Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
288ed98bf7 Merge branch 'tb/bloom-improvements'
"git commit-graph write" learned to limit the number of bloom
filters that are computed from scratch with the --max-new-filters
option.

* tb/bloom-improvements:
  commit-graph: introduce 'commitGraph.maxNewFilters'
  builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>'
  commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts'
  bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty
  bloom/diff: properly short-circuit on max_changes
  bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings'
  bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in two
  commit-graph.c: store maximum changed paths
  commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths'
  t/helper/test-read-graph.c: prepare repo settings
  commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more places
  t4216: use an '&&'-chain
  commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'
2020-09-29 14:01:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4d515253af Merge branch 'cd/commit-graph-doc'
Doc update.

* cd/commit-graph-doc:
  commit-graph-format.txt: fix no-parent value
2020-09-22 12:36:30 -07:00
Taylor Blau
59f0d5073f bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty
When a changed-path Bloom filter has either zero, or more than a
certain number (commonly 512) of entries, the commit-graph machinery
encodes it as "missing". More specifically, it sets the indices adjacent
in the BIDX chunk as equal to each other to indicate a "length 0"
filter; that is, that the filter occupies zero bytes on disk.

This has heretofore been fine, since the commit-graph machinery has no
need to care about these filters with too few or too many changed paths.
Both cases act like no filter has been generated at all, and so there is
no need to store them.

In a subsequent commit, however, the commit-graph machinery will learn
to only compute Bloom filters for some commits in the current
commit-graph layer. This is a change from the current implementation
which computes Bloom filters for all commits that are in the layer being
written. Critically for this patch, only computing some of the Bloom
filters means adding a third state for length 0 Bloom filters: zero
entries, too many entries, or "hasn't been computed".

It will be important for that future patch to distinguish between "not
representable" (i.e., zero or too-many changed paths), and "hasn't been
computed". In particular, we don't want to waste time recomputing
filters that have already been computed.

To that end, change how we store Bloom filters in the "computed but not
representable" category:

  - Bloom filters with no entries are stored as a single byte with all
    bits low (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return
    "definitely not")

  - Bloom filters with too many entries are stored as a single byte with
    all bits set high (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will
    return "maybe").

These rules are sufficient to not incur a behavior change by changing
the on-disk representation of these two classes. Likewise, no
specification changes are necessary for the commit-graph format, either:

  - Filters that were previously empty will be recomputed and stored
    according to the new rules, and

  - old clients reading filters generated by new clients will interpret
    the filters correctly and be none the wiser to how they were
    generated.

Clients will invoke the Bloom machinery in more cases than before, but
this can be addressed by returning a NULL filter when all bits are set
high. This can be addressed in a future patch.

Note that this does increase the size of on-disk commit-graphs, but far
less than other proposals. In particular, this is generally more
efficient than storing a bitmap for which commits haven't computed their
Bloom filters. Storing a bitmap incurs a penalty of one bit per commit,
whereas storing explicit filters as above incurs a penalty of one byte
per too-large or empty commit.

In practice, these boundary commits likely occupy a small proportion of
the overall number of commits, and so the size penalty is likely smaller
than storing a bitmap for all commits.

See, for example, these relative proportions of such boundary commits
(collected by SZEDER Gábor):

