* rs/empty-archive:
t5004: resurrect original empty tar archive test
t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive
Conflicts:
t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh
"git log -c --follow $path" segfaulted upon hitting the commit that
renamed the $path being followed.
* cb/log-follow-with-combined:
fix segfault with git log -c --follow
When a reflog notation is used for implicit "current branch", we did
not say which branch, and worse said "branch ''".
* rr/die-on-missing-upstream:
sha1_name: fix error message for @{<N>}, @{<date>}
sha1_name: fix error message for @{u}
Cloning with "git clone --depth N" while fetch.fsckobjects (or
transfer.fsckobjects) is set to true did not tell the cut-off points
of the shallow history to the process that validates the objects and
the history received, causing the validation to fail.
* 'nd/clone-connectivity-shortcut' (early part):
fetch-pack: prepare updated shallow file before fetching the pack
clone: let the user know when check_everything_connected is run
* jh/checkout-auto-tracking:
glossary: Update and rephrase the definition of a remote-tracking branch
branch.c: Validate tracking branches with refspecs instead of refs/remotes/*
t9114.2: Don't use --track option against "svn-remote"-tracking branches
t7201.24: Add refspec to keep --track working
t3200.39: tracking setup should fail if there is no matching refspec.
checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branches
t2024: Show failure to use refspec when DWIMming remote branch names
t2024: Add tests verifying current DWIM behavior of 'git checkout <branch>'
Use the SANITY prerequisite when testing if a temp file can
be created in a read only directory.
Skip the test under CYGWIN, or skip it under Unix/Linux when
it is run as root.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix recent regression of .gitignore files that list !directory to
mark it not-ignored.
* kb/status-ignored-optim-2:
dir.c: fix ignore processing within not-ignored directories
When a test wants to make sure there is no <string> in an output
file, we should just say "! grep string output".
"test_must_fail" is there only to test Git command and catch unusual
deaths we know about (e.g. segv) as an error, not as an expected
failure. "test_must_fail grep string output" is unnecessary, as
we are not making sure the system binaries do not dump core or
anything like that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As of 95c6f271 "dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs", the
is_excluded API no longer recurses into directories that match an ignore
pattern, and returns the directory's ignored state for all contained paths.
This is OK for normal ignore patterns, i.e. ignoring a directory affects
the entire contents recursively.
Unfortunately, this also "works" for negated ignore patterns ('!dir'), i.e.
the entire contents is "not-ignored" recursively, regardless of ignore
patterns that match the contents directly.
In prep_exclude, skip recursing into a directory only if it is really
ignored (i.e. the ignore pattern is not negated).
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Tested-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Case folding is not done correctly when matching against the [:upper:]
character class and uppercased character ranges (e.g. A-Z).
Specifically, an uppercase letter fails to match against any of them
when case folding is requested because plain characters in the pattern
and the whole string are preemptively lowercased to handle the base case
fast.
That optimization is kept and ISLOWER() is used in the [:upper:] case
when case folding is requested, while matching against a character range
is retried with toupper() if the character was lowercase, as the bounds
of the range itself cannot be modified (in a case-insensitive context,
[A-_] is not equivalent to [a-_]).
Signed-off-by: Anthony Ramine <n.oxyde@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The temporary directory prepared by "difftool --dir-diff" to
show the result of a change can be modified by the user via
the tree diff program, and we try hard not to lose changes
to them after tree diff program returns to us.
However, the set of files to be copied back is computed
differently between --symlinks and --no-symlinks modes. The
former checks all paths that start out as identical to the
working tree file, while the latter checks paths that
already had a local modification in the working tree,
allowing changes made in the tree diff program to paths that
did not have any local change to be lost.
Signed-off-by: Kenichi Saita <nitoyon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we are rebasing without options ('am' mode), the head rebased lives
in '$g/rebase-apply/head-name', so lets use that information so it's
reported the same way as if we were doing other rebases (-i or -m).
