnings, and continue the run without skipping it
(after all, if the check fails, we _want_ to continue with the run).
This commit is best viewed with the diff option `-w` because it
increases the indentation level of the GitHub Action script by two
spaces, surrounding it by a `try ... catch` construct.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently older GitHub runs at least _sometimes_ lack information about
the `head_commit` (and therefore the `ci-config` check will fail with
"TypeError: Cannot read property 'tree_id' of null") in the check added
in 7d78d5fc1a (ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested
commits/trees, 2020-10-08).
Let's work around this by adding a defensive condition.
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
deref_tag() can return NULL. Exit gracefully in that case instead
of blindly dereferencing the return value.
.name shouldn't ever be NULL, but grep_object() handles that case
explicitly, so let's be defensive here as well and show the broken
object's ID if it happens to lack a name after all.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git worktree list" shows the absolute path to the working tree,
the commit that is checked out and the name of the branch. It is not
immediately obvious which of the worktrees, if any, are locked.
"git worktree remove" refuses to remove a locked worktree with
an error message. If "git worktree list" told which worktrees
are locked in its output, the user would not even attempt to
remove such a worktree, or would realize that
"git worktree remove -f -f <path>" is required.
Teach "git worktree list" to append "locked" to its output.
The output from the command becomes like so:
$ git worktree list
/path/to/main abc123 [master]
/path/to/worktree 456def (detached HEAD)
/path/to/locked-worktree 123abc (detached HEAD) locked
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reduce the dependency on external tools by generating the distribution
archives for HTML documentation and manpages using git commands instead
of tar. This gives the archive entries the same meta data as those in
the dist archive for binaries.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recently, a user had an issue due to combining
fetch.writeCommitGraph=true with core.commitGraph=false. The root bug
has been resolved by preventing commit-graph writes when
core.commitGraph is disabled. This happens inside the 'git commit-graph
write' command, but we can be more aware of this situation and prevent
that process from ever starting in the 'commit-graph' maintenance task.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I am excited. Because I like a lot languages, and because I believe this
is the way to contribute to a large number of Portuguese speaking
person.
Jiang Xin and last Portuguese team gave me the lead. Thank you very
much. Honored to be a part of such a project.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <hello@brighterdan.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=NqjO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v2.29.0-rc1' of github.com:git/git
Git 2.29-rc1
* tag 'v2.29.0-rc1' of github.com:git/git:
Git 2.29-rc1
doc: fix the bnf like style of some commands
doc: git-remote fix ups
doc: use linkgit macro where needed.
git-bisect-lk2009: make continuation of list indented
ci: do not skip tagged revisions in GitHub workflows
ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested commits/trees
tests: avoid using the branch name `main`
t1415: avoid using `main` as ref name
Makefile: ASCII-sort += lists
help: do not expect built-in commands to be hardlinked
index-pack: make get_base_data() comment clearer
index-pack: drop type_cas mutex
index-pack: restore "resolving deltas" progress meter
compat/mingw.h: drop extern from function declaration
GitHub workflow: automatically follow minor updates of setup-msbuild
t5534: split stdout and stderr redirection
The core.commitGraph config setting can be set to 'false' to prevent
parsing commits from the commit-graph file(s). This causes an issue when
trying to write with "--split" which needs to distinguish between
commits that are in the existing commit-graph layers and commits that
are not. The existing mechanism uses parse_commit() and follows by
checking if there is a 'graph_pos' that shows the commit was parsed from
the commit-graph file.
When core.commitGraph=false, we do not parse the commits from the
commit-graph and 'graph_pos' indicates that no commits are in the
existing file. The --split logic moves forward creating a new layer on
top that holds all reachable commits, then possibly merges down into
those layers, resulting in duplicate commits. The previous change makes
that merging process more robust to such a situation in case it happens
in the written commit-graph data.
The easy answer here is to avoid writing a commit-graph if reading the
commit-graph is disabled. Since the resulting commit-graph will would not
be read by subsequent Git processes. This is more natural than forcing
core.commitGraph to be true for the 'write' process.
Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Thomas reported [1] that a "git fetch" command was failing with an error
saying "unexpected duplicate commit id". The root cause is that they had
fetch.writeCommitGraph enabled which generates commit-graph chains, and
this instance was merging two layers that both contained the same commit
ID.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/55f8f00c-a61c-67d4-889e-a9501c596c39@virtuell-zuhause.de/
The initial assumption is that Git would not write a commit ID into a
commit-graph layer if it already exists in a lower commit-graph layer.
Somehow, this specific case did get into that situation, leading to this
error.
While unexpected, this isn't actually invalid (as long as the two layers
agree on the metadata for the commit). When we parse a commit that does
not have a graph_pos in the commit_graph_data_slab, we use binary search
in the commit-graph layers to find the commit and set graph_pos. That
position is never used again in this case. However, when we parse a
commit from the commit-graph file, we load its parents from the
commit-graph and assign graph_pos at that point. If those parents were
already parsed from the commit-graph, then nothing needs to be done.