                  |     Percentage of     |    commit-graph   |           |
                  |   commits modifying   |     file size     |           |
                  ├────────┬──────────────┼───────────────────┤    pct.   |
                  | 0 path | >= 512 paths | before  |  after  |   change  |
 ┌────────────────┼────────┼──────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───────────┤
 | android-base   | 13.20% |        0.13% | 37.468M | 37.534M | +0.1741 % |
 | cmssw          |  0.15% |        0.23% | 17.118M | 17.119M | +0.0091 % |
 | cpython        |  3.07% |        0.01% |  7.967M |  7.971M | +0.0423 % |
 | elasticsearch  |  0.70% |        1.00% |  8.833M |  8.835M | +0.0128 % |
 | gcc            |  0.00% |        0.08% | 16.073M | 16.074M | +0.0030 % |
 | gecko-dev      |  0.14% |        0.64% | 59.868M | 59.874M | +0.0105 % |
 | git            |  0.11% |        0.02% |  3.895M |  3.895M | +0.0020 % |
 | glibc          |  0.02% |        0.10% |  3.555M |  3.555M | +0.0021 % |
 | go             |  0.00% |        0.07% |  3.186M |  3.186M | +0.0018 % |
 | homebrew-cask  |  0.40% |        0.02% |  7.035M |  7.035M | +0.0065 % |
 | homebrew-core  |  0.01% |        0.01% | 11.611M | 11.611M | +0.0002 % |
 | jdk            |  0.26% |        5.64% |  5.537M |  5.540M | +0.0590 % |
 | linux          |  0.01% |        0.51% | 63.735M | 63.740M | +0.0073 % |
 | llvm-project   |  0.12% |        0.03% | 25.515M | 25.516M | +0.0050 % |
 | rails          |  0.10% |        0.10% |  6.252M |  6.252M | +0.0027 % |
 | rust           |  0.07% |        0.17% |  9.364M |  9.364M | +0.0033 % |
 | tensorflow     |  0.09% |        1.02% |  7.009M |  7.010M | +0.0158 % |
 | webkit         |  0.05% |        0.31% | 17.405M | 17.406M | +0.0047 % |

(where the above increase is determined by computing a non-split
commit-graph before and after this patch).

Given that these projects are all "large" by commit count, the storage
cost by writing these filters explicitly is negligible. In the most
extreme example, android-base (which has 494,848 commits at the time of
writing) would have its commit-graph increase by a modest 68.4 KB.

Finally, a test to exercise filters which contain too many changed path
entries will be introduced in a subsequent patch.

Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17 21:55:50 -07:00
Conor Davis
e40e936551 commit-graph-format.txt: fix no-parent value
The correct value from commit-graph.c:

    #define GRAPH_PARENT_NONE 0x70000000

Signed-off-by: Conor Davis <git@conor.fastmail.fm>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-15 14:34:34 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
665d70ad03 commit-graph: use the "hash version" byte
The commit-graph format reserved a byte among the header of the file to
store a "hash version". During the SHA-256 work, this was not modified
because file formats are not necessarily intended to work across hash
versions. If a repository has SHA-256 as its hash algorithm, it
automatically up-shifts the lengths of object names in all necessary
formats.

However, since we have this byte available for adjusting the version, we
can make the file formats more obviously incompatible instead of relying
on other context from the repository.

Update the oid_version() method in commit-graph.c to add a new value, 2,
for sha-256. This automatically writes the new value in a SHA-256
repository _and_ verifies the value is correct. This is a breaking
change relative to the current 'master' branch since 092b677 (Merge
branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates', 2020-08-13) but it is not breaking
relative to any released version of Git.

The test impact is relatively minor: the output of 'test-tool
read-graph' lists the header information, so those instances of '1' need
to be replaced with a variable determined by GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH. A
more careful test is added that specifically creates a repository of
each type then swaps the commit-graph files. The important value here is
that the "git log" command succeeds while writing a message to stderr.

Helped-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-17 16:45:14 -07:00
SZEDER Gábor
6141cdfdcb commit-graph-format.txt: all multi-byte numbers are in network byte order
The commit-graph format specifies that "All 4-byte numbers are in
network order", but the commit-graph contains 8-byte integers as well
(file offsets in the Chunk Lookup table), and their byte order is
unspecified.

Clarify that all multi-byte integers are in network byte order.

Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08 12:28:49 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
88093289cd Documentation: changed-path Bloom filters use byte words
In Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt, the definition
of the BIDX chunk specifies the length is a number of 8-byte words.
During development we discovered that using 8-byte words in the
Murmur3 hash algorithm causes issues with big-endian versus little-
endian machines. Thus, the hash algorithm was adapted to work on a
byte-by-byte basis. However, this caused a change in the definition
of a "word" in bloom.h. Now, a "word" is a single byte, which allows
filters to be as small as two bytes. These length-two filters are
demonstrated in t0095-bloom.sh, and a larger filter of length 25 is
demonstrated as well.

The original point of using 8-byte words was for alignment reasons.
It also presented opportunities for extremely sparse Bloom filters
when there were a small number of changes at a commit, creating a
very low false-positive rate. However, modifying the format at this
point is unlikely to be a valuable exercise. Also, this use of
single-byte granularity does present opportunities to save space.
It is unclear if 8-byte alignment of the filters would present any
meaningful performance benefits.