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If an empty message is specified with the option -m of git commit then
the editor is started. That's unexpected and unnecessary. Instead of
using the length of the message string for checking if the user
specified one, directly remember if the option -m was given.
Reported-by: Mislav Marohnić <mislav.marohnic@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In diff_tree_combined we make a copy of diffopts. In
try_to_follow_renames, called via diff_tree_sha1, we free and
re-initialize diffopts->pathspec->items. Since we did not make a deep
copy of diffopts in diff_tree_combined, the original diffopts does not
get the update. By the time we return from diff_tree_combined,
rev->diffopt->pathspec->items points to an invalid memory address. We
get a segfault next time we try to access that pathspec.
Instead, along with the copy of diffopts, make a copy pathspec->items as
well.
We would also have to make a copy of pathspec->raw to keep it consistent
with pathspec->items, but nobody seems to rely on that.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
index-pack --strict looks up and follows parent commits. If shallow
information is not ready by the time index-pack is run, index-pack may
be led to non-existent objects. Make fetch-pack save shallow file to
disk before invoking index-pack.
git learns new global option --shallow-file to pass on the alternate
shallow file path. Undocumented (and not even support --shallow-file=
syntax) because it's unlikely to be used again elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, when no (valid) upstream is configured for a branch, you get
an error like:
$ git show @{u}
error: No upstream configured for branch 'upstream-error'
error: No upstream configured for branch 'upstream-error'
fatal: ambiguous argument '@{u}': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
The "error: " line actually appears twice, and the rest of the error
message is useless. In sha1_name.c:interpret_branch_name(), there is
really no point in processing further if @{u} couldn't be resolved, and
we might as well die() instead of returning an error(). After making
this change, you get:
$ git show @{u}
fatal: No upstream configured for branch 'upstream-error'
Also tweak a few tests in t1507 to expect this output.
This only turns error() that may be called after we know we are
dealing with an @{upstream} marker into die(), without touching
silent error returns "return -1" from the function. Any caller that
wants to handle an error condition itself will not be hurt by this
change, unless they want to see the message from error() and then
exit silently without giving its own message, which needs to be
fixed anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This parameter is equivalent to the parameter --parents on svn cp commands
and is useful for non-standard repository layouts.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schulte <tobias.schulte@gliderpilot.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Commit 02c5631 (difftool --dir-diff: symlink all files matching the
working tree, 2013-03-14) does not handle the case where a file that is
being compared does not exist in the working tree. Fix this by checking
for existence explicitly before running git-hash-object.
Reported-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you were on 'frotz' branch before you checked out your current
branch, "git merge @{-1}~22" means the same as "git merge frotz~22".
The strbuf_branchname() function, when interpret_branch_name() gives
up resolving "@{-1}~22" fully, returns "frotz" and tells the caller
that it only resolved "@{-1}" part of the input, mistakes this as a
total failure, and appends the whole thing to the result, yielding
"frotz@{-1}~22", which does not make any sense.
Inspect the return value from interpret_branch_name() a bit more
carefully. When it errored out without consuming anything, we will
get -1 and we should return the whole thing. Otherwise, we should
append the remainder (i.e. "~22" in the earlier example) to the
partially resolved name (i.e. "frotz").
The test suite adds enough number of checkout to make @{-12} in the
last test in t0100 that tried to check "we haven't flipped branches
that many times" error case succeed; raise the number to a hundred.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation assures users that "A...B" is defined as "A B --not
$(git merge-base --all A B)". This wasn't in fact quite true, because
the calculated merge bases were not sent to add_rev_cmdline().
The main effect of this was that although
git rev-list --ancestry-path A B --not $(git merge-base --all A B)
worked, the simpler form
git rev-list --ancestry-path A...B
failed with a "no bottom commits" error.
Other potential users of bottom commits could also be affected by this
problem, if they examine revs->cmdline_info; I came across the issue in
my proposed history traversal refinements series.