Otherwise, this graph_pos is a valid position in the commit-graph so we
can parse the parents, when necessary.
Thus, this die() is too aggressive. The easiest thing to do would be to
ignore the duplicates.
If we only ignore the duplicates, then we will produce a commit-graph
that has identical commit IDs listed in adjacent positions. This excess
data will never be removed from the commit-graph, which could cascade
into significantly bloated file sizes.
Thankfully, we can collapse the list to erase the duplicate commit
pointers. This allows us to get the end result we want without extra
memory costs and minimal CPU time.
The root cause is due to disabling core.commitGraph, which prevents
parsing commits from the lower layers during a 'git commit-graph write
--split' command. Since we use the 'graph_pos' value to determine
whether a commit is in a lower layer, we never discover that those
commits are already in the commit-graph chain and add them to the top
layer. This layer is then merged down, creating duplicates.
The test added in t5324-split-commit-graph.sh fails without this change.
However, we still have not completely removed the need for this
duplicate check. That will come in a follow-up change.
Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de>
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not all developers are aware of `git diff --check` to warn
about whitespace issues. Running a check when a pull request is
opened or updated can save time for reviewers and the submitter.
A GitHub workflow will run when a pull request is created or the
contents are updated to check the patch series. A pull request
provides the necessary information (number of commits) to only
check the patch series.
To ensure the developer is aware of any issues, a comment will be
added to the pull request with the check errors.
Signed-off-by: Chris. Webster <chris@webstech.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test preparation for the switch of default branch name continues.
* js/default-branch-name-part-3:
tests: avoid using the branch name `main`
t1415: avoid using `main` as ref name
The logic to skip testing on the tagged commit and the tag itself
was not quite consistent which led to failure of Windows test
tasks. It has been revamped to consistently skip revisions that
have already been tested, based on the tree object of the revision.
* js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests:
ci: do not skip tagged revisions in GitHub workflows
ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested commits/trees
Doc fixes.
* ja/misc-doc-fixes:
doc: fix the bnf like style of some commands
doc: git-remote fix ups
doc: use linkgit macro where needed.
git-bisect-lk2009: make continuation of list indented
Hotfix and clean-up for the jt/threaded-index-pack topic that has
graduated to v2.29-rc0.
* jk/index-pack-hotfixes:
index-pack: make get_base_data() comment clearer
index-pack: drop type_cas mutex
index-pack: restore "resolving deltas" progress meter
In command line options, variables are entered between < and >
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When `master` is tagged, and then both `master` and the tag are pushed,
Travis CI will happily build both. That is a waste of energy, which is
why we skip the build for `master` in that case.
Our GitHub workflow is also triggered by tags. However, the run would
fail because the `windows-test` jobs are _not_ skipped on tags, but the
`windows-build` job _is skipped (and therefore fails to upload the
build artifacts needed by the test jobs).
In addition, we just added logic to our GitHub workflow that will skip
runs altogether if there is already a successful run for the same commit
or at least for the same tree.
Let's just change the GitHub workflow to no longer specifically skip
tagged revisions.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pushing a commit that has already passed a CI or PR build
successfully, it makes sense to save some energy and time and skip the
new build.
Let's teach our GitHub workflow to do that.
For good measure, we also compare the tree ID, which is what we actually
test (the commit ID might have changed due to a reworded commit message,
which should not affect the outcome of the run).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since Git now supports hashes other than SHA-1, the hash length isn't
guaranteed to be 40 characters. Replace $_x40 with a hash-agnostic OID
pattern.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the git-resurrect script, there are a few lines that are mistakenly
indented with spaces. Replace these lines with tabs.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the near future, we want to change Git's default branch name to
`main`. In preparation for that, stop using it as a branch name in the
test suite. Replace that branch name by `topic`, the same name we used
to rename variations of `master` in b6211b89eb (tests: avoid variations
of the `master` branch name, 2020-09-26).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a patch series that will change the fall-back for
`init.defaultBranch` to `main`, let's not use `main` as ref name in this
test script.
Otherwise, the `git for-each-ref ... | grep main` which wants to catch
those refs would also unexpectedly catch `refs/heads/main`.
Since the refs in question are worktree-local ones (i.e. each worktree
has their own, just like `HEAD`), and since the test case already uses a
secondary worktree called "second", let's use the name "first" for those
refs instead.
While at it, adjust the test titles that talk about a "repo" when they
meant a "worktree" instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 805d9eaf5e (Makefile: ASCII-sort += lists, 2020-03-21), the += lists
in the Makefile were sorted into ASCII order. Since then, more out of
order elements have been introduced. Sort these lists back into ASCII
order.
This patch is best viewed with `--color-moved`.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