Modify the format document to reflect reality.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-11 09:33:56 -07:00
Garima Singh
76ffbca71a commit-graph: write Bloom filters to commit graph file
Update the technical documentation for commit-graph-format with
the formats for the Bloom filter index (BIDX) and Bloom filter
data (BDAT) chunks. Write the computed Bloom filters information
to the commit graph file using this format.

Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-06 11:08:37 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
118bd57002 commit-graph: add base graphs chunk
To quickly verify a commit-graph chain is valid on load, we will
read from the new "Base Graphs Chunk" of each file in the chain.
This will prevent accidentally loading incorrect data from manually
editing the commit-graph-chain file or renaming graph-{hash}.graph
files.

The commit_graph struct already had an object_id struct "oid", but
it was never initialized or used. Add a line to read the hash from
the end of the commit-graph file and into the oid member.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19 20:46:26 -07:00
SZEDER Gábor
5af7417bd8 commit-graph: rename "large edges" to "extra edges"
The optional 'Large Edge List' chunk of the commit graph file stores
parent information for commits with more than two parents, and the
names of most of the macros, variables, struct fields, and functions
related to this chunk contain the term "large edges", e.g.
write_graph_chunk_large_edges().  However, it's not a really great
term, as the edges to the second and subsequent parents stored in this
chunk are not any larger than the edges to the first and second
parents stored in the "main" 'Commit Data' chunk.  It's the number of
edges, IOW number of parents, that is larger compared to non-merge and
"regular" two-parent merge commits.  And indeed, two functions in
'commit-graph.c' have a local variable called 'num_extra_edges' that
refer to the same thing, and this "extra edges" term is much better at
describing these edges.

So let's rename all these references to "large edges" in macro,
variable, function, etc. names to "extra edges".  There is a
GRAPH_OCTOPUS_EDGES_NEEDED macro as well; for the sake of consistency
rename it to GRAPH_EXTRA_EDGES_NEEDED.

We can do so safely without causing any incompatibility issues,
because the term "large edges" doesn't come up in the file format
itself in any form (the chunk's magic is {'E', 'D', 'G', 'E'}, there
is no 'L' in there), but only in the specification text.  The string
"large edges", however, does come up in the output of 'git
commit-graph read' and in tests looking at its input, but that command
is explicitly documented as debugging aid, so we can change its output
and the affected tests safely.

Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-22 11:33:46 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
06994ae065 Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph'
Docfix.

* ds/commit-graph:
  commit-graph: fix documentation inconsistencies
2018-07-18 12:20:34 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
a9aa3c0927 commit-graph: fix documentation inconsistencies
The commit-graph feature shipped in Git 2.18 has some inconsistencies in
the constants used by the implementation and specified by the format
document.

The commit data chunk uses the key "CDAT" in the file format, but was
previously documented to say "CGET".

The commit data chunk stores commit parents using two 32-bit fields that
typically store the integer position of the parent in the list of commit
ids within the commit-graph file. When a parent does not exist, we had
documented the value 0xffffffff, but implemented the value 0x70000000.
This swap is easy to correct in the documentation, but unfortunately
reduces the number of commits that we can store in the commit-graph.
Update that estimate, too.

Reported-by: Grant Welch <gwelch925@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-28 09:45:03 -07:00
Ville Skyttä
928f0ab4ba Documentation: spelling and grammar fixes
Signed-off-by: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 14:26:23 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
b84f767c8a commit-graph: add format document
Add document specifying the binary format for commit graphs. This
format allows for:

* New versions.
* New hash functions and hash lengths.
* Optional extensions.

Basic header information is followed by a binary table of contents
into "chunks" that include:

* An ordered list of commit object IDs.
* A 256-entry fanout into that list of OIDs.
* A list of metadata for the commits.
* A list of "large edges" to enable octopus merges.

The format automatically includes two parent positions for every
commit. This favors speed over space, since using only one position
per commit would cause an extra level of indirection for every merge
commit. (Octopus merges suffer from this indirection, but they are
very rare.)

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-02 14:27:31 -07:00