So ensure that the calculated merge bases are sent to add_rev_cmdline(),
flagged with new 'whence' enum value REV_CMD_MERGE_BASE.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a deletion is followed by exactly 3 (or whatever the number of
context lines) unchanged lines, followed by another change, the combined
diff output would hide the first deletion, resulting in a malformed
diff.
This happened because the 3 lines before each change are painted
interesting, but also marked as no_pre_delete to prevent showing deletes
that were previously marked as uninteresting. This behaviour was
introduced in c86fbe53 (diff -c/--cc: do not include uninteresting
deletion before leading context). However, as a side effect, this could
also mark deletes that were already interesting as no_pre_delete. This
would happen only if the delete was exactly 3 lines away from the next
change, since lines farther away would not be touched by the "paint
three lines before the change" code and lines closer would be painted
by the "merge two adjacent hunks" code instead, which does not set the
no_pre_delete flag.
This commit fixes this problem by only setting the no_pre_delete flag
for changes that were previously uninteresting.
Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The set-up step to prepare a repository with 50000 tags used a
non-porable '\+' to match one-or-more.
The error was not caught because the next test that uses that
repository did not even bother to check if these expected tags were
actually cloned to the resulting repository.
Fix the sed construct to use BRE and update the "clone" test that
wanted to test cloning from such a repository with many refs to
check the resulting repository.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Git 1.8.2.3
t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive
t5004: ignore pax global header file
mergetools/kdiff3: do not use --auto when diffing
transport-helper: trivial style cleanup
Test 2 of t5004 checks if a supposedly empty tar archive really
contains no files. 24676f02 (t5004: fix issue with empty archive test
and bsdtar) removed our commit hash to make it work with bsdtar, but
the test still fails on NetBSD and OpenBSD, which use their own tar
that considers a tar file containing only NULs as broken.
Here's what the different archivers do when asked to create a tar
file without entries:
$ uname -v
NetBSD 6.0.1 (GENERIC)
$ gtar --version | head -1
tar (GNU tar) 1.26
$ bsdtar --version
bsdtar 2.8.4 - libarchive 2.8.4
$ : >zero.tar
$ perl -e 'print "\0" x 10240' >tenk.tar
$ sha1 zero.tar tenk.tar
SHA1 (zero.tar) = da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
SHA1 (tenk.tar) = 34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | tar cf - -T - | sha1
da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
$ : | gtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | bsdtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
So NetBSD's native tar creates an empty file, while GNU tar and bsdtar
both give us 10KB of NULs -- just like git archive with an empty tree.
Now let's see how the archivers handle these two kinds of empty tar
files:
$ tar tf zero.tar; echo $?
tar: Unexpected EOF on archive file
1
$ gtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
gtar: This does not look like a tar archive
gtar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
2
$ bsdtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
0
$ tar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
tar: Cannot identify format. Searching...
tar: End of archive volume 1 reached
tar: Sorry, unable to determine archive format.
1
$ gtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
$ bsdtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
NetBSD's tar complains about both, bsdtar happily accepts any of them
and GNU tar doesn't like zero-length archive files. So the safest
course of action is to stay with our block-of-NULs format which is
compatible with GNU tar and bsdtar, as we can't make NetBSD's native
tar happy anyway.
We can simplify our test, however, by taking tar out of the picture.
Instead of extracting the archive and checking for the non-presence of
files, check if the file has a size of 10KB and contains only NULs.
This makes t5004 pass on NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a test to verify the emptiness of an archive by extracting its
contents. Don't run this test if the version of tar doesn't support
archives containing only a comment header, though.
The existing check 'tar archive of empty tree is empty' used to work
like that (minus the tar capability check) but was changed to depend
on the exact representation of empty tar files created by git archive
instead of on the behaviour of tar in order to avoid issues with
different tar versions.
The different approaches test different things: The existing one is
for empty trees, for which we know the exact expected output and thus
we can simply check it without extracting; the new one is for commits
with empty trees, whose archives include stamps and so the more
"natural" check by extraction is a better fit because it focuses on
the interesting aspect, namely the absence of any archive entries.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test 2 of t5004 checks if a supposedly empty tar archive really
contains no files. 24676f02 (t5004: fix issue with empty archive test
and bsdtar) removed our commit hash to make it work with bsdtar, but
the test still fails on NetBSD and OpenBSD, which use their own tar
that considers a tar file containing only NULs as broken.
Here's what the different archivers do when asked to create a tar
file without entries:
$ uname -v
NetBSD 6.0.1 (GENERIC)
$ gtar --version | head -1
tar (GNU tar) 1.26
$ bsdtar --version
bsdtar 2.8.4 - libarchive 2.8.4
$ : >zero.tar
$ perl -e 'print "\0" x 10240' >tenk.tar
$ sha1 zero.tar tenk.tar
SHA1 (zero.tar) = da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
SHA1 (tenk.tar) = 34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | tar cf - -T - | sha1
da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
$ : | gtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | bsdtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
So NetBSD's native tar creates an empty file, while GNU tar and bsdtar
both give us 10KB of NULs -- just like git archive with an empty tree.
Now let's see how the archivers handle these two kinds of empty tar
files:
$ tar tf zero.tar; echo $?
tar: Unexpected EOF on archive file
1
$ gtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
gtar: This does not look like a tar archive
gtar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
2
$ bsdtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
0
$ tar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
tar: Cannot identify format. Searching...
tar: End of archive volume 1 reached
tar: Sorry, unable to determine archive format.
$ gtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
$ bsdtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
NetBSD's tar complains about both, bsdtar happily accepts any of them
and GNU tar doesn't like zero-length archive files. So the safest
course of action is to stay with our block-of-NULs format which is
compatible with GNU tar and bsdtar, as we can't make NetBSD's native
tar happy anyway.
We can simplify our test, however, by taking tar out of the picture.
Instead of extracting the archive and checking for the non-presence of
files, check if the file has a size of 10KB and contains only NULs.
This makes t5004 pass on NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Versions of tar that don't know pax headers -- like the ones in NetBSD 6
and OpenBSD 5.2 -- extract them as regular files. Explicitly ignore the
file created for our global header when checking the list of extracted
files, as this is normal and harmless fall-back behaviour. This fixes
test 3 of t5004 on these platforms.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The SVN::Fetcher module is now able to filter for inclusion as well
as exclusion (as used by --ignore-path). Also added tests, documentation
changes and git completion script.
If you have an SVN repository with many top level directories and you
only want a git-svn clone of some of them then using --ignore-path is
difficult as it requires a very long regexp. In this case it's much
easier to filter for inclusion.
[ew: remove trailing whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pjwhams@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
When svn.pushmergeinfo is set, the target branch is included in the
mergeinfo if it was previously merged into one of the source branches.
SVN does not do this.
Remove merge target branch path from resulting mergeinfo when
svn.pushmergeinfo is set to better match the behavior of SVN. Update the
svn-mergeinfo-push test.
[ew: 80 columns]
Signed-off-by: Michael Contreras <michael@inetric.com>
Reported-by: Avishay Lavie <avishay.lavie@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
git-merge-tree causes a null pointer dereference when a directory
entry exists in only one or two of the three trees being compared with
no corresponding entry in the other tree(s).
When this happens, we want to handle the entry as a directory and not
attempt to mark it as a file merge. Do this by setting the entries bit
in the directory mask when the entry is missing or when it is a
directory, only performing the file comparison when we know that a file
entry exists.
Reported-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Tested-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there's already a remote-helper tracking ref, we can fetch the
SHA-1 to report proper push messages (as opposed to always reporting
[new branch]).
The remote-helper currently can specify the old SHA-1 to avoid this
problem, but there's no point in forcing all remote-helpers to be aware
of git commit ids; they should be able to be agnostic of them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
When the client sends a 'shallow' line for an object that the server does
not have, the server should just ignore it and let the client keep that
unknown shallow boundary.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heemskerk <mheemskerk@atlassian.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
